100 hours twin for just $5495.00????
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: London
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
100 hours twin for just $5495.00????
Has anyone been to Ari Ben Aviator to do some hour building on the twins? I have just read februarys Flyer and they have an advert saying you can build 100 hours twin time for just $5495.00, can anyone shed any light on this offer as it seems to good to be true.
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe its riding shotgun on a charter? There is no way you can get P1 multi at 50 bucks an hour. In the states both pilots can log P1 due to their weird regs, but for JAR it would not count, neither would any airline recognise it.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: bristol
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Be very careful. I looked at this before and the way it works is; if you are working under FAR rukes and are flying in an aircraft with another pilot. If you are flying IFR then the second pilot, or safety pilot, can also claim P1. This is an American system. I checked with the CAA and under no circumstances can you do this under JAR rules. The US flying schools conveniently ignore this. ' Will anyone find out you ask?' well maybe not but do you want to take the risk?
Two pilots could log P1 under FARs but I would suggest, that the CAA would view this very dimly indeed. In the US, one pilot could be under the hood for simulated IMC whilst the other pilot acts as safety pilot. I believe in this situation, the safety pilot is the legal PIC with repsonsibility for terrain avoidance and aircraft seperation while the pilot under the hood is the sole manipulator of the controls. Two pilots logging the same time for the purposes of hour buidling towards JAR licences should not be contemplating this approach.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Over here but sometimes over there.
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds very nice,but while it would be nice to have 100hrs twin time in my log book.The 100 hrs of actual Twin experience is what I would rather have, rather than just some nice writting in my log book. <img src="frown.gif" border="0">
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Ballwin MO USA
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello All !. .I used to be an FAA Flight Instructor prior to flying charter then commuters and now FR8.. .I gave over 1800 hrs of Instruction and flew over 1300 hrs FAR Part 135 with 2 crew.. .The only time the FAA allows two pilots to log P1 time is in the case of a non-instrument rated pilot receiving Instrument Instruction for the attainment of his Instrument rating in actual IMC conditions by a certified Instrument flight instructor under an Instrument flight plan filed in the name of the said Instructor. That is the only time this would be the case.. .In 135 charter operations it is not unusual for the operator to request and be granted permission from the FAA to use Second In Command Pilots as part of their operation, this authorisation takes the form of an inclusion in the operators Operational Specifications ( List of FAA authorisations and compliance requirements for the operators Air Carrier certificate ). .Most piston twins do not require two crew and any Second in Command may log only that time that they actually manipulate the controls THAT TIME MUST BE LOGGED AS SECOND IN COMMAND as stipulated in their letter of authorisation to operate as Sec In Comm post successfull checkride.. .This SIC time will be sold at 25 to 50 bux an hour depending on the block-time purchased.. .Alternatively you may yourself rent a twin for a block of time that may realistically cost from 120 to 200 dollars depending on the amount of time purchased and the type rented, I have seen an old Piper Apache go for 85 dollars per hour ' Wet ', this was some years ago.. .Instead of listening to stupid advice from JAR folks who obviously revel in their mis-perceived superiority and have absolutely no clue about what they are talking about you may e-mail me direct for additional info about flying in the U.S. or anything else I may be of assistance in.. .I am an Ex-Brit currently flying FR8 for a living and would be glad to help!!!
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whats wrong slappy, couldn't make it in Europe eh? <img src="wink.gif" border="0"> At least postings like yours give us light relief in these hard times. 
No matter what slappy says, this practice is very common in the US, it is not a JAR v's FAA thing, it is a common sense thing in that any airline worth its salt will not employ someone with phoney twin time!
No matter what slappy says, this practice is very common in the US, it is not a JAR v's FAA thing, it is a common sense thing in that any airline worth its salt will not employ someone with phoney twin time!
ZbV
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Samsonite
Age: 51
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Island Air... Used to fly little light airplanes loooong time ago. I often rented a Seneca and took friends with me. I was PIC I did let the other guys fly as we did share some of the expences. Anyways what they put in their logbooks was nobody elses business but theirs. They could have logged all as P1 and I could have not cared less. And would Airline give a toss if the fellow was alone in the airplane or not... As long as he performs on the simride. DUH
Before we get this emerging ( Not again ) JAR / FAR pissing contest to full swing I want to point out that Europe has a lot to learn from all that " nonsense " " Yanks " do. General aviation is in a lot better shape there than it is here in Europe. . .I fly on a FAA licence and validations. I have had lots of grief while trying to get work with it in Europe ( Nowhere else though ). Luckily I fall into the ECAC category. No problems since.
If you feel that 100 hours of multi in your logbook will enhance your employment prospects go for it.
Before we get this emerging ( Not again ) JAR / FAR pissing contest to full swing I want to point out that Europe has a lot to learn from all that " nonsense " " Yanks " do. General aviation is in a lot better shape there than it is here in Europe. . .I fly on a FAA licence and validations. I have had lots of grief while trying to get work with it in Europe ( Nowhere else though ). Luckily I fall into the ECAC category. No problems since.
If you feel that 100 hours of multi in your logbook will enhance your employment prospects go for it.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Island air:
You are so right, just don't tell all the thousands of first officers around the world that they are building phoney flight time.
The JAR's truly were written for deep thinkers like you with the ability to understand what a waste of time sitting as a second in command is.
Yup what we need is more self trained experts that do not have all that real world exposure to clutter up their minds.
What you should do is just skip the flying part and get a job writing rules for JAR, just imagine all the inovative ideas you could come up with to " fix " aviation.
.............. . The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no.
You are so right, just don't tell all the thousands of first officers around the world that they are building phoney flight time.
The JAR's truly were written for deep thinkers like you with the ability to understand what a waste of time sitting as a second in command is.
Yup what we need is more self trained experts that do not have all that real world exposure to clutter up their minds.
What you should do is just skip the flying part and get a job writing rules for JAR, just imagine all the inovative ideas you could come up with to " fix " aviation.
.............. .
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: US
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are other instances where both pilots in a required two-pilot crew may log PIC time under FAR 61.51 and 135.
Examples: A type rated pilot receiving instruction from a company flight instructor (also obviously type rated). Both may log PIC time.
A non-type rated pilot (not designated as the aircraft commander (P-1)) who is the sole manipulator of the controls on a non-passenger leg under FAR 135. Both may log PIC time.
The FARs do not follow the JARs.
Examples: A type rated pilot receiving instruction from a company flight instructor (also obviously type rated). Both may log PIC time.
A non-type rated pilot (not designated as the aircraft commander (P-1)) who is the sole manipulator of the controls on a non-passenger leg under FAR 135. Both may log PIC time.
The FARs do not follow the JARs.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Over here but sometimes over there.
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Slappy,I don`t think we JAA types are superior.Far from it.I think Europe has a whole has a lot to learn from the way flying in the States is done.. .Unfortunatly I don`t have the right to live and work anywhere else but in the UK,so I have to jump through their hoops to get a licence.. .I don`t really care what other people log as flight time,but if I had 20hrs to log in a Twin,I would want to be the PIC,purely and simply because I need the experience to learn.Sitting next to someone may help,but I need the hands on myself.
ZbV
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Samsonite
Age: 51
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yip A type rated pilot in an airplane that requires 2 pilots may log PIC when " the sole manipulator of controls " Ie. It is his leg to fly. How else you think you could ever meet the 500 hours PIC in type required for insurance purposes. More and more airline requirments are dictated by insurance companies, regulatiosn adjusted accordingly. Have a look at the regs, both JARīs and FARīs. You will see what I mean.