MaxR You said quote/ Have you flown twelve hours in the last 2 years, one of them with an instructor? /quote
the requirement is - note the 'and'
|
A mountain rating on an LAPL(A) has a validity period. Revalidation & renewals should be entered on the revalidation pages.
Everything else for an LAPL(A) either has no expiry (aerobatics, night) or has recency requirements (tow, SEP & TMG privileges) for which logbook evidence is sufficient. |
Originally Posted by cotterpot
(Post 10189948)
MaxR You said quote/ Have you flown twelve hours in the last 2 years, one of them with an instructor? /quote
the requirement is - note the 'and'
|
Surely, if they really put some effort into it, EASA rulemakers could make the subject of PPL and LAPL licence currency much more convoluted than it presently is.
|
Slight thread drift but an interesting point that cotterpot raised was that you actually need 13 hours: 12 as PIC plus an hour with an instructor. As that is different from the NPPL, those who have converted may easily be caught out. The NPPL revalidation requirements being:
(i) flown at least 12 hours which includes at least 8 hours as pilot in command; (ii) completed at least 12 take-offs and 12 landings; (iii) undertaken at least one hour of flying training with an instructor entitled to give instruction on aeroplanes of that class; and (iv) flown at least six hours in the 12 months preceding the specified date |
|
That table suggests that you DO need the instructor's signature in your logbook- I have always asked for that anyway!
However, still no clarification whether it can be a non-UK (European) instructor with a UK issued LAPL(A). My guess, since the rules are silent on the issue, would be it can. Unless someone knows different.... |
DaveW
That's a really useful chart but it doesn't highlight the point that I had missed (and which cotterpot pointed out) which is that the LAPL actually requires 13 hours unlike the NPPL where 12 means 12. Of course, the fact that the LAPL requires all 12 hours to be PIC should be a big enough clue for those not quite so slow witted as I. |
Thanks.
It doesn't highlight the myriad differences between other licence/rating combinations either, but they are all there. It couldn't highlight all those things, otherwise it would be even more unwieldy than it already is. |
Originally Posted by DaveW
(Post 10196397)
Thanks.
It doesn't highlight the myriad differences between other licence/rating combinations either, but they are all there. It couldn't highlight all those things, otherwise it would be even more unwieldy than it already is. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:28. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.