Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

CTA transition in Germany - R/T procedure

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

CTA transition in Germany - R/T procedure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Aug 2013, 10:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Düsseldorf, EDLE
Age: 41
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CTA transition in Germany - R/T procedure

Hi all,

So after having obtained my PPL in the US (and having flown inside and outside of CAS there) and having done some post-PPL flying "back home" in Germany in uncontrolled airspace, I'm now boldy ;-) going to request a crossing of Dusseldorf CTA.

In principle, I believe I know what I'm doing (i.e. what to ask for and what to expect). But rather than making a fool out of myself, I'd like to reassure myself that I'm expecting the R/T dialog to be something like this. Any advice (what to expect, what to omit, etc.) will be much appreciated.

A = Air, G = Ground
=========
A: Dusseldorf Tower, D-Exxx
G: D-xx, Dusseldorf Tower
A: D-xx is a Cessna 152, VFR, local flight from Essen-Mulheim, position 2 miles east of Duisburg at 2200 feet with information (x), request mid-field south-bound transition via November, Sierra.
G: D-xx, transition approved via November and Sierra, at or above 2000 feet, report November, squawk 1234
A: transition approved at or above 2000 feet, squawk 1234, D-xx

...

A: D-xx, overhead November

... (after leaving CTA)

A: D-xx, request frequency change
G: D-xx, frequency change approved, squawk 7000
A: Frequency change approved, squawk 7000, bye

=============

Is that what's going to happen? ;-)
Rhino25782 is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2013, 10:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 252
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds more less like I learned it (been a while though since I crossed a control zone), would suggest some amendments though:

A: Dusseldorf Tower, D-Exxx
G: D-xx, Dusseldorf Tower
A: D-xx is a Cessna 152, VFR, local flight from Essen-Mulheim, position 2 miles east of Duisburg at 2200 feet with information (x), QNH xxxx, request mid-field south-bound transition via November, Sierra.
G: D-xx, transition approved via November and Sierra, at or above 2000 feet, report November, squawk 1234
A: transition approved at or above 2000 feet, squawk 1234, D-xx

...

A: D-xx, overhead November at xxxx feet [and if you have no prior clearance then wait for one until you actually enter the control zone]

... (after leaving CTA)

A: D-xx, leaving the control zone over Sierra at xxxx, request frequency change
G: D-xx, frequency change approved, squawk 7000
A: Frequency change approved, squawk 7000, bye
EDMJ is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2013, 11:26
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Düsseldorf, EDLE
Age: 41
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks - makes all perfect sense. Except for providing the QNH in addition to the ATIS code. I've seen this somewhere before - but can't really think of why that would be necessary?
Rhino25782 is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2013, 14:17
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Belgium
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
May I suggest to take a friend along who has the experience to fly local controlled airspace?
dirkdj is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2013, 14:42
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 252
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...but can't really think of why that would be necessary?
The way I see it is that the QNH is a very important piece of information for you and everyone else around you, as having heard, understood and set it correctly ensures that you (relative to everybody else) really are at the altitude you say you're at, and not above or below it due to having set a different QNH.
EDMJ is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2013, 14:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 252
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By the way: At larger airports, be prepared to get stepwise clearances and to have to orbit somewhere along the way.
EDMJ is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2013, 19:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
"Transition" is an American word based on poor English and does not feature in the ICAO Radiotelephony Manual. You can request "transit" of controlled airspace or "cross" the airfield, not as common in Europe as the US.
Whopity is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2013, 20:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Düsseldorf, Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Rhino,

I fly out of EDLE too and did exactly what you have in mind. DUS is very friendly and will usually approve your request.

Be careful up there!
AlexUM is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2013, 20:28
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Surrey
Age: 67
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Germany

Flying in Germany is a breeze compared to the UK. You will work the regional info service and I have known them keep you with them even through controlled airspace. Or like my trip last week they will ask for you and let you know if you are going to get through. They then usually hand you over or like I said you say with them. I think it was Stuttgart last week and he asked and came back no chance so we just went round. They are very helpful and generally it's easy flying, do watch the anger areas although they are very nice at giving you a steer.
letpmar is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2013, 20:30
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Surrey
Age: 67
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Germany

That should b Danger areas
letpmar is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2013, 21:45
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Unna, Germany
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to be pedantic:

A: D-xx, overhead November at xxxx feet, time xx (eg 10:34 becomes time 34)

The words in bold aren't actually required, time is only required if, for example you have passed the reporting point and (eg) ATC was talking to another aircraft so you couldn't report whilst directly overhead.

Correct would be:

A: D-xx November 2000 feet (time 34)


... (after leaving CTA)

A: D-xx, leaving the control zone over Sierra at xxxx feet, request frequency change

Once more, the bold wording isn't required, additionally you would add timing if it wasn't reported directly over the reporting point so this becomes.

A: D-xx, Sierra, 2000ft, time xx, request frequency change.

G: D-xx, frequency change approved, squawk 7000
A: Frequency change approved, squawk 7000, bye
Steve6443 is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2013, 21:53
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Unna, Germany
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By the way: At larger airports, be prepared to get stepwise clearances and to have to orbit somewhere along the way.
Yup, at Duesseldorf I've had them request I report November, then report 2 miles from the runway - this is where having gps really helps - and finally required me to make a 360 to the left for "spacing", all on youtube for posterity ;-)

Also please listen to the clearance you receive - you might have requested November to Sierra midfield but they will then clear you (eg) November to Sierra via the threshold of the active - and they would expect you to fly over the threshold of the active runway(s), not fly midfield - which I actually did, leaving me to get a slight telling off from the Tower ;-)

Last edited by Steve6443; 29th Aug 2013 at 22:01.
Steve6443 is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2013, 03:29
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"Transition" is an American word based on poor English and does not feature in the ICAO Radiotelephony Manual. You can request "transit" of controlled airspace or "cross" the airfield, not as common in Europe as the US.
That is so wonderfully and quintessentially British: communication complete, perfect grammar, limited action or effect :

God help you Rhino, in dealing with all this nonsense. I have every confidence you'll survive unscathed. Good luck!

Last edited by Silvaire1; 30th Aug 2013 at 03:43.
Silvaire1 is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2013, 08:18
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The quintessential Englishman wouldn't have a clue what a Transition was except perhaps for the transition from a Caterpillar to a Butterfly!
America has managed to bastardise the English language to the point where it no longer conveys a common meaning, a dangerous thing in aviation and one reason why ICAO set standards we should follow and not mock!
Whopity is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2013, 08:50
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 252
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
America has managed to bastardise the English language to the point where it no longer conveys a common meaning, a dangerous thing in aviation and one reason why ICAO set standards we should follow and not mock!
A couple of years ago I was stuck at Birmingham (UK) airport as SLF. Having to communicate with airport staff there, I would from a language point of view have preferred any American airport instead. And I have a Level 6 endorsement in English in my licence.
EDMJ is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.