USA to drop ETOPS restrictions for qualified aircraft
"The INTRODUCER"
Thread Starter
USA to drop ETOPS restrictions for qualified aircraft
To obtain approvals, an aircraft will need fire suppression systems sized for the requested time-to-alternate duration and adequate emergency oxygen supplies for the crew and the passengers. The aircraft will also have to carry automated external defibrillators.
Otherwise, the same weather reporting, training and diversion accommodation requirements as currently required will apply.
Otherwise, the same weather reporting, training and diversion accommodation requirements as currently required will apply.
FAA administrator Marion Blakey says the new rule will also boost aviation safety as it requires tri- and quad-engine aircraft - those for which there are currently no ETOPS rules - to meet the same standards as the twin-engine planes for flights over the poles or farther than 180min from an alternate airport.
Extended TWIN Operations
Tri and quad aircraft already take fuel and oxygen supplies into account so what's the difference?
Are they going to make a quad land at the nearest suitable airport following an engine shut down?
Join Date: May 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maintenance standards, reducing times between inspections. A move that is beneficial for all, as many have found lower costs as a result of fewer complete failures of parts due to increased preventative maintenance.
Grandpa Aerotart
And this from the same administration that got it's knickers in a twist over a 744 flying 3 engines across the pond?
Is it any wonder that aviation administrations the world over get so little respect from professionals?
Someone should point out to them that they cannot have their cake and eat it too.
Is it any wonder that aviation administrations the world over get so little respect from professionals?
Someone should point out to them that they cannot have their cake and eat it too.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And this from the same administration that got it's knickers in a twist over a 744 flying 3 engines across the pond?
Is it any wonder that aviation administrations the world over get so little respect from professionals?
Someone should point out to them that they cannot have their cake and eat it too.
Is it any wonder that aviation administrations the world over get so little respect from professionals?
Someone should point out to them that they cannot have their cake and eat it too.
FAA does not control the civil aviation authorities of Europe, or United Arab Emirates et cetera.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Will not one of the new requirements for ALL aircraft is to have sufficient fire suppressant in all holds. ETOPS twins require this, but quads don't.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Two-engine extended operations increased worldwide from fewer
than 1,000 per month in 1985 to more than 1,000 per day in 2004.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Meanwhile, extended operations engine reliability has improved to the point
that engine shutdowns occur less than half as often as they did in the 1980s.
than 1,000 per month in 1985 to more than 1,000 per day in 2004.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Meanwhile, extended operations engine reliability has improved to the point
that engine shutdowns occur less than half as often as they did in the 1980s.
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: U.K.
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Perhaps we should be referring to EROPS. It matters not how many engines you have,if it's a hold,or cabin fire.
Was'nt the last controlled ditching in the North Atlantic a four engined aircraft? (Over to the history buffs.)
Was'nt the last controlled ditching in the North Atlantic a four engined aircraft? (Over to the history buffs.)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just read this over at FI's site. This is quite a change isn't it? Assuming it's purely based on the reliability statistics convincing the FAA that the time restriction is no longer necessary, why haven't the JAA considered it?
Paxing All Over The World
Non-aviation person speaking.
JamesT73J
That looks like a mighty big assumption!! There is not much that happens in big business that happens for reasons anything other than money. If the UK's CAA had made this statement, then most Brits would assume that the big carriers had been lobbying behind the scenes. 
That said, the risks are fairly well documented and each carrier (and pax if they choose) can consider them. It is likely that it will still be more risky to drive to the airport. That said, I am old fashioned and, when selecting my UK~USA flight for this afternoon, one issue I checked was which a/c was planned to operate the sector and how many of those big silver drums does it have? The answer is four but, as I say, I am old fashioned. Eerrr, that means I am old.
JamesT73J
Assuming it's purely based on the reliability statistics convincing the FAA ...
That said, the risks are fairly well documented and each carrier (and pax if they choose) can consider them. It is likely that it will still be more risky to drive to the airport. That said, I am old fashioned and, when selecting my UK~USA flight for this afternoon, one issue I checked was which a/c was planned to operate the sector and how many of those big silver drums does it have? The answer is four but, as I say, I am old fashioned. Eerrr, that means I am old.
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If this change only applies to US carriers then will that give them an operating advantage over European carriers? The US guys could go more direct and therefore save time and fuel?
.4
.4
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The term "ETOPS" is being retained, but its definition is changed to "ExTended OPerations." Under the new rule, ETOPS applies to all extended airplane operations, regardless of the number of engines.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JAA (EASA) and ICAO intend to adopt similar rules, although there are likely to be some differences.