Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

NPAS News 2021

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

NPAS News 2021

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th March 2021 | 08:05
  #41 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 920
Likes: 18
From: Manchester
NPAS Fixed wing to be ditched ?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9379005/UK-police-chiefs-wasted-10m-surveillance-planes-work-built-areas.html

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/police-paid-10m-for-four-useless-planes-lzls7whkf

Last edited by Senior Pilot; 19th March 2021 at 09:34. Reason: Add quote
MAN777 is offline  
Old 19th March 2021 | 10:48
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 28
Likes: 7
From: Yorkshire and The Humber
Not Even Surprised

To be brutally honest I am not surprised that the fixed wing aircraft are heading for the bin, we could all see this coming. Well, anyone with common-sense could, it's something that NPAS has always lacked, that and keeping people of industry within close proximity of the organisation... the bread and butter of police aviation treated like absolute crap and quite rightly fled. I instantly had a face palm moment when I first acknowledged that NPAS were proposing of replacing the MD902s with P68Rs, this could possibly be one of the worst decisions ever made in NPAS history, even the MD902s didn't spend this much time sitting catching dust in a hangar feeling sorry for themselves. It really does pose several questions: Is West Yorkshire Police in a fit state to be accountable of NPAS? Could there be a better force to take control and make NPAS a better organisation? What is the final straw for NPAS to be disbanded?
RotaryJ is offline  
Old 19th March 2021 | 13:39
  #43 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: SW
"They [planes] cannot hover above the ground"

​​​Daily Mail right on the money there.

Anyone shed light on the claim that it can't land at most airfields as it needs a long runway, Wikipedia quotes a TODR of 400m LDR of 600m which isn't long (unless compared to a helicopter!).
switch_on_lofty is offline  
Old 19th March 2021 | 14:08
  #44 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,111
Likes: 1,085
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Originally Posted by switch_on_lofty
"They [planes] cannot hover above the ground"

​​​Daily Mail right on the money there.

Anyone shed light on the claim that it can't land at most airfields as it needs a long runway, Wikipedia quotes a TODR of 400m LDR of 600m which isn't long (unless compared to a helicopter!).
Not so much a problem with take-off and landing distance - but they stubbornly and stupidly choose an aircraft (initially designed well back into the last century) that uses AVGAS engines, rather than modern turbines. Most smaller, general aviation airfields where that fuel is still available are closed after dark. Larger airfields with longer operating hours often don't have AVGAS available out of daylight hours (because no-one else wants it). Filling the fuel tanks to cater for longer sorties means that only one observer can be carried, because of all up weight restraints. The previous helicopters could carry two. A high winged aircraft with small windows where the "job" is hidden as soon as the aircraft rolls into a turn to orbit was another big error.

As far as "all weather" is concerned, these aircraft had no advantage over the incumbent helicopters. They had no icing clearance so exactly the same weather limitations applied. This had to be obtained later, at the user's further cost. But the NPAS hierarchy knew best, ignoring the advice of those who actually knew what they were talking about and sacked the ones who spoke out.

It's time an inquiry is held into exactly who was pulling the strings with respect to the highly flawed decision to purchase these aircraft and the connections between them and the aircraft manufacturer.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 19th March 2021 | 14:15
  #45 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 4
From: uk
Originally Posted by RotaryJ
What is the final straw for NPAS to be disbanded?
the original contract/agreement as I read it...
was that 50% or more of the Police Chiefs need to want to end it, before it can be wound up.
backtothebeat is offline  
Old 19th March 2021 | 15:21
  #46 (permalink)  
Guest
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 840
Likes: 236
I have heard the Met are definitely taking "their" three EC145s and moving back to Lippitts Hill

I guess this could be the start of the end of the "N" in "NPAS"
PPRuNeUser469990 is offline  
Old 19th March 2021 | 15:38
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 53
From: 4DME
Wonder if Cleveland will get there's back, they had already tried the Islander and came to the same conclusion. It was said it could hover and fly backwards in a strong wind. lol
N707ZS is online now  
Old 19th March 2021 | 16:09
  #48 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 920
Likes: 18
From: Manchester
A fixed wing aircraft is OK for surveillance so long as you can get the height and stand off like the very successful GMP Defender routinely did. They are not very effective at helicopter heights.
MAN777 is offline  
Old 19th March 2021 | 18:44
  #49 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 482
Likes: 44
From: 3nm SE of TNT, UK
Originally Posted by hargreaves99
I have heard the Met are definitely taking "their" three EC145s and moving back to Lippitts Hill
Hmm maybe, let's hope they don't bend one so much that it's unavailable for 6 months................
Fortyodd2 is offline  
Old 19th March 2021 | 20:48
  #50 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,932
Likes: 143
From: Warrington, UK
Lots of interesting reading in February's Police Aviation News:
http://www.policeaviationnews.com/Ac...ary2021PAN.pdf
MightyGem is offline  
Old 19th March 2021 | 22:05
  #51 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 920
Likes: 18
From: Manchester
Just read Bryns summary of NPAS in the latest PAN.
God, Im now so depressed, what a cluster F***.
Speechless !!
MAN777 is offline  
Old 25th March 2021 | 15:21
  #52 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 16
From: Waltham Abbey, Essex, UK
If I am not being wildly mislead I think it may be nearly all over.

After scrambling through the mud and brambles alongside Lippitts Hill this morning I was able to see a several work crews on site playing with a nice new set of doors on the main control room hangar and new windsocks by the pad.

April 1, All Fools Day, is beckoning. That may be Metxit, but, like the European problem, I am not sure this one has a life giving vaccine to save the virus that is WYP.

PANews is offline  
Old 26th March 2021 | 15:47
  #53 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 4
From: uk
Having been one of the TFOs that was given marching orders for daring to not toe the party line at the beginning all I can say is I will dance a little jig when it finally falls.
I was literally marched out of the unit with zero notice having turned up for work that morning as usual, with the news that NPAS had rescinded my secondment with immediate effect. Ten years of ASU service ended on the whim of a Supt who knew nothing about my job.
the treasonable action I committed was to openly say what everyone new. That the only thing you get with less... is less ..!!
Hopefully the flames will lick higher sometime soon.
backtothebeat is offline  
Old 26th March 2021 | 16:08
  #54 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,111
Likes: 1,085
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
BTTB,

Sounds like they wanted you out because they feared that you would be proved correct with time.
Having helped set up one ASU from scratch, and become the CP (and I know we all did a very good job) I’m so glad I took my chance to leave police aviation on my terms, rather than theirs, before NPAS began.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 26th March 2021 | 22:02
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 739
Likes: 6
From: York
A fixed wing aircraft is OK for surveillance so long as you can get the height and stand off like the very successful GMP Defender routinely did. They are not very effective at helicopter heights.
Why would you wish to operate an aeroplane at so called ‘helicopter heights’? (Whatever that means?) What’s the advantage/disadvantage?

Why was the GMP Defender ‘very successful’? Was everyone else’s not successful?
4468 is offline  
Old 26th March 2021 | 22:20
  #56 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: england- up north (where it's grim)
Originally Posted by 4468
Why would you wish to operate an aeroplane at so called ‘helicopter heights’? (Whatever that means?) What’s the advantage/disadvantage?

Why was the GMP Defender ‘very successful’? Was everyone else’s not successful?
it was the crews that made it successful. I loved every minute of it. We had a blank canvas to start with and we made it work brilliantly. Using our experience from helicopters and adapting it accordingly. I left at the right time though.
the_flying_cop is offline  
Old 26th March 2021 | 22:25
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 739
Likes: 6
From: York
it was the crews that made it successful. I loved every minute of it. We had a blank canvas to start with and we made it work brilliantly.
I completely understand. But don’t you agree, nobody should make the mistake of thinking only GMP could get ‘brilliant’ results from an aeroplane!

NEASU did that many years before GMP! 1995 if I recall correctly?

Hampshire and Cheshire even earlier than that.

There’s an awful lot of blinkered and largely misplaced hubris in police aviation.

Along with the predilection for empire building which is in the police DNA, it’s all part of the problem

Last edited by 4468; 26th March 2021 at 22:55.
4468 is offline  
Old 26th March 2021 | 22:57
  #58 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: england- up north (where it's grim)
Originally Posted by 4468
I completely understand. But don’t you agree, nobody should make the mistake of thinking only GMP could get ‘brilliant’ results from an aeroplane!

NEASU did that many years before GMP! 1995 if I recall correctly?

Hampshire and Cheshire even earlier than that.

There’s an awful lot of blinkered and largely misplaced hubris in police aviation.

Along with the predilection for empire building which is in the police DNA, it’s all part of the problem
I didn’t say GMP were the only ones to make it work.
the_flying_cop is offline  
Old 26th March 2021 | 23:12
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 739
Likes: 6
From: York
Originally Posted by the_flying_cop
I didn’t say GMP were the only ones to make it work.
Fantastic. We agree.

Fixed Wing can work in the police role. A number of forces have shown that! 👍
4468 is offline  
Old 26th March 2021 | 23:47
  #60 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: england- up north (where it's grim)
Originally Posted by 4468
Fantastic. We agree.

Fixed Wing can work in the police role. A number of forces have shown that! 👍
The only thing that doesn’t work is NPAS.
the_flying_cop is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.