Type rating Costs S-92 and AW139
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: LogicFreeZone
Age: 45
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Type rating Costs S-92 and AW139
Could someone give me the approximate costs for an initial type rating course (JAA) on these two? I heard the aw139 used to be around €50k two years ago?
Thanks!
Rotatohead
Thanks!
Rotatohead
Last edited by Rotatohead; 22nd Dec 2012 at 11:37.
An operator expecting a pilot to pay for all or part of a MPH TR isn't a serious player.
A pilot willing to pay for all or part of an MPH TR is a
a) wise investor in their future career
b) an underminer of industry terms and conditions
c) a mug
d) desperate
Take yee pick
A pilot willing to pay for all or part of an MPH TR is a
a) wise investor in their future career
b) an underminer of industry terms and conditions
c) a mug
d) desperate
Take yee pick
Last edited by Torquetalk; 23rd Dec 2012 at 17:53.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: LogicFreeZone
Age: 45
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
d)
Problem is, I find myselfe competing against an increasing number of ex military pilots who get their ratings payed and work up to two years for free. Usually no employer can resist that...
Problem is, I find myselfe competing against an increasing number of ex military pilots who get their ratings payed and work up to two years for free. Usually no employer can resist that...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: LogicFreeZone
Age: 45
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...and I still can't see what's wrong with that. It's an investment I'm am willing to make just as my licence or my intrument rating was years ago.
Paying for a rating is not uncommen at all. Most of the "civilian" pilots I know had to do it at least once. And if it gets you a great step ahead in your career, maybe even the critical one, why not?
Of course I could just stick with my executive job and save me the money but maybe I'm tired of being forced to disregard duty times and weather minima, flying with unrated copilots, working unpaid overtime, not having a predicable off time. And all that for €60k a year.
(And yes, this is already one of the better companies to work for here in Germany.)
Paying for a rating is not uncommen at all. Most of the "civilian" pilots I know had to do it at least once. And if it gets you a great step ahead in your career, maybe even the critical one, why not?
Of course I could just stick with my executive job and save me the money but maybe I'm tired of being forced to disregard duty times and weather minima, flying with unrated copilots, working unpaid overtime, not having a predicable off time. And all that for €60k a year.
(And yes, this is already one of the better companies to work for here in Germany.)
Last edited by Rotatohead; 23rd Dec 2012 at 20:20.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 18 Degrees North
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At some point after you get your CPL and after you may already have a number of single engine ratings you have to stop paying for your own type ratings to start your career and an employer should invest something in you.
Up to about 10 years ago in the UK anyway, the spending would stop before the IR and the employer would typically pay for that and twin ratings, then the trend started for people to pay for there own IR to get them ahead of the competition.
Now the next stage seems to be kicking in where people as well as paying for all they have already spent including the IR are willing to pay for massively expensive complex twin ratings.
For me this type of behaviour just destroys the career path for everyone except the very rich, and lets employers who can afford it completely off the hook.
Like I said a good employer invests in training for you, a bad employer will always take advantage of people who have gone far beyond the call of duty in paying for stuff and all you will do is feed this trend.
Lastly under EASA, as I understand it, all type ratings lapse completely after 3 years expiry and need a full type rating course to regain, so if you don't get a position after your self pay rating which is very possible, you could completely waste your $80k or equivalent
Up to about 10 years ago in the UK anyway, the spending would stop before the IR and the employer would typically pay for that and twin ratings, then the trend started for people to pay for there own IR to get them ahead of the competition.
Now the next stage seems to be kicking in where people as well as paying for all they have already spent including the IR are willing to pay for massively expensive complex twin ratings.
For me this type of behaviour just destroys the career path for everyone except the very rich, and lets employers who can afford it completely off the hook.
Like I said a good employer invests in training for you, a bad employer will always take advantage of people who have gone far beyond the call of duty in paying for stuff and all you will do is feed this trend.
Lastly under EASA, as I understand it, all type ratings lapse completely after 3 years expiry and need a full type rating course to regain, so if you don't get a position after your self pay rating which is very possible, you could completely waste your $80k or equivalent
Last edited by Camp Freddie; 23rd Dec 2012 at 20:47.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: near atlantic
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...and I still can't see what's wrong with that. It's an investment I'm am willing to make just as my licence or my intrument rating was years ago.
First, with your money you can do whatever you want but you can't justify that It's an "investment"...only see what´s going on in the fixed wing´s world. At least in the fixed wing´s world an A320 TR "only" cost 30.000 euros or less (but now that is not enough to get a job too, how everybody "invested" in a TR now you have to pay for a line training too)
Paying for a rating is not uncommen at all. Most of the "civilian" pilots I know had to do it at least once.
In fact my new employer just sent me off to multi No. 3.
Oh, the company hired 3 more pilots and they also got their training paid for, two of them are first time on twins.
Don't pay for your rating.You're sending the wrong signal and it's the wrong rating anyway.You go 139 they will need 92.You go 92, the offer will be for a 155.That's the way it is.
Last edited by GoodGrief; 23rd Dec 2012 at 21:15.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: LogicFreeZone
Age: 45
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just to clarify: I will NOT pay for a COMPLETE rating but I am willing to pay for parts of it if that's what's necessary to get a guaranteed job.
How many employers are there that think like that? I agree that investing in employees allways pays off in the long run but most companies aren't interested in the long run.
I am competing agains pilots that, when they exit the military, get their ATPL, IR and type rating payed. Companies even make money out of that by overcharging for the ratings. They get payed a temporary allowance for a year that allows them to work for free which more than once got me kicked off the flight schedule recently.
@GoofGrief: Congrats!
Since I know the buisiness around here, I know how ratings are usually done. I can only think of very few companies that train to international standards and send their pilots to sim training.
How many employers are there that think like that? I agree that investing in employees allways pays off in the long run but most companies aren't interested in the long run.
I am competing agains pilots that, when they exit the military, get their ATPL, IR and type rating payed. Companies even make money out of that by overcharging for the ratings. They get payed a temporary allowance for a year that allows them to work for free which more than once got me kicked off the flight schedule recently.
@GoofGrief: Congrats!
Since I know the buisiness around here, I know how ratings are usually done. I can only think of very few companies that train to international standards and send their pilots to sim training.
Last edited by Rotatohead; 23rd Dec 2012 at 21:41.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: bora scirocco
Age: 50
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, but that´s not his fault. That´s the way it is. Unfortunately !
Recently we were witnesses where people pay for 155 TR to be employed ... and yes, they were employed after all !
JR
Recently we were witnesses where people pay for 155 TR to be employed ... and yes, they were employed after all !
JR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: LogicFreeZone
Age: 45
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And it's now on me to save the rotary business? In this case I will happily relinquish my pursuit of a better job with a professional operator.
Don't know what your're flying FC80 but if it's a 139 or bigger and your are payed more than 7k we could trade jobs! So you can prevent me from moral misconduct and safe the chastity of the helicopter business at the same time.
Seriously, I admit that it's doubtfull that this is the way to go, practicaly and morally, and a discerning operator might even find such an offer insulting but it is the last option I will have to consider befor being forced to consider a new career as a janitor.
Don't know what your're flying FC80 but if it's a 139 or bigger and your are payed more than 7k we could trade jobs! So you can prevent me from moral misconduct and safe the chastity of the helicopter business at the same time.
Seriously, I admit that it's doubtfull that this is the way to go, practicaly and morally, and a discerning operator might even find such an offer insulting but it is the last option I will have to consider befor being forced to consider a new career as a janitor.
