Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Puma ditching Nigeria

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Puma ditching Nigeria

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th December 2009 | 12:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Cape Town/London
Puma ditching Nigeria

Apparently a Puma has ditched in Nigeria today, reports says all out OK and the aircraft's afloat.

Nothing further and fingers crossed everyone is OK.
farmpilot is offline  
Reply
Old 11th December 2009 | 15:14
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 21
From: Beyond the black stump!
Chopper ditches at Agbami

All 18 personnel on board a helicopter heading to SeaBird Exploration's seismic vessel Kondor Explorer are safe after the aircraft was forced to ditch into the sea earlier today.

Upstream staff Friday, 11 December, 2009, 13:46 GMT

The helicopter made a controlled landing into the sea at a few hundred metres from the Kondor Explorer, currently working on a survey at the Agbami field off Nigeria, at 12:10 CET.

“No persons were injured and all 18 persons from the helicopter were safely picked up from the sea by rescue boats,” the company said in a statement.

There were 16 crew and two pilots on the helicopter.

SeaBird boss Tim Isden said that the company has launched an investigation into the incident, adding the cause is not yet clear.
"Our emergency response team on the Kondor Explorer carried out their duties superbly," he said. "There were no injuries and all 18 men were collected from the water."

The Kondor Explorer is carrying out a 4D seismic survey at Agbami for field operator Chevron.

Published: 11 December 2009 | Last updated: 11 December 2009
Cyclic Hotline is offline  
Reply
Old 11th December 2009 | 15:29
  #3 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
Hmmmmmm....a few hundred meters from the destination.....wonder what happened?
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 11th December 2009 | 17:00
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
From: n/a
Can anyone say who the puma operator was?
Daysleeper is offline  
Reply
Old 11th December 2009 | 17:13
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: AFRICA
Only Bristow has got Super Puma 332 in Nigeria and use them for charter

Bristow is flying two S92 for the Agbami/Chevron contract.

Hopefully everyone is safe, welldone
froggy_pilot is offline  
Reply
Old 11th December 2009 | 20:00
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 768
Likes: 45
From: Montreal
Seismic ship. Low deck compared to a rig.
Puma Ditches In Nigeria | VTOLBLOG

Landing or takeoff? Incident or self-inflicted?

And the usual beg for pictures. Sounds like it is sitting on the barge in good shape - wonder how soon it can fly again.
malabo is offline  
Reply
Old 11th December 2009 | 20:58
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Sounds like it was on arrival.
infosource is offline  
Reply
Old 12th December 2009 | 16:29
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Dunfermline
vandyke is offline  
Reply
Old 12th December 2009 | 16:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: GB
more pics

Norske skip reddet 18 etter helikopterstyrt| TV 2 Nyhetene
kajn is offline  
Reply
Old 12th December 2009 | 17:05
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Dunfermline
It was recovered by the SIEM Marlin. this is the ROV construction vessel for Chevrons Akbami field.
I haven't heard yet why It went down, will hopefully get more details soon
vandyke is offline  
Reply
Old 12th December 2009 | 21:35
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: AFRICA
I've worked 2 weeks last month with Siem Marlin on Agip/Oyo field, very competent and professional crew, (radio man, HLO and deck crew...)

Everybody is safe

A controlled ditch is always better than an uncontrolled landing
froggy_pilot is offline  
Reply
Old 13th December 2009 | 09:08
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: here and there
A controlled landing onto a helideck "a few hundred meters away" would even be better.
archos is offline  
Reply
Old 13th December 2009 | 11:18
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Aberdeen
Good point Archos - I don't suppose the crew thought of that !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Zaphod1 is offline  
Reply
Old 13th December 2009 | 12:19
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Ecosse
I do agree that a controlled landing onto a helideck would make more sense bearing in mind they were so close to it but we don't yet know the circumstances. Whatever the reason the crew did really well & Its nice to know that everyone got out ok.

Zaphod,

I don't suppose the crew thought of that
I would be very much surprised if the crew hadn't thought of landing on
the deck as an option!!
Beaucoup Movement is offline  
Reply
Old 13th December 2009 | 13:09
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Toledo, OH
It is quite possible that a deck landing was not a viable option. I don't know about the Puma, but many twin engine helicopters have a minimum single engine speed when operating in Category A. If this is the case, then the deck landing was not a doable event. I have a friend that had to ditch a S76 due to an engine failure, because of the minimum single engine speed.
rick1128 is offline  
Reply
Old 13th December 2009 | 14:57
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
From: Beside the seaside
It is known as sarcasm Beaucoup.

It is known as DSELW - Deliberate Single Engine Landing Weight Rick.
Epiphany is offline  
Reply
Old 13th December 2009 | 16:12
  #17 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 50
From: Aberdeen
I think you will find that the aircraft was carrying diversion fuel to a land airport. If it ditched due to engine failure, it was because it had already slowed down below a speed/height where a go-around on one engine was possible.

HC
HeliComparator is offline  
Reply
Old 13th December 2009 | 18:17
  #18 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
I thought Tigers hovered on one engine at max weight? Or is that some misconception?

Archos ....Archos....I know that name from somewhere....let me think a bit!

Ah yes...."One more....One More....One more....an endless refrain it was one night (actually several) amongst which some bicycles got ridden into a swimming pool by a fellow wearing Tails...and all wound up looking like the Grand Mufti himself!
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 13th December 2009 | 18:52
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
From: Beside the seaside
MAUW for a Tiger is 18960 lbs. Dont have the graphs to hand but OEI IGE hover weight at sea level 20 degrees is around 16000 lbs.
Epiphany is offline  
Reply
Old 13th December 2009 | 19:20
  #20 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: NE Scotland
Question Puma Ditching

The tail rotor looks in good shape for a power on landing. Was it turning at the time??
Did my NDLPs in G-PUMI on 26 Oct 1994.
hoveratsix is online now  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.