Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

SPZ-7600 ILS problem

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

SPZ-7600 ILS problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Oct 2019, 10:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: house
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SPZ-7600 ILS problem

Hi All,

We are encountering a problem when flying ILS approach. The glideslope deviation fluctuates randomly; for a while the R/C is exactly on the correct glidepath and then suddenly the R/C starts to deviate and the corrective action seems to be really slow, althought the pitch command indicator on ADI shows correct attempt to restore the optimum path. Flying several ILS approaches in sequence does not reveal any regular pattern, but sometimes we are within 0.5 dot through the whole glide and then sometimes more than 1 dot off especially under 500 ft where the glide path gets narrower. This R/C has dual FD, 3-axis, SPZ-7600 autopilots.

The ILS signal is received correctly, without flags. Pilots say that with reference to PAPI the GS indication on EHSI is correct.The R/C performs autolevelling correctly, so the radar altimeter is functioning for GS gain programming.
The airdata system has some small fluctuation in vertical rate (inside 25ft per minute) and the autopilot calculated TAS is slightly smaller than expected (2-4 kts), but still these errors are quite small and not considered as causing this issue completely. Basically, it feels that the autopilot is just slow on pitch channel!

Does anyone know what kind of registers there are that could be used to monitor autopilot pitch channel gain? Are there any adjustable gain settings on pitch channel or some adjustable pitch rate settings?
How to test that the pitch jackscrew actuator has the needed speed&response to keep the R/C at correct glideslope?

Thank you in advance,
Karote

karote is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2019, 13:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Age: 55
Posts: 464
Received 43 Likes on 29 Posts
Had similar situation once and a bad servo was deemed to be the problem.
Sir Korsky is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2019, 17:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,321
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
With a 3 axis AP you need to help it by reducing power at the top of drop - all the AP can do is bring the nose up or down to maintain the glidepath so you will see changes in IAS if you don't set the correct power.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 04:51
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 20 Posts
Assuming you’re using the correct technique, is it just the one airframe doing it?

Are you only flying the same ILS to the same runway every time? Could it be the ground equipment? Wouldn’t be the first time the localizer or glide slope goes haywire when a bus drives past the ground equipment.
havick is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 15:53
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Isn't there a magic black box you can plug the ILS receiver in to to check the proper electronic functioning of the system and indications? If they check out OK then the pitch servo theory comes next (assuming it's an aircraft type that has a dedicated pitch servo). Assuming the guys flying it know the magic number TQ reduction at top of drop that gets you on a pretty good GP all the way down without touching anything. Certainly in the S76 with SPZ7600, if you decouple the collective mode, the proper manual power reduction at the top of drop should have you on the GP all the way down without having to touch anything....maybe just a click or 2 of pitch trim every now and then.
gulliBell is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 18:42
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: house
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the reply, yes we have tried on 4-5 different airfields, so thus we have ruled out the issue with ground equipment. It is this single airframe doing this. We have a second R/C but it is a 4-axis version and it flies nicely the ILS. 4-axis has the collective control and also accelerometers, so it is more advanced and thus not so good to compare with
karote is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 18:44
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: house
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Sir Korsky,

Thanks for the reply, yes we actually changed pitch rotary actuator as it had some extra friction causing it not to work smoothly. However, this did not solve this problem.
Has there been any problems with the jackscrew or the position sensors?
karote is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 18:51
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: house
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gulliBell
Isn't there a magic black box you can plug the ILS receiver in to to check the proper electronic functioning of the system and indications? If they check out OK then the pitch servo theory comes next (assuming it's an aircraft type that has a dedicated pitch servo). Assuming the guys flying it know the magic number TQ reduction at top of drop that gets you on a pretty good GP all the way down without touching anything. Certainly in the S76 with SPZ7600, if you decouple the collective mode, the proper manual power reduction at the top of drop should have you on the GP all the way down without having to touch anything....maybe just a click or 2 of pitch trim every now and then.
Hi, thank you for your reply. We have check the functionality of the NAV receiver with the IFR4000 ramp generator and based on these measurements, the NAV radio is working and the EHSI shows deviations correctly. This is by the way B412.

"Assuming the guys flying it know the magic number TQ reduction at top of drop that gets you on a pretty good GP all the way down without touching anything" Could you please explain this a little bit more? I'm an avionic system engineer and not a pilot. I have tried to ask if the pilots are completely sure how to fly this 3-axis R/C and well, I believe them. But if there is something that I could still challenge them about , please let me know.
karote is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 21:18
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 20 Posts
What model 412? SP, HP, EP, EPI?
havick is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 21:46
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by karote
"Assuming the guys flying it know the magic number TQ reduction at top of drop that gets you on a pretty good GP all the way down...
For example, on capturing the GP, a TQ reduction of 7% at 120 kts will keep you on the GP without having to do much else....I forget what the power reduction is for the B412. But, by the sound of it, if the AP is making pitch changes, and the pilot hasn't been making any manual power changes, then something is not right and the mystery needs to be solved.

gulliBell is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2019, 07:09
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,321
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Are both the pitch channels behaving well - do you have the facility to monitor each channel's demand signal?

Can you fly a coupled ILS with just one pitch channel engaged? If so doing this with each AP deselected in turn might help you diagnose if it is an AP computer or servo problem.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2019, 07:48
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hedge
Posts: 227
Received 23 Likes on 6 Posts
Are there not AP test Level 1 and 2 checks you can do on the ground? Either with engines running or hydraulics hooked up?

Error codes are usually generated and can at least point in right direction for troubleshooting.

Will usually display as 1Exx 2Exx for respective system.

The xx number will narrow it down though you will need Honeywell manual to refer. I.e, Bell MM not much help.

We had similar issue with 4 axis system on ILS GA 412EP. Turned out to be a accelerometer. Not saying that's your issue but run the BIT level 1 and 2 checks and see what codes you get.

I am assuming 3 axis has the same BIT modes.

Good luck.


Last edited by Salusa; 15th Oct 2019 at 10:08. Reason: Update
Salusa is online now  
Old 15th Oct 2019, 12:20
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Great White North
Posts: 171
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Friction, Friction, Friction

As the great god of the SPZ system at Honeywell used to say:"friction, friction, friction"

You need to make sure all frictions are per the maintenance manual, not only flight controls but also hydraulic servo input levers. These are very precise values to check/set if you want the whole system to work.

Often overlooked are the hydraulic servo input levers, friction needs to be very low (refer to MM) and is often too high on new/overhauled servos due to the use of "D' rings in lieu of "O" rings to prevent leaks. Unfortunately, this is not adjustable and may require installing a different servo.

Fly Safe, Always
Encyclo is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2019, 16:06
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: house
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Havick,

It's EP.
karote is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.