SAR S-92 Missing Ireland
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 6,563
Likes: 952
From: Aus
Not a nice summary at all SAS, this is a summary. Captain, Co-pilot, Backseat. Timing in seconds. When is it they become aware of the "blob" and its significance? 28.261 or 59.005?
Sabres holstered.
28.261 OK so small target at six miles eleven o’clock Large out to the right there ehm
31.234 Roger
31.533
33.58 Eh just a small little island…that's BLMO itself
36.184 ""
46.767 K...looking at an island just in, directly ahead of us now guys, you want to come right [Commander’s Name]
50.417 ""
50.862 OK, come right just confirm?
51.81About..
52.035 twenty degrees right yeah
52.888 ""
53.404 OK Come Right...select heading
54.416 ""
55.231 Select
55.38 Roger
55.691 heading
56.164 Heading selected
57.231 ""
57.691 Come right now come right COME RIGHT
59.005 ""
59.893 [Expletive]
60.73 OOOHHHH
61.198[Expletive]
62.557 We’re gone
8.588 seconds between the first backseat advise and the ultimate come right command.
Sabres holstered.
28.261 OK so small target at six miles eleven o’clock Large out to the right there ehm
31.234 Roger
31.533
33.58 Eh just a small little island…that's BLMO itself
36.184 ""
46.767 K...looking at an island just in, directly ahead of us now guys, you want to come right [Commander’s Name]
50.417 ""
50.862 OK, come right just confirm?
51.81About..
52.035 twenty degrees right yeah
52.888 ""
53.404 OK Come Right...select heading
54.416 ""
55.231 Select
55.38 Roger
55.691 heading
56.164 Heading selected
57.231 ""
57.691 Come right now come right COME RIGHT
59.005 ""
59.893 [Expletive]
60.73 OOOHHHH
61.198[Expletive]
62.557 We’re gone
8.588 seconds between the first backseat advise and the ultimate come right command.
Please do not point a single finger at the Crew without including everyone that assisted in setting up the environment that led to this tragedy....that would be very unfair and narrow minded
Last edited by megan; 8th February 2020 at 13:36.
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
I see it as being 46.7 when the Back Seater clearly calls it and directs a turn.
There seems to be some mis-identification by the Pilots.
With the comment about two targets...with one being to the right...and the back seater calling for a right turn....I can imagine (assume...guess) that complicated the thinking by the Pilots.
We have to remember there were three inputs to the situation....what the Pilots were seeing and what the Back Seater was seeing....with the Pilots having to fly the aircraft (even if just pushing buttons for the Autopilot).
The Captain had to process all of this....and make the decisions as to what needed to be done.
It was a very dark night....with a low ceiling....which did not help.
Before being too critical of the Crew....put yourself into their shoes and think about what they were dealing with that night.
There are legitimate questions that can and should be asked.....but we have to recall that it is a far different situation when you are doing it....rather than sitting at your computer and discussing it after the fact.
We are all human....and last time I checked there are no Super Humans amongst us.
There seems to be some mis-identification by the Pilots.
With the comment about two targets...with one being to the right...and the back seater calling for a right turn....I can imagine (assume...guess) that complicated the thinking by the Pilots.
We have to remember there were three inputs to the situation....what the Pilots were seeing and what the Back Seater was seeing....with the Pilots having to fly the aircraft (even if just pushing buttons for the Autopilot).
The Captain had to process all of this....and make the decisions as to what needed to be done.
It was a very dark night....with a low ceiling....which did not help.
Before being too critical of the Crew....put yourself into their shoes and think about what they were dealing with that night.
There are legitimate questions that can and should be asked.....but we have to recall that it is a far different situation when you are doing it....rather than sitting at your computer and discussing it after the fact.
We are all human....and last time I checked there are no Super Humans amongst us.
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 927
Likes: 12
From: Germany
Doesn’t sound to good :-(
Easy to point fingers - but we‘re all only humans
As always, main point is, you need to be ahead of your aircraft, where am I, whats next - when and how to execute it and what’s after that?
Any uncertainty- reduce pressure (speed) and get ahead again.
What I recognized is, that quite a lot of pilots only turn right/left to avoid traffic- even so we have the ability to play with altitude (no option with low ceiling so).
Hope, that pilots remember this accident and take their time to get ahead again instead of pressing on
Easy to point fingers - but we‘re all only humans
As always, main point is, you need to be ahead of your aircraft, where am I, whats next - when and how to execute it and what’s after that?
Any uncertainty- reduce pressure (speed) and get ahead again.
What I recognized is, that quite a lot of pilots only turn right/left to avoid traffic- even so we have the ability to play with altitude (no option with low ceiling so).
Hope, that pilots remember this accident and take their time to get ahead again instead of pressing on
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 222
Likes: 11
It's far too simplistic to boil this down to the last 20 seconds or so where things rapidly went wrong. No doubt there were many layers of failure starting way before the incident and permeating through all levels of the organisation. I suspect one of the reasons the report has taken so long (too long) is the complex interactions between the multiple failures that conspired to end with the loss of an experienced SAR crew and highly capable modern helicopter.
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
We might remember all the Stake Holders who get to challenge the Findings before the Report is published.....that puts into motion a process where covering one's hind end becomes both possible and convenient.
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 6,563
Likes: 952
From: Aus
There seems to be some mis-identification by the Pilots
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
There were many slices of swiss cheese where the holes shouldn't have aligned but that last one was the operating crew, presumably following their SOPs (Ops manual).
It was, in the final analysis, a relatively straightforward night letdown over water in a very capable helicopter and they hit the only high ground for several miles in any direction.
£40K worth of NVG would have saved a £30+ Million helicopter and 4 lives.......................
It was, in the final analysis, a relatively straightforward night letdown over water in a very capable helicopter and they hit the only high ground for several miles in any direction.
£40K worth of NVG would have saved a £30+ Million helicopter and 4 lives.......................
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Crab is right on that....nothing beats being able to see in the dark as compared to not being able to see in the darkl
The ability to see "white" light sources, no matter now small, at great distances is amazing.
Even the ability to see unlighted objects is astounding!
The ability to see "white" light sources, no matter now small, at great distances is amazing.
Even the ability to see unlighted objects is astounding!
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 6,563
Likes: 952
From: Aus
crab, I have absolutely no idea of system capabilities, but the aircraft had High Definition Electro-Optic and Infrared (EO/IR) Camera System, and the front seat crew were able to view if selected. Would NVG be more capable?
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere by the Baltic Sea
scan different directions and the view is not restricted to aircraft heading or to that direction which the camera is pointing...
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere by the Baltic Sea
I agree and share your thoughts Crab, but I think that the ”radar set up” was also one key factor in order to avoid this sad accident...
I’d like visualize my thoughts with some hypotetic radar pictures (taken from AW139). Btw. The red radar echo is a faulty echo from radar radome,
which seems to be at approximately 0,4 NM distance with WX mode.
If the radar was on 10 NM scale/WX mode it will be almost impossible to detect the targets, when they appear closer than 0,5 NM.
I’d like visualize my thoughts with some hypotetic radar pictures (taken from AW139). Btw. The red radar echo is a faulty echo from radar radome,
which seems to be at approximately 0,4 NM distance with WX mode.
If the radar was on 10 NM scale/WX mode it will be almost impossible to detect the targets, when they appear closer than 0,5 NM.
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Seeing visible light sources is where NVG's really perform.
I have watched Airliner Strobe and Landing lights for aircraft landing at Atlanta.....from Augusta......about 150 miles away on a clear night.
Star gazing from the helipad at a remote site was breath taking.
Something as small as a cigarette shows up like a beacon.
If the Light House light was working that night....it would have been a very bright point of light and very easy to see if the aircraft was clear of cloud.
I have watched Airliner Strobe and Landing lights for aircraft landing at Atlanta.....from Augusta......about 150 miles away on a clear night.
Star gazing from the helipad at a remote site was breath taking.
Something as small as a cigarette shows up like a beacon.
If the Light House light was working that night....it would have been a very bright point of light and very easy to see if the aircraft was clear of cloud.
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
Beat me to it S&R.
Megan, the best solution is for the front crew to be on NVG and have a radar picture on an MFD and for the rearcrew to monitor radar and FLIR on their screen - that way all the bases are covered and with some overlap.
FLIR is excellent but relies on thermal contrast to detect things - it doesn't work in fog or cloud and rain degrades the picture too (the moisture tends to attenuate much of the thermal energy and greatly reduces contrast.) You also get periods of thermal washout/crossover when the background is radiating the same energy as objects in the foreground.
.Megan, the best solution is for the front crew to be on NVG and have a radar picture on an MFD and for the rearcrew to monitor radar and FLIR on their screen - that way all the bases are covered and with some overlap.
FLIR is excellent but relies on thermal contrast to detect things - it doesn't work in fog or cloud and rain degrades the picture too (the moisture tends to attenuate much of the thermal energy and greatly reduces contrast.) You also get periods of thermal washout/crossover when the background is radiating the same energy as objects in the foreground.
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere by the Baltic Sea
WX PRIMUS P701 Radar...
Last edited by Search&Rescue; 9th February 2020 at 19:21.
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 17
Likes: 1
From: 60 north
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Sort of understandable if the report is critical of the crew members who aren't here to defend themselves.
Some 70% plus of accidents are caused by crew, CFIT even higher.
It is urgent to get this report out as it will also reveal a large amount of recommendations for this specific company and Irish SAR and IAA, I suspect.
I do feel for the Crew and the relatives, but that is no excuse for us to enter year 4 without a final report.
Regards
Cpt B
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
Sorry Crab, I disagree.
Some 70% plus of accidents are caused by crew, CFIT even higher.
It is urgent to get this report out as it will also reveal a large amount of recommendations for this specific company and Irish SAR and IAA, I suspect.
I do feel for the Crew and the relatives, but that is no excuse for us to enter year 4 without a final report.
Regards
Cpt B
Some 70% plus of accidents are caused by crew, CFIT even higher.
It is urgent to get this report out as it will also reveal a large amount of recommendations for this specific company and Irish SAR and IAA, I suspect.
I do feel for the Crew and the relatives, but that is no excuse for us to enter year 4 without a final report.
Regards
Cpt B