December Gen Nav
Before "Ze Germans" get here
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: ?
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
December Gen Nav
It might have been just me and a vertl limited few I know who also did Gen Nav, but a lot of people seemed to fail it? I was suprised not to pass it with 71% as I thought it was a very fair exam. I did find it crazy tight on time, and I suspect I may not have been the only one.. Comments, thoughts,questions?
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep, I failed too!!! Second time and with 74% !!! I would not mind so much except that it is my last subject and my re-take in Feb will be sitting no. 6!!!!!!! 
I also thought that it was an ok exam, nothing too hard and I was really, really shocked to fail. I honestly feel that I know what I am talking about with this subject and do not know where I have gone wrong!!! If only we received feedback!!!
I have heard that there are questions being asked of this paper by the powers that be...however this is just a rumour...
Any more views???
M
I also thought that it was an ok exam, nothing too hard and I was really, really shocked to fail. I honestly feel that I know what I am talking about with this subject and do not know where I have gone wrong!!! If only we received feedback!!!
I have heard that there are questions being asked of this paper by the powers that be...however this is just a rumour...
Any more views???
M
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While I also agree with Decembers' exam being "tight on time" to say the least, I just managed to finish it with seconds to spare! Granted, there was alot of of CRP-5 work but we can all do that standing on our heads blindfolded (even though some answers only had 2 degrees difference)!
All in all it wasn't a bad exam, not 1 question on Polar Stereographic (not my fortie) and unfortunately only 1 question on PET (my fortie). The exam could have been alot worse!
I passed with 85% - Shame things didn't go so well with Met. 71%
Now that was a hard exam!
All in all it wasn't a bad exam, not 1 question on Polar Stereographic (not my fortie) and unfortunately only 1 question on PET (my fortie). The exam could have been alot worse!
I passed with 85% - Shame things didn't go so well with Met. 71%
Now that was a hard exam!
Last edited by Dah Dah...Dit; 29th Dec 2003 at 01:24.
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Age: 54
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funny how peoples minds work in different ways. I sat and failed the Dec Nav exam having thought I had walked it. In fact i was wondering if it would be my highest scoring pass. How wrong can one be.
Met on the other hand I breezed an 85.
If anyones interested and i am sure he won't mind me saying, but i have been in contact with and am arranging a few one day crammers with Send Clowns, down at Bournemouth.
Hopefully that will sort out the gremlins that are risking me doing the whole darn 14 again. 13 in the bag 1 to go,sitting 6, oh god the pressure !!!
Met on the other hand I breezed an 85.
If anyones interested and i am sure he won't mind me saying, but i have been in contact with and am arranging a few one day crammers with Send Clowns, down at Bournemouth.
Hopefully that will sort out the gremlins that are risking me doing the whole darn 14 again. 13 in the bag 1 to go,sitting 6, oh god the pressure !!!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 46
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Got 90% for Gen Nav in December but being an ex Navy bridge watchkeeping officer it would be dissappointing in the least to have failed nav!!!
I do agree that it was way over the top on CRP 5 stuff and mentioned this to the staff at London Guildhall. What got me through I think was the excellent feedback I had. LGU still have the old CAA Gen Nav stuff and if you can do that the JAA stuff is a piece of cake. If any one has any queries on any of the Gen Nav stuff dont be afraid to PM me.
Cannot stress enough you got to be able to do the CRP 5 stuff with your eyes shut. Most of the form of the earth questions can be answered by drawing a picture and doing the sums in your head - you dont need to sit there with your calculator, pencil and paper working it out.
IE that question:
Circumnavigating the earth at 60 N , GS 480 knots. What GS needed to circumnavigate the earth in same time at the equator:
a 480
b 240
c 720
d 960
Cos 60 = 0.5, there its twice the GS = 960 = D. Next question......
Meteorology was a tough one too, but is my "chosen specialist subject". Was getting high 90s in feedback, only managed mid 80s, so I would say it was a hard paper.
There were a couple of gash questions in Rad Nav as well.
I do agree that it was way over the top on CRP 5 stuff and mentioned this to the staff at London Guildhall. What got me through I think was the excellent feedback I had. LGU still have the old CAA Gen Nav stuff and if you can do that the JAA stuff is a piece of cake. If any one has any queries on any of the Gen Nav stuff dont be afraid to PM me.
Cannot stress enough you got to be able to do the CRP 5 stuff with your eyes shut. Most of the form of the earth questions can be answered by drawing a picture and doing the sums in your head - you dont need to sit there with your calculator, pencil and paper working it out.
IE that question:
Circumnavigating the earth at 60 N , GS 480 knots. What GS needed to circumnavigate the earth in same time at the equator:
a 480
b 240
c 720
d 960
Cos 60 = 0.5, there its twice the GS = 960 = D. Next question......
Meteorology was a tough one too, but is my "chosen specialist subject". Was getting high 90s in feedback, only managed mid 80s, so I would say it was a hard paper.
There were a couple of gash questions in Rad Nav as well.
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
timzsta - yes that was a nice easy question. I found alot of them were simple enough i.e. the relative bearings, grid plotting etc.
What caught me out on the time side of things were the q's towards the end of the paper when time was getting short. This was the question that asked " what is the latest time the a/c can start it's descent to cross point x at !5:20"? (or something)
Not particularly difficult, just not what I wanted to be seeing as Q45 with 15 mins to go!
Anyway, at least it's passed - now onto Flight Planning!!
What caught me out on the time side of things were the q's towards the end of the paper when time was getting short. This was the question that asked " what is the latest time the a/c can start it's descent to cross point x at !5:20"? (or something)
Not particularly difficult, just not what I wanted to be seeing as Q45 with 15 mins to go!
Anyway, at least it's passed - now onto Flight Planning!!
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,805
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The pass rates for General Nav are amongst the lowest for the ATPL(A) group. Each month around 60% of all the candidates in the UK who take this paper pass it. December's pass rate was slightly better than usual at 64%. It's probable that more people failed General Nav than the other papers but that, in itself, is quite normal if slightly depressing.
Jet Blast Rat
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sarfend-on-Sea
Age: 50
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it is the exam, Drifter. I teach General Navigation and Flight Planning, and offer private tuition. I have had more people wishing to study Gen Nav on their last chance to pick up a pass, i.e. 4th attempt or 6th sitting, than all our other instructors have in their subjects combined. I haven't had any in that position for Flight Planning, I don't think. I certainly am by far the busiest in the school for private tuition (students from all the schools, I hasten to add - it is not me failing to teach the course!).
That all suggests that pople who are passing other subjects are not passing General Navigation.
That all suggests that pople who are passing other subjects are not passing General Navigation.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Clowns,
Gen Nav is giving me the heebe-geebes somewhat. I don't really find anything particuarly difficult but I keep hearing of guys doing good in the course and then failing the exam or barely passing.
Does anybody have any pointers on where the problems exist? I'm doing the exams in Feb so anything to help us expect the unexpected...
Gen Nav is giving me the heebe-geebes somewhat. I don't really find anything particuarly difficult but I keep hearing of guys doing good in the course and then failing the exam or barely passing.
Does anybody have any pointers on where the problems exist? I'm doing the exams in Feb so anything to help us expect the unexpected...
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,805
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From our experience the quality of basic PPL ground training has nosedived in the last couple of years, it is normal to find ATPL candidates who cannot use the CRP5 and who don't know the difference between heading and track. We spend a lot of time teaching stuff that really should have been covered in the PPL.
For the exam I would agree with timzsta, you need to be totally comfortable with the CRP5. Don't expect very much Polar Stereo stuff, the plotting is easy peasy, usually VOR/DME fixes on the Jepp airways chart that covers Ireland and you can expect a few 'mensa' type theory questions. Good quality feedback can help with this paper because the oddball questions do seem very odd until you see how to solve them.
For the exam I would agree with timzsta, you need to be totally comfortable with the CRP5. Don't expect very much Polar Stereo stuff, the plotting is easy peasy, usually VOR/DME fixes on the Jepp airways chart that covers Ireland and you can expect a few 'mensa' type theory questions. Good quality feedback can help with this paper because the oddball questions do seem very odd until you see how to solve them.
Before "Ze Germans" get here
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: ?
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am going to be a bit controversial here and wonder if the decrease in quality of groundschool instruction has to do with more and more PPL students doing their licences in the US being taught by FAA rated pilots who have never even sat the JAA PPL exams, and who a lot of them cant actually use a CRP themselves? I dont mean this as an insult its just not something thats covered in the FAA syllabus in much detail and therefore they need not know it. I certainly could have benefited from better PPL groundschool for Nav and Met, but my FAA instructor was not familiar with much of the Nav and MEt questions in the confuser.
Guest
Posts: n/a
it is normal to find ATPL candidates who cannot use the CRP5 and who don't know the difference between heading and track
I certainly could have benefited from better PPL groundschool for Nav and Met, but my FAA instructor was not familiar with much of the Nav and MEt questions in the confuser.
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,805
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nope, the norm is reading the PPL confuser and learning the answers to the questions. Thom is often considered too complicated for the PPL exams, I think his books are excellent.
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From my experience, I've found that there are 2 ways of teaching PPL training in the U.K. The 1st type is purely for people who want to fly for fun. This involves a more simplified approach to training but obviously still teaches the proper syllabus. The 2nd type is geared more towards the aspiring professional pilot. By this I mean, if you're going to learn how to fly a plane, then you might as well learn to commercial standards. Same goes for commercial navigation techniques.
Overall though, I have to agree with the philosophy that the structure of the JAA PPL is by far superior to the FAA method, especially in terms of Navigational techniques.
Now I've been in Florida now for some months studying for my ATPL's but have occasionally found the time to fly with a few fellow Brits trained 'The American Way'. My point is this : While general handling + procedures are very good (although it's checklist overkill), general nav. is a disgrace. They just fly from point to point, slap on a couple of 6min markers, + off they go - knowing nothing of Closing angle techniques/ inverse fraction rules etc. which was drummed into me from day 1!
I'd also like to agree with Alex on the Trevor Thoms PPL books. Granted it's a bit indepth for the average recreational flyer and I think maybe contains a bit too much information required for the written exams, but for those wishing to pursue this as a career (ATPL's), these are an invaluable set of books!
Overall though, I have to agree with the philosophy that the structure of the JAA PPL is by far superior to the FAA method, especially in terms of Navigational techniques.
Now I've been in Florida now for some months studying for my ATPL's but have occasionally found the time to fly with a few fellow Brits trained 'The American Way'. My point is this : While general handling + procedures are very good (although it's checklist overkill), general nav. is a disgrace. They just fly from point to point, slap on a couple of 6min markers, + off they go - knowing nothing of Closing angle techniques/ inverse fraction rules etc. which was drummed into me from day 1!
I'd also like to agree with Alex on the Trevor Thoms PPL books. Granted it's a bit indepth for the average recreational flyer and I think maybe contains a bit too much information required for the written exams, but for those wishing to pursue this as a career (ATPL's), these are an invaluable set of books!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Derby
Age: 45
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The problem in GNav
Is simply that there are TOO many CRP 5 questions to do. 26 questions where you had to use the CRP5 were on the exam the month before.
Our instructor gave us paper after paper of questions where you had to use the CRP 5 and after 30 or so papers of it you do get a lot quicker, even if you yourself don't notice it.
One of my buddies failed his GNAV exam due to the lack of practice, he hadn't used his CRP 5 in weeks and thought he would be safe. (due to 26 questions involving CRP5)
Moral of the story> There's no such thing as enough practice.
Even if you think you know everything your CRP 5 can do, do it over and over.
Gnav IMO isn't as complex to me anymore since it's all about a few drawings, formulas. It's basically a lot like M&B, calculation after calculation, nothing to it. The trick may be though when do you know what formula you can use for what questions and what map i.e. POrigin, Convegence for the 4-5 maps (were there more?).
Our instructor gave us paper after paper of questions where you had to use the CRP 5 and after 30 or so papers of it you do get a lot quicker, even if you yourself don't notice it.
One of my buddies failed his GNAV exam due to the lack of practice, he hadn't used his CRP 5 in weeks and thought he would be safe. (due to 26 questions involving CRP5)
Moral of the story> There's no such thing as enough practice.
Even if you think you know everything your CRP 5 can do, do it over and over.
Gnav IMO isn't as complex to me anymore since it's all about a few drawings, formulas. It's basically a lot like M&B, calculation after calculation, nothing to it. The trick may be though when do you know what formula you can use for what questions and what map i.e. POrigin, Convegence for the 4-5 maps (were there more?).
Before "Ze Germans" get here
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: ?
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No I didnt get groundschool for my exams but Dah Dah made the point I was trying to make very well. If you are going on to higher things its a huge help to have a good base to start from.
I think Thoms books arent good enough to prop up the short leg of my bed. They may have all the info, but they are the worlds most boring books. Have you ever read the Jeppesson PPL or CPL books Alex? Loads of colour, pictures, Little illustrative stories in the columns, well laid out books that keep you from falling asleep after 5 mins. They should make them for the JAR PPL. I would agree with you though, the PPL confuser can be abit of a dangerous thing as it is sometimes the sole basis of the exams.
I think Thoms books arent good enough to prop up the short leg of my bed. They may have all the info, but they are the worlds most boring books. Have you ever read the Jeppesson PPL or CPL books Alex? Loads of colour, pictures, Little illustrative stories in the columns, well laid out books that keep you from falling asleep after 5 mins. They should make them for the JAR PPL. I would agree with you though, the PPL confuser can be abit of a dangerous thing as it is sometimes the sole basis of the exams.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, now I'm on sitting six I've decided to sign up for the ABACUS Gen Nav question bank...I was wondering if Alex Whittingham could comment on this??? Is it any good??? If not can he advise me on where I can find more JAA type questions from?
M
M