Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Guimbal Cabri G2

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Guimbal Cabri G2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st November 2025 | 11:20
  #1621 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 118
Originally Posted by DavidSmithHeli
Beautiful video, but FWIW there are many inaccurate things said in there about our helicopter. The R22 is lower cost to operate and purchase vs the G2 without any question. Maybe they wanted the 3 blades or fenestron, but they should not misrepresent things.

we have held prices for the aircraft and spare part cost increases to basically zero over 3 years. We also extended the life limit of our main rotor blades to 15 years. So to say operating costs have increased since the pandemic is just nonsense.

We have also added impact resistant windows, electronic ignition, new stabilizer and cockpit cameras to the aircraft and held our aircraft price flat for several years.

if anyone thinks the G2 is lower cost or more capable than the R22 in any commercial-relevant metric. DM me please…
David
It is all well and good saying your product is better and cheaper ( why wouldnt you ) but like all manufacturers you ll talk a load of bolls--cks when it comes to running helicopters. Over 35 year I have owned and operated everything from Hu 269B through to AS 350 B3 and I can assure you that not one manufacturer including yourselves has come anywhere near what they say they cost to run ! If the guy in the video says they are cheaper to run in his operation I would tend to believe the man who writes the cheques not the manufacturer. As to more capable I would choose a fully articulated rotor head every time over a teetering one, let a lone the Robinson teetering head design. You are welcome to shoot me down but I am happy to challenge you with an average UK instructor to do EOL to the ground in zero wind with your R 22 compared to a S300 that my school uses. Dont get me wrong the R22 auto's but there is little margin for error.
Hughes500 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st November 2025 | 11:33
  #1622 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 386
From: Brantisvogan
Originally Posted by KiwiNedNZ
Really - so why is there about 5 operators that use them for mustering and nowhere near the coast. Last time I looked Katherine is nowhere near the coast and nor is Roley James and the others who operate them.
Katherine appears to be a few hundred feet amsl, so not exactly taxing altitude wise, would presume 1 up and not full tanks for the role as well.
Doesn't tend to behave quite the same at 5000ft and 37C.
It is a pretty thing, modern design and I'd take the composite body design in an oopsie any day, but hot and high, the 22 will kick its backside (auto performance notwithstanding).
Bell_ringer is online now  
Reply
Old 21st November 2025 | 12:23
  #1623 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 76
Likes: 13
From: Manchester
H500, not sure if you've operated a G2 and a R22 in your company but it's no secret that the operational/running cost of a G2 is a lot higher than a R22. I might even dare to say it sits closer to the running cost of a R44.
Unless you don't count insurance, depreciation etc and purely look at the service interval costs, then I'm not sure since I don't have all the data for that. But counting everything from purchase, depreciation, insurance, maintenance, fuel, oil etc, then the G2 will empty your bank account quicker than the R22....
Ovc000 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st November 2025 | 13:22
  #1624 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 888
Likes: 65
From: California
Originally Posted by Ovc000
H500, not sure if you've operated a G2 and a R22 in your company but it's no secret that the operational/running cost of a G2 is a lot higher than a R22. I might even dare to say it sits closer to the running cost of a R44.
Unless you don't count insurance, depreciation etc and purely look at the service interval costs, then I'm not sure since I don't have all the data for that. But counting everything from purchase, depreciation, insurance, maintenance, fuel, oil etc, then the G2 will empty your bank account quicker than the R22....
1,600 posts and 82 pages later,...

I heard yesterday (on YouTube) that an Australian mustering company has recently sold its fleet of 14 R22s and replaced them (albeit a smaller number) with Cabris.

Sad day for the R22, but I guess someone thinks their higher cost isn't a big deal.
Robbiee is offline  
Reply
Old 21st November 2025 | 13:55
  #1625 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 56
From: UK
Originally Posted by Robbiee
I heard yesterday (on YouTube)

Australia's HM Air sells 14-strong R22 fleet
Bravo73 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st November 2025 | 14:03
  #1626 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 888
Likes: 65
From: California
Originally Posted by Bravo73
,...which ties into my first complaint.

Lumping posts into one created TWENTY !!!!!!! YEARS AGO just because its about the same model! What is with this place and its obsession with Godzilla sized threads? Am I really supposed to hunt through 1,600 comments to find the beginning of a new conversation?!
Robbiee is offline  
Reply
Old 21st November 2025 | 14:25
  #1627 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 386
From: Brantisvogan
Originally Posted by Robbiee
,...which ties into my first complaint.

Lumping posts into one created TWENTY !!!!!!! YEARS AGO just because its about the same model! What is with this place and its obsession with Godzilla sized threads? Am I really supposed to hunt through 1,600 comments to find the beginning of a new conversation?!
You could have just read the dedicated topic in rotorheads, instead of adding even more to a long-running topic that no one forced you to read
Bell_ringer is online now  
Reply
Old 21st November 2025 | 14:41
  #1628 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 888
Likes: 65
From: California
Originally Posted by Bell_ringer
You could have just read the dedicated topic in rotorheads, instead of adding even more to a long-running topic that no one forced you to read
Well, I'll wipe the egg off my face and admit I didn't see that one, lol.

,...but still, this thing's twenty years old. Can't we just give it its gold watch and let it move down to Florida already?
Robbiee is offline  
Reply
Old 21st November 2025 | 14:53
  #1629 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 563
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by Bell_ringer
Katherine appears to be a few hundred feet amsl, so not exactly taxing altitude wise, would presume 1 up and not full tanks for the role as well.
Doesn't tend to behave quite the same at 5000ft and 37C.
It is a pretty thing, modern design and I'd take the composite body design in an oopsie any day, but hot and high, the 22 will kick its backside (auto performance notwithstanding).
Well last time I looked they dont do mustering at 10000ft. Maybe compare apples and apples. Each to his own.
KiwiNedNZ is offline  
Reply
Old 21st November 2025 | 16:49
  #1630 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 118
Originally Posted by Ovc000
H500, not sure if you've operated a G2 and a R22 in your company but it's no secret that the operational/running cost of a G2 is a lot higher than a R22. I might even dare to say it sits closer to the running cost of a R44.
Unless you don't count insurance, depreciation etc and purely look at the service interval costs, then I'm not sure since I don't have all the data for that. But counting everything from purchase, depreciation, insurance, maintenance, fuel, oil etc, then the G2 will empty your bank account quicker than the R22....
I am only going on what the man in the video says. You dont suddenly buy another type and then tell everyone it is cheaper ( the accountant say so ) . My point has always been, never ever believe what an OEM tells you, his job is to sell you his product. Go ask the guys and gals signing the cheques, they will tell you what one actually costs to run. I have owned and run over 30 different machines over the years as i said from 269B's to As 350B3's so i know what they cost as the money has come out of my bank account ! So if the man says they are cheaper he must have a good reason to say so !
Hughes500 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st November 2025 | 16:56
  #1631 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 239
Likes: 50
From: San Diego, CA
Last I checked, a new Cabri costs almost as much to purchase as a new R44 Cadet. I did love the cabin layout though; it felt very modern, with everything very low down for maximum visibility, premium-feeling switches, electronic ignition (plus magneto for redundancy), etc. Also a bizarrely long range for a little two-seater, far more than even the R44. But expensive. Also the R22 derates the engine for longevity, while the Cabri uses the same engine but not derated.
CGameProgrammerr is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd November 2025 | 07:48
  #1632 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 550
Likes: 12
From: Africa
Originally Posted by KiwiNedNZ
Little video we put together from a visit out to HeliMuster NT in the Territory.

https://youtu.be/uy0LDfT2Sho?si=mAfWsNutLTQs8PCT
Is there an English translation somewhere?
Hot and Hi is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd November 2025 | 11:07
  #1633 (permalink)  
Guest
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 840
Likes: 236
From: UK
Nice aircraft but seriously lacking power, porpoises in straight and level flight, and just as expensive as an R44, but with two fewer seats. Plus seems to require more niggy maintenance than R22/R44
PPRuNeUser469990 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th November 2025 | 02:51
  #1634 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Down under
Originally Posted by hargreaves99
Nice aircraft but seriously lacking power, porpoises in straight and level flight, and just as expensive as an R44, but with two fewer seats. Plus seems to require more niggy maintenance than R22/R44
It's funny i've found it to be better performing than the R22 with a similar payload. I've got over a thousand R22 hours and around 50 in the G2, regularly in and out of both on the same day etc. Close to sea level.

Also it's very stable in level flight but you do have to correct the small attitude deviations from turbulence compared to the R22 where you ideally don't correct them and just allow it to swing around under the rotor disc etc. It porpoises around if its out of balance (trim etc).

Have noticed the string seems to tell lies in the cabri... when its aligned with the mark it feels out of balance, 1-2cm to the right of the mark feels flat in the seat makes me wonder if the air hitting the screen is being influenced by the rotor wash?
Aluminium Mallard is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.