Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Revalidation by experience?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Revalidation by experience?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Feb 2020, 16:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Augusta, Georgia, USA (back from Germany again)
Posts: 234
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Revalidation by experience?

All,

I was stationed most recently in Germany 2015-2017. I brought my EASA PPL up-to-date. Added a TMG rating to it and to my SPL.

For my current 24-month SEP validity a German official generously let me use an hour of dual with an FAA instructor with the promise that I would do it with a German instructor the next time.

I've been to the UK and Germany several times in the first 12 months of this 24-month period. The second 12-month period starts now. I'll be in Germany for a couple weeks this summer.

Please help me get this correct since I'll likely only have one trip that includes a flying opportunity. I need:

12 hours SEP PIC during this 12-month period
No more than six hours can be dual.
I need a one-hour flight with an instructor (with German license?) - need not be the 12th hour?
An examiner reviews/signs my license. (Clearly must have the 12 hours, but can it be done by mail if the examiner is willing?)
The one-hour instructional flight may be in a single engine airplane or TMG as I am rated in both.

Please correct any errors.

Thanks,

Terry
LTCTerry is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2020, 18:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: EDSP
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are inquiring specifically for the SPL?
SPL TMG is rolling 24-months: When you sit into the cockpit, within the last 24 months you shall have 12 hours PIC / 6 hrs non dual + 12 landings + one hour training flight w/ EASA FI (NO!!! CRI / doesn't have to be german). The training flight will be signed in your logbook with the FIs Hans-Otto and his license number. So will be a revalidation by an examiner FE if you choose to replace experience by that. No further paperwork. Training flight done in a SEP for PPL will be accredited.

PPL is what you wrote:
Within 12 months prior to bi annual revalidation:
12 hours in
12 landings
1 training hour (at any time within 12 months pre expiry) with FI or CRI, TMG and SEP exchangeable, only one needed.
All replaceable with a FE or CRE check ride (your choice of FE/CRE), but only within three months prior to revalidation.
Once it's expired, examination flight with FE assigned by the local authority uppon application.

So if you want to have both current the trick is not to do the training flight with a CRI and have it signed in the logbook not only the paperwork for revalidation. Otherwise if your PPL is valid your SPL should be as well.

Last edited by BDAttitude; 7th Feb 2020 at 18:32.
BDAttitude is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2020, 22:42
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: anywhere
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
The instructor needs to be an EASA instructor, not necessarily a German licence holder.

If you meet all the other criteria, ie hours & landings, the FI/CRI who does the 1 hour training flight can also endorse your licence with the new expiry date (no need for an examiner) if authorised to do so by the national authority that issued your licence. Some national authorities may not have authorised anyone, so check with your German instructor.
Prop swinger is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2020, 22:55
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1 training hour (at any time within 12 months pre expiry) with FI or CRI, TMG and SEP exchangeable, only one needed.
The EASA requirement is for refresher training of at least one hour total flight time so may be more than one flight with more than one instructor.
If the last instructor you fly with is FCL.945 certified, the instructor may sign the rating in the licence provided they have the same SOLI.
Whopity is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2020, 03:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: EDSP
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Prop swinger
If you meet all the other criteria, ie hours & landings, the FI/CRI who does the 1 hour training flight can also endorse your licence with the new expiry date (no need for an examiner) if authorised to do so by the national authority that issued your licence. Some national authorities may not have authorised anyone, so check with your German instructor.
Which german LBA does per
NfL 1-521-15.
I don't think his license must be issued in Germany, he has to complete the paperwork with the local licensing authority though.


Originally Posted by Whopity
The EASA requirement is for refresher training of at least one hour total flight time so may be more than one flight with more than one instructor.
That's not how the authorities like to interprete that here. It must be one continuous flight with max 2 landings (i.e. one t&g allowed) of min 1 hour.
BDAttitude is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2020, 10:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Bressuire
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
LTCTerry which EASA country (SOLI) issued your EASA licence, this is important?

It is the issuing authority that determines the administration of your licence. The 1hr of training may be conducted by any valid EASA instructor for the class/type, the state where they are licenced is irrelevant for this purpose. Whenever paperwork is required this can only be counter-signed by those approved by the issuing authority and all forms must be submitted to that authority. If the licence is issued by the UK then whopitys' advice is of course wholly correct.

I do not like phrases such as: "That's not how the authorities like to interpret that here". What is liked and what must be are two different things. The UK does not determine the content for the "revalidation training" flight/s. No other state may interpret this requirement differently from the SOLI. I'm sure, by the way, the term stating the maximum number of landing is a language error" for why would it be of value to set such a limit on a training flight. To emphasise, the training flight is NOT a test.

Last edited by Fl1ingfrog; 8th Feb 2020 at 11:01.
Fl1ingfrog is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.