CPL/ME or MEP then CPL?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Age: 40
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CPL/ME or MEP then CPL?
Very soon I have to decide whether to do the MEP rating then later the CPL, or whether to complete a CPL/MEP on the same course. Currency isn't going to be an issue, neither will cost.
I cannot make up my mind whether its more logical to get the MEP rating and enjoy some twin time getting used to wobbly props, retracts, and turbos pre-CPL, or whether the CPL/ME course would be more productive.
What does the forum recommend?
G
I cannot make up my mind whether its more logical to get the MEP rating and enjoy some twin time getting used to wobbly props, retracts, and turbos pre-CPL, or whether the CPL/ME course would be more productive.
What does the forum recommend?
G
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You could wait till the spring and pop down to Egnatia in Greece (LGKV). The general environment is relatively pleasant
Do the whole thing in a DA42.
I am sure they will accept payment in Euros rather than Drachmas
Do the whole thing in a DA42.
I am sure they will accept payment in Euros rather than Drachmas
Why not do the MEP and an IR and leave the CPL till last. A PPL wit an IR is more use than a CPL without one! As you have said money is not an issue, the more ME experience you get the better and experience gained on the IR is countable towards the total for a CPL.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bearing in mind the current position of the industry, in your position I would do CPLSE, SEIR and then upgrade to MEIR. You'll get plenty of complex experience on the CPL course.
I did the CPL, MEIR route and pay through the nose for an annual. While I appreciate money isn't an issue, why pay for an annual IRME reval. until you need it? It's a bit like renewing your Class I; reassuring but useless.
FTOs. will give you the 'no MEIR, no job' BS, but there ain't no jobs out there at the moment, just the instructors/marketing depts. keeping theirs.
I did the CPL, MEIR route and pay through the nose for an annual. While I appreciate money isn't an issue, why pay for an annual IRME reval. until you need it? It's a bit like renewing your Class I; reassuring but useless.
FTOs. will give you the 'no MEIR, no job' BS, but there ain't no jobs out there at the moment, just the instructors/marketing depts. keeping theirs.
mcb
I know a number of people who have followed the SE route thinking it would be a cheap upgrade to ME but they all found it was far more expensive in the long run and involved lots of duplication like two initial test fees!
I know a number of people who have followed the SE route thinking it would be a cheap upgrade to ME but they all found it was far more expensive in the long run and involved lots of duplication like two initial test fees!
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
whopity - your point is understood, acknowledged and agreed with; however, I maintain that I would go down the SEIR route and keep in practice with the money 'preserved' until such time as the market picks up.
Then I would be in the position to upgrade, knowing that the boxes I had ticked ATPL theory wise were still current, ie not worrying about that wee timebomb.
Then I would be in the position to upgrade, knowing that the boxes I had ticked ATPL theory wise were still current, ie not worrying about that wee timebomb.
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did MEP IR then CPL in the twin then MCC
Personally I would say it better to get it out the way and then have it in the bank if an opertunity comes up.
Its pretty easy to get a revalidation but its not to get the course done if your on a time scale.
You can always renew your IR on the single if you so wish.
Those first jobs can be a bit of a right place and right time and if you don't have all the ticks in the boxes the start your type rating next week won't be possible if you have to fit in a twin IR upgrade course. Where as a two days refresher and then IR renewal is possible in 7 days.
As for the CPL/ME its alot to do in the time frame and I would doud't you wouldn't over run.
If you do the ME first then IR then CPL you end up with about 50 hours in the aircraft which is usually the starting point for private hire for insurance. Athough saying that that was my plan and i have never hired a twin yet and my MEP went to the wind 2 years ago outside 5 years valid.
The cpl test in the twin after the IR is way easier than in a single complex you just have to do a single engine missed approach with circle to land which is easy after the IR compared to all the fannying around doing PFL's etc in the Single CPL.
Personally I would say it better to get it out the way and then have it in the bank if an opertunity comes up.
Its pretty easy to get a revalidation but its not to get the course done if your on a time scale.
You can always renew your IR on the single if you so wish.
Those first jobs can be a bit of a right place and right time and if you don't have all the ticks in the boxes the start your type rating next week won't be possible if you have to fit in a twin IR upgrade course. Where as a two days refresher and then IR renewal is possible in 7 days.
As for the CPL/ME its alot to do in the time frame and I would doud't you wouldn't over run.
If you do the ME first then IR then CPL you end up with about 50 hours in the aircraft which is usually the starting point for private hire for insurance. Athough saying that that was my plan and i have never hired a twin yet and my MEP went to the wind 2 years ago outside 5 years valid.
The cpl test in the twin after the IR is way easier than in a single complex you just have to do a single engine missed approach with circle to land which is easy after the IR compared to all the fannying around doing PFL's etc in the Single CPL.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is stating the obvious but it's worth asking oneself if ME is really needed.
When I was starting my PPL in 2000, everybody said to me "when will you be moving up to twins". It was the "in" thing back then. You got a PPL, then ME, and then you got bored and dropped out of flying
By the time I got going on reasonable trips, I lost any interest in ME as a potential purchase. I have just 1.5hrs in my logbook, done in a very posh C421C. Mr Thielert p*ssed on the "affordable ME" bonfire well and truly, and down with it went the avtur option which would be so great in southern Europe.
Today, avgas costs make a piston twin quite pricey to operate - unless it has two Rotaxes in which case you need a spare one anyway The jury is still out (or yet again out) on the DA42TDi and it will be a few years before anybody can trust it for long trips. Singles do offer quite a lot, especially if you can stretch to a PT6 engined plane like the Jetprop
Not wishing to start another SE v. ME debate
When I was starting my PPL in 2000, everybody said to me "when will you be moving up to twins". It was the "in" thing back then. You got a PPL, then ME, and then you got bored and dropped out of flying
By the time I got going on reasonable trips, I lost any interest in ME as a potential purchase. I have just 1.5hrs in my logbook, done in a very posh C421C. Mr Thielert p*ssed on the "affordable ME" bonfire well and truly, and down with it went the avtur option which would be so great in southern Europe.
Today, avgas costs make a piston twin quite pricey to operate - unless it has two Rotaxes in which case you need a spare one anyway The jury is still out (or yet again out) on the DA42TDi and it will be a few years before anybody can trust it for long trips. Singles do offer quite a lot, especially if you can stretch to a PT6 engined plane like the Jetprop
Not wishing to start another SE v. ME debate
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with you, mad_jock - timing is all, and the more tools in your box the better!
However, the market is not indicating a need for the low hour MEIR jockey, and IMHO, unlikely to do so for a good few years.
An indicator to move up an engine will be when the large pool of mid houred newbies with MEIR, currently flying SE VFR taxi services start to be shown an interest by carriers. Then, I believe, would be the time to upgrade. In the meantime, you are IR current, RT current and maybe MCC positive. (Do you have to be ME to do MCC? I cannot remember...)
However, the market is not indicating a need for the low hour MEIR jockey, and IMHO, unlikely to do so for a good few years.
An indicator to move up an engine will be when the large pool of mid houred newbies with MEIR, currently flying SE VFR taxi services start to be shown an interest by carriers. Then, I believe, would be the time to upgrade. In the meantime, you are IR current, RT current and maybe MCC positive. (Do you have to be ME to do MCC? I cannot remember...)
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did...
IR
Then ME
Then CPL SE
Then CPL ME
This was in FAA land though, but the hardest but most useful rating to have after the PPL is the IR, so why not do that first. Then when it comes to the CPL you should a few more hours experience under your belt which will make the whole lot easier by far.
IR
Then ME
Then CPL SE
Then CPL ME
This was in FAA land though, but the hardest but most useful rating to have after the PPL is the IR, so why not do that first. Then when it comes to the CPL you should a few more hours experience under your belt which will make the whole lot easier by far.
Do you have to be ME to do MCC?
There are no pre-requisites whatever for entry to the MCC course in EASA Part-FCL, either explicit or implied. Of course this does not prevent a course provider introducing his own pre-requisites to filter out those he believes would not cope with the course.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK, mainly
Age: 39
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the large pool of mid houred newbies with MEIR, currently flying SE VFR taxi services start to be shown an interest by carriers.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I assume it's a large pool - I know three at Norwich binned by a small domestic/Europe market carrier forced into the smaller aircraft fleets. A step back denying others (me, grrrr...) that step forward.
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know I have flown with 4 FO's in the last 6 months that were on their first type and job. And know of another two who are starting ratings very soon with less than 1000 hours.
None of them would have been in the position to be flying multi crew now if they hadn't got all the tickets when the jobs opened up.
SEP hours to be honest are worthless anyway these days.
None of them would have been in the position to be flying multi crew now if they hadn't got all the tickets when the jobs opened up.
SEP hours to be honest are worthless anyway these days.
Until you get AF447 where a jet has been lost, apparently, because of a lack of basic handling skill in three highly qualified pilots. Not to mention OO-TML where the aeroplane may have been smaller, and the pilots a bit lower experience, but the problems seem broadly the same.
I hope that may end the rot, and the realisation set in that whilst CRM and automation management are vital in the big jet cockpit, handling skill is nonetheless not optional either.
G
N.B. Why the heck is this thread running in Private Flying ?