Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

UK SAR 2013 privatisation: the new thread

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

UK SAR 2013 privatisation: the new thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Sep 2014, 15:19
  #941 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monde
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Their rearcrew recruitment strategy has baffled many. Beggars can't be choosers. No rearcrew = No SAR. Explain that to the DFT.
Vie sans frontieres is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2014, 20:47
  #942 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: EGPB/EGPD
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the flip side though, the O&G Commitment could provide a great ab initio training platform
This could be the future... Not entirely sure though, as some of the results of ab initio haven't been great.

I remember many moons ago when BHL took people straight off the street with no medical or winch experience and some of them are still in the service now having had very successful careers.
shetlander is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2014, 21:29
  #943 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dark side off the sea!!
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Off the streets.

Shetlander that's not quite the case,
The handful of civil trained winchmen from old BHL i.e when they had S-61's where already employed in ground roles and where selected to be trained up internally as they where known as Public Transport winchmen and eventually got the experience and opportunity to go full SAR but it took a number of years.

When CHC took over some off them struggled to pass at the time modular IHCD paramedics course.

There is no short cut to SAR and good quality medical skills rear crew wise.
jonnyloove is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2014, 11:05
  #944 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,317
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
There is no short cut to SAR and good quality medical skills rear crew wise.
shame they don't seem to want to pay a decent wage for those skills
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2014, 11:41
  #945 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
Posts: 1,459
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by P3 Bellows
... I wonder if there has been any contingency planning within Bristows for the contract with the UK Coastguard if the Scots vote to go their own way on the 18th. ...
Shared SAR resources are not a new concept.

And anyone expecting a parochial approach from Bristow is probably ignoring 60 years of the reverse.

Running a service for these islands from Dyce, Dalcross and Stornoway with some pen-pushers in Redhill and an EU/EEA border in the middle somewhere isn't rocket science. It might make the VAT returns more complicated. They have always been different legal jurisdictions anyway.
jimf671 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2014, 12:28
  #946 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: EGPB/EGPD
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
shame they don't seem to want to pay a decent wage for those skills.
Stating the obvious but this might explain the unfilled vacancies.
shetlander is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2014, 12:36
  #947 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From a regulatory and 'union' perspective are the UK SAR rearcrew and paramedics considered aircrew or passengers (like UK police observers and air ambulance paramedics)? I guess as they are still not licenced from an aviation perspective they do not require aviation medicals or to follow CAP371 flight time limitations?
Spanish Waltzer is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2014, 14:01
  #948 (permalink)  
Tightgit
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The artist formerly known as john du'pruyting
Age: 65
Posts: 804
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
SW I believe they are called SAR Technical Crew Members.
handysnaks is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2014, 14:42
  #949 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An August revision of CAP 999 mandates less formalised medical requirements for SAR Technical Crew. However they will still be required to remain within their FTLs, despite the lack of licence.
The SAR RC is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2014, 14:56
  #950 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
Posts: 1,459
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP999_...icoper_SAR.pdf
jimf671 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2014, 14:59
  #951 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Handy & SAR RC. So who mandates the FTL? The authority or the company? How can the authority mandate people who they do not licence? But if it is the company then what stops the company simply changing it when needs must? Or is all that covered in CAP999 too?

SW

Edited to add....Thanks for the link Jim.....!
Spanish Waltzer is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2014, 15:48
  #952 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
Posts: 1,459
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Spanish Waltzer
Thanks Handy & SAR RC. So who mandates the FTL? The authority or the company? How can the authority mandate people who they do not licence? But if it is the company then what stops the company simply changing it when needs must? Or is all that covered in CAP999 too?
Chapter 4 refers to Training and Checking for both pilots and rear (SAR Technical Crew). To me it reads like a company thing based on a mix of EASA regs (HHO) and Chapter 4 additional items.
jimf671 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2014, 17:25
  #953 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Escaped from ABZ...
Posts: 311
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
The company define the ftl within the operations manual. However, the ops manuals are approved by the authority....
detgnome is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2014, 15:34
  #954 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,317
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Shetlander - they have to pay the pilots well because there is competition in the market, not least the N Sea.

The poor, unlicensed rearcrew have no real competition for their considerable skills and whilst organisations keep trying to create SAR rearcrew on the cheap through training up paramedics and the like who are already used to low wages - not much will change.

An extra £10-15K would have enabled many more military SAR rearcrew to take up posts without having to take a big lifestyle/wages hit.

Nice to see that the guys who do all the dangerous and demanding stuff in SAR get paid the least ......go figure
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2014, 15:53
  #955 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The 4th dimentia.....
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Devil

Bristow always looked down on the rear crew. Many a Bristow trained pilot heard to exclaim "how could a crewman do that job" when referring to a position of management or organisational responsibility. Good to see values are still the same...
Northernstar is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2014, 19:26
  #956 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: PLANET ZOG
Posts: 313
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Nice to see that the guys who do all the dangerous and demanding stuff in SAR get paid the least
Crab, nice to see that you recognise the underpaid Engineers.. oh.. sorry, my mistake.
3D
3D CAM is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2014, 20:01
  #957 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monde
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bristow Managed Transition literature lists prospective engineer starting salaries to be one and a half times greater than those for rearcrew. So who are the underpaid ones?
Vie sans frontieres is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2014, 20:10
  #958 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dark side off the sea!!
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Equal Pay scales

You will find in the coming years that Licensed aircraft engineers pay scales coming in line with pilots as the need for engineers will out strip demand for pilots. And you can see it happening now with Bristow and CHC looking at engineering apprenticeships.
jonnyloove is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2014, 20:24
  #959 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
Posts: 1,459
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
Perhaps some of you chaps could have a look at 3.5 to 3.7, Performance Requirements. A comparison with 2.1 to 2.3 of Chapter 3 in the 2010 version reveals a few changes. I would be grateful for your opinions on how this may affect real world SAR flying 'between a rock and a hard place'.


If you are Navy then you may wish to be excused, since, of course, it's only hovering.


(I have the PDF of the May 2010 version if anyone needs it.)
jimf671 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2014, 21:37
  #960 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: PLANET ZOG
Posts: 313
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Vsf
And not before time. My comment was meant to be tongue in cheek!
Things have obviously changed since I stopped spannering. Not that long ago!

I am not taking anything away from the guys/gals in the back,(or front), they all would get medals if I had my way and have my utmost respect. And I told them that more than once!!!!
3D
3D CAM is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.