Aer Lingus Endgame
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 35K
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good to see that 475 people had the brains to vote themselves out of a job. And they let people with this kind of think fly a plane ????
From what I hear MOL a, doest pay well b, isnt expanding service at DUB.
Still there is a new McDonalds in Dublin, they need some flippers and scrapers
From what I hear MOL a, doest pay well b, isnt expanding service at DUB.
Still there is a new McDonalds in Dublin, they need some flippers and scrapers
Jolly Green Giant
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm just curious to find out where Aer lingus pilots think the company would find the money to give them the pay and conditions they're asking for and also where they think the money would come from to keep the pilot body at it's present level. If you think any bank would lend this company money it it's present state then you're off your rocker!
If a company is losing money like AL and has suffered a dramatic downturn in business, then they must re-structure and cut costs and that includes reduncies, it's a sad fact of life when it happens, but it is a fact of life. It's plain and simple, the company do not have the money, why can't people understand this? how can you expect AL to keep workers on when they're losing money? Do you think AL should keep all it's workers on and continue to run at a loss?
Someone please answer this and try and keep it civilised.
If a company is losing money like AL and has suffered a dramatic downturn in business, then they must re-structure and cut costs and that includes reduncies, it's a sad fact of life when it happens, but it is a fact of life. It's plain and simple, the company do not have the money, why can't people understand this? how can you expect AL to keep workers on when they're losing money? Do you think AL should keep all it's workers on and continue to run at a loss?
Someone please answer this and try and keep it civilised.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sunny Dublin by the sea
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oneworld I couldn’t agree more. Too many people have seen EI as an extension to the Irish government for too long and, in my opinion this is a major (the only?) cause of the ridiculous staff vs. seat equation.
Of course people will be upset and say the company hasn’t honoured its commitments and it’s not fair but as you say that it is the way the world goes around.
Crusty: If the pilot body would rather see the company go under than accept changes to working practices then that speaks volumes. WW should just turn out the lights. I truly hope this doesn’t happen, but the individuals who have already signed will, perhaps, feel a little easier living with their decision to leave voluntarily.
Call_Belle et. al.: References to coffee machines on the fifth floor and the relative merits on the coffee in the ‘Canner’ warrant no place on this forum.
Since September there has been a lot of sadness and anger in EI, at all levels I must add, and I thought the company would pull through.
Personally I would be upset to see it go under. Though recent events in EI have already cost me and my partner jobs we both enjoyed.
Wise up guys…
Of course people will be upset and say the company hasn’t honoured its commitments and it’s not fair but as you say that it is the way the world goes around.
Crusty: If the pilot body would rather see the company go under than accept changes to working practices then that speaks volumes. WW should just turn out the lights. I truly hope this doesn’t happen, but the individuals who have already signed will, perhaps, feel a little easier living with their decision to leave voluntarily.
Call_Belle et. al.: References to coffee machines on the fifth floor and the relative merits on the coffee in the ‘Canner’ warrant no place on this forum.
Since September there has been a lot of sadness and anger in EI, at all levels I must add, and I thought the company would pull through.
Personally I would be upset to see it go under. Though recent events in EI have already cost me and my partner jobs we both enjoyed.
Wise up guys…
Join Date: Aug 1998
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This dispute is not about pay or working conditions. It's about respect. EI pilots have none from management. They plough through the agreements and refuse to engage in meaningful negotiations.. .1600 weeks outstanding leave. That's 40 pilot jobs.. .40 copilots should have commmand by now (to help reduce the leave bill among other reasons); 40 extra jobs for copilots.. ."Work practice" changes give no monetary saving to EI; it only gives them the opportunity to flaunt their already inept rostering system.. .A job and work security agreement where several clauses must be fulfilled (by both sides) before the route of compulsory redundancies is tackled. The company have helpfully ignored most of these clauses.. .Absolute stonewalling at the idea of jointly determining the requirement for pilot numbers in EI.. .No williingness by management to benchmark their pilots' productivity against ANY other airline.. .In other areas in the airline where the voluntary take up has not been sufficient no compulsory notice has been served; those people now check punters in every day of the week.. .Pilots have not rejected the survival plan unlike some other groups.. .A company that reads "interim" changes as permanent.
Where do you draw the line? When do you make a stand? Are these enough examples? Does any pilot reading this not think their job (and QUALITY of job) is worth fighting for?
Where do you draw the line? When do you make a stand? Are these enough examples? Does any pilot reading this not think their job (and QUALITY of job) is worth fighting for?
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: 5530N
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
V50, or is it M5O .......go back to your desk and stop cluttering the net with rubbish. AL pilots are fair and good guys that have been stood on for years by management and are so backed into a corner that they have to take a stand. Ease off on calling these guys idiots, they are some of the best pilots and handlers on the block.
The Bear
The Bear
Rebel PPRuNer
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone else think the semi-state [no, not EI, RTE] showed themselves up by expecting the panelists to comment on a report based on two paragraphs!!!
What WW has to get his head around is that Ryanair lose our bags or whack them off things and guess what? We don't expect EI to do much better! What the general public has in its head is the image of DUB shut down and Airbuses on the tarmac.
Were Ansett and Sabena and Swissair not evidence enough? I'm patriotic and I will fly Irish over anyone else if I can but when I have flown BA [mainline, CFE and BRAL] I felt on a fullservice airline. On EI I don't.
EI, IMHO, needs an all airbus fleet as with Ansett III and it needs it now, with the 146 and 737 gone. Sabenas got some A319s doing nothing to get them started, could even swap with VEX for the -500.
Also, I think the Irish Govt should buy the rights to the Shamrock logo so that if EI is sold and f*cked about with the branding can be withdrawn. We don't want an "Australian Airlines" scenario, where QF put their country's name on a low cost.
What WW has to get his head around is that Ryanair lose our bags or whack them off things and guess what? We don't expect EI to do much better! What the general public has in its head is the image of DUB shut down and Airbuses on the tarmac.
Were Ansett and Sabena and Swissair not evidence enough? I'm patriotic and I will fly Irish over anyone else if I can but when I have flown BA [mainline, CFE and BRAL] I felt on a fullservice airline. On EI I don't.
EI, IMHO, needs an all airbus fleet as with Ansett III and it needs it now, with the 146 and 737 gone. Sabenas got some A319s doing nothing to get them started, could even swap with VEX for the -500.
Also, I think the Irish Govt should buy the rights to the Shamrock logo so that if EI is sold and f*cked about with the branding can be withdrawn. We don't want an "Australian Airlines" scenario, where QF put their country's name on a low cost.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ireland
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Willie Wonka got his wake up call today. The boys will close his Choccie factory down unless he plays fair with his sweeties.. .Never heard such rubbish Listener when the boss is canning people and lashing out mad money on Maxwell House it is news!!!!
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 35K
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the pilots loved pprune-ing so much they voted themselves out of a job.
The airline is selling planes and quite literally the silver. These are not the actions of a profitable future. sorry I made that difficult to understand ill try again.
T h e a i r l i n e i s s e l l i n g p l a n e s a n d q u i t e l i t e r a l l y t h e s i l v e r .
The airline is selling planes and quite literally the silver. These are not the actions of a profitable future. sorry I made that difficult to understand ill try again.
T h e a i r l i n e i s s e l l i n g p l a n e s a n d q u i t e l i t e r a l l y t h e s i l v e r .
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hang on, I'll check my roster...
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I despair, the ability of some people on this forum to pontificate on topics with which they are so clearly ill acquainted is astounding.
Aer Lingus had 800million euro in the bank before September 11th, it has made an operational profit in every month except October. The pilots are not, OneWorld22, looking for improved pay or conditions. They are fighting to maintain current conditions (very liberal) and current pay (2 rises behind other groups within the airline, effectively giving the company over 11 miilion euro).
Expert external international analysts told Sabena pilots to roll over, the game was up, the company needed what they were asking for. They told us to stand up and resist union brekaing for its own sake. Aer Lingus cant even use the working conditions they have at the moment due to a pathetic weekly (yes weekly) hand written roster.
I could go on but with such prejudice and begruddgery on this site I am struggling to see the point.
Be advised that we, the Aer Lingus pilots are doing everything we can to ascertain the facts, we are making as intelligent decisions as we can and we are taking as much professional advice as we can get. We belive we are not only doing the right thing, but the only thing. 97% on a 92% turnout after unprecedented attendance at union meetings.
I fail to see why my purported aviation colleagues on this forum and elsewhere fail to support us. Damage to Aer Lingus, damage to the working conditions there, to the union, to the pay, to the numbers does benefit to not one of us...
Aer Lingus had 800million euro in the bank before September 11th, it has made an operational profit in every month except October. The pilots are not, OneWorld22, looking for improved pay or conditions. They are fighting to maintain current conditions (very liberal) and current pay (2 rises behind other groups within the airline, effectively giving the company over 11 miilion euro).
Expert external international analysts told Sabena pilots to roll over, the game was up, the company needed what they were asking for. They told us to stand up and resist union brekaing for its own sake. Aer Lingus cant even use the working conditions they have at the moment due to a pathetic weekly (yes weekly) hand written roster.
I could go on but with such prejudice and begruddgery on this site I am struggling to see the point.
Be advised that we, the Aer Lingus pilots are doing everything we can to ascertain the facts, we are making as intelligent decisions as we can and we are taking as much professional advice as we can get. We belive we are not only doing the right thing, but the only thing. 97% on a 92% turnout after unprecedented attendance at union meetings.
I fail to see why my purported aviation colleagues on this forum and elsewhere fail to support us. Damage to Aer Lingus, damage to the working conditions there, to the union, to the pay, to the numbers does benefit to not one of us...
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dublin
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MarkD, I disagree
In the last 12 months I've flown with Ryanair about 20 times and Aer Lingus about 12 times. They both do precisely what they say on the tin: Ryanair is low cost no frills and bloody good at it and Aer Lingus is a full service airline and is bloody good at that. Whether in Premier or Economy, Aer Lingus is in my experience easily as good as BA, Air France, KLM, etc, etc. On time, spotless aircraft, flexible tickets (whether they are meant to be or not!) and extremely friendly helpful professional staff.
I think there is plenty of room for both Ryanair and Aer Lingus. I sincerely hope AL will survive, not be taken over and will finally re-model itself to survive recessions and not just booms. However, even with the staff now reduced to 4000, it still has over twice the staff of Ryanair for less aircraft. Why is this? I guess being full service does require a certain % more staff but surely not over double.
[ 01 February 2002: Message edited by: BillyFish2 ]</p>
In the last 12 months I've flown with Ryanair about 20 times and Aer Lingus about 12 times. They both do precisely what they say on the tin: Ryanair is low cost no frills and bloody good at it and Aer Lingus is a full service airline and is bloody good at that. Whether in Premier or Economy, Aer Lingus is in my experience easily as good as BA, Air France, KLM, etc, etc. On time, spotless aircraft, flexible tickets (whether they are meant to be or not!) and extremely friendly helpful professional staff.
I think there is plenty of room for both Ryanair and Aer Lingus. I sincerely hope AL will survive, not be taken over and will finally re-model itself to survive recessions and not just booms. However, even with the staff now reduced to 4000, it still has over twice the staff of Ryanair for less aircraft. Why is this? I guess being full service does require a certain % more staff but surely not over double.
[ 01 February 2002: Message edited by: BillyFish2 ]</p>
Jolly Green Giant
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But, spearing britney, you're looking to avoid reduncies maintain your working conditions and pay at the present unsustainable level, that's the point. How can you expect the company to maintain the staus quo when it doesn't have the money??
Your company needs less pilots and renegotiated working conditions to survive. Your CEO spelt it out last night on Primetime. Please, someone tell me, where do you expect the money to come from to keep the status quo????
And I totally agree, there should be room for both FR and EI, two completely different airlines with different products to offer, both as pointed out, very good products. I feel sorry for Willie Walsh, he's in an impossible position.
Your company needs less pilots and renegotiated working conditions to survive. Your CEO spelt it out last night on Primetime. Please, someone tell me, where do you expect the money to come from to keep the status quo????
And I totally agree, there should be room for both FR and EI, two completely different airlines with different products to offer, both as pointed out, very good products. I feel sorry for Willie Walsh, he's in an impossible position.
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Europe
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been biting my tongue for a while but there comes a time when things have to be said and done.
(1) The comparrison between Aer Lingus pilots and Sabena pilots prior to the collapse of Sabena are invalid based on two facts. (l) The opinion of the most respected airline financial and economics analyst in the world, who said EI and SN are a million miles apart and that there is no legitimacy or need for the demands being placed on the Aer Lingus pilots by management. (ll) To suggest that Aer Lingus pilots' costs are contributing or have caused a financial crisis in Aer Lingus is ludicrous. The total cost attributable to Flt Ops in EI is 4%. IATA average is 7.2% BA 9% and AA 11%.
(2) Why have pilots (who in one case, never attended a union meeting in 36 years) voted for strike action in such overwhelming numbers ? 475 / 14 (12 management Pilots).
(3) Why have management refused for four months to offer a redundancy package to senior skippers ? Then they offered the package to skippers on year 10 or below when the most junior Capt. was on year 11. Now they have offered the package to all Capts. who are surplus for 2002. How many ? 0. Will they promote those who have passed their command checks allowing jobs at the bottom to be saved ? No.
(4) A top of scale capt. costs 4 times as much as a junior copilot. Cost was the problem, if one senior captain retires how many jobs will that save at the bottom ? 4 ? No 1. 15 Senior Capts. have expressed an interest in retiring, an interest not a commitment. Their employment cost is equal to 60 at the bottom.
(5) If the management succeeds in firing 86 copilots at the bottom of the list the balance will be Cs 230 FOs 196 with the need for an augmented LA operation. It is obvious that their plan is to crew via contract copilots in the future.
(6) In 1997 Aer Lingus through appaling foresight and inept planning were left drastically undercrewed during an industry upturn, this led to the non allocation of 2600 weeks leave, 65 pilot years of which 50 was due to Capts, 50 promotions lost. The leave backlog is 1600 weeks according to the union 600 according to the management call it 1200 for arguments sake, = 30 pilot years. Management are happy to cripple any potential to expand in an upturn. It is intended to commence redundancies while this leave backlog is not being addressed, that is fundementally unacceptable.
(7) The managements' agenda is to crush the union, reduce the pilot body to the bare minimun, continue to operate by utilising pilots on days off and provide leave when they see fit. They will promote using a right to left seat principle within fleet type ignoring the seniority agreement.
(8) The 86 jobs are a smokescreen, its the working changes they want. Why don't we agree a furlough deal some ask? The fundemental platform on which a furlough deal is based is agreeing the crew that you require and the grounds / mechanism under which all pilots surplus to that number return.
Aer Lingus management will not disclose the manner of calculation of their 426 requirement or the grounds under which any pilot surplus to that number would return.
That is the impasse that we face and the people we have to deal with. I do not believe any professional pilot can criticise our stance though some might think it foolish, I am surprised at the lack of support in some areas. We have decided to fight and maybe die on our feet but are refusing to live on our knees.
That is the choice of 97% of Aer Lingus Pilots, you don't have to agree with it but I would be grateful if you respected it.
(1) The comparrison between Aer Lingus pilots and Sabena pilots prior to the collapse of Sabena are invalid based on two facts. (l) The opinion of the most respected airline financial and economics analyst in the world, who said EI and SN are a million miles apart and that there is no legitimacy or need for the demands being placed on the Aer Lingus pilots by management. (ll) To suggest that Aer Lingus pilots' costs are contributing or have caused a financial crisis in Aer Lingus is ludicrous. The total cost attributable to Flt Ops in EI is 4%. IATA average is 7.2% BA 9% and AA 11%.
(2) Why have pilots (who in one case, never attended a union meeting in 36 years) voted for strike action in such overwhelming numbers ? 475 / 14 (12 management Pilots).
(3) Why have management refused for four months to offer a redundancy package to senior skippers ? Then they offered the package to skippers on year 10 or below when the most junior Capt. was on year 11. Now they have offered the package to all Capts. who are surplus for 2002. How many ? 0. Will they promote those who have passed their command checks allowing jobs at the bottom to be saved ? No.
(4) A top of scale capt. costs 4 times as much as a junior copilot. Cost was the problem, if one senior captain retires how many jobs will that save at the bottom ? 4 ? No 1. 15 Senior Capts. have expressed an interest in retiring, an interest not a commitment. Their employment cost is equal to 60 at the bottom.
(5) If the management succeeds in firing 86 copilots at the bottom of the list the balance will be Cs 230 FOs 196 with the need for an augmented LA operation. It is obvious that their plan is to crew via contract copilots in the future.
(6) In 1997 Aer Lingus through appaling foresight and inept planning were left drastically undercrewed during an industry upturn, this led to the non allocation of 2600 weeks leave, 65 pilot years of which 50 was due to Capts, 50 promotions lost. The leave backlog is 1600 weeks according to the union 600 according to the management call it 1200 for arguments sake, = 30 pilot years. Management are happy to cripple any potential to expand in an upturn. It is intended to commence redundancies while this leave backlog is not being addressed, that is fundementally unacceptable.
(7) The managements' agenda is to crush the union, reduce the pilot body to the bare minimun, continue to operate by utilising pilots on days off and provide leave when they see fit. They will promote using a right to left seat principle within fleet type ignoring the seniority agreement.
(8) The 86 jobs are a smokescreen, its the working changes they want. Why don't we agree a furlough deal some ask? The fundemental platform on which a furlough deal is based is agreeing the crew that you require and the grounds / mechanism under which all pilots surplus to that number return.
Aer Lingus management will not disclose the manner of calculation of their 426 requirement or the grounds under which any pilot surplus to that number would return.
That is the impasse that we face and the people we have to deal with. I do not believe any professional pilot can criticise our stance though some might think it foolish, I am surprised at the lack of support in some areas. We have decided to fight and maybe die on our feet but are refusing to live on our knees.
That is the choice of 97% of Aer Lingus Pilots, you don't have to agree with it but I would be grateful if you respected it.
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hang on, I'll check my roster...
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OneWorld22 you asked earlier to keep it civilised and I am trying but you make it really hard, you either arent reading what is being said or you arent believing it so I wil try just once more
"But, spearing britney, you're looking to avoid reduncies maintain your working conditions and pay at the present unsustainable level, that's the point." NO ITS NOT!!! arrghhh!!! THERE IS NOTHING UNSUSTAINABLE ABOUT OUR LIBERAL WORKING CONDITIONS. THERE IS NOTHING UNSUSTAINABLE ABOUT OUR LOW PAY
"How can you expect the company to maintain the staus quo when it doesn't have the money??" 800 fing million euro!!!!!
. ."Your company needs less pilots and renegotiated working conditions to survive." RUBBISH
"Your CEO spelt it out last night on Primetime. Please, someone tell me, where do you expect the money to come from to keep the status quo????". .THE MONEY BEING MADE EVERY SINGLE MONTH AND THE MONEY IN THE BANK
Are you Willie Walsh??? I'll leave it to maxfli, I'm off to the pub.
"But, spearing britney, you're looking to avoid reduncies maintain your working conditions and pay at the present unsustainable level, that's the point." NO ITS NOT!!! arrghhh!!! THERE IS NOTHING UNSUSTAINABLE ABOUT OUR LIBERAL WORKING CONDITIONS. THERE IS NOTHING UNSUSTAINABLE ABOUT OUR LOW PAY
"How can you expect the company to maintain the staus quo when it doesn't have the money??" 800 fing million euro!!!!!
. ."Your company needs less pilots and renegotiated working conditions to survive." RUBBISH
"Your CEO spelt it out last night on Primetime. Please, someone tell me, where do you expect the money to come from to keep the status quo????". .THE MONEY BEING MADE EVERY SINGLE MONTH AND THE MONEY IN THE BANK
Are you Willie Walsh??? I'll leave it to maxfli, I'm off to the pub.
Jolly Green Giant
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SB,
Thanks for keeping it civilised. BUT, I'm talking about sustaining the current conditions. Of course the company is taking in revenues while it's still flying, but not enough to maintain what you're looking for. Why can't you accept that thinking?. .If you can tell me how AL could divert money to maintain the current pilot levels, then I'm all ears. It's not good enought to say AL has money in the bank, the point is that it doesn't have enough, you must see that.
Noone wants to see AL fail, but it can't continue under the present system and yes I'm all for trimming Management levels and getting rid of some of the ridiculous jobs these freeloaders have, very like the situation at BA where you have Managers for bread quality! Everyone will have to suffer pain in the short term, then when the company grows again it can re-build it's staff levels and hopefully grow bigger then it ever has. I'm also fully aware the pilots were one of the few groups who supported Michael Foley, who I think really could have made a difference.
I'd like to see AL sever all ties to the government, stand on it's own two feet without BA or any other airline jumping and most of all removing the SIPTU snake from the company and the current charade of union reps sitting at board room tables, I mean what a joke! Read Kevin Myers' article in todays IT about FR and SIPTU.. .But all this will involve an awful lot of pain for people.
Anyway, I genuinely things work out for everybody and I mean that.
(No, I'm definitely not Willie Walsh, I'd be more of a M'OL man myself!)
Thanks for keeping it civilised. BUT, I'm talking about sustaining the current conditions. Of course the company is taking in revenues while it's still flying, but not enough to maintain what you're looking for. Why can't you accept that thinking?. .If you can tell me how AL could divert money to maintain the current pilot levels, then I'm all ears. It's not good enought to say AL has money in the bank, the point is that it doesn't have enough, you must see that.
Noone wants to see AL fail, but it can't continue under the present system and yes I'm all for trimming Management levels and getting rid of some of the ridiculous jobs these freeloaders have, very like the situation at BA where you have Managers for bread quality! Everyone will have to suffer pain in the short term, then when the company grows again it can re-build it's staff levels and hopefully grow bigger then it ever has. I'm also fully aware the pilots were one of the few groups who supported Michael Foley, who I think really could have made a difference.
I'd like to see AL sever all ties to the government, stand on it's own two feet without BA or any other airline jumping and most of all removing the SIPTU snake from the company and the current charade of union reps sitting at board room tables, I mean what a joke! Read Kevin Myers' article in todays IT about FR and SIPTU.. .But all this will involve an awful lot of pain for people.
Anyway, I genuinely things work out for everybody and I mean that.
(No, I'm definitely not Willie Walsh, I'd be more of a M'OL man myself!)
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A 97% vote says it all.
This group is not made up of union whackos or jumped up bus drivers...as the media would like to portray.
Among the numbers there are Doctors (including two heart surgeons), Lawyers, Engineers, Accountants, and graduates of various other discplines.
Aer Lingus pilots are demanding to be treated as professionals. Simple as that. They are not going to be shafted. Their professionalism has been reinforced by the stance they`ve taken.
Those pilots among you who can`t see that are traitors to YOUR OWN PROFESSION in in my humble view.
This group is not made up of union whackos or jumped up bus drivers...as the media would like to portray.
Among the numbers there are Doctors (including two heart surgeons), Lawyers, Engineers, Accountants, and graduates of various other discplines.
Aer Lingus pilots are demanding to be treated as professionals. Simple as that. They are not going to be shafted. Their professionalism has been reinforced by the stance they`ve taken.
Those pilots among you who can`t see that are traitors to YOUR OWN PROFESSION in in my humble view.
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hang on, I'll check my roster...
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OneWorld22 "BUT, I'm talking about sustaining the current conditions. Of course the company is taking in revenues while it's still flying, but not enough to maintain what you're looking for. Why can't you accept that thinking?"
Because our current working conditions are such that we can be better than industry standard efficient pilots. The company is not using them to the bes of their ability, but can you blame us for that? They seek UNSAFE (imho) conditions to beat us over the head with when they join the rest of the world and have computerised rostering. Look at it this way the conditinos they seek allow 6 dublin to chicago return trips in one month with short turnarounds. You might do that once, but think of the cumulative effect.
As for the revenues not being enough to maintain what I am looking for BELOW INDUSTRY STANDARD pay and conditons - I cannot and will not believe that that is the case. If it is then fine, close the company it doesnt deserve to exist. The pilots are not the problem, they have given all they can and have on more to give.
. ."If you can tell me how AL could divert money to maintain the current pilot levels, then I'm all ears. It's not good enought to say AL has money in the bank, the point is that it doesn't have enough, you must see that."
I am afriad I don't, it has more than enough to pay me a frozen 23K irish a year to safegueard two years of training and well over 100k irish of investment.
Because our current working conditions are such that we can be better than industry standard efficient pilots. The company is not using them to the bes of their ability, but can you blame us for that? They seek UNSAFE (imho) conditions to beat us over the head with when they join the rest of the world and have computerised rostering. Look at it this way the conditinos they seek allow 6 dublin to chicago return trips in one month with short turnarounds. You might do that once, but think of the cumulative effect.
As for the revenues not being enough to maintain what I am looking for BELOW INDUSTRY STANDARD pay and conditons - I cannot and will not believe that that is the case. If it is then fine, close the company it doesnt deserve to exist. The pilots are not the problem, they have given all they can and have on more to give.
. ."If you can tell me how AL could divert money to maintain the current pilot levels, then I'm all ears. It's not good enought to say AL has money in the bank, the point is that it doesn't have enough, you must see that."
I am afriad I don't, it has more than enough to pay me a frozen 23K irish a year to safegueard two years of training and well over 100k irish of investment.
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Costa del Dublin
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maxfli, Spearing Britney and the other AL pilots,. .As an ex-colleague of yours, I too would like to add my voice of support for your stand. . .I was one of the cadets let go in Sept, and as I never made it back to Dublin before the chop, I have only met a limited number of line pilots. However those I have met were, to a (wo)man, outstanding people, very professional in their attitudes and always more than helpful to and supportive of us cadets.
I have heard a rumour that one of the demands of the pilots is a written guarantee that anyone let go now would get priority if/when recruitment starts again. Is this true, and if so, will the guarantee be extended to ex-cadets also? At the time of our firing, we were given a verbal "guarantee" that taking us back on, after sacked line pilots were taken back, would be the "preferred option," but to get something in writing would be good!
So good luck guys/gals, hopefully some of us cadets will see you on an AL flightdeck someday!
I have heard a rumour that one of the demands of the pilots is a written guarantee that anyone let go now would get priority if/when recruitment starts again. Is this true, and if so, will the guarantee be extended to ex-cadets also? At the time of our firing, we were given a verbal "guarantee" that taking us back on, after sacked line pilots were taken back, would be the "preferred option," but to get something in writing would be good!
So good luck guys/gals, hopefully some of us cadets will see you on an AL flightdeck someday!