Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

BA aircraft catches fire in US!

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

BA aircraft catches fire in US!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Sep 2001, 15:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Europe
Age: 56
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post BA aircraft catches fire in US!

I just heard on the radio that a BA aircraft caught fire while being refuled. Passengers were on board but all got off uninjured. One of the ground crew suffered burns but there was no indication of how bad.

Apparently the wings were scorched!

Does anybody else have any further details?

Edited for spelling

[ 06 September 2001: Message edited by: Vortex what? ]
Vortex what...ouch! is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2001, 15:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The ground worker has died - no other injuries.

Pretty good initial coverage here:-

Denver BA B777 Fire
xxzz123 is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2001, 15:51
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Hamburg,Germany
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

correct me, if i'm wrong, but refuelling a plane with passengers on board is against safety rules, isn't it ?
enginefailure is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2001, 15:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Saudi Vegas
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I think it depends on company procedures, at my company fueling while loading pax ok with steps on aft and doors armed but certainly a no-no whilst disembarking.
On BBC teletext it says pax were disembarking.
It's a toughy, the crew have no control of what a fueler does when they just pull on stand and the engineer might not have even reached the a/c at that stage !
near enuf is good enuf is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2001, 16:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

It's a regular procedure although pax are advised not to fasten their seatbelts... I strongly disagree with this policy which is to reduce turnaround times.

[ 06 September 2001: Message edited by: xxzz123 ]
xxzz123 is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2001, 16:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

Doesn't it have something to do with the type of fuel ? i.e. permissable to refuel with pax on board with JET A1 but not with AVGAS
Metro man is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2001, 17:03
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1996
Location: Check with Ops
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Engine Failure,

It's not against the rules, although each company will have its laid down procedures for carrying out refuelling with pax on board.

Near Enuff,

Refuelling whilst disembarking is not a 'no-no'. Certainly in BA it is permitted and both flight crew and cabin crew are, according to Flying Crew Orders, to be aware that it may be happening even without having first spoken to the refuellers ie they might be putting on an 'initial' so many tonnes before getting the final figures.

According to the Company, the ignition source is not known but it seems the fuel hose disengaged from the aircraft, spilt a load of fuel on the ground and it is this which caught fire and scorched the aircraft.


Pontius
Pontius is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2001, 17:37
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chennai (MAA)
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

As per schedules the flight has a turnaround
of two hours. But the flight according to BA FLIFO landed 40 min late at DEN.
rsoman is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2001, 17:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Wherever I lay my hat....
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

Very bad news about the fatality. RIP.

Fuelling with pax on board tends more often than not to be a local airport ruling rather than an airline restriction - although airlines do naturally all have their own rules.

Many airports (e.g. in France) insist on having a fire vehicle standing by during the process.

TA

tech...again is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2001, 17:53
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Wherever I lay my hat....
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

Apparently the aircraft involved is 777-236 G-VIIK.
tech...again is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2001, 18:16
  #11 (permalink)  

SkyGod
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Palm Coast, Florida, USA
Age: 67
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 1 Post
Post

The same happened to a Tower Air B-747 Freighter in MIA a few years ago:

The ignition source was the fuel truck, it had a faulty exhaust "shield" if memory serves me right.

The repair bill was around $20 million.
TowerDog is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2001, 23:10
  #12 (permalink)  
m&v
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: delta.bc.canada
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

Refuelling with Pax onboard acceptable in north America,provided doors armed,and crew member available,plus a pilot to radio if required.Aircraft well grounded..
m&v is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2001, 23:45
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: New York
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

Hi all

seems that the Aircraft section of the refuelling pipe broke off. This is of a reduced skin thickness at one point to cause minimum damage if the bowser should move while still attached. Under (ab)normal circumstances there is a emergency shut off valve on the fuelling truck which instantly closes off the fuel. It looks like the truck part didnt workcausing fuel to be sprayd around.

That is only a rumour and the rest is just conjecture.
Perhaps the fuel went over the hot part of the engine or the hose hit the ground and caused a spark.

Either way I feel very sad for the familly of the ramp worker and send my condolences.

This could have so easily been me or a colleague as Engineers still refuel in lots of places on the network.

Please forgive my grammar and spelling as it has been a long day.

love

LP
Le Pen is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2001, 23:51
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ATC
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

What a nasty way to go!

A needless tragedy!
Justin A Beaver is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2001, 00:17
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: South West England
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

As already mentioned, condolences to the family.
With regards to disembarking passengers while fuelling, on one of my cabin crew training courses, the point was raised that should the need to evacuate arise, at least the passengers are already heading in the right direction!
Deep Cover Gecko is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2001, 01:05
  #16 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

BA company procedures allow refuelling with pax onboard (except with wide-cut fuels). However, airport/national regulations take precedence, so that if the airport doesn't permit it, it doesn't happen (in theory).

Very sad to have lost a life, but it could have been much worse.

Not seen any pictures yet but have heard varying stories relating to the amount of damage.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2001, 02:14
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,...135800,00.html
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2001, 02:33
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: straight forward, there you go
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

According to JAR-OPS 1.something Refueling with AVGAS is FORBIDDDDDEN. But with JET-A1 it is allowed according to company procedures, which have been approved by the authority and pax NOT boarding or disembarking.
Mindthegap is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2001, 03:11
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: In front of the Computer
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Picture of the damaged 777 and a local report

9news.com
Enter after the Virgin is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2001, 05:33
  #20 (permalink)  
QAVION
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Re the report on the link above...

"The man was using a re-fueling crane about fifty feet above a British Airways jet when the fuel line broke, spraying gas onto a hot engine which caught fire. He was blown off the crane and engulfed in flames."

Can anyone tell me what a "re-fueling crane" is??? If he was at "50 feet", it sounds like the refueller was pumping gas into the top of the fin???

Q.
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.