Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

NPAS News 2021

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

NPAS News 2021

Old 19th Mar 2021, 08:05
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 863
NPAS Fixed wing to be ditched ?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9379005/UK-police-chiefs-wasted-10m-surveillance-planes-work-built-areas.html

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/police-paid-10m-for-four-useless-planes-lzls7whkf

Last edited by Senior Pilot; 19th Mar 2021 at 09:34. Reason: Add quote
MAN777 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2021, 10:48
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Yorkshire and The Humber
Posts: 6
Not Even Surprised

To be brutally honest I am not surprised that the fixed wing aircraft are heading for the bin, we could all see this coming. Well, anyone with common-sense could, it's something that NPAS has always lacked, that and keeping people of industry within close proximity of the organisation... the bread and butter of police aviation treated like absolute crap and quite rightly fled. I instantly had a face palm moment when I first acknowledged that NPAS were proposing of replacing the MD902s with P68Rs, this could possibly be one of the worst decisions ever made in NPAS history, even the MD902s didn't spend this much time sitting catching dust in a hangar feeling sorry for themselves. It really does pose several questions: Is West Yorkshire Police in a fit state to be accountable of NPAS? Could there be a better force to take control and make NPAS a better organisation? What is the final straw for NPAS to be disbanded?
RotaryJ is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2021, 13:39
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SW
Posts: 195
"They [planes] cannot hover above the ground"

​​​Daily Mail right on the money there.

Anyone shed light on the claim that it can't land at most airfields as it needs a long runway, Wikipedia quotes a TODR of 400m LDR of 600m which isn't long (unless compared to a helicopter!).
switch_on_lofty is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2021, 14:08
  #44 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 13,367
Originally Posted by switch_on_lofty View Post
"They [planes] cannot hover above the ground"

​​​Daily Mail right on the money there.

Anyone shed light on the claim that it can't land at most airfields as it needs a long runway, Wikipedia quotes a TODR of 400m LDR of 600m which isn't long (unless compared to a helicopter!).
Not so much a problem with take-off and landing distance - but they stubbornly and stupidly choose an aircraft (initially designed well back into the last century) that uses AVGAS engines, rather than modern turbines. Most smaller, general aviation airfields where that fuel is still available are closed after dark. Larger airfields with longer operating hours often don't have AVGAS available out of daylight hours (because no-one else wants it). Filling the fuel tanks to cater for longer sorties means that only one observer can be carried, because of all up weight restraints. The previous helicopters could carry two. A high winged aircraft with small windows where the "job" is hidden as soon as the aircraft rolls into a turn to orbit was another big error.

As far as "all weather" is concerned, these aircraft had no advantage over the incumbent helicopters. They had no icing clearance so exactly the same weather limitations applied. This had to be obtained later, at the user's further cost. But the NPAS hierarchy knew best, ignoring the advice of those who actually knew what they were talking about and sacked the ones who spoke out.

It's time an inquiry is held into exactly who was pulling the strings with respect to the highly flawed decision to purchase these aircraft and the connections between them and the aircraft manufacturer.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2021, 14:15
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 35
Originally Posted by RotaryJ View Post
What is the final straw for NPAS to be disbanded?
the original contract/agreement as I read it...
was that 50% or more of the Police Chiefs need to want to end it, before it can be wound up.
backtothebeat is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2021, 15:21
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 16
I have heard the Met are definitely taking "their" three EC145s and moving back to Lippitts Hill

I guess this could be the start of the end of the "N" in "NPAS"
hargreaves99 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2021, 15:38
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,225
Wonder if Cleveland will get there's back, they had already tried the Islander and came to the same conclusion. It was said it could hover and fly backwards in a strong wind. lol
N707ZS is online now  
Old 19th Mar 2021, 16:09
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 863
A fixed wing aircraft is OK for surveillance so long as you can get the height and stand off like the very successful GMP Defender routinely did. They are not very effective at helicopter heights.
MAN777 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2021, 18:44
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 3nm SE of TNT, UK
Posts: 433
Originally Posted by hargreaves99 View Post
I have heard the Met are definitely taking "their" three EC145s and moving back to Lippitts Hill
Hmm maybe, let's hope they don't bend one so much that it's unavailable for 6 months................
Fortyodd2 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2021, 20:48
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,596
Lots of interesting reading in February's Police Aviation News:
http://www.policeaviationnews.com/Ac...ary2021PAN.pdf
MightyGem is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2021, 22:05
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 863
Just read Bryns summary of NPAS in the latest PAN.
God, Im now so depressed, what a cluster F***.
Speechless !!
MAN777 is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2021, 15:21
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Waltham Abbey, Essex, UK
Age: 75
Posts: 1,122
If I am not being wildly mislead I think it may be nearly all over.

After scrambling through the mud and brambles alongside Lippitts Hill this morning I was able to see a several work crews on site playing with a nice new set of doors on the main control room hangar and new windsocks by the pad.

April 1, All Fools Day, is beckoning. That may be Metxit, but, like the European problem, I am not sure this one has a life giving vaccine to save the virus that is WYP.

PANews is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2021, 15:47
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 35
Having been one of the TFOs that was given marching orders for daring to not toe the party line at the beginning all I can say is I will dance a little jig when it finally falls.
I was literally marched out of the unit with zero notice having turned up for work that morning as usual, with the news that NPAS had rescinded my secondment with immediate effect. Ten years of ASU service ended on the whim of a Supt who knew nothing about my job.
the treasonable action I committed was to openly say what everyone new. That the only thing you get with less... is less ..!!
Hopefully the flames will lick higher sometime soon.
backtothebeat is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2021, 16:08
  #54 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 13,367
BTTB,

Sounds like they wanted you out because they feared that you would be proved correct with time.
Having helped set up one ASU from scratch, and become the CP (and I know we all did a very good job) I’m so glad I took my chance to leave police aviation on my terms, rather than theirs, before NPAS began.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2021, 22:02
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: York
Posts: 720
A fixed wing aircraft is OK for surveillance so long as you can get the height and stand off like the very successful GMP Defender routinely did. They are not very effective at helicopter heights.
Why would you wish to operate an aeroplane at so called ‘helicopter heights’? (Whatever that means?) What’s the advantage/disadvantage?

Why was the GMP Defender ‘very successful’? Was everyone else’s not successful?
4468 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2021, 22:20
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: england- up north (where it's grim)
Posts: 196
Originally Posted by 4468 View Post
Why would you wish to operate an aeroplane at so called ‘helicopter heights’? (Whatever that means?) What’s the advantage/disadvantage?

Why was the GMP Defender ‘very successful’? Was everyone else’s not successful?
it was the crews that made it successful. I loved every minute of it. We had a blank canvas to start with and we made it work brilliantly. Using our experience from helicopters and adapting it accordingly. I left at the right time though.
the_flying_cop is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2021, 22:25
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: York
Posts: 720
it was the crews that made it successful. I loved every minute of it. We had a blank canvas to start with and we made it work brilliantly.
I completely understand. But don’t you agree, nobody should make the mistake of thinking only GMP could get ‘brilliant’ results from an aeroplane!

NEASU did that many years before GMP! 1995 if I recall correctly?

Hampshire and Cheshire even earlier than that.

There’s an awful lot of blinkered and largely misplaced hubris in police aviation.

Along with the predilection for empire building which is in the police DNA, it’s all part of the problem

Last edited by 4468; 26th Mar 2021 at 22:55.
4468 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2021, 22:57
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: england- up north (where it's grim)
Posts: 196
Originally Posted by 4468 View Post
I completely understand. But don’t you agree, nobody should make the mistake of thinking only GMP could get ‘brilliant’ results from an aeroplane!

NEASU did that many years before GMP! 1995 if I recall correctly?

Hampshire and Cheshire even earlier than that.

There’s an awful lot of blinkered and largely misplaced hubris in police aviation.

Along with the predilection for empire building which is in the police DNA, it’s all part of the problem
I didn’t say GMP were the only ones to make it work.
the_flying_cop is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2021, 23:12
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: York
Posts: 720
Originally Posted by the_flying_cop View Post
I didn’t say GMP were the only ones to make it work.
Fantastic. We agree.

Fixed Wing can work in the police role. A number of forces have shown that! 👍
4468 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2021, 23:47
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: england- up north (where it's grim)
Posts: 196
Originally Posted by 4468 View Post
Fantastic. We agree.

Fixed Wing can work in the police role. A number of forces have shown that! 👍
The only thing that doesn’t work is NPAS.
the_flying_cop is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.