Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

State of the Industry

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

State of the Industry

Old 11th Sep 2019, 20:54
  #221 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 160
Originally Posted by helicrazi View Post
Over capacity, new management, new strategies blah blah blah

The biggest crisis in this industry is the one being ignored - the lack of pilots, lack of new pilots entering the industry and pilots leaving for fixed wing or retiring.

Its all very well turning these companies around but there is a lack of pilots!!! Urgent investment needed. However these days they are more likely to invest in HR instead
As someone soon to be at the "ab initio" stage of CPL(H)/IR could you please point me in the vague direction where pilots are lacking?
ApolloHeli is online now  
Old 11th Sep 2019, 21:00
  #222 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 357
Originally Posted by ApolloHeli View Post
As someone soon to be at the "ab initio" stage of CPL(H)/IR could you please point me in the vague direction where pilots are lacking?
You will get a type rating as a new FO on the north sea at the moment, also other job adverts for FOs being advertised without the requirement of a type rating.

Bristow are offering an IR sponsorship that may be of interest to you.

Lots of onshore jobs have been vacant for a very long time, however as an ab initio these wont be suitable
helicrazi is online now  
Old 11th Sep 2019, 21:04
  #223 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 160
Originally Posted by helicrazi View Post
You will get a type rating as a new FO on the north sea at the moment, also other job adverts for FOs being advertised without the requirement of a type rating.

Bristow are offering an IR sponsorship that may be of interest to you.

Lots of onshore jobs have been vacant for a very long time, however as an ab initio these wont be suitable
I've seen the IR sponsorship but sadly I'm about two months late for that. Aside from an S92 FO position that has been advertised on Bristow's "Jobs" page since much earlier this year, I don't see any more positions being up for grabs. I'm fine with covering my own IR(H) costs, as long as I know where to send my applications to when it's done in Jan/Feb. Might not be the right thread for it but would be nice to know which bases/operators are happy to consider ab-initio FOs
ApolloHeli is online now  
Old 11th Sep 2019, 21:19
  #224 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 357
PM sent apollo
helicrazi is online now  
Old 13th Sep 2019, 09:29
  #225 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 166
O&G Offshore granting more and more waivers to cater for lack of suitable ‘ab-initio’ applicants
JulieAndrews is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2019, 09:58
  #226 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 65
Rumour has it that CHC is still burning through cash and another round of redundancies are incoming. The new CEO has been in the position a week and appears his aim is to run the company super lean in order to reduce costs and increase profitability.

Staff (Global) were apparently told about this plan yesterday? Any insight? Seen nothing in the mainstream media yet, only snippets on social media.

If true, I can’t see them buying out any company if they don’t have the cash to sustain its own business model, never mind another.

How can a company that recently exited Chapter 11 be in such a position already after such a short period of time? Something seriously seriously wrong in the helicopter services world at the moment. Are the big oil companies pushing far too hard now?

Very interesting anyway. (If the rumours are true)
Mitchaa is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2019, 14:02
  #227 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK and MALTA
Age: 58
Posts: 1,259
Originally Posted by Mitchaa View Post

How can a company that recently exited Chapter 11 be in such a position already after such a short period of time? Something seriously seriously wrong in the helicopter services world at the moment. Are the big oil companies pushing far too hard now?
Because they are generally run by self-serving, greedy, backstabbing incompetents who have proved time and again that they are completely incapable of balancing a budget without sticking their fat bonuses at the top of the spreadsheet. Just look at the bonus announcements made recently at Bristow's as they re-structured. If you are walking away with millions, and you started as scum, what do you care about the devastating mess you leave behind.

Chapter 11 has just provided another tool for these people to generate more bonuses as the people doing the real work and taking all the real risks suffer through endless rounds of redundancy.

There, now I feel better with that off my chest.

DB
DOUBLE BOGEY is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2019, 14:19
  #228 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 160
Originally Posted by JulieAndrews View Post
O&G Offshore granting more and more waivers to cater for lack of suitable ‘ab-initio’ applicants
Can you elaborate on what you mean by "waivers"?
ApolloHeli is online now  
Old 13th Sep 2019, 15:46
  #229 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 628
Mitchaa, yep, bit of a “Hunger Games” parallel, with Dallas being the “Capitol” to the other districts of Panem. Don’t know what inside rumours you have but there are still vacancies advertised for the Dallas office. Flight Operations now run by Supply Chain. Dallas was chosen as a First Reserve strategy to bring Dobbin’s questionable Canadian public company into an MBA-run American airline model. Take it private, tinker with the internals, then flip it back in an IPO for huge profit, and get out. Timing was bad.
malabo is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2019, 23:31
  #230 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 166
AH
Maybe ‘waiver’ was the wrong word.
The customer sets the minimum flying experience requirements for the crews they want on contract for their O&G flying - after all, they are paying.
Regardless of total hours there was a general minimum requirement of 500-hrs multi-engine for the co-Pilot.
Makes sense I suppose - the more the merrier?
There is the facility to accept 250-hrs ME but a program of Line Training and mitigation had to be in place to counter the lack of ME time. Not all operators are equal - some have training departments used to such programs, others do not.
It wasn’t often that this ‘facility’ was drawn upon but operators are now having to use every ‘trick’ in the book to attract suitable pilot material to fill the cockpits.
JulieAndrews is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 20:39
  #231 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,827
Originally Posted by ApolloHeli View Post
As someone soon to be at the "ab initio" stage of CPL(H)/IR could you please point me in the vague direction where pilots are lacking?
Babcock Blackpool for starters:

https://jobs.babcockinternational.co...0LQ/556860501/
Bravo73 is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2019, 01:09
  #232 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Inside the Industry
Posts: 829
I wonder what this will mean for the helicopter operation?

https://www.theage.com.au/business/c...18-p52snb.html
industry insider is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2019, 03:01
  #233 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: West coast Australia :)
Posts: 238
Good question, in the short term probably not a lot and it is likely to take years to finish the selling process.
bigglesbutler is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2019, 03:15
  #234 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: On land
Posts: 147
I wonder what this will mean for the helicopter operation?
I know you shouldn’t answer a question with another question, but how many oil and gas companies operate their own helicopter squadron?

Last edited by Nescafe; 19th Sep 2019 at 05:21.
Nescafe is online now  
Old 19th Sep 2019, 08:14
  #235 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Nigeria
Age: 54
Posts: 4,806
Originally Posted by Nescafe View Post


I know you shouldn’t answer a question with another question, but how many oil and gas companies operate their own helicopter squadron?
Not sure anymore. Connoco Phillips used to have their own, and still has a FW department I think. The obvious well known one is Brunei Shell - 2 S92 pax, 2 AW139 pax and 1 S92 SAR
212man is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2019, 10:30
  #236 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,295
Originally Posted by Nescafe View Post
..how many oil and gas companies operate their own helicopter squadron?


The two big players are Saudi Aramco and Esso Australia. Both have owned and maintained their own helicopter fleets for many years. Only branching out to contractor crews to supplement their own direct hire crews.
gulliBell is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2019, 12:45
  #237 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: nowhere special
Posts: 397
Don't Chevron have a financial stake in the operators in Angola?
nowherespecial is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2019, 12:58
  #238 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Nigeria
Age: 54
Posts: 4,806
Originally Posted by gulliBell View Post
The two big players are Saudi Aramco and Esso Australia. Both have owned and maintained their own helicopter fleets for many years. Only branching out to contractor crews to supplement their own direct hire crews.
good point about Aramco, but I guess he knew about Esso (XOM) which is what prompted the question.

Don't Chevron have a financial stake in the operators in Angola?
I thought Chevron stopped flying in Angola, and resorted to boats, following their fatal accident 3 years ago? Maybe not.
212man is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2019, 13:05
  #239 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Inside the Industry
Posts: 829
Chevron in the GOM operates it own fleet of AW139s I believe. Chevron Angola (via its part ownership in Heli Malongo) is still flying. Total uses boats.
industry insider is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2019, 14:36
  #240 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,295
Originally Posted by 212man View Post
good point about Aramco, but I guess he knew about Esso (XOM) which is what prompted the question.
There would easily be a million+ flight hours combined between those two helicopter owner/operator offshore oil companies....Esso Australia has never had a helicopter accident (touch wood!), Saudi Aramco has had one major fatal that I recall. That is a remarkable safety record when compared to the accident rate of the major offshore helicopter contractors. I'm not sure what conclusions can be drawn about that, but the statistics might suggest oil companies owning/operating their own helicopters has certain business advantages.

gulliBell is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.