PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Thrust Reverser falls off 747 in Frankfurt
Old 27th May 2007, 01:13
  #41 (permalink)  
b737800capt06
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
James T73J - Brakes/RT

Hi James

If you can get hold of a AOM (you can find a copy on the net for 737-800) the manual goes in some detail as to why aircraft use reverse thrust.

You are right in that the use of the reverse thrust helps reduce the huge load on the brakes, as you can imagine brakes on a 747/767/757 or A340 are very costly to replace. Greatest load is present at highest rate of knots, so deploying reverse thrust once you have main gear touch.

The level of brake modulation is calculated and the force required to slow aircraft down at a set rate is dependant on whether reverse thrust/spoiler deployment has taken place, so if no reverse thrust or idle reverse thrust is used then the force required by the brakes is that much greater.

Anyone remember what happen with that Qantas flight that overran on a wet runway landing BangKok?? no/idle reverse thrust or autobrake set to 1 or 2 rather than 3 or Max?
b737800capt06 is offline