Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Bristow & other Oz offshore pay deals

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Bristow & other Oz offshore pay deals

Old 15th Jan 2008, 08:27
  #81 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Down Under
Posts: 31
Well, my sources say that the deal of 15% as of May then 5% Jan 09, 5% Jul 09 were accepted by CHC management.
Additionally, 2 extra weeks of leave (6 total per year) has been sought & management is going to Canada for approval. Interesting indeed.
Combine this with a captial city domicile policy & it makes for a good industry standard. Glad to see the boys are having a win in negotiations.

Has got to be good for pilot's on the whole one would think.
AusWhirlyBusDriver is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2008, 09:40
  #82 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Other side of the fence
Posts: 69
Chc Deal

Oz Whirly,

Just confirm: in total that's 25% from May 08 to Jul 09 (just over a year)! If that's true lets see what the other companies have to offer. There are only a certain amount of multi-engine IFR drivers around. They will naturally be drawn to the highest bidder.


Last edited by GreenerGrass; 15th Jan 2008 at 18:09.
GreenerGrass is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2008, 10:32
  #83 (permalink)  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In my Hammock or at the Pub!
Posts: 140
Thumbs up Great News for the industry

Wow that is excellent news for the industry in general. I guess folks will gravitate towards employers of choice that combine sustainable work routines with adequate leave cycles and industry standard coin.......

As Bob Dylan wrote....."The times they are a changing!"


maxeemum is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2008, 03:11
  #84 (permalink)  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 102
Chc Eba

Hi guys,


You are quite correct in your assertions re the pay deal on offer. The question is, will their PC and pilots go for it?


It's become abundantly clear that CHC is making a move to be the preferred off-shore employer in Oz. Have they got a massive expansion plan on? Given their pay is already 6 - 11% better than it's nearest rival, the recent domicile re-think and the pay offer on the table, they'll be streets ahead.

For example - a mid-level CAPT with the competition who lives on the east coast, it'll be an increase of over $36,000 before tax (ah... that's $1800 / month for the mathematically challenged). That kind of difference kills off any kind of loyalty one might have.

My sources from CHC tell me that a CAPT from BHA is already making serious enquiries but no details obviously. I expect there will be more to follow.

papa68 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2008, 04:19
  #85 (permalink)  
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Nigeria
Age: 53
Posts: 4,615
it'll be an increase of over $36,000 before tax (ah... that's $1800 / month for the mathematically challenged)
It was $3000/month when I went to school....or have you taxed it?
212man is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2008, 05:31
  #86 (permalink)  
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South of the Equator
Posts: 182
Papa, I think you maybe behind the times.

I think you will find the following is factual:

Bristow’s pay the least with an attitude to boot!, but with a more than reasonable superannuation system.
CHC pays straight down the line, with both a reasonable superannuation system and Salary Protection Insurance
Jayrow have lead the race in the last three years, and if the rumors are true about their small touring force living anywhere they want and the other rumor about paid family holidays, they should stay in that position.

The bottom line boys, the big three will all be within a few % of each other when the final calculations are compared.

Last edited by High Nr; 16th Jan 2008 at 08:44. Reason: Edited for double wording and poor spelling....sorry.
High Nr is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2008, 07:03
  #87 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: On the move...
Age: 54
Posts: 359
Number of hours?

Do Jayrow off-shore still do the least number of hours?
Their on-shore Capt's do a fair few, but it's a different pay scale isn't?
CYHeli is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2008, 03:08
  #88 (permalink)  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 102
Tax correction

212 Man,

Apologies old chap - I should have explained it a bit better. It was indeed meant to be $1800 / month after tax. For most, the bottom line is what really matters and given the tax brackets we're talking about, 40% of any additional salary will be taken by the ATO. It's possibly one of the reasons the salaries here need to be increased so substantially - tax.

News to hand - my sources tell me that CHC have apparently approved the extra 2 weeks of leave for the CHC off-shore guys in Oz. I don't have anything concrete at this stage in the way of proof but these are interesting times indeed...

High NR,

Your point is taken but the latest initiatives from CHC have actually widened the gap to a point where the disparity has become tangible. Just my thoughts.

papa68 is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2008, 08:47
  #89 (permalink)  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 68
I note that there is a lot of talk about percentages on this thread but what do the proposed new CHC wages for P1 & P2 add up to in hard currency, on-shore and off-shore. How far behind are the rest?
anonythemouse is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2008, 10:38
  #90 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pizza hut
Posts: 629
Have Bristow taken on any pilots to live full time in Kerratha from the UK? Or has the new labour vote given them a change of tack?
griffothefog is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2008, 04:54
  #91 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: was there, now here
Age: 50
Posts: 60
A senior captain and a training captain quitting?

Those shirts really are driving the guys away.

Or is it the pay?
movin' up is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2008, 00:01
  #92 (permalink)  
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: all over the place
Posts: 26
With the increase in pays for those who don't fly 'offshore' I think there are more pilots asking themselves 'why live in a +*&^%hole half my life when one can get a good/well rewarded job closer to home'. It's getting to the point where unless the renumeration increases guys will 'move on' where as a few years ago they probably thought this was a job 'for life'
John Galt is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2008, 06:23
  #93 (permalink)  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Age: 50
Posts: 3

I could not agree with you more and am currently asking myself the same question. If I could be home with my family every night on slightly less money it really is a no-brainer.
206LDriver is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2008, 09:45
  #94 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North of Antartica
Posts: 180
With that attitude I would not hold your breath!!
Might be a long wait!!
Heli-phile is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2008, 22:21
  #95 (permalink)  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 102
Touring vs flying closer to home

movin' up,

Mate, it's all about the shirts - how many times do we need to go through this??? Sure AWBD wants to talk about pay and conditions etc (and he's perfectly entitled to his view of course) but that's just his view! It's clear to everyone else that attire is key here and CHC and the rest wear nice flying suits. It's a no brainer. AWBD - not a peep out of you thanks with your extremist and contrary views!

John Galt & 206L Driver,

Your views are noted but I don't think they're necessarily correct. Whilst there may be a couple of jobs that involve staying at home on pay similar to that of tourers, they are v few and far between. Most of the good jobs still pay well under $100,000 or thereabouts whilst a tourer will be paid approx $15,000 to $30,000+ more.

Some points to note when comparing the two types of employment:

1. If we take that difference to be approx $1,125 (average take home pay after tax at 40%), then it can (and does) make a difference to a lot of helo guys.

2. Many tourers don't pay for their food whilst on tour.

3. Most off-shore positions (if not all) have 4 weeks of leave (CHC has reportedly moved to 6 weeks). This means you should only be away for 5 months of the year.

4. Field leave is in 2 to 3 week blocks which allows tourers a lot of freedom to do other things in their spare time e.g. study, take o/s holidays, seek additional work etc.

5. The ability and potential for salaries to increase in the off-shore sector I believe are far greater than for that in EMS in the short to medium term. An ability to pay is one issue but a major factor I suspect is the inundation of ex-military types working in EMS using their pensions to top up what are otherwise lower salaries. When those eligible for pensions from the military dry up, then EMS salaries might improve somewhat, esp if they want to attract ex-mil types.

6. The off-shore sector has a "progression system" that brings in young and relatively inexperienced pilots and grooms them for command positions. Which EMS operator in Oz employs 500-1000 hr guys with no night or IFR experience, let alone multi-engine turbine time? For many entering the "big time", the off-shore operators provide the best intial and perhaps long term prospects.

Ultimately, it is an individual choice which depends v much on your circumstances and priorities. However, I don't think there is a case that there are plenty of jobs out there that pay like the off-shore sector but involve staying at home. If there were, we'd all be after them.

Just my thoughts...

papa68 is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2008, 19:49
  #96 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: offshore
Posts: 38
Papa 68,
You raise some good points, but I dont understand the , "only 5 months away " bit. Normally tourers are not on 6on 6 off ,or 4 on 4 off, as such. Its 42/42 days or 28/28 days, on site and any travel incurred to and from work is taken in your leave time. This equates to being away from home a little over 6 months a year.
Is it true that in Australia a company will give you leave in addition to this ??!!
tribal is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2008, 02:21
  #97 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Other side of the fence
Posts: 69


Yes to your question. In Australia if you tour you also receive an extra 4 weeks annual leave(soon to be 6 for CHC). The field leave associated with each tour is only to compensate you for time away from home. Fixed base guys get to be home every night/day. All pilots should be entitled to industry standard annual leave. If fixed base pilots receive 6 weeks per year then tourers should receive the same.

And you're right it's not really equal time away or home anyway as the actual roster is 15 on/ 13 off.

GreenerGrass is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2008, 10:04
  #98 (permalink)  
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South of the Equator
Posts: 182
4 Weeks???

Think you will find that Bristow and Jayrow have always been six weels of leave...!
High Nr is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2008, 23:50
  #99 (permalink)  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 102
Touring cycles in Oz

To explain the whole touring cyle thing in Oz.

tribal - the touring cycles you speak of really relate to intenational touring cycles as I know it. Most have gone to 'equal' time in either 4, 6 or 8 week blocks of on / off time. I say 'equal' as travel is conducted in your own time. I did actually mention the extra 4 to 6 weeks of annual leave in my post so I'm not sure how you couldn't deduce that equates to approx 5 months at work?!??

However, to explain more fully, GG is quite correct in saying that in Oz you get additional leave. The reasons for this, I wasn't fully aware of to be honest but it makes sense I guess. And GG is quite correct in saying that in Oz it is strictly a 15 on / 13 off touring cycle. One could do the maths to figure out the exact time spent at home but I for one can't be bothered. For the train spotters out there, you would do 12 touring cycles a year if you take your 4 weeks of leave, less (obviously) if you get 6 weeks off.

High Nr - close but no cigar old chap. Neither BHA or CHC Oz have ever had 6 weeks of additoinal leave, just the 4. CHC have some wierd wording in their EBA that suggests that they have had 6 weeks but the fine print says it includes 2 weeks of field leave. The net result was 4 weeks. This I believe has recently been changed to 6 weeks of actual annual leave.

Gets complicated doesn't it?

papa68 is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2008, 00:14
  #100 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: offshore
Posts: 38
Papa 68,
How I came to the 5 month figure, is from your earlier quote as such:

3. Most off-shore positions (if not all) have 4 weeks of leave (CHC has reportedly moved to 6 weeks). This means you should only be away for 5 months of the year.

Cheers Tribal
tribal is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.