Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Hairy cross-wind landing...

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Hairy cross-wind landing...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Dec 2006, 14:00
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pilot Pete
Can be a double edged sword for the nervous pax and you have to judge it on the day; the really nervous could get panicked by you telling them that things aren't going to necessarily go smoothly! We can't win......
PP
Well, the pilot got a round of applause once we'd shuddered to a stop (amid some nervous laughter), so I think we can say he won there!
Crowe is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2006, 14:58
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: EGNX
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I've noticed that landings in such conditions are often quite long (presumably because of the extra speed added). Here is a good example of a plane landing some 3000ft+ past the threshold at EDI:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qIRG2HMgL8

How do you cope with short runways (e.g. Jersey) in these conditions?
Doors to Automatic is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2006, 15:54
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Backup generator for radar tracking at airport failed

Looks like crosswinds weren't the only problem last week. In addition to the radar failure, power was lost in concourse A, forcing more than a handful of cancellations, and I'm sure, a few gate changes.

Things seem to be back to normal at the airport, even though there's about 200,000 homes and businesses still without power.
Middle Seat is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2006, 16:06
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: schiphol
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Atempting a landing at 60 degrees and gusts of 60 kts: time to report to the chief-pilot for a high-threat talk!
capt cb is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2006, 22:00
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: PNW, USA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
757 PIO in Roll

Interesting bit of video of the SEATAC approach. A few years ago Boeing completed an (optional) mod for the 757 which introduces a damper into the roll channel flying controls. The damping effect increases as the speed/magnitude of the pilot input increases. Under normal circumstances the damper isn't felt by the pilot.
Boeing decided on this after a number of occurrences when the somewhat sluggish 757 response in roll - especially toward the end of the approach - could result in an over-enthusiatic application of roll command from the pilot, which in turn could lead to a quite high-amplitude PIO.
The video seems quite a nice example of this - and a fair indication that this aircraft operator didn't take up the mod!
GrazingIncidence is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2006, 22:40
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Surrounding the localizer
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Boeing decided on this after a number of occurrences when the somewhat sluggish 757 response in roll
The 757 does not have a sluggish roll response, it does however have a large control wheel displacement compared to roll response, sluggish is not a description I would use.

The video seems quite a nice example of this - and a fair indication that this aircraft operator didn't take up the mod!
Have you actually flown a 757 in 40 gusting 60?
haughtney1 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2006, 23:51
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone know why they didn't divert rather than land over crosswind limits???!
Tankengine is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2006, 00:25
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: PNW, USA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by haughtney1
Have you actually flown a 757 in 40 gusting 60?
Nope!
I wasn't intending a criticism at all, though. Just wondering whether the mod, if installed, might've reduced the effect we could see on this occasion. Don't suppose we could ask those guys to try it again, with and without! In the interests of data-gathering, you understand.
GI
GrazingIncidence is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2006, 01:26
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would like to know what the difference in landing a 757 in a cross wind is as compared to

DC9
737
767
piper cub

or any other plane

and if you happen to have the max crosswind published by boeing for this aircraft and for NWA?
jondc9 is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2006, 10:10
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whoever put that wind report in gusting to 60 knots last week at SEA confused a lot of people. That report was two days after this video at 1AM. The video was taken during the day time. No connection. Nobody has stated what the wind was when they landed but it looks like about 30 knots looking at the trees. We have all landed under those conditions many times. The 757 is a very stable aircraft, my favorite, and the rudder and spoiler inputs seemed excessive in the video.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2006, 11:16
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Surrounding the localizer
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
My apologies GrazingIncidence, I didn't mean to flame you.....its just that there are sooo many armchair experts/spotters on here that post uninformed drivel..it needs a bit of factual information thrown in now and then

I find bubbers44 comments absolutely spot on, where I work our 757 X-wind limitation is 40 knots..(my own as an F/O is 26 kts) and I can attest to it.

The 757 perfectly controllable in a 35 kt gusty X-wind...which I had to deal with on a recent line check
haughtney1 is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2006, 14:21
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: At home
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spot on blubbers44 the 757 is like a rock and happens to my favorite as well. Yesterday at around 1600z BIKF tower reported wind 240/65-81. 20-30 min later 5 B-757´s landed on rwy 29 in rather moderate conditions at 250/ 50-65 , without a hitch though I gather short final must have been a bit bumpy.

Merry x-mas y´all.
Early
Early Right is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2006, 17:30
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DUBLIN
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkPgalYvGB8


Shamrock from dubai, landing into RWY 28, EIDW (Dublin).

57kts at 220. Gusting up to 60!
DUB-GREG is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2006, 17:50
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: schiphol
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
O.K.: for all you guy's: x-wind gusting 60 kts, FAS might be around 150 kts; kicking out the crabangle: calculate the relative airsteam over the leeward wing, what do you think: lower or higher than stallspeed?

And I do want to point out to youall the Transavia 757 Christmas night many years ago at SPL.

All those brave stories about those 50+kts x-wind landings.....

Years ago landed a 733 at HER 52 kts from the south: still not proud about it.
capt cb is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2006, 18:00
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We quit at 50 knot gusts but each airline has it's own limits. I think the approach NWA made at SEA was within limits. Don't like to question the pilots flying that approach but something really unusual must have happened at 50 feet to cause all that rudder and spoiler/aileron input on both approaches.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2006, 18:13
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: schiphol
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We have about the same limits. I'm not questioning the guy's at SEA, only the one's that seem to think that there is no other option and will not divert when they should have done so. Aviation is not for the fearless.rgrds CB
capt cb is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2006, 19:18
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
capt cb

aviation not for the fearless?

I am sure you mean commercial aviation!

but I do agree with you, forgive my jest above.

its the guys who try the second and third approach that are asking for trouble...assuming they did everything right the first time (except land)
jondc9 is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2006, 22:45
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: washington,dc
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jondc9


there was a case of a pilot landing at erie, pa. missed the approach and diverted. his dispatch asked him to go back and try just one more time.

he and the plane overran the runway.

one try, properly done and adios!
bomarc is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.