Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Landing, take-off at VABB unsafe

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Landing, take-off at VABB unsafe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th May 2006, 20:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: India
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Landing, take-off at VABB unsafe

Mumbai airport has as many as 165 obstacles in the approach and take-off areas — the highest in the country. The obstacles — trees, hoardings, buildings, hills, etc — are shown on the pre-flight charts available with pilots of all airlines.

This means a disaster is waiting to happen at the airport, which has an average of 550 aircraft movements a day.

Incidentally, Delhi airport has 42 obstacles, Chennai 48 and Kolkata 20.
The obstacles make an aircraft’s glide path at Mumbai airport one of the steepest in the world. In the words of an Air India (AI) pilot, the glide path is the stretch an aircraft covers in ‘its final stages of landing’.

A pilot landing at or taking off for Mumbai for the first time could easily run the plane into one of the obstacles around the airport periphery, noted the AI pilot.

“All the obstacles have been mapped in the pre-flight charts, but bigger aircraft like Boeing 747 and 777 are likely to face more difficulties,” he added.

An air traffic controller said the obstacles have increased over the years with the rise in encroachments around the airport.

Obstacles

— Hoardings
— Hoardings on buildings
— Buildings
— Antennae
— Trees
— Kalpana Theatre
— Factories
— Slums

http://web.mid-day.com/1news/city/2006/may/136729.htm
lizardking is offline  
Old 6th May 2006, 21:07
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: I used to go missing a lot...Miss Canada, Miss United Kingdom, Miss World.
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As long as charts are up to date & relavent performance calculations are conducted per A/C type, can`t really see the problem.
Seems like more Journalist sensationalism to me.
Buster Cherry is offline  
Old 7th May 2006, 02:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have you operated there? I have had no problems...
Intruder is offline  
Old 7th May 2006, 03:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Intruder,

How do you account for the height of the new control tower in relation to the requirements of ICAO Annex 14?

Mutt
mutt is offline  
Old 7th May 2006, 04:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crapper's corner there at the end of 27 near the hold short position is a hazard as well
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 7th May 2006, 06:18
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Dodoland
Age: 62
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pls comment!!!

On top of all d s**t U face in BOM:
3 months ago I arrived at BOM with 20' to spare before 27 was to be opened. 14 was being used but with marginal tailwind. I elected to hold as most flights that arrived after me. Only a Jet Airways ATR managed to land. We were all informed that 27 will reopen with 10 min delay after the published NOTAM time. It reopened only after another 17 min - a total delay of 27'! On top of this, contrary to worldwide practice, Being #1 I was only released from the stack at 10000' at the time of the rw opening, not in advance - in order to land at or a short time after the rw reopened. Altogether I landed with a whoppish 37 min delay after the original NOTAM time.
Shame for the locals who let themselves be caught with their pants down with sched mainenance on the main rw and marginal wx on the alternate rw!!!
But of course my company did not hear so far from the local DCA, after my report....
Just to add another piece to the pile of s--t:
I was shot at on short final 27 at Diwalli (local hindu festival) with fireworks from the small hilolck just off the CL. While I belive these are harmless, they distracted my junior FO and he botched up the landing...
Beware Guys, Beware Guys of the demons of unsustainable growth in India!
dessas is offline  
Old 7th May 2006, 06:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Out there
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Little has changed in 30 years but as you say what this space with "open skies" and traffic build up, together with the incompetent ATC.....
Baywatcher is offline  
Old 7th May 2006, 07:23
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South of 90N
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe another consideration would be about the 27 surface conditions... Every time I am waiting to see my nose gear come through the cabin floor...
18Holes is offline  
Old 7th May 2006, 08:37
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Now at Home
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
welcome guys to the real aviation world of the

INCREDIBLE INDIA

(as so promoted by the Tourism Office.) Every day of flying here is quite a big challenge !
Airbus_a321 is offline  
Old 7th May 2006, 16:43
  #10 (permalink)  

ex-Tanker
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Luton Beds UK
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which Runway?

Lizard King,

Which runway is refered to here?

Used to be a displaced threshold on 27 due to obstacles.

The airline I flew for allowed a landing at the displaced threshold
too - thus ensuring you flew below the corrected GS...

Desk experts!

FC.
Few Cloudy is offline  
Old 7th May 2006, 16:51
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tring, UK
Posts: 1,841
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Not the worst airport in the world by a long way but I do agree about the obstacles. I'm sure when they built the place they spent a long time lining up the runways with the biggest hills they could see. If 27 was 26 or 28 the final appoach would be almost obstruction free...
FullWings is online now  
Old 7th May 2006, 17:21
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Staines, Middlesex
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just out of interest what is the angle of the ILS at Mumbai?
speedbird676 is offline  
Old 7th May 2006, 19:24
  #13 (permalink)  
9Ws
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3.3 degree glide path

ILS starts at 3700 feet and is 10.5 nm long
9Ws is offline  
Old 7th May 2006, 19:52
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: IN THE PIT
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mumbai HF what a frickin joke!!
Runway surface condition what a frickin joke
Terminal condition what a frickin joke (unless you are a RAT)
Obstacles well..... frickin joke
Sludge from the slums, 27 threshold. Incl the stray dogs!
What a frickin joke!!

There is nothing NOTHING i could say that was pleasant about mumbai to fly into or else.

Discusting, dirty, dreadfiul, not even the monsoon in about 3 weeks will wash it clean. Never has done before. As for the controlling..... What to do?

I'm not peaved, just telling the truth, messy, unprofessional nasty place to fly into. If you disagree you aint flown in there enough!!
critical winge is offline  
Old 7th May 2006, 22:12
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: EDDF
Age: 52
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dont be so negative

stop winching guys... the chicken tikka masala at cafe leopold has been the top of the line since 1871... and a cold kingfisher....
the best thing in BOM is when your hear 'Gear up"
lars
warmkiter is offline  
Old 8th May 2006, 00:29
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How do you account for the height of the new control tower in relation to the requirements of ICAO Annex 14?
I don't.

I don't often read ICAO Annex 14, and I try hard to not run into control towers regardless of their height.

Is Mumbai an "adventure" like every other airport within 3000 miles? Indeed!

Maybe an An-124 or A300 or B757 will lose an engine at V1 one of these days, and mow down some of those obstacles. I doubt it will have much effect -- the Indians will just rebuild them...
Intruder is offline  
Old 8th May 2006, 01:14
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: pacific islands
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am based out of Mumbai and i wish i could say that you guys are full of it, but after a TCAS incident (i filed a report on March 13th, please dont ask me why i can remember the date, and have yet to hear anything from DGCA and probabaly will never either, as it was an ATC vector to opposing traffic which triggered it off.), and countless other silly things that have happened to me i agree to all the negatives that have been posted.
This is what i have learnt in 6 months of flying in and out of VABB 1) I never carry less that 30 minutes extra hold above the so called 15 for traffic, and 2) have the efis mode in centre map and watch anything turning yellow like a hawk.

I just love the way the locals do things at the airport. If there is any work to be done on site then the workers and their families pitch up their tents next to the runway and live on the spot while maintenance is being carried out etc. Crappers corner (end of 27) is frequently used as a latrine.

cheers
coco

Last edited by coco-nuts; 8th May 2006 at 12:28.
coco-nuts is offline  
Old 8th May 2006, 04:58
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmm, first operated into BOM over thirty years ago with the 'ole B707, and from the sound of it, it ain't changed...
Haven't been there in about five years and can't say I miss it all that much....except the few topless gals out at the Reef Hotel on Mudd Island.
411A is offline  
Old 14th May 2006, 21:43
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BOM

Disgusting place beware!

WX: unreliable, tailwind on ILS 27
Rwy: very bad, bumpy, slippery, stray animals etc
ATC: unreliable, expect holdings 30min
Obstacles: Lots, even Tower not according ICAO guidelines
Tarmac: complicated clearances, crossing rwys, stray dogs and people
Terminal: as soon as gate is hooked up you smell it
Security: doubtful, slums around, they even stole the LOC last year!

And of course leaving BOM you will visit crappers corner at Rwy27, it sucks
FlyingCroc is offline  
Old 14th May 2006, 21:58
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Camp X-Ray
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Intruder
I don't often read ICAO Annex 14, and I try hard to not run into control towers regardless of their height
You wouldn't have to be very far off the centreline of R14 to hit the tower. Our company restrictions require us to have the tower in sight at all times when landing 14/32.
Hand Solo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.