Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Ryanair loses legal bid to identify website critics

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Ryanair loses legal bid to identify website critics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jul 2006, 16:43
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dublin
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pigsfly
Any chance that that Police will instigate or be instructed to instigate a perjury investigation into this alleged false evidence by Eddie Wilson and Warick Brady. Its only right that these people sould earn that they are not above the Law.

Well done.

No need to be so coy - it's not "alleged" false evidence. The judge found AS A FACT that their evidence was false.

Now remind me again - what happened to Jonathon Aitkin and Jeffrey Archer for that sort of thing??????

Here's a little reminder from http://wwa.rte.ie/news/1999/0608/aiken.html
In London, the disgraced former Conservative cabinet minister, Jonathon Aitken, has been jailed for 18 months after admitting perjury and perverting the course of justice. Aitken, a former Chief Secretary to the Treasury, admitted lying to the High Court during a failed libel action in 1997. He had tried to sue the Guardian newspaper and Granada television in the High Court over allegations about his links with wealthy Saudi businessmen. The case collapsed after it emerged he lied about aides to the Saudi royal family settling his hotel bill at the Paris Ritz in 1993. Debt collectors last week took his Rolex watch and cufflinks, as well as other possessions from to try to recoup his legal costs of £2 million. He has declared himself bankrupt
Camel Killer is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2006, 17:46
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: EuroZone
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
supercilious:

Disdainfully arrogant; haughty.


Strikes me that the judge is one sharp cookie.

Not quite the words I'd use to describe the said individual; but then I'm no expert linguist.
A330busdriver is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2006, 23:12
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Various
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As one of those who has felt it necessary to do my best here on pprune to keep warning potential Ryanair pilot employees about how they might find themselves treated, I have to welcome this judgment as a vindication of those who have been saying that all is not well in the FR camp. We have been "pooh-hooed", accused of "hijacking" threads and worse. But we have a High Court judge with us now.

There can be few organisations that would be prepared to suffer such a slating - and to have several senior Executives accussed of such serious mis-behaviour - without feeling obliged to take action. The reality, known to most Ryanair pilots and staff, is that this problem starts at the very top and colours the way the whole organisation works. For that reason (that it starts at the top) there will be no action.

And that means that they will continue with their little ways. Tails will be lowered for a short period, and then it will start again. But they have been seriously damaged, and they know it. There has been too much smoke and too much denial of any fire.

As for the future, who will employ such "Executives" elsewhere? Even worse, the pilots might even get their "tails up" and suffer notions of "fair play". We might even look back at this judgment and say that this was the moment things changed forever.
Aloue is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2006, 23:37
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Here there and everywhere
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The important thing that took place is that some Ryanair pilots went into court and told the truth. That is what made the walls of the evil empire come tumbling down. It is easy to say that everyone should tell the truth, but a bit harder to do in some organisations that others.

I don't know how many pilots were involved, but I think we should all be VERY grateful for their courage, whoever they may be.
delwy is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2006, 09:34
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Devon
Age: 70
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No doubt that it was a stunning victory, but I'm looking forward to 2pm this afternoon, when the judge gives his decision on costs etc.There'll be some a@se kicking in the boardroom later!
Hirsutesme is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2006, 12:19
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cartoon strip
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah to be a fly on the wall late this afternoon in FR HQ,. Can you imagine:

MOL(in CJ Haughey accent): well now OBrien whose feckin idea was this anyway?
DOB: it wasn't me boss, honest boss, it was Eddie's idea, I tried to dissuade him honest boss.
MOL: well Wilson, who's going to pay for this. €100,000's down the feckin ****ter, for what? Eh, you feckin gob****e.
EW: no boss it wasn't me, honest boss. It was.....your idea boss....I swear I have it in a memo.
MOL: you're all fired. (clicks intercom) Send in the next bunch of brown nosing bastards.
RogerIrrelevant69 is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2006, 18:20
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 951
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Devil

Originally Posted by Aloue
As one of those who has felt it necessary to do my best here on pprune to keep warning potential Ryanair pilot employees about how they might find themselves treated, I have to welcome this judgment as a vindication of those who have been saying that all is not well in the FR camp.
As a simple question, and no more, can someone who works for FR, is extemely unhappy, and posts complaints like that on pprune all the time about it explain in simple terms why he or she doesn't just quit, instead of carrying on drawing the pay while telling us all how awful it is?

My assumption that Aloue works for FR might be wrong, but there are plenty of negative posts from people who evidently do.

I expect to be reviled for asking the question, but this is something I simply cannot understand.

Presumably if disaffected staff walk in sufficient numbers, things would change, if they really are so bad.
old,not bold is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2006, 19:00
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Devon
Age: 70
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Trying not to be rude,OLD, but that is a very simplistic view. It really is not easy to walk out of job, people will put up with huge amounts of cr@p, because they like the type of work, kids are settled at school, dont want to leave an area, cant find another job, havent yet got the hours etc etc.
And often there is a loyalty to colleagues and friend, and people develop this odd siege mentality, we can take anything you throw at us!.
However, it is clear that the tide is turning, there is huge anger and bitterness which is going to explode, and hopefully, sweep away the management aberrations currently in charge.
And huge congratulations to REPA
Hirsutesme is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2006, 20:48
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: One hump; two if you're pretty.
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post 'Tis the east and Minuteman is the sun.

why he or she doesn't just quit, instead of carrying on drawing the pay while telling us all how awful it is?
Someone once told me, ONB, that a true socialist will fight to the death to modify his working environment to suit himself rather than morph to the space available. Simplistic, yes, but a reasonable analysis of our callow Aloue who regularly falls over himself to shout from the rooftops just how dreadful Ryanair is. The poor chap must be hyperventilating with apoplectic joy at our recent legal speed hump. Oh well, a good mood is such a fragile thing, and who am I to spoilt it for him.

He's not alone in his delight, though, and such base pleasure from so admired an adversary too. Dear oh dear.
Leo, Leo, wherefore art thou Leo?
Never too far away, Minuteman, rest assured. Most unbecoming of you to gloat, though, and over such small beer too. To take you up on your Shakespearean affectation, though, I wondered how I might gently remind you of the dangers of gloating. Aaron seems to do the trick, if you know your Titus Andronicus. He, too, was gloating in his own villainy, Minuteman, but was rather more machiavellian than your good self, in my estimation at least. Aaron, rest assured, was planing rape too, though. He of Levinia, you of Ryanair. He was motivated by his love of Tamora. What motivates you to rape, Minuteman? Perhaps a clue lies in Canto 13 in the Hell of Danté, as distinct from the hell of IALPA, which is proving somewhat more expensive.
The harlot, who ne'er turn'd her gloating eyes
From Caesar's household, common vice and pest
Of courts, 'gainst me inflam'd the minds of all;
And to Augustus they so spread the flame,
That my glad honours chang'd to bitter woes.
My soul, disdainful and disgusted, sought
Refuge in death from scorn, and I became,
Just as I was, unjust toward myself.
By the new roots, which fix this stem, I swear,
That never faith I broke to my liege lord,
Who merited such honour; and of you,
If any to the world indeed return,
Clear he from wrong my memory, that lies
Yet prostrate under envy's cruel blow.”
Like all enduring long term relationships, Minuteman, we know by now how to push each other's buttons. Lets not bother, though, until the real game's afoot and as you and I will both no doubt agree, its some way off yet. Happy summer to you, old friend.
Leo Hairy-Camel is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2006, 21:30
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Measure for measure...

My dear Leo, indeed when the real game is afoot there may well be a lot of buttons pushed. However it may be more akin to the following:

We must not make a scarecrow of the law,
Setting it up to fear the birds of prey,
And let it keep one shape, till custom make it
Their perch and not their terror.

A happy summer indeed!
minuteman is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2006, 22:34
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Various
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice to have been mentioned by Leo, to whom full marks must be accorded for the act of turning up and making an impressive entry, stage left (ooops... I meant right). Funny enough Leo I am not hyperventilating, but I am going to address the issues, as you do above, by changing the subject from the inconvenience of an apparently damning judgment by a High Court judge.

While thinking earlier today about Ryanair I got to thinking about the weather and some people I know somewhere. It was nice. It kept me from having to think about bad things, or answering inconvenient questions from the wife, or anything unpalatable like perjury.

Just as well you think the judgment is a speed hump Leo- I've just been reading a bit of the judgement on another site ..... de judge has said some blunt things Leo and denial is probably the only recourse. But it's a bit more than a "speed hump" or even "speed hill" - more like a "speed mountain".
Aloue is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2006, 06:54
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: land of the long BLUE cloud
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Costs............

was the ruling on costs announced yesterday???
outofsynch is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2006, 07:42
  #33 (permalink)  
Boy
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apparently the hearing on costs was delayed until next Friday. However, it seems like counsel for one (or both) of the two pilots associations has said they might be looking for "indemnity costs". I don't know what those are (but I suspect that they are not likely to be pleasant for Ryanair).

Apparently the words in court were to the effect that the association lawyers wanted Ryanair's lawyers to know that this would happen next week. Given the comprehensive defeat that Ryanair has suffered it seems highly probable that costs will be awarded against them (whatever of "Indemnity Costs" I know nothing).
Boy is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2006, 08:17
  #34 (permalink)  

Keeping Danny in Sandwiches
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Google produced this on costmonkey
http://www.costsmonkey.co.uk/html/indemnity_costs.html
Conduct will commonly be a deciding factor in deciding whether the indemnity basis is the appropriate alternative to the standard basis and then only if the court considers a party's conduct has been wholly unreasonable. An example of such unreasonableness may be where a claiming party has been purposely dishonest and, more to the point, has intentionally misled the parties to the proceedings.
sky9 is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2006, 11:55
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: On the Camel's back
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting that, while decrying the judgement as a "disappointment" or a "legal speed bump", Ryanair have not actually disputed the judges damning indictment of both the organisation and the executives concerned.
So Leo, why don't we cut through the bull$hit in your post and focus on the actual issue. Seeing as denial is not a realistic option (though no doubt it is the chosen one), can you tell us if you agree with the judges judgement that Ryanair are the only bullies in town and the management are the only liars? And if you do agree, do you think this is an acceptable attitude to take?
Finally Leo, how do you think the impending court cases are gonna go seeing as so many principle management witnesses have been utterly discredited?
CamelhAir is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2006, 12:54
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: One hump; two if you're pretty.
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post Some rise by sin, and some by virtue fall.

But man, proud man,
Drest in a little brief authority,
Most ignorant of what he ’s most assured,
His glassy essence, like an angry ape,
Plays such fantastic tricks before high heaven
As make the angels weep.
It doesn't do to stop short like that, Minuteman. The best bits are always toward the end. Premature articulation muddies the pond so.
Leo Hairy-Camel is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2006, 13:15
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Upagumtree
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Does LHC still claim to be a Ryanair line captain?

(sorry for not paying enough attention)
DH121 is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2006, 13:50
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: On the Camel's back
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DH121, he still makes that claim. As you can from his posts, line pilot or not, he does not enjoy a close relationship with reality.

Leo, as you no doubt read my last post, why not provide some answers to the questions instead of posting nonsensical irrelevant verse? Could it be that the white house is badly rattled by this judgement?
CamelhAir is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2006, 14:01
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DH121, he does indeed. However, he has seen "the writing on the wall" and is hoping to apply for alternative employment as a Professor of poetry and obscurity back in the antipodes. Like all Ryanair fellow travellers he never, but never, but never-ever answers or addresses any questions that might bring even a scintilla of doubt on the moral or business behaviour of Ryanair.

I'm trying to hunt down some of the words uttered by the Judge which, by all accounts are rather unfavourable regarding the said Ryanair behaviour. When I get them I will invite Leo to reply(ignore) the EVIDENCE and FINDINGS 0F FACT by a High Court judge.

Leo might Cowper have had such as you in mind ? ….
Fanaticism soberly defined,
Is the false fire of an o’erheated mind.

More pertinent to the Ryanair-Hairy Camel view of the world perhaps is the story of Heywood Broun who listened with disbelief to a politician giving his version of the facts. “How does he get away with it?” whispered a fellow reporter, “he is murdering the truth”. Broun shook his head in disagreement, “He’ll never get close enough to do it bodily harm.”

Which is why Ryanair never saw the disaster coming at them. Tee hee …. now that IS justice.
atse is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2006, 14:09
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never lets us down

Ah Capt. Leo, for once you are correct.

The quote you make is entirely relevant!

This quite nicely points at what is also relevant about the court case: not the fact that FR were unable to get the disclosure of identities but the fact that senior management personnel have been found to get up on the stand in a court of law and give false evidence in an attempt to perpetuate FR myths whilst attempting to "break the resolve" of FR pilots - in order to maintain what "little brief authority" they have.

The judge in the case also points out the "perfectly reasonable terms and conditions" which we had another debate on some time ago bear "all the hallmarks of oppression." What an extraordinary difference in opinion!

So now we have determined that FR management cannot be trusted and it has been shown that the "most cossetted group of employees" are being bullied "by Ryanair itself," where do your beloved management stand now, Leo?

Why shouldn't your colleagues be allowed to seek to change the "most onerous" conditions they find themselves in? It could be you next, being the ordinary line pilot that you are!
minuteman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.