Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

VFR Minima vs PPL(A) priviliges

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

VFR Minima vs PPL(A) priviliges

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Apr 2013, 18:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: na
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VFR Minima vs PPL(A) priviliges

Hello there,

Can someone please shed some light about the title mentioned above.
I seem to be confusing the VFR flight Minima with the privileges of the PPL, which the latter may be more restrictive.

What are the differences between the two?

Does it differ from each member state?

A basic PPL can fly in a minimum flight visibility of 3km, remaining in sight of surface at all times and minimum visibility 10km and in sight of surface on a SFVR clearance in a CTR.
likair is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2013, 07:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
A basic PPL can fly in a minimum flight visibility of 3km,
This is a licence privilege in a UK National licence and was a restriction placed upon JAA licences issued by the UK CAA however; in August 2012 the ANO was amended removing JAA licences from the ANO. There is no such restriction on EASA licences so their is no longer a 3 km limit for JAA, now EASA licence holders. It remains in force for existing UK National licences (non NPPL). As this licence privilege has changed, the only restriction for those affected will now be the VFR minima which can vary from State to State. The SVFR minima will also change with the introduction of SERA.
Whopity is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2013, 10:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Glasgow
Age: 40
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Same with the "in sight of the surface" requirement.
riverrock83 is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2013, 11:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So for someone like me with two license's, UK Lifetime PPL & now nice Blue EASA PPL,

can I pick and choose which minima I like? ie: 1.5k or 3k vis etc.

I know where to look for my original licence VFR minima, but cannot find the definitive list/table for EASA, anyone know?
PA28181 is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2013, 11:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Regulation 1178/2011
FCL.205.A PPL(A) — Privileges
(a) The privileges of the holder of a PPL(A) are to act without remuneration as PIC or co-pilot on aeroplanes or TMGs engaged in non-commercial operations.
(b) Notwithstanding the paragraph above, the holder of a PPL(A) with instructor or examiner privileges may receive remuneration for:
(1) the provision of flight instruction for the LAPL(A) or PPL(A);
(2) the conduct of skill tests and proficiency checks for these licences;
(3) the ratings and certificates attached to these licences.
Plain and simple!

Use the licence with the most advantageous privileges.

Last edited by Whopity; 26th Apr 2013 at 11:47.
Whopity is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2013, 12:02
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Whopity, but I am not after the Rules & Regs regarding my privileges as a pilot, as I know my limitations there.

As said, I want to know the differences for VFR/weather related minima for an EASA licence from a UK Lifetime PPL.
PA28181 is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2013, 13:52
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
As said, I want to know the differences for VFR/weather related minima for an EASA licence from a UK Lifetime PPL.
3km Vis and in sight of the surface, there is no other difference.
Whopity is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2013, 14:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quotes:

3km Vis and in sight of the surface, there is no other difference.

There is no such restriction on EASA licences so their is no longer a 3 km limit for JAA, now EASA licence holders.



I'm confused....

Last edited by PA28181; 26th Apr 2013 at 14:15.
PA28181 is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2013, 14:22
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It has been my (possibly incorrect) understanding that standard ICAO vis minima of 1.5k apply to EASA licences, and that the original 3k restriction still applies to UK lifetime PPL licences.
flybymike is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2013, 15:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 18nm NE grice 28ft up
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
vis minima of 1.5k apply to EASA licences,
Loopy! No wonder EASA don't understand the IMC rating when their VFR rules allow you to take off and land in poorer vis than an IMC rated pilot is allowed on an instrument proceedure. I can only assume life has a lower value in EASA la la land.

At least it will go some way towards standardising the death rate throughout Europe.

D.O.

Last edited by dont overfil; 26th Apr 2013 at 15:21.
dont overfil is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2013, 19:18
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Moray,Scotland,U.K.
Posts: 1,782
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
If I inadvertantly found myself in 3km viz, I'd be looking for any space to put down on. (Unless it was a rainshower, which I knew I'd soon be out of.)
PS See what at 3km - a cloud/fogbank?
Maoraigh1 is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2013, 21:31
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dont overfil
Loopy! No wonder EASA don't understand the IMC rating when their VFR rules allow you to take off and land in poorer vis than an IMC rated pilot is allowed on an instrument proceedure. I can only assume life has a lower value in EASA la la land.
It is worth remembering the VFR minima in Europe are now consistent with ICAO recommendations, with which the UK was historically out of step. This is not to suggest it is necessarily a good idea for any given pilot to operate at the limit of allowed visibility.
mm_flynn is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.