Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Landing with engine only after control failure.

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Landing with engine only after control failure.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Nov 2006, 23:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: England
Age: 40
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Landing with engine only after control failure.

Hi,

I have read about airliners landing after their controls have failed (ailerons, elevators etc) by using the engines to turn and control pitch.

My question is, in these cases did the pilots still have elevator trim and flap control or had those gone too?
Tiger_ Moth is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2006, 00:14
  #2 (permalink)  
Psychophysiological entity
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tweet Rob_Benham Famous author. Well, slightly famous.
Age: 84
Posts: 3,272
Received 37 Likes on 18 Posts
I am thankfully in the minority when I say that I spent a memorable 40 mins with totally jammed elevators and trim. I had calm conditions that made things a lot easier, also it was a twin turboprop which gave me very quick power reaction time. The main thing was trying to free the control-run while not heaving on the controls so that they suddenly moved and re-jammed in a kamikaze position. Other than that, the engines gave me a good control over the rate of decent.

When finally the plane was fixed, I found myself over JEY with a frozen throttle. The torque would have gone through the roof on decent, so single engine at night in a blizzard and massive cross-wind.

The strange thing is, it's those kind of days that I miss.
Loose rivets is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2006, 07:21
  #3 (permalink)  

Combine Operations
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.K.
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are two famous cases of airliners losing all their controls (i.e. the whole caboodle) after total hydraulics failure.

One was a JAL 747. It eventually crashed, with massive loss of life, the other was American (sorry, I forget the airline), which made a landing, of sorts, at Sioux City. Each case showed incredible skill on the part of the crew to keep the aircraft flying as long as they did, using engines only.
Farmer 1 is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2006, 08:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Farmer 1
There are two famous cases of airliners losing all their controls (i.e. the whole caboodle) after total hydraulics failure.
There was at least a third.
Originally Posted by Farmer 1
One was a JAL 747. It eventually crashed, with massive loss of life, the other was American (sorry, I forget the airline),
United DC-10
Originally Posted by Farmer 1
which made a landing, of sorts, at Sioux City.
With massive loss of life.

The outcomes were: JAL 747 flew into a mountain with 520 people dead, 4 surviving. It is suspected that there would have been more survivors if rescuers had shown up sooner. The United DC-10 had over 100 dead and less than 200 surviving. The whole flightdeck crew among the survivors.
Originally Posted by Farmer 1
Each case showed incredible skill on the part of the crew to keep the aircraft flying as long as they did, using engines only.
The third case was DHL A-300 shot down in Baghdad. The crew was unhurt.

And it seems they did lose flaps. A big disadvantage of United DC-10 was that they had to make fast, flapless approach. Whereas the DHL A-300 had the advantage of being shot down in dirty configuration.
chornedsnorkack is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2006, 09:14
  #5 (permalink)  

Combine Operations
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.K.
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The outcomes were: JAL 747 flew into a mountain with 520 people dead, 4 surviving. It is suspected that there would have been more survivors if rescuers had shown up sooner. The United DC-10 had over 100 dead and less than 200 surviving. The whole flightdeck crew among the survivors.
I believe the rescuers showed up soon enough, but they were not Japanese (American, I think). So, in order for the Japanese not to lose face, they were ordered to leave the scene.

That's all right, then. Must get the priorities right.
Farmer 1 is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2006, 09:59
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Loose Rivets

Sounds like an amazing story, Would love to hear a full account of that night. Maybe able to learn from it as some of us may be flying similar type. What was the out come? Fluid re freezing? I know it's a pain in the A$$ typing it all out but I personally would love to hear about it..

Cheers Crew..
crew the screw is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2006, 13:09
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: England
Age: 40
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, I could just about imagine getting a plane down with engines if the trim was still intact but with only engines I would have thought it would be nigh on impossible to judge the flare right as I guess there would be massive lag between input and response.

How did you get your controls un-jammed loose rivet?
Tiger_ Moth is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2006, 14:00
  #8 (permalink)  

Combine Operations
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.K.
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You're right, Tiger Moth, it is nigh on impossible.

And another thing - no hydraulics = no brakes.
Farmer 1 is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2006, 00:02
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wellington,NZ
Age: 66
Posts: 1,679
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Tiger Moth,
Re the JAL hydraulics failure, as you may know, the event that caused the failure was a failed pressure bulkhead down the back. When it blew, it took most of the vertical fin with it. The aircraft then would have had very little, if any, stability in the yaw axis. It's amazing they kept it going as long as they did.
I have heard from a controller now retired about a B170 that took off, asked to return with a "minor problem", made a very wide circuit, and landed, following which the copilot (as he was called then) got out, wandered down the back, and removed the elevator control lock. The flight then resumed, normally.
Tarq57 is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2006, 02:39
  #10 (permalink)  
sir.pratt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
simple google searches will locate the incidents you seek.

just quietly, i would have thought mose people already involved in commercial aviation would have more than a passing interest in these matters, and would have sought the documentaries (discovery channel - 'moments to disaster' is one) out.
 
Old 16th Nov 2006, 04:18
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: pub
Age: 41
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sir.pratt
and would have sought the documentaries
There's been a great movie about the United DC-10, can't remember the name though..and the landing itself was taped too, go google. Got it, but not here with me.

Those poor sods had hit the crap in full measure with rudder getting jammed in an off centre position and forcing the plane into a constant rate of turn. They balanced it with differential thrust (I think this was actually done by a check captain riding on the jumpseat), but not turn the other way round. So instead of right turn to Sioux city of about 30 degs they had to make a near complete circle to the left, and not sure if not more of them. Then at no flap landing way over 200 kts all went well until they had to reduce power in an attempt to flare. The jammed rudder prevailed, banked the craft to the left, struck the runway with a wingtip and landed side up, tearing in pieces as it rolled down. In the end about 150 fatalities, including the f/d.

The JAL smashed just below the tip of a mountain into a dense forest, barely accessible, at night and I think it was raining too. Still the SAR made it very quick and managed to save some folks. Japanese public went mad then and demanded Boeing CEO (whom I can't remember at all) to resign and commit a suicide, so I've been told.

Last edited by W.R.A.I.T.H; 16th Nov 2006 at 04:19. Reason: lost for words
W.R.A.I.T.H is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2006, 06:52
  #12 (permalink)  
sir.pratt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
JAL 74 pressure bulkhead blowout:

http://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/...d_program=8316

pretty sure this is the rpg/shoulder sam freighter one - excellent story with great actual video

http://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/...d_program=7913
 
Old 16th Nov 2006, 07:57
  #13 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,588
Received 1,711 Likes on 786 Posts
Just do a search on Propulsion based Engine Control or Thrust Based Emergency Control or variations thereof...
ORAC is online now  
Old 16th Nov 2006, 08:49
  #14 (permalink)  

Combine Operations
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.K.
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's been a great movie about the United DC-10,
... and there's been another film of the same, starring Charlton Heston.

He starred in some great films, but this wasn't one of them. For some reason, the female senior cabin crew (a true heroine) was changed from white to black, and from an intelligent professional into a total moron who wouldn't know her fuselage from her wingtip.

I don't know whom the film insulted most - the profession, the business, blacks or whites. That aside, it was too bad even to be funny.
Farmer 1 is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2006, 11:15
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: sURREY
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[quote=W.R.A.I.T.H;2968732] In the end about 150 fatalities, including the f/d.

Sorry W.R.A.I.T.H but the Crew of the DC10 incident ALL survived.
Captb747 is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2006, 13:51
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Middle East / UK
Age: 45
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was also an American Airlines DC-10 in a similar situation. "The Windsor incident" as it became known. Captain was Bryce McCormick I believe. They landed the a/c in the one piece.
Eff Oh is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2006, 18:05
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: pub
Age: 41
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I stand corrected. Probably got it mixed with another incident.
W.R.A.I.T.H is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.