PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Landing with engine only after control failure.
Old 13th Nov 2006, 08:57
  #4 (permalink)  
chornedsnorkack
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Farmer 1
There are two famous cases of airliners losing all their controls (i.e. the whole caboodle) after total hydraulics failure.
There was at least a third.
Originally Posted by Farmer 1
One was a JAL 747. It eventually crashed, with massive loss of life, the other was American (sorry, I forget the airline),
United DC-10
Originally Posted by Farmer 1
which made a landing, of sorts, at Sioux City.
With massive loss of life.

The outcomes were: JAL 747 flew into a mountain with 520 people dead, 4 surviving. It is suspected that there would have been more survivors if rescuers had shown up sooner. The United DC-10 had over 100 dead and less than 200 surviving. The whole flightdeck crew among the survivors.
Originally Posted by Farmer 1
Each case showed incredible skill on the part of the crew to keep the aircraft flying as long as they did, using engines only.
The third case was DHL A-300 shot down in Baghdad. The crew was unhurt.

And it seems they did lose flaps. A big disadvantage of United DC-10 was that they had to make fast, flapless approach. Whereas the DHL A-300 had the advantage of being shot down in dirty configuration.
chornedsnorkack is offline