Bell 525 Relentless
Laurenson
First flight conducted in 20 knots gusting winds so they already doubled the envelope of the S-97 on its first flight. As to aft cg it is designed to carry 18. Since it only had a crew of two, one would expect an aft cg.
The Sultan
First flight conducted in 20 knots gusting winds so they already doubled the envelope of the S-97 on its first flight. As to aft cg it is designed to carry 18. Since it only had a crew of two, one would expect an aft cg.
The Sultan
Did you arrive at this conclusion from being there during lift off and observing this evolution closely, or from viewing a youtube clip?
Sultan:
What has the S-97 got to do with this?
Double the envelope? Do you have the telemetry data for both first flights?

PS: Tip of the cap to Bell and the 525 team, glad to see the program making progress.
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Africa
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You have right Lonewolf_50, first congratulation to the team.
Then when I compare the H160 and Bell 525, it seem the bell helicopter is less stable even if the wind could explain that.
Then when I compare the H160 and Bell 525, it seem the bell helicopter is less stable even if the wind could explain that.

Anyway, it's exciting to me when someone gets a new model working.
(I still am sad that Comanche got canned. That was a cool bird).
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
ATN,
Here you go:
Why angled/tilted tail rotors?
Canted tail rotor pylons, why?
20 degree cant on CH-53 and HH-60
For its part, Bell says the main benefits of the 525's canted TR are reduced fuel burn (in combination with the 'lift assist tailboom design') and improved CG characteristics.
I/C
Here you go:
Why angled/tilted tail rotors?
Canted tail rotor pylons, why?
20 degree cant on CH-53 and HH-60
For its part, Bell says the main benefits of the 525's canted TR are reduced fuel burn (in combination with the 'lift assist tailboom design') and improved CG characteristics.
I/C
Can anyone recall any other time when three brand new helicopter designs have made their first flights all within the same six weeks? Ruling out the S-97,which is XP, it will be interesting to see which of the other two gets certificated and into service first?
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: daworld
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I take it they are NOT looking at moving into the HEMS/SAR market with this, looking at the size of those main wheels. Or are the photo's deceiving and the wheels are actually bigger than they look??
I take it they are NOT looking at moving into the HEMS/SAR market with this, looking at the size of those main wheels. Or are the photo's deceiving and the wheels are actually bigger than they look??

Noooby
The wide stance of the landing gear on the 525 makes it ideal for rough or at sea landings unlike the Puma series and by observation the new Airbus 175. Example below.
http://flightsafety.org/hs/hs_sept-oct04.pdf
The Sultan
The wide stance of the landing gear on the 525 makes it ideal for rough or at sea landings unlike the Puma series and by observation the new Airbus 175. Example below.
http://flightsafety.org/hs/hs_sept-oct04.pdf
The Sultan