Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Cathay Fuel Leak cause - poor maintenance?

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Cathay Fuel Leak cause - poor maintenance?

Old 5th Dec 2004, 08:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: asia
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cathay Fuel Leak cause - poor maintenance?

In an article reported in todays SCP, "Cathay Pacific confirmed it had adjusted fuel-line clips on 27 out of 96 engines. The airline's investigation found that the P-shaped clip's position was the main reason fuel leaked from the number 4 engine shortly after flight CX251 left Hong Kong for London on September 5th.
A spokeswoman for Cathay Pacific said the clips had been placed incorrectly, causing cracks in the fuel line. She said the airline had checked all 96 clips and found 27 had to be refitted."
stickyb is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 09:27
  #2 (permalink)  

Controversial, moi?
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your thread title is as provocative as it is meaningless.

From my understanding CX maintenance is of the highest standards, among most other leading airlines.

If a mistake was made it has been rectified. Oh that we lived in a perfect world. You obviously do.
M.Mouse is online now  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 09:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,439
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A bit touchy heh M.Mouse?

If the spokesperson was correctly quoted the cause of the cracked pipe was an incorrectly fitted widget. So who fits the widgets? If they were the correct part put fitted incorrectly is that or is that not 'poor maintainence'?
Obviously it may be an isolated case but...and here is the darn funny thing...it's those isolated instances where 27/96 widgets are fitted incorrectly that might just cause something serious.
What was provocative in the post title or content?
Load Toad is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 10:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: hong kong
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PROVOCATIVE ?? MEANINGLESS ??
Have we been reading the same post M Mouse ??
Relevant, concise, questioning and somewhat disturbing are words I would use to describe the content..........
mr Q is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 11:33
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

I don't know the in's and out's of the p-clip and fuel line in question. If it is indeed on the engine then the cause of concern would be with the engine overhaulers rather than CX maintenance itself. Remember CX Engineering is primarily outport/line station Maintenance. Maintenance in HKG is done by a 3rd party agent!

You have to admit that the way the title is written was indeed to provoke a reaction as that is what it has achieved. But then again when you are one of the worlds best you are always going to be in the spot light.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 11:51
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balmullo,Scotland
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It may well be that either the maintenance manual/and or I.P.C. were incorrect,but the post IMHO means direct maintenance,but I would hazard to guess that this is a procedural error and not as stated poor maintenance.
matkat is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 12:01
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: asia
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, my apologies if i said the wrong thing in the title.
Analysing the words, as some of you seem to want to do:


Cathay Fuel Leak cause Totally factual and from the words of the newspaper report and apparently the spokeswoman herself.

poor maintenance? Note I put in a question mark as I was asking if that were the case.

I am not a journo (would hardly be starting a post from an already half day old newspaper article) nor am I an anorak (at least not on the aviation scene)
stickyb is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 13:30
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

First and foremost the responsibility of all the Maintenance on Cathay Pacific aircraft lies with the airline and it is the same for the day to day operations, which includes handling etc.
Now nobody has yet asked the question, were the P Clips fitted incorrectly at engine build by Rolls Royce and if so, we are all barking up the wrong tree.
These things happen with highly complicated pieces of engineering and will always happen to even the best of us.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 16:49
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it is indeed on the engine then the cause of concern would be with the engine overhaulers
Already asked!
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 17:44
  #10 (permalink)  

UkEng
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: England
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blimey aren't you lot touchy?
It isn't just Cathy (sic) with this problem. We've all been alerted to the possible problem.
Not poor maintenance, just one of those designs which hadn't caused a problem for years, has now and has been quickly rectified.
ukeng is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 20:18
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GE CF6's had a similar problem last year. I don't recall any posts over that incident and subsequent fleet check. Just because a p-clip chaffed through a pipe it does not mean to say it was poor maintenance. There are problems every day on aircraft which are due to any number of problems. If they have found that many engines with the same problem I would think it is more a design problem than poor maint, unless one man has been very, very busy or all the engineers at CX are poor, which I personally seriously doubt. I believe after most incidents it is also quite often quoted around here to await the official report and not jump to conclusions on a preliminary report, especialy one from the press (South China Post?).
SnapOff is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.