Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Which runway would you prefer?

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Which runway would you prefer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Oct 2008, 18:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: YYZ via the UK
Age: 49
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which runway would you prefer?

Had problems deciding on which runway to choose for landing this morning at YYZ. Was working the midnight shift where the operations are constrained by noise abatement...and preferential runway configurations.

The runway layout in YYZ is 05/23, 24R/L-06R/06L and a north south parrallel of 15L/R-33L/33R

Surface wind was varying between calm and 050 at 3-5 knots and sometimes from the north also at about 3-5 knots.

Chose landing runway as 05 as this is the prefered noise runway for arrivals after midnight.
However upper winds strongly out of the west. A 767 on 2 mile final reported a tail wind of about 25-30kts (about 260 at 27kts I think).

Noise abatement aside.......in this scenario would you prefer to take the runway where you have a head wind till short final and then a small tail wind on landing....or tail wind down to short final and then head wind on landing?

I am presuming it would be easier to slow down with the upperwinds being headwind...rather than trying to get the speed back with a tail wind to short final.

Secondly...what is the maximum tailwind component various aircraft types can take on landing? I know afew....but unsure of ones like the CRJ series or the B777?
Married a Canadian is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2008, 08:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No doubt for me (747-400 driver) ... has to be headwind to short final and then a light tailwind (certainly if onto a dry and clear surface)..

If you have a 25kt tail at 1000ft, then your groundspeed is say 175kts vs 150kts IAS for final approach speed. This means you will need about 5x175 or about 900fpm RoD which will reduce the power required and help potentially destabilise the approach. It, equally importantly, makes slowing down from an intermediate approach speed MUCH harder.

Most aircraft can accept about a 15kt tailwind component afaik.
TopBunk is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2008, 20:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B777....15 Kt Tailwind.

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2008, 21:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
R/W 33 (either-dunno locally whats better). Headwind on approach, headwind on landing, maybe a minor crosswind.
Cough is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2008, 19:44
  #5 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Been a while for me to YYZ (ex777). With those conditions, I'd prefer 5kts TWC on landing with a headwind down final rather than 25kts TWC at 600ft (2nm). Ideally, it would be a headwind all the way down. Our stabilised approach criteria mean everything has to be in place (stable, correct configuration, power up) by 500' radio at the latest. We could achieve the first two but you could easily find yourself with idle thrust trying to overcome the inertia caused by the large tailwind. Not a good place to be at that stage.

5kts TWC on touchdown shouldn't be a problem for most airliners, provided the runway isn't slippery or contaminated.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2008, 00:56
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: England
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The one that gives me the least track miles, providing its within limits
Permanent Standby is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2008, 01:26
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Assuming a reasonably long non-contaminated runway, then most definately a headwind on final with 5kts tail on landing.
A Comfy Chair is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2008, 21:57
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Dre's mum's house
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, 737-800, give me the headwind on approach, up to 10 tail on landing.
The Real Slim Shady is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.