Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Washington State aircraft damaged during search and rescue

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Washington State aircraft damaged during search and rescue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jul 2016, 04:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 513
Received 38 Likes on 16 Posts
Washington State aircraft damaged during search and rescue

Yakima first responders assist with emergency helicopter landing | KIMA

They hit a rock with their UH-1

by Jackie DelPilarSaturday, July 23rd 2016

YAKIMA, Wash. -- The Yakima Fire Department assisted with an emergency helicopter landing this week that almost ended in a crash.
A news release from the Yakima Fire Department says a helicopter from the King County Sheriff's office made an emergency landing after the chopper was damaged.
The helicopter was on a rescue mission over Mount Adams for a lost hiker.
The Airport Rescue Fire Fighting, or ARFF crew, along with YFD 94 and Battalion 91 responded to the airport to assist with the landing.

Firefighters say the landing skid and fuselage was damaged, making it impossible for the helicopter to land without support.
The helicopter hovered near the ground for crew members to jump out . The news release says crews then stacked more than a dozen pallets for the chopper to land on. Firefighters stood by in case of a crash, which fortunately did not happen.
The helicopter landed safely and was later taken back to King County for repairs.


Last edited by Senior Pilot; 23rd Jul 2016 at 06:58. Reason: Add photo
havoc is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2016, 05:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: in the training office
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
They hit a rock

Quite a large one and with some force, looking at the damage incurred.
Adam Nams is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2016, 06:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere, Over the Rainbow
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Word on the street is LTE. High commendations were made by other crews that observed it for the pilot for getting it back out without losing the ship.

Mike
TwinHueyMan is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2016, 22:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oregon, US
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mt. Adams is 12,281 feet high. If they were anywhere near the top of it with that UH-1, it would be pretty easy to get into LTE or power settling. Were they trying to do a one skid/ toe in rescue at the time?
500guy is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2016, 05:41
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,381
Received 211 Likes on 96 Posts
In the case of a heavy Huey above 6000', LTE stands for LACK of Tail Rotor Effectiveness.
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2016, 07:49
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere, Over the Rainbow
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure what they were up to up there, but despite the fast fin and strakes the old "wrong direction, wrong side" tail rotor just didn't have enough it seems. Would be willing to bet 212 drivetrain will be requested when the aircraft goes in for repairs.

Mike
TwinHueyMan is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2016, 13:50
  #7 (permalink)  
LRP
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts
actually it is on the correct side, just turns in the wrong direction.
LRP is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2016, 19:11
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,381
Received 211 Likes on 96 Posts
What Twin Huey means is that this machine needs the "flip-flop" modification, so the tail rotor goes onto the other side of the fin, which then lets it rotate up into the rotor downwash.
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2016, 19:18
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,747
Received 152 Likes on 76 Posts
Hang on aren't we speaking about a 212 here? tractor vs pusher TR. don't think we want to go back to 204 daze.
albatross is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2016, 19:43
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: US
Posts: 175
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
They are talking about the old Helitrade (now Hillsboro) STC for the 212 hub and blades and going to a tractor tailrotor with 212 blades on the rh side. That may actually not be as effective as a ship with composite Huey blades, fast fin/strakes and Van Horn composite left side tail rotor blades. I'd like to see a fly-off of both styles during hot and high. Might surprise folks.
roscoe1 is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2016, 19:45
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: US
Posts: 175
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BTW, I hope they put the pallets under the stinger after the blades stopped turning. Yikes.
roscoe1 is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2016, 20:45
  #12 (permalink)  
LRP
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Ascend Charlie
What Twin Huey means is that this machine needs the "flip-flop" modification, so the tail rotor goes onto the other side of the fin, which then lets it rotate up into the rotor downwash.
What I was referring to is that the "pusher" tail rotor is more effective than a tractor. The problem with the UH-1 T/R is that it rotates in the wrong direction. Bell's solution was to flip it to a tractor to get it rotating up into the M/R downwash without having to redesign the gearbox to change the rotation. The increase in efficiency by the rotation change out-weighed the decrease in efficiency by switching sides.
In mid-1970 an MWO came out for the AH-1G that flopped the T/R to a tractor, the difference in available left-pedal was noticeable. Later during the AH-1S (MOD) program the 212 tail rotor, 42 and 90 deg gearboxes and control system (all part of the AH-1J) was added to increase the efficiency of the tail rotor as part of the ICAM. Although I have no personal experience with it, I believe that this is the modification that is available for the 205 along with L-703 engine and modified transmission.
LRP is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2016, 19:21
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere, Over the Rainbow
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A pusher is better than a tractor, but the tractor on a H1/205/212 rotates up on the front (vs down in the front on the pusher) which adds more help than which side it's on from what I hear. The 212 drivetrain has bigger TR blades than the stock UH-1D/H and 205 blades. These are available for the UH-1 and 205 with a 212 drivetrain swap, which typically also includes the 212 MR blades paired with a -17 donk. I think they call it a 205A++. If they could have a pusher that rotates up in front, I think it'd be key - not sure this exists though.

The only TR enhancement this bird has (if I remember correctly from seeing it while in WA) is the fast fin and strakes. Northwest Helicopters built it I believe, as well as the WA DNR Hueys, which also have the wrong side/wrong direction tail rotors - but those crews attested to how much the fast fin and strake helped when BLR was first pushing the mod to the market. Before this, the stock fin and tail rotor meant they were routinely holding full left pedal and spinning out of dip spots up in the hills.

Never flew a Huey in the PNW, so this is all hearsay based on working Black Hawks up there. We ran out of tail rotor occasionally, but for completely different reasons!

Mike

Last edited by TwinHueyMan; 28th Jul 2016 at 19:37.
TwinHueyMan is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2016, 05:54
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Article and photo from the Yakima Herald:

YAKIMA, Wash. — As a damaged helicopter hovered above the Yakima Air Terminal earlier this week, firefighters stacked pallets on the tarmac to ensure it could land safely.

Details of the operation last Sunday were not released by the Yakima Fire Department until this morning.

The King County Sheriff’s Office helicopter had been attempting to land searchers on Mount Adams, when its fuselage and one of its skids were badly damaged after striking a rock outcropping.

The helicopter headed to Yakima, which was the nearest airport with a full-time fire crew on site.

Several members of the crew and searchers jumped from the craft as it hovered just feet from the tarmac, according to a news release issued by the Yakima Fire Department.

Then, in order to compensate for the broken skid, firefighters began stacking pallets for one side of the helicopter to settle on. The craft then landed without further incident.

The helicopter was one of several being used to search for a 60-year-old man who has been missing on Mount Adams since Sunday. That search is scheduled to continue today.

John Eacott is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2016, 06:16
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Redding CA, or on a fire somewhere
Posts: 1,959
Received 50 Likes on 15 Posts
NW Helicopters did not build the fast fin and strakes... BLR did. I habve a Huey with both the fast fin, strakes, the composite TR blades, and the dash 17. We have not switched the TR to the other side as of yet.

It is a beast.....

Gordy is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2016, 14:19
  #16 (permalink)  
LRP
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts
if you switch sides with the T/R do you go with the entire 212 tail rotor drive train?
LRP is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2016, 23:09
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere, Over the Rainbow
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NW Helicopters did not build the fast fin and strakes... BLR did.
Definitely. But NW Heli has a knack for building incredibly clean and very awesome Hueys with every option available... except the 212 drivetrain. Probably a testament to the fact that they have a graveyard of H1s that I assume they use for parts to build and/or support their fleet of completions, especially in the US.

Gordy, can you attest to the power of the stock UH-1 tail rotor setup with the BLR toys on a Huey? Never met anyone that said the stock UH-1 T/R was solid (without BLR) when flown commercially at high GW and DA.

Mike
TwinHueyMan is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2016, 05:01
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Puget Sound area
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not mentioned in this thread is the 703 engine and Van Horn T/R blades that this helicopter has.

And yes we did wait for the rotors to stop before piling the pallets under the stinger.

It impacted snow not rocks. That would have ended differently.

It was a ride that I care to not repeat.
pj98321 is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2016, 13:13
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,289
Received 512 Likes on 214 Posts
Glad you are here to tell the Tale!

Flying on the Mountains gets a bit tricky at times as they have a way of reminding us who is Boss....but perhaps that is why they are as magnificent as they are.

Care to provide us with the full story of what happened as we might all learn a lesson or two from your doing so.


For a bit of History about Mt. Adams and Mt. Rainier and pilots landing on top of them.

http://www.historylink.org/index.cfm...m&file_id=8469
SASless is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2016, 15:15
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: US
Posts: 175
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The -17 engine is the commercial (type certificated) version of the -703 which is not type certificated. The differences are relatively minor and I believe a 703 can be made a -17 by complying with some service bulletins.
I have to say that in the US where we have public agencies flying restricted catagory or non-certificated Hueys hoisting the public, I am surprised that none of the civil operators have pushed the point that you cannot do any class D loads(non-jettison-able) unless you have a Catagory A Helicopter so why do public use agencies get to do that? The move to twin engine is an expensive one and near as I can tell cost is the ONLY reason to not be using twins for this type of work. An engine failure with people on the hook simply cannot end well unless all are very fortunate.
roscoe1 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.