Ikarus C42 thoughts?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: On a Flight Level
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ikarus C42 thoughts?
Looking for suggestions for the future, as a commercial pilot for 10 years I've longed to get back into GA for some time but it's so expensive. Now I don't have the time with a young family but will do in the future and I've always said I'd like an aircraft I could take somewhere(3hrs endurance tops not channel hopping) as I'd get bored finding my house for an hour each week and something interesting like a tail dragger or vintage to get back to basics without it been a spam can. Can anyone recommend the C42? Or something as cheap...(I know it's not a tail dragger or vintage 😜
Pros.
1. Very modern 3-4K a share £30 a month and £20hr dry (cheap mogas)
2. Basic instruments so great for getting the charts out.
3. Unusual, in that the control stick is centre and other strange lever ergonomics
4. Capable of farm strips
5. Above all it seems very SAFE. German built, Easy to fly with BRS fitted. I'm past the days of getting in anything I have a family I want to share the experiance with safely.
I fly airliners with lots of fancy EFIS/FADEC/AUTOPILOT etc so the thought of something like a cirrus bores me, but the thought of a Harvard would cripple me financially lol.
Anybody have have experiences with the IKARUS? Or thoughts on other aircraft?
Pros.
1. Very modern 3-4K a share £30 a month and £20hr dry (cheap mogas)
2. Basic instruments so great for getting the charts out.
3. Unusual, in that the control stick is centre and other strange lever ergonomics
4. Capable of farm strips
5. Above all it seems very SAFE. German built, Easy to fly with BRS fitted. I'm past the days of getting in anything I have a family I want to share the experiance with safely.
I fly airliners with lots of fancy EFIS/FADEC/AUTOPILOT etc so the thought of something like a cirrus bores me, but the thought of a Harvard would cripple me financially lol.
Anybody have have experiences with the IKARUS? Or thoughts on other aircraft?
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
My 'day' job is teaching people to fly in a PA28. Our microlight school had until recently been strictly flexwing. I had a ride in one but thought I'd never, after 35 years and at my advancing years ever master the differences. Recently they bought a C42. I had a go and was hooked! I now fly it just for fun, even at the end of a day in the PA28, for relaxation. As you say, the controls are all in different places but it only took me one ride to get used to them (though selecting flap is still not as smooth as I'd like). I'd say it's more of a challenge to land well but feels really safe. If you can find a C42 group to join, go for it!
However, one note of caution. Probably, like me, you've no qualms about IMC. Today, we went from few at 900' and otherwise blue sky to overcast at 900' whilst we were out in the PA28. Not a problem, just let down IMC. This would be a potential disaster in the C42.
However, one note of caution. Probably, like me, you've no qualms about IMC. Today, we went from few at 900' and otherwise blue sky to overcast at 900' whilst we were out in the PA28. Not a problem, just let down IMC. This would be a potential disaster in the C42.
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: just to the left of the filing cabinet
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you'll find the limitiation with the very light end of GA is that of payload. For example a C42 can only lift a total of 180kg. It's fine if you want to fly solo, but put two 90kg people on board and you are left with 3kg for fuel! And that's before you factor in things such as luggage and the general detritous which accumulates in most aircraft.
I suspect that most replies will suggest going down the LAA permit route in something like a Jodel as they can be good load-lifters with more sensible running costs compared to spam cans.
So probably a good starting point would be to consider what the a/c would normally be expected to carry - that should narrow the field a bit.
Oh - and don't forget - you'll have to make your own coffee ;-)
I suspect that most replies will suggest going down the LAA permit route in something like a Jodel as they can be good load-lifters with more sensible running costs compared to spam cans.
So probably a good starting point would be to consider what the a/c would normally be expected to carry - that should narrow the field a bit.
Oh - and don't forget - you'll have to make your own coffee ;-)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hellfire Corner
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A friend is training in an Ikarus and likes it a lot, but prefers the Rans S6. The payload is vastly different, the design is good, the 80hp Rotax is fairly bullet-proof, the flap lever doesn't try to skin you and the stick is in a conventional position. And they are cheaper. My OH (who may pop up here) reckons that the recovering that is necessary periodically is a small price to pay for flying as cheap as one could get in any aeroplane-shaped machine.
You could buy three or four Jodels for the cost of one Sportcruiser (or equivalent); presuming you have hangarage, they are definitely worth considering. Lots of fun.
My 2d worth.
You could buy three or four Jodels for the cost of one Sportcruiser (or equivalent); presuming you have hangarage, they are definitely worth considering. Lots of fun.
My 2d worth.
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally, I would go for a LAA permit light aircraft.
Running costs are virtually identical with the same engine but you have a bigger choice of types especially vintage and taildraggers- and they are often cheaper to buy than a C42.
See also the comments on the recent "Microlight, Permit or C of A ? " thread.
PS I have a Kitfox Model 5 taildragger with Rotax 912ULS.
Running costs are virtually identical with the same engine but you have a bigger choice of types especially vintage and taildraggers- and they are often cheaper to buy than a C42.
See also the comments on the recent "Microlight, Permit or C of A ? " thread.
PS I have a Kitfox Model 5 taildragger with Rotax 912ULS.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Maidenhead
Age: 41
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have you considered an EV97 Eurostar? I fly both the EV97 and the C42 and I far prefer the EV97. Much better visibility being low wing, 20kts quicker, same engine, same running costs and parts availability seems to be much better too. I spent 20 hours flying round the alps in one in September and it was superb. We've got the newer SL model which has EFIS, BRS and looks a little sleeker too. Definitely worth a look.
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Brighton, UK
Age: 45
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I learned to fly on one 6 years ago, then converted it to a group A after a year of microlight flying.
The C42 is a wonderful aircraft. Responsive, forgiving, easy to fly. 80hp beats the 100hp in my opinion. Extra power unnecessary, burns more, not as smooth.
I heard a story from a friend only this week who is learning to fly on one. He said ... "Just got to do a couple more solo hours and Came in with too much airspeed and didnt bleed it off in the roundout. Bounced on the runway and tried to save it rather than going around. Bounced 3 more times which got progressively worse with nose high attitude. Thought I was going to lose it but somehow it recovered itself."
Must be very forgiving indeed!!!
The only downside is the same as the upside! It's so forgiving and easy to fly, I personally consider it a little dull. It is Also lacking in any space to put anything.
The C42 is a wonderful aircraft. Responsive, forgiving, easy to fly. 80hp beats the 100hp in my opinion. Extra power unnecessary, burns more, not as smooth.
I heard a story from a friend only this week who is learning to fly on one. He said ... "Just got to do a couple more solo hours and Came in with too much airspeed and didnt bleed it off in the roundout. Bounced on the runway and tried to save it rather than going around. Bounced 3 more times which got progressively worse with nose high attitude. Thought I was going to lose it but somehow it recovered itself."
Must be very forgiving indeed!!!
The only downside is the same as the upside! It's so forgiving and easy to fly, I personally consider it a little dull. It is Also lacking in any space to put anything.
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Do I come here often?
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Like the OP I operate some pretty sophisticated kit, both fixed and rotary wing.
I have an LAA single seat rag and stick aeroplane for the joy of it and have recently bought a six seat go places machine.
I would love something like ChampChump's Aeronca, but have never been quick enough out of the blocks when one comes up for sale. (Also the current Lady Dementia would have apoplexy if I bought another aeroplane)
Have you tried a SkyRanger? A colleague bought one for exactly the same reasons as the OP gives, he (the colleague) is besotted with it, and I don't blame him. The shortfield ability is fantastic, the price is reasonable for a young bloke with young family, the handling is not brilliant, but I do covet the thing.
It is a bit of a compromise in most areas, but great fun for just bimbling. His current ambition is to visit every strip in Lockyears.
SND
I have an LAA single seat rag and stick aeroplane for the joy of it and have recently bought a six seat go places machine.
I would love something like ChampChump's Aeronca, but have never been quick enough out of the blocks when one comes up for sale. (Also the current Lady Dementia would have apoplexy if I bought another aeroplane)
Have you tried a SkyRanger? A colleague bought one for exactly the same reasons as the OP gives, he (the colleague) is besotted with it, and I don't blame him. The shortfield ability is fantastic, the price is reasonable for a young bloke with young family, the handling is not brilliant, but I do covet the thing.
It is a bit of a compromise in most areas, but great fun for just bimbling. His current ambition is to visit every strip in Lockyears.
SND
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: On a Flight Level
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the constructive inputs, I used to say I wouldn't want anything to easy to fly incase I got bored but I think it's important to be safe incase I've not flown it in a while I can jump straight in. Getting something forgiving and rewarding is a challenge. I thought of a chipmunk but it can get expensive flying it often and I have a few friends who own a share in one but never fly it. . With regard to the C42 weight I'm 6ft 1 but slim...ish, I was going to take 2 adults not worried about bags a rucksack will suffice. Daft question as I'm pre VLA etc but is the microlight version and VLA/class A versions differnt aircraft or is it like commercial just pay more fees to CAA to class the aircraft higher weight?
With regard LAA aircraft I love that scene but I wouldn't fancy an amateur built aircraft which is a shame as there are so many great designs.
With regard LAA aircraft I love that scene but I wouldn't fancy an amateur built aircraft which is a shame as there are so many great designs.
Last edited by Captain Spam Can; 17th Nov 2016 at 10:56. Reason: .
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: On a Flight Level
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Eurostar is a sweet looking aircraft but it's looks very conventional for my use I.e controls in the correct places. And I see very few come up in shares.
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Running costs of Microlight or VLA/Class A versions of same aircraft virtually identical as long as both are on BMAA/LAA permit. Although I am not sure why you do not fancy amateur built aircraft (particularly since some of the modern kits are, whisper it, essentially factory built and assembled by the first owner), many LAA aircraft were factory built eg. Jodels, Aeroncas, Luscombes etc.
PS The Eurostar is a lovely little aircraft particularly the LAA version with 100hp. I used to have a share in one. It's just that the Kitfox is more interesting to fly, copes with rougher/softer fields because it is a taildragger with big main tyres and you can fold the wings and take it home with you if you want- see this video taken when I was selling a previous Kitfox: https://youtu.be/rfPJGJeWk50
NB The phone number at the end is no longer valid.
PS The Eurostar is a lovely little aircraft particularly the LAA version with 100hp. I used to have a share in one. It's just that the Kitfox is more interesting to fly, copes with rougher/softer fields because it is a taildragger with big main tyres and you can fold the wings and take it home with you if you want- see this video taken when I was selling a previous Kitfox: https://youtu.be/rfPJGJeWk50
NB The phone number at the end is no longer valid.
Last edited by Forfoxake; 17th Nov 2016 at 12:37. Reason: Adding PS
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: On a Flight Level
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fantastic video, the exact type of flying I'm after that really is back to basics and looks very rewarding., appreciate the time to post that forfoxake.
I have no experience of the C-42, and there are remarkably few of them here in BE. As I understand things, it makes an excellent trainer and serves very well for a local bimble. For touring, even on a modest scale, one might want something faster, though. And, as has been rightly stated, with a bit more load carrying capacity.
Regarding the VLA/microlight difference: there are quite some legal differences, but they will only become relevant on "serious" touring. Flying a microlight internationally requires (in theory) an overflight permit for each country visited. The VLA, being an EASA concept, has no limitation there - as long as the UK adheres to EASA
Regarding the VLA/microlight difference: there are quite some legal differences, but they will only become relevant on "serious" touring. Flying a microlight internationally requires (in theory) an overflight permit for each country visited. The VLA, being an EASA concept, has no limitation there - as long as the UK adheres to EASA
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hampshire, UK
Age: 72
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you have reservations about the C42 as a tourer, a locally based pilot flew his from Goodwood to Capetown and back to Goodwood. Google "Flight of Ikarus". Quite a trip to say the least.
I have been flying my 70yr old Champ for 700hrs and 15yrs now, and it suits me perfectly - but like any vintage vehicle be it car or aeroplane it's not turn-the-key-and-go like a modern equivalent, and that's where the C42 Ikarus and EV97 Eurostar win ... or lose depending on personal preferences! Maintenance can be time-consuming, and some spares are becoming increasingly difficult to find. Not impossible, just time-consuming (again!).
I have not flown a C42, although it's something I plan to do as I would like to sample the central stick and unusual throttle arrangement; I have had a few trips in a Eurostar, which I think is a delightful machine. The showstopper for me is the capital cost for a decent pre-owned example of either C42 or EV97, which is roughly 3 times that of a Champ. Difficult to justify that investment to Mrs Slip. I'm used to being sole-owner, so I don't plan to join a group until that should become the only option left to me.
I have been flying my 70yr old Champ for 700hrs and 15yrs now, and it suits me perfectly - but like any vintage vehicle be it car or aeroplane it's not turn-the-key-and-go like a modern equivalent, and that's where the C42 Ikarus and EV97 Eurostar win ... or lose depending on personal preferences! Maintenance can be time-consuming, and some spares are becoming increasingly difficult to find. Not impossible, just time-consuming (again!).
I have not flown a C42, although it's something I plan to do as I would like to sample the central stick and unusual throttle arrangement; I have had a few trips in a Eurostar, which I think is a delightful machine. The showstopper for me is the capital cost for a decent pre-owned example of either C42 or EV97, which is roughly 3 times that of a Champ. Difficult to justify that investment to Mrs Slip. I'm used to being sole-owner, so I don't plan to join a group until that should become the only option left to me.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Plumpton Green
Age: 79
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Regarding the VLA/microlight difference: there are quite some legal differences, but they will only become relevant on "serious" touring. Flying a microlight internationally requires (in theory) an overflight permit for each country visited. The VLA, being an EASA concept, has no limitation there - as long as the UK adheres to EASA
* only two countries charge for them. No prizes for guessing which they are.
Last edited by patowalker; 17th Nov 2016 at 15:15.
Just another pointer.
All Rans S6, except the S6-116 model are microlights max AUW 450 kg.
The Rans S6-116 is a proper 'aeroplane' P1 using a PPL (A) or modern equivalent & its 500 kg AUW makes it a better bet. With the 5 ft smaller wing behaves more sportingly (not much mind you).
The C42 is a microlight max 475 ish KG if you carry the expensive ballistic parachute which weighs part of the extra gain too !.
Under that nice looking cosmetic non structural skin is a simple Ali tube boom: like all of this type fatigue can affect them if well used.
Also I hear they're so very boringly easy to fly you might regret it soon.
mike hallam.
All Rans S6, except the S6-116 model are microlights max AUW 450 kg.
The Rans S6-116 is a proper 'aeroplane' P1 using a PPL (A) or modern equivalent & its 500 kg AUW makes it a better bet. With the 5 ft smaller wing behaves more sportingly (not much mind you).
The C42 is a microlight max 475 ish KG if you carry the expensive ballistic parachute which weighs part of the extra gain too !.
Under that nice looking cosmetic non structural skin is a simple Ali tube boom: like all of this type fatigue can affect them if well used.
Also I hear they're so very boringly easy to fly you might regret it soon.
mike hallam.
One for you to consider the quite amazing Zenair 701. I'm now on my second. 500kg MAUW. 90 liters fuel. Over six hours endurance. Farm strips doddle. 44 lbs luggage. Very tolerant C of G. 100hp Rotax giving 90 mph cruise. Good panel with most things you need inc. AI. Transponder. Strobes. Nav. lights. Tundras. About 1,000 flying worldwide. Available as kit or factory. Price: anywhere from £20k to 35.
The C42 is a great choice.
The C42 is a great choice.
I don't think I'd turn up my nose at any of the current or recent generation 912 engined 3-axis microlights. Each have their strengths and weaknesses, most are a little limited on payload - but for a nice, cheap to run, puddlehopper for 1 person and proper bag, or two people doing short legs with small bags, they're pretty much all good.
Others in the same bracket I'd look at:-
Medway SLA Executive
SkyRanger (any version with a 912 or 912S engine)
CH740 Savannah
Zenair CH601 / Zodiac (most versions, just fly it and make your mind up)
FlightDesign CT2K or later CTSW
EV97 Eurostar
Reality Escapade (maybe not the earlier Easy Raider if you ever plan on taking a friend flying who you still want to be your friend after the flight).
G
Others in the same bracket I'd look at:-
Medway SLA Executive
SkyRanger (any version with a 912 or 912S engine)
CH740 Savannah
Zenair CH601 / Zodiac (most versions, just fly it and make your mind up)
FlightDesign CT2K or later CTSW
EV97 Eurostar
Reality Escapade (maybe not the earlier Easy Raider if you ever plan on taking a friend flying who you still want to be your friend after the flight).
G