Question on PPL Hours crediting
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Kent
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Question on PPL Hours crediting
Afternoon All!
I'm new to this forum so would like to say a big hello and ask for your help.
I'm a PPL student, doing it as a hobby (no intention to change career or anything), I've been taking lessons at Rochester EGTO since about April and very much enjoying flying with Skytrek. I'm hoping the longer term to find a share a nice little plane and get some proper aviators so I fit in better at the airfield.
In 2001 (at the tender age of 17) I was lucky enough to get an RAF Flying Scholarship, which included 20 hours of training with Tayside Aviation, Dundee (civilian training school). These were probably two of the best two weeks I've ever had, lots of flying, boozing and enjoying the company of fellow students!) oh to be 17 again!
It has since taken me 15yrs or so to get in a position where flying is a realistic (just about affordable) hobby to take up.. having had five or six lessons this year it is all gradually coming back to me!
Anyway, I have my old log book from 2001 which is pretty basic (hours logged, aircraft, type, Dual / Solo etc) but all signed and stamped by Tayside.
I can see nothing in CAP804 / FCL210.A that suggests my old hours from 2001 can't be credited against the EASA PPL 45hr requirement. In 2001 I followed a JAR syllabus flying SEPs (C152, as now).
I did ping an email to the CAA licensing bods to confirm this and they've sent me back a form 'SRG2137' and suggested I'd need to apply for an 'exemption' and pay £53. Anyone got any idea what I'd be applying for an 'exemption' from? the form gives me no clues at all.
They also tell me there's an Information Notice to be released this week on the crediting of hours pre-2012. I'm no lawyer and I appreciate this is a legal minefield, but am I missing something obvious in the regs?
It wouldn't be the end of the world, but I'd prefer to avoid the situation of applying for my license and then being told I'd need to complete another £3 - 4k worth of hours before I can fly off into the sunset with the mrs (...and then promptly return back within 30mins of civil twilight..) ..obviously this assumes I can do the whole thing on minimum-ish hours anyway, which is by no means a given.
I've asked the CAA chap to clarify, but wondered if anyone had any similar experience on this point?
Any help gratefully received.
Thanks!
Pat
I'm new to this forum so would like to say a big hello and ask for your help.
I'm a PPL student, doing it as a hobby (no intention to change career or anything), I've been taking lessons at Rochester EGTO since about April and very much enjoying flying with Skytrek. I'm hoping the longer term to find a share a nice little plane and get some proper aviators so I fit in better at the airfield.
In 2001 (at the tender age of 17) I was lucky enough to get an RAF Flying Scholarship, which included 20 hours of training with Tayside Aviation, Dundee (civilian training school). These were probably two of the best two weeks I've ever had, lots of flying, boozing and enjoying the company of fellow students!) oh to be 17 again!
It has since taken me 15yrs or so to get in a position where flying is a realistic (just about affordable) hobby to take up.. having had five or six lessons this year it is all gradually coming back to me!
Anyway, I have my old log book from 2001 which is pretty basic (hours logged, aircraft, type, Dual / Solo etc) but all signed and stamped by Tayside.
I can see nothing in CAP804 / FCL210.A that suggests my old hours from 2001 can't be credited against the EASA PPL 45hr requirement. In 2001 I followed a JAR syllabus flying SEPs (C152, as now).
I did ping an email to the CAA licensing bods to confirm this and they've sent me back a form 'SRG2137' and suggested I'd need to apply for an 'exemption' and pay £53. Anyone got any idea what I'd be applying for an 'exemption' from? the form gives me no clues at all.
They also tell me there's an Information Notice to be released this week on the crediting of hours pre-2012. I'm no lawyer and I appreciate this is a legal minefield, but am I missing something obvious in the regs?
It wouldn't be the end of the world, but I'd prefer to avoid the situation of applying for my license and then being told I'd need to complete another £3 - 4k worth of hours before I can fly off into the sunset with the mrs (...and then promptly return back within 30mins of civil twilight..) ..obviously this assumes I can do the whole thing on minimum-ish hours anyway, which is by no means a given.
I've asked the CAA chap to clarify, but wondered if anyone had any similar experience on this point?
Any help gratefully received.
Thanks!
Pat
Regulation 1178/2011, Article 9
1. In respect of issuing Part-FCL licences in accordance with Annex I, training commenced prior to the application of this Regulation in accordance with the Joint Aviation Authorities requirements and procedures, under the regulatory oversight of a Member State recommended for mutual recognition within the Joint Aviation Authorities’ system in relation to the relevant JAR, shall be given full credit provided that the training and testing were completed by 8 April 2016 at the latest.
1. In respect of issuing Part-FCL licences in accordance with Annex I, training commenced prior to the application of this Regulation in accordance with the Joint Aviation Authorities requirements and procedures, under the regulatory oversight of a Member State recommended for mutual recognition within the Joint Aviation Authorities’ system in relation to the relevant JAR, shall be given full credit provided that the training and testing were completed by 8 April 2016 at the latest.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Kent
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the quick reply BB. Appreciate it.
Having reread Article 9 I think I now see what is getting at.. if you started on a JAR course pre 2012 it all qualifies as long as the testing is completed pre 2016.
I guess its Article 9 that I would be asking for an exception from under art.14 (4) of Reg 216/2008.
Simple this innit..!
Worse case is I'll qualify with 65 or more logged hours and be a better pilot as a result..
Having reread Article 9 I think I now see what is getting at.. if you started on a JAR course pre 2012 it all qualifies as long as the testing is completed pre 2016.
I guess its Article 9 that I would be asking for an exception from under art.14 (4) of Reg 216/2008.
Simple this innit..!
Worse case is I'll qualify with 65 or more logged hours and be a better pilot as a result..
Thanks to AOPA discussing the problem directly with the right people at the CAA, the Authority has agreed to permit PPL flight training conducted before 2012 to be credited towards the Part-FCL PPL or LAPL. The regulatory method being that the student pilot must apply for a '14(4)' exemption before taking the Skill Test.
Currently, this exemption takes about 10 working days to process and is then valid for 2 months. So don't apply too early - and make sure that you've got the exemption in your sweaty paws before taking the Skill Test!
So we've probably saved several people several £K as a result?
Currently, this exemption takes about 10 working days to process and is then valid for 2 months. So don't apply too early - and make sure that you've got the exemption in your sweaty paws before taking the Skill Test!
So we've probably saved several people several £K as a result?
'That' only refers to ab initio flight training pre-Apr 2012.
As far as I'm aware, existing 3rd country conversion criteria for pilots who already hold pilot licences remain in place.
As far as I'm aware, existing 3rd country conversion criteria for pilots who already hold pilot licences remain in place.
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wasnt there some thread somewhere on pprune, that the training hours would be valid for an NPPL, then convert that to a LAPL then do what is necessary to
convert to an EASA PPL.
convert to an EASA PPL.
Moderator
Worse case is I'll qualify with 65 or more logged hours and be a better pilot as a result..
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks to AOPA discussing the problem directly with the right people at the CAA, the Authority has agreed to permit PPL flight training conducted before 2012 to be credited towards the Part-FCL PPL or LAPL. The regulatory method being that the student pilot must apply for a '14(4)' exemption before taking the Skill Test.
Currently, this exemption takes about 10 working days to process and is then valid for 2 months. So don't apply too early - and make sure that you've got the exemption in your sweaty paws before taking the Skill Test!
So we've probably saved several people several £K as a result?
Currently, this exemption takes about 10 working days to process and is then valid for 2 months. So don't apply too early - and make sure that you've got the exemption in your sweaty paws before taking the Skill Test!
So we've probably saved several people several £K as a result?
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lancashire
Age: 39
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is exemption form SRG2137 still valid and the agreement still in place?
I have 32 hours spanning the past 18 years but never got the chance to finish and complete a skills test, now, as life comes to a stable settle, I have just signed back up at my local FTO. We were having the discussion about my hours. Obviously, I have no vision of jumping back in and completing a skills test in 20 hours, but, if I made it to a point where the CFI was happy with my skills and was confident in me, some of those hours may be useful. I am going to take the form in with me and see if they have encountered it, but if anyone has further info to help me (Parts, annexes and articles that require exemption from, etc), all info would be appreciated.
Regards all out there!
I have 32 hours spanning the past 18 years but never got the chance to finish and complete a skills test, now, as life comes to a stable settle, I have just signed back up at my local FTO. We were having the discussion about my hours. Obviously, I have no vision of jumping back in and completing a skills test in 20 hours, but, if I made it to a point where the CFI was happy with my skills and was confident in me, some of those hours may be useful. I am going to take the form in with me and see if they have encountered it, but if anyone has further info to help me (Parts, annexes and articles that require exemption from, etc), all info would be appreciated.
Regards all out there!
Why on earth not? 20 hours should be plenty, unless you have major confidence issues. It's all buried in there - I took my PPL test after a gap of 12 years and it took me 3.9 hours
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi - I'm in the same boat as the OP. I did my Flying Schol in 2002, did a few hours on a UAS 2003-2004, then a long gap and now looking to do my PPL. Just trying to figure out exactly needs doing in order to get these hours to count? The flying school I went to the other day was adamant that if it was pre-2012 then it would not count... but this thread seems to suggest otherwise?
Any help most gratefully received, cheers in advance.
Cam
Any help most gratefully received, cheers in advance.
Cam
Join Date: May 2022
Location: bournemouth
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello everyone this is my first time posting here..
I am in a similar position as the OP, I have around 40 hours from 2001-2004. I have now started flight training again and it looks like I need 15-20 hours including solo, judging how the first 5 have gone with my instructor.
We can't quite get a confirmed answer of whether my previous experience counts though.
The offending paragraph (below) has been removed by the CAA as of the 31st of Dec 2019 when we left the EU:
(2) Omit paragraph 1.
Repealed by Aviation Safety (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019/645 Pt 4(4) reg.298(2) (December 31,
From our point of view this seems to be good news and any hours regardless of date, should count towards a CAA PPL. Therefore no exemption is needed.
Does anyone here have any recent experience with this?
Many Thanks
I am in a similar position as the OP, I have around 40 hours from 2001-2004. I have now started flight training again and it looks like I need 15-20 hours including solo, judging how the first 5 have gone with my instructor.
We can't quite get a confirmed answer of whether my previous experience counts though.
The offending paragraph (below) has been removed by the CAA as of the 31st of Dec 2019 when we left the EU:
Article 9 Credit for training commenced prior to the application of this Regulation 1. In respect of issuing Part-FCL licences in accordance with Annex I, training commenced prior to the application of this Regulation in accordance with the Joint Aviation Authorities requirements and procedures, under the regulatory oversight of a Member State recommended for mutual recognition within the Joint Aviation Authorities’ system in relation to the relevant JAR, shall be given full credit provided that the training and testing were completed by 8 April 2016 at the latest.
Amendment of Article 9 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011
298.—(1) Article 9 (credit for training commenced prior to the application of this Regulation) is amended as follows.(2) Omit paragraph 1.
Repealed by Aviation Safety (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019/645 Pt 4(4) reg.298(2) (December 31,
Does anyone here have any recent experience with this?
Many Thanks
Moderator
Welcome fbaj,
To be honest, flying experience achieved before 2004 (with presumably a long gap of not flying until very recently?) won't mean much for your skills. If it were credited toward your training, I expect that flying up to the skill level, rather than the hour minimums would be a good plan.
To be honest, flying experience achieved before 2004 (with presumably a long gap of not flying until very recently?) won't mean much for your skills. If it were credited toward your training, I expect that flying up to the skill level, rather than the hour minimums would be a good plan.