Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

New Specialist Airline Pilot Forum?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

New Specialist Airline Pilot Forum?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th May 2006, 18:55
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: santa maria
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think there should be a forum for only professional pilots and retired professional pilots.

there are plenty of forums for everyone to get involved as engineers and atc etc have plenty to teach the rest of us.

is it possible for current type ratings etc to be reasearched from the caa/jaa/faa license number? as this is quick and easy to provide.

as far as admin cash im sure it would not be a problem to everyone but why not see if balpa or ialpa type organisations would not fund it as it would be a gold mine for them.

it is the professional pilots rumour network after all
standardbrief is offline  
Old 10th May 2006, 21:46
  #142 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Person
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: see roster
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bomber Harris:
I need to reboot my computer an log on again to check I really read these posts correctly!!!
Why not just refresh the page?

When you retire and hand in your security pass, you immediately start going out of recency. You don't keep up with SOPs, AISs, etc etc. You have a wealth of experience to offer PPRuNe, that's not in question, we are trying to debate the point as to whether or not the opinions of the retired would contribute to the proposed new forum.

The recent B744 thread had some venerable contributions from those retired members who had flown the Classic, the VC10 and the B707. Their combined experiences are considerable, but none of them were relevant to the thread.

I realise some won't get the point, but that's irrelevant too.
overstress is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 08:34
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Poole, Dorset,UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B 744 ...thirteen years in command.....is that relevant?
Bunkabuser
bunkabuser is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 09:15
  #144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cartoon strip
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bunkabuser,

Apparently not. Unlike other professions such as medicine, law and engineering, it would appear that once you retire from aviation you have nothing whatsoever to contribute to a professional forum. In fact it's probably best you get a full frontal lobotomy the day after your retirement to prevent any opinions about your former profession entering and clouding your fast retreating mental faculties.
RogerIrrelevant69 is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 10:55
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd opt for the lobotomy if only to forget the pleasure and fun the game provided and that I can no longer indulge.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 14:17
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Professor James Reason has probably contributed more to Flight Safety than a large number of operational pilots. Discuss!
4Greens is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 15:16
  #147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Danny,

I have only just come across this thread so have not read all the replies, but it is an excellent idea.

Forgive me if I am repeating what may have been mentioned on previous pages as I have not waded thorugh all replies.

5milesbaby on page one mentioned using real names as it would be a private forum - I would be happy with that but could forsee problems as topics that are being discussed may have been raised anon.

A small subscription fee would help cover the effort to create a secure (person wise) forum.

Any way of verifying people as per the private airlines/NATS forums already on PPrune??

I think that real names and identities are a must for anyone wishing to join - available only to the moderators, but a good way of cutting out any willy waving or slanging matches.

There are still calls for a private 'current pilots only forum' as well - if the guys who give up their time to moderate and develop PPrune are happy to do this, all well and good - however - as an ATCO I would feel that discussing CHIRPS etc without ATCO and possibly engineer input would not be entirely beneficial.

Good luck sorting this one out!!
anotherthing is offline  
Old 13th May 2006, 12:27
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Skytrucker is right.
People like him need their own private forum.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 13th May 2006, 15:15
  #149 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Person
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: see roster
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bunkabuser. Of course your 13 years in the LHS is relevant. The point I was trying to make (not very well) is: where do you draw the line? There are many retired pilots who all have a huge fund of knowledge and experience. But at some point, as things move on in aviation, your knowledge becomes less current, in the strictly technical sense.
Postings like "on the XXX back in the '70s we used to do it like this" are fascinating, but contribute little to a discussion about a more modern a/c.
So what I mean is, the day after you retire, your knowledge is current and extremely relevant. There is then a sliding scale for all of us, until we become the dribbling old boy in the nursing home, the staff whispering: "yes, that senile one, used to be an airline pilot"
The question is, where do you make the cut on this sliding scale? When I'm retired, I hope to forget all my SOPs instantly and get out and enjoy it!
ATB
Overstress

if I am repeating what may have been mentioned on previous pages as I have not waded thorugh all replies
May I humbly say that much of the frustration I have with PPRuNe is exactly this - people can't be bothered or don't have enough time to speed-read a thread to see if they're making an *rse of themselves before they post. 'Anotherthing' - not that your posting falls into this category

Last edited by overstress; 13th May 2006 at 15:28. Reason: spelling
overstress is offline  
Old 13th May 2006, 15:45
  #150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Poole, Dorset,UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Overstress!
I really don't care too much about this.....thirteen years in B744 LHS....twenty four rears left hand seat four engine heavy jet. SOPs come and go but the B744 goes on for ever!
Bunkabuser ....back to sleep!
bunkabuser is offline  
Old 13th May 2006, 17:03
  #151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I think it is a worldwide phenomena which I have heard being described as the arrogance of youth.
JW411 is offline  
Old 13th May 2006, 18:26
  #152 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Person
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: see roster
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Overstress!
I really don't care too much about this
Point taken!

the B744 goes on for ever!
Agreed!
overstress is offline  
Old 13th May 2006, 22:55
  #153 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
WTFDIK but...

I seem to have read more than a few accounts of totally current, qualified pilots who don't think it's worth listening to those they deem less knowledgeable. These accounts come from those CVR recordings and the document eventually includes the phrase "the aircraft impacted...."
LowObservable is offline  
Old 14th May 2006, 06:08
  #154 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Person
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: see roster
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LO: That was in a flight deck. This is an anonymous forum.

Your point is: :???:
overstress is offline  
Old 14th May 2006, 12:43
  #155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Danny

In theory an excellent idea

Unfortunately, there is a rather distasteful prurience and rush to judgement over any incident that comes to the attention of some posters to this forum, including opinions expressed by those professional pilots who you wish to entertain on your proposed forum.

"any info on xx at yy?
Who was involved" (I really don't like this bit)

Such an incident is then followed by a seemingly never ending chain of analysis by those without the facts (or often the knowledege) to formulate an opinion of the causes of the event.("I don't know anything about the 737 but..." type of remark is pitiful). Sometimes appalling ignorance of the basics is exposed. Regretfully, these remarks/comments are frequently made by pilots who clearly hold professional pilots licences.

Even more sadly, there is on occasions a "holier than thou" judgement made on the actions of unfortunate crew involved.

Great idea. I only wish it would work in practice, but I have my doubts.

I won't even comment on the "what about us" postings made on this thread by those that would not qualify to join.

Anyway, good luck, whatever you decide
pontius's pa is offline  
Old 14th May 2006, 13:32
  #156 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Overstress: Proverbs 16:18
LowObservable is offline  
Old 14th May 2006, 21:37
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So Pontius, why do you bother to put up with us?

Off with their heads should it be?
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 14th May 2006, 23:30
  #158 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: In my own world.
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't let it worry you.

A couple of points.
This idea sounds a bit elitist.
The next step will be to have forums dedicated to crew on a/c over 20 tonnes and on it will go.
I'd like to know on what side of the fence do the the people for and agin this idea sit on the 744 debate.I mean is this a way to silence the opposition?.
Don't forget we all started off as wanabees.
These days with the security and all there is no way of showing youngsters what we do.I can still remember standing behind the crew flying up the Qld coast in a DC-9 asking tons of questions and the old fokkers coming in from the outback.
I suppose this could be one way bolstering the training scene.Eg to get onto the 'airline pilot forum' on pprune one has to have a cpl for instance.Next minute there is rush on flying sckools.
With the 744 thread don't let it worry you.The crew on the spot did what they knew to be right and if they weren't sure all they had to do was pick up the phone to ops for clarification.What anyone else thinks is irelevant.
Thanks.

Last edited by pcpilot2; 15th May 2006 at 01:26.
pcpilot2 is offline  
Old 15th May 2006, 16:49
  #159 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Person
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: see roster
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the old fokkers coming in from the outback


Plenty of those here on R&N
overstress is offline  
Old 15th May 2006, 17:06
  #160 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Now then, the B744 has been in service for over 20 years. If the likes of "overstress" had been on the B744 for 20 years then he would most likely already be an old f*rt. Since he seems to be claiming to be a bright ray of sunshine then we have to assume that he has only been on the aeroplane for "five minutes" as we used to say.

So why is it that he and his like seem to think that "bunkabuster's" 13 years in the left seat of the B744 doesn't count for much for he is "out of date"? I would have thought that such experience was worth listening to!
JW411 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.