Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

NYPD Aviation Unit - Going shopping!

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

NYPD Aviation Unit - Going shopping!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Jun 2002, 09:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question NYPD Aviation Unit - Going shopping!

Hi Guys

Don't know if you've read about this on your side of the pond, but the NYPD is revving up to replace most of our aging helo fleet and we're going shopping for quicker and more powerful equipment to patrol the city's skies.

We're keeping our two Bell 412 Air Sea Rescue's we've only had a few years, but getting shot of our three Bell 206B III Jet Rangers and the Bell 206 L IV Long Ranger. Great helos and they get the most use but with two big guys up front, all the gear we carry and full gas, it can be kinda tricky carrying passengers!

Anyways, we're buying four new helos and the brass have decided that twins is probably the way to go - for better payload.
The NYPD is the biggest Police Department in the world so all the manufacturers are bidding to get the Unit badge on their helos.

We operate under extremely hazardous conditions in a very demanding environment - equipment failure is not an option!
It seems like you guys on Rotorheads operate every goddam helo under the sun somewhere in the world, so I'd be very interested in your thoughts and experiences.

My questions are ~

Which helo(s) would you recommend?
What are your reasons? (Speed, payload, reliability whatever?)
Any which you'd say 'No way, Jose' ?
Why?

Thanks in advance for your time.

Joe Zabaglione
Floyd Bennett Field, Brooklyn


(And guys, I'm new on the Rotorheads block, so go easy OK. )

One of our B412's (taken before 9/11.

Last edited by Bronx; 19th Jun 2002 at 22:12.
Bronx is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2002, 19:22
  #2 (permalink)  

There are no limits
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shrewsbury, England.
Age: 67
Posts: 505
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On our side of the pond its mainly between the MD902 and Eurocopter EC135. There is not much betweeen them, although I fly the 902 and it is a delight to fly being smooth and quiet.

There are still some operators of the Eurocopter AS355 Twin Squirrel but that is now a little long in the tooth.

I would imagine that there will be some replies extolling the virtues of both.

Good luck
What Limits is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2002, 19:32
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dansaff
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bronx, check out the Phoenix PD they seem to be cutting the edge in the southwest as far as police aviation is concerned.
As for the UK, a very varied helicopter fleet, i'm looking forward to the replies, hope there's some "mines better and bigger than yours" incoming!!
flygunz is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2002, 20:20
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the replies so far.
Last time I knew, Phoenix were operating about seven MD520N Notars. Good unit.
I'm trying to get 'informal' feedback from pilots in the industry round the world and Rotorheads seems like the best place to ask.
Thanks
Joe Z.

Last edited by Bronx; 19th Jun 2002 at 20:25.
Bronx is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2002, 21:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many years ago (mid to late 70s) I was working as a reporter on the New York Post when we were taken out to Floyd Bennett to see some helicopters the NYPD had just picked up - UH1s from the Military - and the one thing that sticks in my mind was that for some reason, the police had had to pay $160 each for them. I presume you got your money's worth.
t'aint natural is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2002, 21:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lone Star State
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, Hoverman, I'm taking the bait.

Officer Bronx,

I'm old school and a little light on operational experience with the "new" twins on the market today such as the EC120, 135, BH 430, 427, etc., so I'm going to defer any opinion with regard to anything I haven't flown.

What does NYPD do with the aircraft? Are you mainly into patrol work, rescue, EMS? What are your plans for the new aircraft? How many people do you want to carry?

I've seen a few agencies using 117's and 105's. Phoenix is using the NOTARs as is the NPS in Grand Canyon (I believe that Papillon actually owns that aircraft). As a side note, Grand Canyon is somewhere around 6500 ft. How well it does - I have no idea, and if I'm not mistaken, the NPS aircraft is the twin version (I don't know the designators).

The 117s are very popular with EMS and they tend to pack a lot of toys wherever they go.

What about your neighbors in Maryland? They're flying the twin Dauphine's aren't they?

I think I've spent too much time in the woods to be of any real help here, but if it were me, I'd ask for four more 412s.

Thanks for the time.

C Ya
SandBlaster-214 is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2002, 22:31
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DD
Thanks for your comments. Good as the 412 is, they're not suitable for all our missions, and four more would be a little extravagant!
I guess we do what most air support units do, depending on location. We respond to various emergencies and tasks, supporting Patrol as well as other units of the NYPD. from deploying divers during air-sea rescues to placing officers atop hi-rise buildings during emergencies. The Aviation Unit is vital to the NYPD in providing New York City with the fastest and most professional response available.
Bronx is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2002, 03:30
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Out Back
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bronx,

I used to fly our state Police Bk117. It's only real downfall is it's range and support backup. Though having said that if you were going to buy a few I'm sure the support would be forthcoming.

The rear cabin has heaps of room, although the front cabin can be a little squeezy for burley coppers. It will easily take a 6 men swat team and all there bomb, bullets and bullsh*t. Although not far.

It is a great EMS machine and a good winching platform, we had double lift winch compared to the single lift on the twin squirrel.

It has a useful payload we carried three crew, FLIR,Winch and full fuel. ( still having enough payload for additional pax. )

They are relative quick 150 VNE but with all the crap hanging off probably closer to 110-115.

I'm not sure of your budget but they are a good machine and best of all built to MILSPEC (ie. like a tank)

Goodluck
lills is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2002, 05:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Yendys
Posts: 129
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

DesertDude,

I would put a line through the EC-120 when making a list of 'new' twins mate; it's OEI performance is woeful, about the same as a B206.

Gibbo
Gibbo is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2002, 06:09
  #10 (permalink)  
Gatvol
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: KLAS/TIST/FAJS/KFAI
Posts: 4,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NYPD has a ton of money and since 911 probably unlimited funds........So It would sure like nice to see an MH-53 ruuning down Wall Street at 100' at VNE......all prettied out in Blue.....
Can you imagine, about five SWAT teams dropping in on some OC Social Club gathering from one of those......


(Sacramento PD retired)
B Sousa is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2002, 08:30
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bronx:

You're in a great position to lead the country in cutting edge technology, here!
We were in the same situation 4-5 years ago when it was decided to replace our ageing aircraft.
We fly in probably the most demanding police force area in the UK. 9000 sq miles of rugged terrain, 450 miles of coastline, mountains, lakes and a population which trebles during the 'silly season'. If it wasn't for the military (on the whole) supplying SAR then we would trully be a fully paid up member of the paramilitary brigade.
I'll assume your police officers are paramedic and winch trained.
Dependent on your endurance requirements I would suggest pushing the boat out and looking at the >3 tonnes twin class.
It's almost certain that if you go down the route of purchasing light twins (135 / 902 / 109 / Bell, now, then within 5-8 years you'll be complaining of lack of payload/endurance/performance. Police ops is almost certainly underdeveloped (UK) and they are slowly beginning to realise what a potent capability they have.
We currently fly the EC135 and I can see a time when demands will require us to move up to the next class. More and more we are being asked to get involved in complex operations which require either a greater payload (firearms teams to be taken greater distances, or carry more of them/staying airborne for longer)or carry specialist equipment (intercepting boats off shore - winching / rapid roping). If the government relinquish responsibility for military SAR cover, the onus may fall back to the police. All in all, if I was to recommend a new generation helo to take the unit forward into the 21st century it would be a new generation 3 tonne class.
I don't know how much of a foothold European helo manufacturers have over there but they have a very comprehensive suite of helos to cater for your needs.
BUY NEW GENERATION TECHNOLOGY or your running costs living with past technology (let alone back up support), will bleed you dry!!
You're bound to get a good deal, talking the numbers you're looking for....make this the best decision of the year or watch out!

PS: give the USA 'soccer' team a chuck up will you, they are doing you a great service over in Japan....

TC
Thomas coupling is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2002, 16:04
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bronx, as I am sure you are aware, make sure you know what you are going to put in/on the airframes. If you have to get new STC's for some of the equipment, it will add to the cost and time involved.

Not a bad thing, just something to remember to factor in. We had to get a new STC for a downlink system and it was a pain in time and money. And the FAA is really (for good reasons) doing a lot of testing if you have a FADEC system.
HeliMark is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2002, 16:14
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: California
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bronx,

Floyd Bennet field, what history.

I'd suggest making a short list then talking and visiting operators of the type to determine true operating costs.

Then work out a short term lease of a few different types to see how they actually work in your operations.

And keep the L model with the C-30 as a backup, great power and cheap to run.


222, 230 and 430 would be nice but pin down Bell on spares cost and availabilty before buying.

Let us know what you got !
tgrendl is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2002, 17:56
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I´ve flown in a police unit and would recommend the brand new EC145. On the base of the proven BK 117 the ship fits nearly all imaginable missions. Compared to the BK the internal space is greater and better usable. More payload, greater range and the best, due to the new cockpit design, a much better view for the pilot (not so exciting on BK`s). On the state of the art, full NVG compatible+IR spotlight, hoist, rapelling kit and all the other special stuff available and usable. Rigid rotor system, flights are really smooth and calm. Ground clearance MR and TR is unbeatable. If you are looking forward (the next 10-15 years), it`s makes no sense to bet on 20 years old overimproved constructions with their known limitations. ( an example: the A109, allways more engine power and avionics, but airframe limited). May be EC will have starting problems like all other new ships and the bugs of the older ships are known. Ok that's an advantage. But EC's orderbooks are full and to the time you could have the ships delivered, they have made the experiences.

Last edited by tecpilot; 20th Jun 2002 at 19:47.
tecpilot is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2002, 04:26
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,380
Received 25 Likes on 15 Posts
Question

Techpilot,

"Rigid rotor system, flights are really smooth and calm".

Huh? In nil wind, calm as a mill pond, maybe. Otherwise, the BK rotor system is as near to a fixed wing for lousy gust reponse and ride characteristics as I can remember.

However, strong as a tank, beautifully made (everything fits, trim and parts actually go back where they're supposed to after removal) and a bundle of fun to drive. But a fair old handful without CSAS and autopilot, and only marginally better after all those $$$$'s worth!
John Eacott is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2002, 06:16
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hallo John Eacott,
greetings to down under.
Unfortunately at the moment i can't remember where it is, but i'm shure, i've seen a chart with ride characteristics and vibration levels. Compared with light airplanes and some other helos the BK stand in the upper (better) quarter. To vibration and different rotor systems we've seen some threads in the past. I agree it's difficult discussion. To avoid the next thread i will cancel the
"Rigid rotor system, flights are really smooth and calm".
The EC 145 is equipped with a rigid rotor system but have new rotor blades + the "balls".

What's going on with your fixed line trials?

Last edited by tecpilot; 21st Jun 2002 at 06:27.
tecpilot is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2002, 21:27
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: SW England
Age: 69
Posts: 1,501
Received 90 Likes on 36 Posts
For what it's worth, our UK police unit operates a 902 for 1200 hours/year. Only real issue seems to be the ability of MDHI to convince its customers that it will remain a going concern - the a/c itself is a treat to operate and fly. As for flight AP/SAS off (hi John! how's the ski season shaping up?) - ours has been u/s awaiting spares for 4 weeks and the only noticeable difference has been that it's quicker to get the beastie airborne as there are fewer checks to do! Seriously, the AP/SAS is excellent when it works, and you'd want it there for you hovering downwind at night with few visual references - over the Hudson river springs to mind - but the aircraft is very stable without. The presence of the "broom cupboard" control-run closet behind the pilot's head does reduce the ability of the crew to interact to a minor degree when compared to the AS355, but this has caused us no problems so far. As Thomas Coupling says, buy new-generation - you'll benefit in the long run.
Thud_and_Blunder is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2002, 02:17
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think the MD902 would be a fine choice to replace the 206s. It has much better performance than the EC135 and with a soon to be released MGW increase will have an even greater payload margin over the 135. It is very smooth, very quiet and very comfortable to fly. It has one of the best pilot seats I've ever sat in. The Bendix autopilot is great, but I doubt you'd have much use for that. The sliding rear doors are great for easy in and out and rappelling, fast rope, short-haul, hoist or whatever you use. There is room for six in back (EC135 is only 5) on folding mesh seats, or lots of room for cargo. The most outstanding feature in my opinion is the panoramic visibility up front. You've got to see it to believe it. e-mail me if you like more info.

[email protected]
inthegreen is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2002, 15:44
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool NYPD Aviation Unit Going Shopping


Lucky guys having the world as your oyster and undoubtedly every manufacturer's carpet-bagger banging on your door!
The 412 is still a capable (20th Century) machine and well worth keeping for it's current roles. If you want a great and reliable machine, go for the 'Dauphin' - a few early teething problems with the new EC 155, - but with an upgraded engine it will be the business for your work - small rotor diameter, great cockpit viz and now an even larger cabin. I would suggest you get a team together and go over to Germany and visit the German Border Guards who operate a load of these new beauties - and have all the NVG/FLIR/goodies, bells and whistles on them to add to your own Christmas Wish List. From experience using them on SAR and Police Support Ops, the 'Dauphin' (as was) is a great little machine and although the spares are a tad pricey and support needs nailing down hard (spares packages etc & 'power by the hour' a must) we always averaged a 95% serviceability rate - which Sikorsky could never hope to beat on a good day, with a following wind! Also, get yourself a few smaller nippier little NVG capable machines for those 'down and dirty, sneaking about in the dark jobs' - best to get advice from those other Police EC135 and McD operators out there for the best buy on the block!

Shame Bell can't go CobraZ head & BERP blades and re-engine the old 214B with 2 Blackhawk donkeys - then those of us who truly love the Huey might have something that could attack 150 knots from that reliable old stable and could also be a great lifter! Are you listening, Fort Worth? Time to hit the 21st Century!

Good luck - and a word of advice - run a decent procurement competition, and UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES let your bean-counters do the choosing - always a perfect recipe for ending up procuring buying the cheapest, most unsuitable and poorly equipped machine available! (The Augusta 139 might be nice - but its still a few months down the road and unproven as yet.)

Oracle is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2002, 18:52
  #20 (permalink)  
widgeon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
http://www.tc.gc.ca/aviation/activep...e.asp?x_lang=e

Are bell actively marketing the 427 ? , see above link they have not exported any this year .
On paper it would seem to be a contender and seeing NYPD are probably the first user of Bell helicopters in a law enforcement role it will take a lot to change them.
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.