Ullswater Lake Maule pilot not guilty
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most dictionary's define a "landing" re flying, as
Ground also refers to water in other dictionary's. A "T&G" is also a "landing" As both of these normally require the aircraft to cease flying albeit still moving, I presume that full or near full power would be needed with balloon tyres in the oggin to keep flying, so neither should be called a landing.
Possibly trespass occured? but not a criminal offence (unless covered by some act like railways) Assuming no breach of the ANO occured ie 500' closer etc,, Then whats the problem, skillful flying but a bit daft as anything there, like floating detritis could have made it more than a prank.
Landing is the last part of a flight, where a flying animal, aircraft, or spacecraft returns to the ground
Possibly trespass occured? but not a criminal offence (unless covered by some act like railways) Assuming no breach of the ANO occured ie 500' closer etc,, Then whats the problem, skillful flying but a bit daft as anything there, like floating detritis could have made it more than a prank.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That (and as a result, the outcome) is what makes the tragedy and the non-event totally incomparable.
I was thinking to myself, as we took off today, from an unattended grass strip, did Ullswater pilot "book out" to a water landing in a wheel plane? That must have raised eyebrows! But then, the emergency services would have been able to determine that the water landings were intended, and emergency response was not required
The combined age of the two taildraggers I guest flew today was 155 years. Yes, I know that an example of one of the types has been "waterskiied" (in South Africa), But I cannot imagine suggesting to my host that those would be a good thing to try "just for fun" - in any type! I want to honour the great opportunity afforded me, by demonstrating my professional attitude toward flying!
I was once flying a club 172, on business for the club. They had sent an instructor with me for the flight. He asked me if I would demonstrate a roll for him. Quite put aback by the request, I said "no". I'm quite able to safely roll a 172, but it was correct that I didn't, right?
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Gone
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Judging by some of the responses here, perhaps I am also considered to be reckless.
It was early eighties at a east Essex flying club when the water skiing conversation came up by a very experienced flying instructor whom was renowned for smoking as soon as he jumped in the aircraft.
The said instructor was sitting at the bar drinking a coffee with a few of us around him. He had a small Corgi model aircraft in his hands as he was demonstrating the pitch attitude on the bar surface of how to touch the water.
He then asked us......what do you think would happen? I recall him receiving many answers. Even my answer was that as soon as the wheels touched the game would be over. He kept shaking his head disagreeing. When we had all finished answering he took the last sip from his coffee and said who's up for it. As I said, this guy was very good and experienced. I immediately jumped up me me me. We went out in a 152 and headed out towards the Clacton.
Approaching the Blackwater he said I have control. In a descending cruise we levelled off at about 3 - 4ft above the water. The sense of speed was amazing in the old girl. Suddenly, the main wheels touched the water as I felt the contact and saw water spray. He explained that touching the water at
80MPH was no different to touching tarmac.
We came back 30 mins later and I told the others what I had just witnessed.
I think a few of the them also went out and did the same with him at a later date knowing that I had come back to tell the tale.
Happy days.
It was early eighties at a east Essex flying club when the water skiing conversation came up by a very experienced flying instructor whom was renowned for smoking as soon as he jumped in the aircraft.
The said instructor was sitting at the bar drinking a coffee with a few of us around him. He had a small Corgi model aircraft in his hands as he was demonstrating the pitch attitude on the bar surface of how to touch the water.
He then asked us......what do you think would happen? I recall him receiving many answers. Even my answer was that as soon as the wheels touched the game would be over. He kept shaking his head disagreeing. When we had all finished answering he took the last sip from his coffee and said who's up for it. As I said, this guy was very good and experienced. I immediately jumped up me me me. We went out in a 152 and headed out towards the Clacton.
Approaching the Blackwater he said I have control. In a descending cruise we levelled off at about 3 - 4ft above the water. The sense of speed was amazing in the old girl. Suddenly, the main wheels touched the water as I felt the contact and saw water spray. He explained that touching the water at
80MPH was no different to touching tarmac.
We came back 30 mins later and I told the others what I had just witnessed.
I think a few of the them also went out and did the same with him at a later date knowing that I had come back to tell the tale.
Happy days.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Judging by some of the responses here, perhaps I am also considered to be reckless.
One winter dusk, a not yet a pilot friend called me in a panic, asking if I had heard that we would be getting 90 to 110km winds over night and the next day. Yes, I had, and my plane was safely away. He told me that three other friend's planes were not, all just sitting on the ice of the frozen lake. The local area of the lake was irregularly flooded in 6" of water (which is why the planes had been left for a while, to wait that out). For the next 5 hours, I taught myself to waterski 180/185's - at night, to get them off the ice, and off a local airport for tiedown. Very reckless of me, I know, but the winds did come, and the planes would have been wrecked, left where they had been. This to me was a risk vs benefit, which was justified - it was not fun, it was scary. The owners all thanked me...
I think a few of the them also went out and did the same with him at a later date knowing that I had come back to tell the tale.
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's a sad commentary on pilots, that some cannot simply appreciate the freedom to fly within limitations and good judgement, for its own pleasure, and instead have to go doing really dumb things in planes
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's becoming a pretty miserable state of affairs that no one is allowed to deviate from the straight and narrow line of utter compliance, risk free, don't for gods sake be different way of life. Perhaps if the observer had been a little more observant rather than run off half cocked.
It seems people can see danger in every corner these days and then have need to advise everyone else to avoid it.
I miss the days when we were allowed to think for ourselves, or perhaps it is the technology that puts everything we do into the public world wide view.
What a piece of nonsense.
It seems people can see danger in every corner these days and then have need to advise everyone else to avoid it.
I miss the days when we were allowed to think for ourselves, or perhaps it is the technology that puts everything we do into the public world wide view.
What a piece of nonsense.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North west
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
did Ullswater pilot "book out" to a water landing in a wheel plane?
I once landed in a friends stubble field, at his invitation. Some well meaning soul saw me disappear behind some trees and called 999. The response was impressive.
The number of calls that turn out to be gliders landing out should be sufficient grounds to ban the sport.
The number of calls that turn out to be gliders landing out should be sufficient grounds to ban the sport.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wonder what anybody watching the event live must have thought?! Must have been harrowing thinking of that, as they drove back home on those winding Lake District A roads, at the national speed limit, passing cars going the opposite way at 120mph closing speed and only a couple of feet apart. That's hardly dangerous though is it?! Doesn't raise any eyebrows.
And people will get pulled behind boats to water ski at 30-40mph, but you don't see anyone getting pulled behind a vehicle on a road at the same speeds as a common pastime do you?
I don't see what all the fuss is about! Probably just a bit of jealousy that it wasn't them doing it, as they don't own a nice Maule or have any skill.
The bloke is only risking himself and his airplane, and obviously doesn't have a problem with it, so why should anyone else?
And people will get pulled behind boats to water ski at 30-40mph, but you don't see anyone getting pulled behind a vehicle on a road at the same speeds as a common pastime do you?
I don't see what all the fuss is about! Probably just a bit of jealousy that it wasn't them doing it, as they don't own a nice Maule or have any skill.
The bloke is only risking himself and his airplane, and obviously doesn't have a problem with it, so why should anyone else?
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This 'ban anyone from having fun', 'stick with the heard and don't be a free-thinker' attitude seems to be growing in UK. It's one of the reasons for the decline in GA 'Fun Flying', and probably why GA today seems more a training ground for the airline industry than folk seeking 3-dimensional freedom. The fun seekers have gone elsewhere - probably to microlights.
At one time 'fun flying' attracted individuals.... characters, if you like. Many unconventional, but all interesting and few of them 'don't do anything unusual' flat-earthers. They weren't cowboys, but skilled careful pilots who knew what they were about.
Seems not to be the case now.
And of course if you do do anything 'unusual' (as we did frequently in the 70s, 80s, and 90s) there's countless bozos out there with a camera smarter than they are who'll record it, complete with inane remarks, and stick it on youTube.
At one time 'fun flying' attracted individuals.... characters, if you like. Many unconventional, but all interesting and few of them 'don't do anything unusual' flat-earthers. They weren't cowboys, but skilled careful pilots who knew what they were about.
Seems not to be the case now.
And of course if you do do anything 'unusual' (as we did frequently in the 70s, 80s, and 90s) there's countless bozos out there with a camera smarter than they are who'll record it, complete with inane remarks, and stick it on youTube.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've heard about a few people flying through Tower Bridge
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
fastjet45
http://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/255...w-updated.html
apparently someone had reported a helicopter crashing by the road side and reported it to 999
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Gone
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thing
I had not heard about the Hunter fly-by as well.
The flying club bar stories that I have heard was that a Piper Commanche
and a Beech Bonanza had done the honoury deeds.
I had not heard about the Hunter fly-by as well.
The flying club bar stories that I have heard was that a Piper Commanche
and a Beech Bonanza had done the honoury deeds.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.pprune.org/aviation-histo...er-bridge.html. (Hunter)
Jetblu
Major Christopher Draper - a pilot whom I would have regarded it as a privilege to represent FOC - but I was under two at the time.
Images from his autobiography - originally posted by Wunper
Result: Conditional Discharge & 10 guineas costs.
A very sensible decision by the Stipendiary Magistrate Mr Frank Milton who, by the time I appeared before him as a very young barrister about 20 years later, was Sir Frank Milton, Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate. Tough when required and merciful when appropriate; a good combination.
Press reports: Images originally posted by Warmtoast
..........
This small picture is a scan of a postcard showing him flying a Puss Moth under Tower Bridge in September 1931.
The writing on the picture says 'C. Draper 30th September 1931'.
Written on the back is 'Given to E. T. Cherry on 17th June 1933 by Major C. Draper (Himself)'.
There doesn't seem to be much room for 'characters' in our modern, obsessively risk averse, world.
Opinions clearly differ about whether that is good or bad.
Jetblu
I've heard about a few people flying through Tower Bridge ....
Images from his autobiography - originally posted by Wunper
Result: Conditional Discharge & 10 guineas costs.
A very sensible decision by the Stipendiary Magistrate Mr Frank Milton who, by the time I appeared before him as a very young barrister about 20 years later, was Sir Frank Milton, Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate. Tough when required and merciful when appropriate; a good combination.
Press reports: Images originally posted by Warmtoast
..........
This small picture is a scan of a postcard showing him flying a Puss Moth under Tower Bridge in September 1931.
The writing on the picture says 'C. Draper 30th September 1931'.
Written on the back is 'Given to E. T. Cherry on 17th June 1933 by Major C. Draper (Himself)'.
There doesn't seem to be much room for 'characters' in our modern, obsessively risk averse, world.
Opinions clearly differ about whether that is good or bad.
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Gone
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flying Lawyer
Many thanks for posting that very interesting information. I had not done any specific searches.
One could say flying through the bridge was reckless. Bridges were not designed to be flown through, were they.
Clearly, the way to go is by skiing under the bridge for which it was designed
to take traffic, innit.
And I also noted your comments about FOC representation.
Many thanks for posting that very interesting information. I had not done any specific searches.
One could say flying through the bridge was reckless. Bridges were not designed to be flown through, were they.
Clearly, the way to go is by skiing under the bridge for which it was designed
to take traffic, innit.
And I also noted your comments about FOC representation.
Later, when someone allowed the Major to rent an aircraft, he disappeared. After the search had given up, he was found in Belgium. The trusting FBO had to pay the cost of bringing the aircraft back.