Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Bell 505 Jet Ranger X

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Bell 505 Jet Ranger X

Reply

Old 17th Jun 2013, 20:24
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,798
One more:



I/C
Ian Corrigible is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th Jun 2013, 20:29
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: UK/ATL
Posts: 368
Great paint job and scenery really helps! Are there facts, figures etc available?

And maybe some static pictures?
nomorehelosforme is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th Jun 2013, 22:29
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Maitland
Posts: 125
I have always been a huge fan of the Bell product. Pity I don't fly them any more.
Looking at this one my first impression was "I wouldn't like to have to replace that big arsed windscreen". And the next thing was "I wouldn't want the Turbomecca engine, just hope that Soloy will have an after market Lycoming or RR"
And the "sub $1m price", not in my life time.
McGowan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th Jun 2013, 22:56
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,871
Mmmmm .... shiny!

Is that meant to imply it's a composite structure or just a nice polishing job?

Having said that I like Bells too, so good luck to them.
Arm out the window is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th Jun 2013, 23:10
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 1,632
CGI render makes it look like a cheap homebuilt. Next time maybe employ professionals?
AdamFrisch is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jun 2013, 00:46
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Top of the World
Posts: 129
Angel

B206Iii MTOW with heavy high-skids 1519.5kg hmmmm so thats drop of almost 20kgs TOW
Vertical Freedom is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jun 2013, 05:04
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 1,765
Just landed last night at CDG , and today I ll pop into the Bell chalet and have a look see and find out more.

See if they have a press kit or so.....otherwise come Anaheim next Feb, either the mockup or the real McCoy will be on display.

Cheers
chopper2004 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jun 2013, 07:02
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 183
Looks great.

If latest technology will allow you to put 5 people in it, fill it up and OGE hover at 30 C, I will buy one !

I am glad Bell are re-entering the market, the 66 needs competition.

Arrrj

PS - would love a 429...they are cool !
Arrrj is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jun 2013, 07:42
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hassocks, Mid-Sussex
Age: 61
Posts: 281
You've got to love Bell's bend-over politics in selecting the Turbomeca powerplant in a same-sex effort to satisfy elements of their competitors market. However, I am more than a little sure that this gesture will prove to be a pain in their widely-parted derriere! Why throw away the decades of performance, reliability and moderate operating cost of the Allison/RR product? For me that's one mark down.

The design looks like a poor Chinese copy of a Colibri. That's another mark down.

The rotorhead appears to retain the same autogyro-style teetering arrangement which in practice is a sloppy, slow-to-respond, limited performance system with dangerous susceptibility in low and negative-G manoeuvers. That's another mark down.

Needless to say, I won't be buying one.
Grenville Fortescue is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jun 2013, 14:57
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: "Deplorable but happy as a drunken Monkey!
Age: 69
Posts: 1,413
Finally....a slicked up Jet Ranger! Oh....Surprise!

I bet the Pilot Seat still sucks out loud, the Pilot Door will not stay open by itself, and the Seat will not adjust.

My old Dodge Diesel Pickup Truck does better any Bell!
SASless is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jun 2013, 15:08
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: Mesopotamos
Posts: 1,060
I'm a big fan of a lot of the Bell products, but this thing seems to be a bit too cryptic for me, even the price tag is too good to be true.
cattletruck is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jun 2013, 17:08
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Depends on the day!
Posts: 99
huh?

I'm a big fan of a lot of the Bell products, but this thing seems to be a bit too cryptic for me, even the price tag is too good to be true.
What's so cryptic about it?
PhlyingGuy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jun 2013, 17:33
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 554
Seems to me that if you could currently buy a 206A with a flat floor for under $1 million, thats a pretty stinking good deal and Frank wouldnt have a stranglehood over the market with the R66.

With respect to complaints about the teetering rotorhead....not sure whats expected when its clear that main objective on this model is ultra low cost and good reliability.
SansAnhedral is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jun 2013, 18:24
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 1,765
@Arrj

Speaking of the 429, I had a look see at Air Zermatts new 429 on display here

You'd love it

But forgot to ask for more info on the new ship!
chopper2004 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jun 2013, 19:45
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 644
Why throw away the decades of performance, reliability and moderate operating
cost of the Allison/RR product?
What are they thinking?! Everyone on the planet knows how to fix (and get parts for) the RR 250 - well most everyone. Perhaps trying to discipline RR. Like others above, I believe that this will eventually bite them.

Last edited by EN48; 18th Jun 2013 at 19:52.
EN48 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th Jun 2013, 21:26
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 376
Speaking of the 429, I had a look see at Air Zermatts new 429 on display here
They finally got it? Does this replace the EC135?

WRT the new Bell, it is promising if they have identified that this end of the private/commercial/utility market is potentially so big that it justifies a new product to compete against the R66/EC120/EN480B.

Suppose the rotorhead is cost saving, but also surprised it doesn't have an RR 250 or 300 engine.
FLY 7 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th Jun 2013, 01:49
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 798
When I saw this, I thought it was an out of season April Fool's joke.

They've taken the worst of the B206 (teetering head) and the worst of the EC120 (TM). The best thing I can see about it is no broom closet. However that also probably brings the crashworthiness down from mil to EC levels.

Why not just create a civilianised OH58D and call it a B406?

Or just drop the price on the B407.
krypton_john is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th Jun 2013, 02:28
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Iceland
Posts: 466
why did they not just buy the Marenco helicopter project, it is at least up to date... Characteristics - marenco
rotorrookie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th Jun 2013, 09:38
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hassocks, Mid-Sussex
Age: 61
Posts: 281
why did they not just buy the Marenco
Because the development costs would preclude Bell from offering the Short Light Single (God, what a name) in the sub-1-mil bracket they are currently aiming for.

Me on the other hand, I agree with you 100%. I would go for something like the Marenco with the view to creating an ultra-economic modern aircraft to run head-to-head with the Colibri. If I were Bell I would then package this with a low fixed rate of interest payment plan so that you only have to front 50% of the purchase price.
Grenville Fortescue is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th Jun 2013, 10:05
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Down Under
Age: 41
Posts: 667
Agree with Grenville, turbomeca product in a Bell

I love Bell products but they need a short light 429 style single, bit like JRX,MAPL concept they released 10 years ago or so.

Isn't that why operators buy Bell, to get away from Turbomeca, this new product had me excited somewhat then I read the paragraph that mentioned Arrius

Last edited by belly tank; 19th Jun 2013 at 11:52.
belly tank is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service