Crab , I can only assume you are fully conversant with the current amendment to the S92A operations manual having the type on your E.A.S.A. A.T.P.L.
|
Jim, I can only use my two tours at Lossie as experience but I can't remember a situation where it would have been quicker to go over the top and rely on an unknown let down at the other end. As for letting down in the Moray Firth, it isn't as straight forward as you may think near the Beauly Firth end. With the correct low level skills (SAR basics) and goggles, a relatively fast transit can be made even in quite poor conditions. I'm not saying that a high level transit will never be used but it still won't be the best way on most occasions even with new technology. Before you ask, I have flown new technology in icing and snow without the pressure of a dying casualty and I know where I would rather be. Of course this relies on getting enough practice at low level and with goggles - Crab has done that one to death! I'm sure they will be fine with all the experience they have in place.
|
Whether people like it or not, or are willing to admit it, there has already been a subtle shift in ethos of UK SAR Operations by the commercial operators. The military call it mission creep. In the past the priority was to get the casualty to a hospital, usually by utilising one equipped with an HLS. Already, we are seeing Bristow crews more frequently electing to drop the casualty at an airport for onward transfer via ambulance. This is a perfectly acceptable solution where injuries are not time critical and mitigates the issues of single-engine performance in urban HLSs. It may even be a quicker option than a low level grovel in marginal weather where the modern aircraft are equipped for a fast, IFR transit potentially in icing conditions (stand-fast AW189 clearance), assuming there is a slick ambulance transfer. The problem comes when there isn't a convenient airport and the weather or HLS isn't compatible with the best hospital option.
The numbers were expertly crunched to justify the 10-base solution. If senior members of the DfT had seen the map I saw recently which dramatically visualised the rescues carried out round the UK in recent years they would be very nervous about coverage down the east coast. Stats can be very forgiving when trying to justify a solution which saves money. I guarantee the press/public won't be as forgiving if and when said compromise gets exposed. |
llamaman - excellent post - the quote 'lies, damn lies and statistics' was never more apposite than when looking at the way the 10 -base solution was 'justified' - sadly, some of that work was done by my own colleagues!
Pitch horn - I don't have to be S-92 qualified to know SAROPS - perhaps 14 years as Sqn trg Off, CFS agent and part-time Stds isn't enough for you. Jim. the paranoia that exists within MCA and Bristow regarding social media and this contract means that no-one would talk to me unless it was off the record - obviously no-one has done so:ok: |
Originally Posted by pitch horn
(Post 9127309)
Crab , I can only assume you are fully conversant with the current amendment to the S92A operations manual having the type on your E.A.S.A. A.T.P.L.
Seeing as you probably are, perhaps you could confirm or deny that the icing clearance is based on the absence of large super-cooled droplets. How do you check that this is the case? |
VSF
The point I am making is that there are people on this thread pontificating about an aircraft and its limitations ( as dictated in the Ops manual ) that they have absolutely no experience on.
Crab - your cv is small beer compared to many involved in SAR. I'm not just referring to the U.K. but globally. |
Originally Posted by Vie sans frontieres
(Post 9127866)
Pitch horn
Seeing as you probably are, perhaps you could confirm or deny that the icing clearance is based on the absence of large super-cooled droplets. How do you check that this is the case? |
I could perhaps look it up but don't have the time or the inclination. I am just a pilot. Freezing conditions are freezing conditions and, having been well scared one dark, stormy, winter night, I will stay well clear of the combination whenever possible. Especially if there is no quick and easy exit.
If you have a beef about the policies of UK SAR, MCA and Bristow then take it up with them or, better still, your local MP - not the crews who are trying to do their best. |
I don't think anyone is beefing with the crews - just questioning headline statements about capabilities that may be exaggerated or spun to deflect any criticism for not fulfilling the terms of the contract from the start.
Pitch Horn - globally, very certainly but UKSAR, maybe not so small beer - it's irrelevant since the point was that I don't have to be S-92 qualified to understand icing limitations and SAROPs. |
Originally Posted by Same again
(Post 9128105)
I could perhaps look it up but don't have the time or the inclination.
You previously mentioned meriting all that money you earnt. Hmmm. |
I know all the limitations of the aircraft that I fly. As far as airframe icing limitations are concerned my own limitations would be exceeded well before - and will not be. Just off out to spend some of that money. Bye.
|
Originally Posted by Same again
(Post 9128270)
I know all the limitations of the aircraft that I fly. As far as airframe icing limitations are concerned my own limitations would be exceeded well before - and will not be. Just off out to spend some of that money. Bye.
|
This is starting to sound like some Cat checks I have conducted - a question is asked by the examiner, a bold but vague answer is given by the examinee, some probing of understanding is undertaken and then evasion, obfuscation and deception ensues as the examinee tries to cover up the fact he doesn't know the subject.;)
|
Well I seem to have passed all my tests Crab. I'm still flying SAR and enjoying it very much thank you. How's life with you?
|
Originally Posted by Same again
(Post 9129393)
Well I seem to have passed all my tests Crab. I'm still flying SAR and enjoying it very much thank you. How's life with you?
|
How's life with you? Did my time, enjoyed it and moved on:ok: |
Originally Posted by crab
moved on
|
I meant I had moved on from flying SAR not moved on from caring about it.
I believe that anyone privileged enough to be involved in UKSAR should care deeply about its quality of service and not just treat it like any other job where the paycheck is all that matters. |
Did my time, enjoyed it and moved on |
Not so - I could have stayed in to the very end which would have coincided with my normal end of military service.
If small-minded individuals want to claim a victory from excluding a very experienced SAR operator and QHI from the new service for voicing an opinion then let them crack on - it doesn't say much for the quality of the individuals concerned. |
On 16 Sep, Ian Corrigible pointed us to a Flight Global report, which included this about the 189
AgustaWestland confirms that it has now attained EASA approval for its Limited Ice Protection System AW189 Limited Ice Protection System Receives EASA Certification The system further enhances the all-weather capabilities of the new generation helicopter http://www.agustawestland.com/docume...l_AW1283_S.jpg
Finmeccanica-AgustaWestland announced today that the Limited Ice Protection System (LIPS) for the AW189 super medium twin engine helicopter has received EASA certification. The LIPS system will allow the AW189 to further enhance its all-weather capabilities, continuing the process to make the all-new super medium class helicopter suitable to operate in the most adverse and harsh environmental conditions. airsound |
From the article
The AW189 is the first helicopter in its weight category to receive an ice protection system certification. The Limited Ice Protection System (LIPS) permits flight within a known and defined envelope of icing conditions provided that the capability to descend into a known band of positive temperature is available throughout the intended route, typical of conditions encountered, for example, over the North Sea. and The LIPS system is available as an option and includes ice detectors, Supercooled Larger Droplet (SLD) marker, Ice Accretion Meter and heated windshield. The system does not require heated rotor blades and associated equipment, while the engine air intake heating system is already incorporated into the standard AW189 helicopter. The AW189 equipped with LIPS retains the performance and procedures for Cat. A operations and has only limited restrictions in terms of low temperature and ice presence during IFR operations, therefore expanding the all-weather operating capability of the type. Oh and I don't believe the 139, which will be doing the 189's job this winter, has even this capability............. |
Perhaps AW could lend the Supercooled Larger Droplet marker to the S92 flights. It sounds like they could do with one.
|
Oh and I don't believe the 139, which will be doing the 189's job this winter, has even this capability............. |
SLD icing detector
|
Correct unless it has the extra kit. Presumably the SLD icing detector simply says 'vacate the icing environment' if it detects the presence of SLDs? You can usually see the formation of clear ice on parts of the airframe (aerials, wipers, ice accretion probe) it doesn't give any protection, just detection. |
Chivenor
According to the local news Chivenor is continuing on state due to a delay in the contract.
|
Before certification of the LIPS the AW189 had an all weather capability. Now, with LIPS, its all weather capability is enhanced. Does that mean it can now fly in more weathers than the atmosphere can produce?
|
According to the local news Chivenor is continuing on state due to a delay in the contract. If the new service wasn't standing up at St Athan in time there was supposed to be a 2-week notice given as I was given to understand not a last minute plan B. North Devon Journal reporting at 8:25 a 7-day delay in handover! |
|
So.......... A 7 day delay.
What can I say........... Nimrod AEW3.........Nimrod MRA 4 :ugh: still waiting.... Typical Lib Dem forgetting history again. Get a grip. |
Sorry to be so very far behind the drag curve, but is it REALLY true that there are no longer any free-swimming divers left in the UK SAR world?
Am I alone in thinking that this is an insidious travesty? |
Originally Posted by JerryG
(Post 9134031)
Am I alone in thinking that this is an insidious travesty? P3 Bellows Do the words 'Reputational Damage' mean anything to you? |
Do the words 'Reputational Damage' mean anything to you? |
Originally Posted by P3 Bellows
(Post 9134153)
Indeed. I think the AEW3 was probably a bigger delay and cock up than the MRA4.
|
Crab - sorry, I must be missing the point, but your story seems at odds with itself - glad you had a good party though - hmm, could be why today's typing not entirely cogent!
|
could be why today's typing not entirely cogent! My point was that the delay in taking over from Chiv was due, it appears, to petty politics and not through any lack of effort or ability (quite the opposite) from the team at St Athan. No doubt the truth will out in the end. |
A week. Who cares. Tiny stuff in the big picture. Useful for lazy MPs and Councillors to get a few column inches though.
More importantly, what news of Boulmer? |
Crab,
You know the truth. Please tell us all as it may shut the ex north Devon councillor up. So, how was the party? |
The party was excellent, a stunning location with perfect weather and an awesome flying display by Aerosparx! Who would have thought that night, close formation in motorgliders covered in LEDs and punching out pyros and smoke would ever get sanctioned.
As for the truth - I don't know what went on in the corridors of power but I do know that St Athan had dug out blind to achieve operational readiness in just a month after receiving the aircraft. There was some rumour about numbers of pilots but the RAF SAR flights have operated on the bare minimum many times due to illness, OOAs and FI dets without compromising safety or capability so it really doesn't sound like a level playing field. To be honest, it sounds like a last minute knee-jerk reaction from someone in the chain - RAF, MCA, DfT - with little real reason. Blaming the delay on Bristow is not fair or justified. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:23. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.