Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Dangerous 747 Operation

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Dangerous 747 Operation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Nov 2003, 20:23
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Behind the P2
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boss Raptor, Okada Air B727 5N-EDO, I'd like to see that one with 420 pax!!

I'm sure you meant this one: http://www.airliners.net/search/phot...nct_entry=true
epreye is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2003, 21:55
  #22 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: London,Bucharest...wherever...
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep typo, of course 747 5N-EDO...
Boss Raptor is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2003, 23:40
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boss Raptor: You may be deficient in International Law and International Protocol when you suggest that the American FAA somehow has jurisdiction over a foreign owned and foreign registered airplane in a foreign country. Let me ask you: Under what U.S. Federal rules and under which U.S. Federal regulations could an FAA inspector even board, much less stop the airplane?
There is FAR Part 129 which governs foreign air carriers:

FAR 129.1... "a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this part prescribes rules governing the operation within the United States of each foreign air carrier holding a permit issued by the Civil Aeronautics Board or the Department of Transportation under section 402 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1372) or other appropriate economic or exemption authority issued by the Civil Aeronautics Board or the Department of Transportation.
"(b) Sections 129.14 and 129.20 also apply to U.S.-registered aircraft operated in common carriage by a foreign person or foreign air carrier solely outside the United States. For the purpose of this part, a foreign person is any person, not a citizen for the United States, who operates a U.S.-registered aircraft in common carriage solely outside the United States."

The only authority is given to U.S. registered aircraft in the case of foreign operators in foreign lands.

The Saudi DCA has jurisdiction in the Kingdom over this B747, 3D-BOX.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2003, 09:49
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,504
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Glueball,

The Saudi Presidency of Civil Aviation has a long-term memorandum of agreement with the FAA. As such the FAA have a lot of clout in Saudi and there would be nothing stopping them from getting a PCA representative to accompany them on a ramp check.

B747Plumber.

Forward your complaint and EVIDENCE to:

[email protected]

or

Captain Mohd Berenji at the PCA. (email [email protected] and ask for his contact details)

or, if the aircraft is operating for Saudia.

[email protected]

Good Luck.

Mutt.
mutt is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2003, 17:12
  #25 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: London,Bucharest...wherever...
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you Mutt...

Saves me having to re-iterate the direction of my two previous posts for Glueball a third time

'Glueball as I stated FAA carries out safety oversight on contract to Saudi DCA, this function is co-ordinated from FAA Intl. Field Office JFK, confirmed and detailed in the links posted above.

As such Saudi DCA (FAA) will jump the aircraft in JED which they are entitled to do and FAA IFO JFK are a good course of communication for someone in the USA'
Boss Raptor is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2003, 20:57
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MIAMI
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DANGEROUS 747 OPERATION

DEAR PLUMBER:

THIS ALLEGATIONS ARE VERY SERIOUS. I WONDER HOW YOU CAME ABOUT THIS INFORMATION? IS IT FROM A VALID SOURCE? IT SOUNDS VERY DETAILED, I IMAGINE YOU EITHER HAVE SOMEONE ON THE INSIDE OR YOU WORK FOR THEM. ADDITIONALLY, DO YOU HAVE PROOF OF ALL THIS IN YOUR POSSESION?

JUST WONDERING.. YOU WILL NEED ALL THIS INFORMATION TO FOLLOW IT WITH THE CIVIL AVIATIONS OF ALL THREE COUNTRIES THAT YOU ADVISED.

ADDITIONALLY COULD YOU LET US KNOW THE NAMES OF THE FLIGHT DECK THAT ARE FLYING WITHOUT BEING CURRENT? I THINK WE ALL WANT TO KNOW..

GOOD LUCK!!!
NAP2003 is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2003, 21:29
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Where the Money Takes Me
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmmm........Miami eh?

Am I putting two and two together and making five?

....p.s. No need to shout, we know you're annoyed!
LGW Vulture is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2003, 16:07
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: here and there
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question FAT ?!

126.9,

unsafe Farnair Suisse? More details please...Thank you!
MaxBlow is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.