Bell 206/OH-58 Differences
Thread Starter
Bell 206/OH-58 Differences
Any one with any idea what drove the two types to have different rotor diameters and different rotor RPM? Were the transmission casing the same, also tail gear box? Obviously different ratio gears in the main as engine input was the same 6,000rpm.
Thanks all, wondered for years having flown both.
Thanks all, wondered for years having flown both.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South East Asia
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know too much about the OH-58 and how the differences came about but military and commercial variants of a supposedly common design can differ enormously. From my experience with the Bell UH-1 and Bell 205 helicopters I can tell you that only the silhouette is the same, thereafter everything is different, even the engines and the rivets. Horses for courses.
I know in Oz someone managed to get a lot of 58 bits into a 206.
The resulting vibration from incorrect NR and other issues and the intervention of
the authorities caused a lot of expensive parts to be thrown away!!
Bell are probably kicking themselves that they didn't make the parts just slightly different so they wouldn't physically fit.
A lit of PMA parts were manufactured with data from the DoD info in the "public domain" and reverse engineered.
The resulting vibration from incorrect NR and other issues and the intervention of
the authorities caused a lot of expensive parts to be thrown away!!
Bell are probably kicking themselves that they didn't make the parts just slightly different so they wouldn't physically fit.
A lit of PMA parts were manufactured with data from the DoD info in the "public domain" and reverse engineered.
Apparently, the original OH-58A (1967) had 44 different modifications carried out on the airframe to convert it from the Bell 206A into the then new LOH. Some of the bigger changes included a longer main rotor blade and extended tailboom.
Lots of US Army test reports here that might be of interest.
https://publicaccess.dtic.mil/psm/ap...ction&q=OH-58A
500 Fan.
Lots of US Army test reports here that might be of interest.
https://publicaccess.dtic.mil/psm/ap...ction&q=OH-58A
500 Fan.
Some info here:
https://www.thisdayinaviation.com/ta...06a-jetranger/
https://www.thisdayinaviation.com/ta...06a-jetranger/
Though similar in appearance to the civil Bell 206A JetRanger, the OH-58A has significant differences and few parts are interchangeable between models. The Kiowa’s main rotor blades and tail boom are longer than the JetRanger’s. The rotor system turns at a slower r.p.m. Landing skids are mounted differently. The OH-58A has a lower maximum gross weight. There are internal differences as well, for example, the main transmission of the OH-58A has only three planetary gears while the 206B uses four, giving it a greater torque capacity.
