Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

NDB DME Approach Procedure

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

NDB DME Approach Procedure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Oct 2014, 14:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Down the Taxiway...
Age: 37
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NDB DME Approach Procedure

As absurd as it sounds ... Its a fact

https://www.flickr.com/photos/14887399@N05/15532556846/


The approach is based on an NDB and a DME arc!!


Any one have any other examples for such an approach
bucks_raj is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2014, 14:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1. This is not an NDB/DME approach.

2. Is there any difference if DME arc takes you to ILS or NDB approach? Many airports in the world have same layout for all types of approaches for the same runway (FAF = FAP).
FlyingStone is online now  
Old 17th Oct 2014, 15:59
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: europe
Age: 67
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The OP did not state that it was an NDB/DME approach!

He pointed out that it was based on an NDB and a DME arc. This is pretty indisputable.

At a quick glance I would guess that it is a VOR NDB DME approach as all three of those are required ground aids.
deefer dog is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2014, 16:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 192
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are quite a number of NDB/DME Approaches in Australia. Flown this one a number of times. What with coastal effect, night effect, a big CB parked 5 miles away and a 20 kt crosswind it was always fun.
http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/...RMNB01-139.pdf

GPS approaches make it all seem easy now.
Agent86 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2014, 16:26
  #5 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The approach is based on an NDB and a DME arc!!
- I'd go with that. What an amazing approach for a busy international airport - a 'glancing blow' off the VOR and the far end NDB, but don't miss the 'International Museum of Toilets' in town. Says it all!

One would (hope) there is something better for the main runways. Luckily I have not come across any similar............
BOAC is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2014, 20:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd declare an emergency.
Amadis of Gaul is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2014, 20:58
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by deefer dog
The OP did not state that it was an NDB/DME approach!
..apart from the title 'NDB DME Approach Procedure'?
Background Noise is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2014, 21:06
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Germany
Age: 71
Posts: 776
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
What is difficult anout that approach?
RetiredF4 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2014, 23:38
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,560
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
That does look odd, and would be a bit tricky if you didnt have the VOR working to help you track the arc.

Agent 86, your approach is different (and easier); the NDB and the DME are (vitrually) in the same spot, so orientation would be much easier than the Flickr approach.

At a quick glance I would guess that it is a VOR NDB DME approach as all three of those are required ground aids.
Doesn't say VOR is required although obviously, for the arrival at least, you'd need it...
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2014, 00:06
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,414
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
There was an approach to Wallops Island where the final leg was a DME arc with the FAF and MAP being radials on the arc.
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2014, 02:06
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Poland
Age: 69
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE][/That does look odd, and would be a bit tricky if you didnt have the VOR working to help you track the arc.QUOTE]

Forgive me, but if it is a VOR NDB DME approach one would not be allowed to shoot it without the VOR!
clivewatson is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2014, 02:32
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,560
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Forgive me, but if it is a VOR NDB DME approach
It's not a VOR NDB DME approach. The thread title is NDB DME, and it doesn't say anywhere on the chart that VOR is required. It does say that for the DME. Pity the graphic doesn't show the chart title. That would solve it once and for all.

It's pretty logical that it wouldn't "require" the VOR, otherwise there would be no need for the convoluted use of the NDB.

Originally Posted by GF
There was an approach to Wallops Island where the final leg was a DME arc with the FAF and MAP being radials on the arc.
Sounds fun. 5 DME arc? "Stable Capn...apart for the minor heading changes to stay lined up on final!".
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2014, 02:44
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,414
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Bloggs,

I just looked, the VOR/DME RWY 10 at KWAL Wallops Island, VA is still published. Pity I can't, actually don't know how, to post it. The final course is the 24.1 DME arc with a IAF at the 218R, the FAF at the 201R and MAP at the 189R. The miss is a left turn it intercept the arc back to MAGGO, the IAF. It's all off the SBY VOR.
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2014, 03:06
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,560
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
24.1 DME arc not so bad!



That's a pretty interesting approach because the normal arc tracking tolerances would be way too big there. Say you were .5nm off, there's no way you'd get in from the MDA on the straight-in.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2014, 03:52
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BOQ
Age: 79
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
24.1 DME arc not so bad!
A little thread drift, but it might interest GF and possibly Bloggs, that in the early 70s, Toledo Express Airport, like Wallops, had a TACAN arc as the final segment for RWY 25 that the Guard F-100s used routinely.

I believe it was a 10 or so DME arc , don't remember the minima. Flew it once coming over from Columbus.

The chart is long gone. It was cancelled after the Toledo Guard crashed one on the approach.

If you look at Hutchinson, KS, there are VOR, ILS and LOC approaches with DME arcs to final, but the NDB is a simple PT, no other requirement than ADF capability. End of an era. If you're flying NDB over here these days it's probably only because you can't afford much else for your puddle-jumper.

edit: BTW at the time the TOL Tacan wasn't at the field or the approach was off of Waterville.

Last edited by OK465; 18th Oct 2014 at 04:09.
OK465 is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2014, 08:52
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: B.F.E.
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are a few in Micronesia. There is an NDB/DME - A to Kosrae (TTK) Airport. Has a DME facility colocated with an NDB, no VOR to be found. NDB final approach guidance with DME identified fixes, and an arc transition (you just use your RMI with the ADF needle displayed and track the arc distance off the DME the same way you would use an RMI during a VOR/DME arc. Easy money). Will upload a picture of the chart later.
hikoushi is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2014, 11:06
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Europe
Age: 61
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EGBB

EGBB NDB/DME RWY 33/15.... If ILS U/S
Gryphon is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2014, 14:07
  #18 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jeppesen breaks it down into two charts:



aterpster is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2014, 14:43
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,560
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Original:

Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2014, 14:59
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BOQ
Age: 79
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes, I can see pulling that chart out at night in the wx for the in-range check and approach brief and having no confusion potential at all.

(BTW single-seat Cat E dive-and-drive on a DME arc final segment is truly a Darwinian instrument flight experience.)
OK465 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.