Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Bell 206/OH-58 Differences

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Bell 206/OH-58 Differences

Old 2nd Jan 2018, 16:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,818
Bell 206/OH-58 Differences

Any one with any idea what drove the two types to have different rotor diameters and different rotor RPM? Were the transmission casing the same, also tail gear box? Obviously different ratio gears in the main as engine input was the same 6,000rpm.

Thanks all, wondered for years having flown both.
megan is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2018, 01:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South East Asia
Posts: 394
I don't know too much about the OH-58 and how the differences came about but military and commercial variants of a supposedly common design can differ enormously. From my experience with the Bell UH-1 and Bell 205 helicopters I can tell you that only the silhouette is the same, thereafter everything is different, even the engines and the rivets. Horses for courses.
Saint Jack is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2018, 05:18
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Top of the World
Posts: 29
4 seats to 5, smaller petrol tank, no tail drive or tgb cowls etc
Vertical Freedom is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2018, 06:18
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,493
I know in Oz someone managed to get a lot of 58 bits into a 206.

The resulting vibration from incorrect NR and other issues and the intervention of
the authorities caused a lot of expensive parts to be thrown away!!

Bell are probably kicking themselves that they didn't make the parts just slightly different so they wouldn't physically fit.

A lit of PMA parts were manufactured with data from the DoD info in the "public domain" and reverse engineered.
RVDT is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2018, 10:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 381
Apparently, the original OH-58A (1967) had 44 different modifications carried out on the airframe to convert it from the Bell 206A into the then new LOH. Some of the bigger changes included a longer main rotor blade and extended tailboom.

Lots of US Army test reports here that might be of interest.

https://publicaccess.dtic.mil/psm/ap...ction&q=OH-58A

500 Fan.
500 Fan is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2018, 01:27
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 171
Some info here:

https://www.thisdayinaviation.com/ta...06a-jetranger/

Though similar in appearance to the civil Bell 206A JetRanger, the OH-58A has significant differences and few parts are interchangeable between models. The Kiowa’s main rotor blades and tail boom are longer than the JetRanger’s. The rotor system turns at a slower r.p.m. Landing skids are mounted differently. The OH-58A has a lower maximum gross weight. There are internal differences as well, for example, the main transmission of the OH-58A has only three planetary gears while the 206B uses four, giving it a greater torque capacity.
Tickle is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.