Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Bell 525 Relentless

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Bell 525 Relentless

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th February 2012 | 23:02
  #41 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Knowing the "Greenies" I was burdened with....this is going to be a Dog's Breakfast!

Unless the system is self diagnosing and has a big pink finger to point out the ailing module....then maybe things will work out.
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 12th February 2012 | 23:54
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Ventura Ca U.S.A.
It won't look anything like the mockup. It will be a pain when it thinks for the pilot & surprizes him with an Auto Auto in to the ground.

#1 rule keep it simple stupid.
#2 rule let the military pay for R & D.

Certification will be a bitch.
hillberg is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 00:38
  #43 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,536
Likes: 293
From: The Alps
Was standing near the front and got video footage though slightly disappointed by the music! Lol

Very interesting to millennium falcon style cockpit revolving seats but was genuinely impressed with the design and yes I thought at first some similarity to the 214st but was proven wrong.

Relentless by Name Relentless by Nature can see that a lot of hard work has gone into this

Round 2 tomorrow!

Cheers
chopper2004 is online now  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 01:25
  #44 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Her feet seem awfully small....and if she rolls over on her side...how does one get out of her in a hurry?
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 01:28
  #45 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,536
Likes: 293
From: The Alps


















Cheers

Last edited by chopper2004; 13th February 2012 at 01:57.
chopper2004 is online now  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 02:08
  #46 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Really nice looking machine IMO...

The first machine of that class that I've actually thought "Cool, I want to fly that!"
somepitch is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 02:18
  #47 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Chief Bottle Washer
Community Builder
Community Influencer
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,253
Likes: 1,437
From: PPRuNe
Originally Posted by SASless
Well praise the Lord!

If she flies as good as she looks....she will be a winner.

But....the proof is in the pudding as they say!

Somebody...quick...tell me about the pilot seats....they going to be as comfortable as a 2x10 plank? Do the Pilot access doors latch open or do you still have to use your foot to hold the things open? Do the doors open a full 180 degrees or only half way?
What Pilot access doors? That's why they swivel, you have to get out via the forward cabin door: great for Emergency Exit, battling the bears for egress

Originally Posted by SASless
Her feet seem awfully small....and if she rolls over on her side...how does one get out of her in a hurry?
My immediate thoughts were that they haven't learnt from the A109 development of the undercarriage. Retracting into the fuselage takes up space (which could be used for fuel or baggage) and lots of weight for complex undercarriage. A pair of sponsons would both widen the track for stability, and simplify the retraction and associated ironmongery.

But hey, what do we know
Senior Pilot is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 03:19
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 481
Likes: 58
From: USA
Do they have a flying prototype or was that just a mock up / concept?
havick is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 03:20
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 1
From: ...in view of the 'Southern Cross' ...
Mmmm ....

A good effort from the Bell folk ...

I think though that Agusta still have the front run with their 189 ....

Those that are familiar with the 139/189 can see how very easy it will be to put 'fly by wire' into those airframes as a natural development ....

I won't see it (probably a good thing ) as my 'useby' is rapidly approaching but others will ....

The Bell advantage as always will be SUPPORT of their product ...
spinwing is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 03:38
  #50 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 178
Likes: 5
From: Great White North
Are the Pro Pilot Helicopter Product Support survey results out for this year?

Who's #1 this year?
Encyclo is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 05:02
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, USA
Nice looking.....but didn't Sikorsky make this in 1977 already?
AdamFrisch is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 05:41
  #52 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 557
Likes: 27
From: At home
From how the controls looks like, and it being fly-by-wire it must be an easy transition from a newish excavator..... but then again those skilled operators, may not want to take a paycut associated with the career move....

Is this a result of Mr. Lappos's involvement with Bell?? Sure looks like a 76, and didn't the RAH-66 have fly-by-wire....
Nubian is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 05:55
  #53 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Canada
I don't see the 76 resemblance... Granted it's pointy at the front, has a tail rotor and some windows, but that's where the resemblance ends for me...

I think it's closer to the AW products if anything but the cockpit looks better with the big side windows...
somepitch is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 06:23
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Iceland
That Auto Auto sounds a bit scary...
IceHeli is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 07:10
  #55 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 917
Likes: 11
From: Tax-land.
Kuros to SP pointers, I'd like to add that for a helicopter (of any size) those swiveling seats seem to be an awful lot of wasted space, more like a show off.
The specs in the web site do not really knock my socks off so to speak: the 189 already does 16 pax, 400nm plus and 150 Kts cruise.
Good luck in certifying the very first CIVILIAN FBW in a helicopter.

"Auto Auto" ... with a female voice
tottigol is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 07:35
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 1
From: ...in view of the 'Southern Cross' ...
Mmm ...

.... "Auto Auto" ... with a female voice ...

It'll will fit so well with the "oh !!!! Oh !!!!" ... male voice!


spinwing is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 10:29
  #57 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Gee....no Pilot Access doors...hmmmm odd thing that. The Captain is supposed to be the last person off a sinking ship right? "After you Bubba! Now Coey...do let the nice Man go first as he is a passenger, Lad!"

With itty bitty tires like the ones on the mockup....no risk of this thing ever working off other than steel decks or paved aprons, taxi ways, and runways.

Even then...it will take a strong deck to support all that weight on such a small footprint.

How's the gear doors going to like lots of mud and snow stuffed into them?

I know Bell has thought of all this as they put this concept together....right?
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 11:41
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: here
Gee....no Pilot Access doors...hmmmm odd thing that
How big are the pilot acces doors on the S-92?
jeffg is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 11:47
  #59 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Jeff....think companionways on big helicopters.

76's have an unusual use for pilot doors too....but having to swivel yer chair around to exit the cockpit? May we assume the side window will be jettison able thus providing an emergency exit? That would be logical.
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2012 | 12:23
  #60 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 659
Likes: 13
From: Under my coconut tree
And legal Sas...
griffothefog is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.