Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Apparent brake failure!! Do you take off??

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Apparent brake failure!! Do you take off??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Mar 2011, 16:34
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ecuador
Age: 45
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SNS3Guppy
Again, you never know when you'll need it. You made the correct decision to return to the hangar and get help.
Thanks Guppy, and by the way there wasn´t even a maintenance hangar then!
We were just on a massive grass strip in the middle of nowhere………so luckily the brake-fix was easy to do.
("arcing & sparking" as a figure of speech)
If not, I would not have soloed my 1st time, and my instructor would have helped me upon arrival at our aeroclub without brakes……..for our own strip is a bit of a tight squeeze!! 8 meters wide, and not too long either.
Now with my 40 hours solo, I´m a bit more confident and would be able to do it without brakes………or so I´d like to think.

Originally Posted by RTN11
If you're just about to line up and find the brakes inop, i think you definitely made the right decision not to fly. It would be playing on your mind on landing, and really not what you want on first solo.
Roger on that!!!!!!

Originally Posted by ZS-FOY
It's the landing that one has to worry about no brakes.
Yep, I think that´s a bit of a given though!!
I mean, landing is part of most flights………..if everything goes well, that is.
I tend to keep landing in mind as part of my flight planning, in other words "before T /O".

Originally Posted by Torque Tonight
ULH,

At your stage, especially on your first solo, choosing NOT to fly was absolutely correct. With a bit more time and experience behind you you will be better able to exercise judgement on matters like this, but even then, if you are at your home base airfield there wouldn't be many compelling reasons to take to the air with a known defect like this.
I agree wholeheartedly!

Originally Posted by Hodja
Flying with a known brake failure is just taking another unneccesary risk
Exactly!!

Originally Posted by Hodja
break check
Pun intended?

Originally Posted by mad_jock

I didn't go either
I agree……...

Originally Posted by Katamarino
You could argue that if we had taken the aircraft with a failed brake, we'd not have ended up in the one with the dodgy engine, of course; but in this entirely unexpected situation, the brakes rather came in handy.
Interesting story……….it all comes down to KNOWING there´s something wrong with the aircraft even before taking off.
You knew about the 1 C172 suffering from a brake problem………however the 2nd C172 surprised you with a (more serious) break down in flight……
Add the 2 items together, and it may spell disaster!! An accident is always a chain of events as they say, and well done on taking away the 1st link of that particular chain by swapping planes that night!!

Hats off by the way………landing on GPS at night, without any lights!!

It turned out to be an interesting thread.
Keep the stories coming!

###Ultra Long Hauler###
Ultra long hauler is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2011, 17:03
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maintenance is no rocket science. You don't need to even read or write to be able to fix brakes on a common type of aircraft.
Actually, maintenance is rocket science; what applies to fixing a Cessna 172 applies for the most part to fixing a rocket.

One doesn't need to be able to read or right to fly an airplane, either, but it surely helps. Whereas one is required to reference to applicable maintenance publications while performing a repair, being able to read is a big plus.
SNS3Guppy is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2011, 18:34
  #23 (permalink)  
jxk
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cilboldentune, Britannia
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And of course some aircraft like the AA5's need their brakes to be able to steer on the ground - which would automatically make it a NO go item.
jxk is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2011, 18:47
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite a few aircraft need brakes for steering. Brakes are also necessary in the event of a flat or low tire, strong crosswind, holding short of a runway, during a runup, and other occasions.

The fact that an aircraft is certified with brakes should be telling enough.
SNS3Guppy is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2011, 20:06
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As i'm moving from my 'Slot' i roll forward an inch or two then dab the breaks, one doesn't want to go careering off down the taxi way without the means to stop!... especiaily if it involved chewing the tail off the first A/C in line, or clipping the bowser......
FlyingKiwi_73 is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2011, 20:08
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: suffolk
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"arcing and sparking "
WTF is that ? this has got to be a wind up !
hatzflyer is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2011, 20:26
  #27 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
Brakes are likely to be needed on any flight so I wouldn't go without them.

My first landing in a taildragger (a Husky) was to the shortest licensed airfield runway in UK (grass) and was from the right hand seat. I had flown in there a few times before in other aircraft so I made sure I landed the aircraft on the numbers, at the placarded airspeed. I had been briefed about it having heel operated brakes, rather than the more common toe brakes but I was surprised that despite my best efforts I didn't notice any real retardation from them (I nearly pushed my heels through the floor as the end of the runway came closer). I could tell that my instructor was began to get a bit agitated but he left me to it. The aircraft slowed enough for me to turn off onto the rougher grass which slowed us better. As we taxied in he began debriefing me about more positive use of the brakes next time. Suddenly he stopped and apologised. He realised there were no brake pedals on my side of the cockpit. I had been trying to stop using the heel rests.
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 16th Mar 2011, 22:24
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My first landing in a taildragger (a Husky) was to the shortest licensed airfield runway in UK (grass) and was from the right hand seat.
You flew a Husky from the right seat?
SNS3Guppy is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2011, 01:29
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You flew a Husky from the right seat?
hah, sitting on the strut, braking flintstone style?
FlyingKiwi_73 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2011, 09:05
  #30 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
hah, sitting on the strut, braking flintstone style?
No, sitting in the right hand seat. Is that where they normally make you sit?
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 17th Mar 2011, 10:00
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK, mainly
Age: 39
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One assumes that it was something other than the standard tandem seating Husky ?
madlandrover is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2011, 10:21
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,047
Received 2,920 Likes on 1,249 Posts
Originally Posted by SNS3Guppy
Again, you never know when you'll need it. You made the correct decision to return to the hangar and get help.

Bit like this then LOL


NutLoose is online now  
Old 17th Mar 2011, 10:37
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: GLASGOW
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow

Just as well he was gentle on the initial throttle up. Could have been back of the hangar with lots of dents, or worse.

Liked the other guy immediately checking his brakes.

Yes, I am slightly surprised that anyone would consider taking off with a known defect, particularly brakes. I had the opposite the other day where I lined up and the take off roll was very sluggish, not normal. Aborted, and I actually thought pads had jammed, they had, required loosening.

The opposite effect of never reaching Vr - hedge here we come
maxred is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2011, 16:41
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, sitting in the right hand seat. Is that where they normally make you sit?
Just curious about the "right hand seat" in an airplane that has tandem seats: one in front of the other. Whereas there's no right hand seat, just a front and back seat, to go "right" you'd need to be outside the door and hanging on the strut.
SNS3Guppy is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2011, 17:04
  #35 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
One assumes that it was something other than the standard tandem seating Husky ?
Well assumed!

But for the further education of those who wrongly think the aviation world stops at the end of their personal knowledge , it was a Beagle Husky, built as a utility aircraft. Basically a Lycoming engined Auster. The one I flew had a hook and was primarily used for banner towing. Unfortunately it was later written off in a banner pick up accident, definitely not by me though. It had two side by side seats and one in the back. Some had four seats.

Beagle Husky - multi-purpose

JetPhotos.Net Photo » G-ATCD (CN: 3683) Private Beagle D5/180 Husky by Oliver Holmes

Beagle Husky G-ATCD: Picture No. 2905 from Pixstel
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 17th Mar 2011, 17:24
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just curious about the "right hand seat" in an airplane that has tandem seats: one in front of the other. Whereas there's no right hand seat, just a front and back seat, to go "right" you'd need to be outside the door and hanging on the strut.
Nice one ShyT. I know Guppy can't see my post but I'm looking forward to Mr Experienced's response to you.

I've copied his post for posterity.
Lord Spandex Masher is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2011, 18:09
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It had two side by side seats and one in the back. Some had four seats.
Interesting.
SNS3Guppy is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2011, 18:50
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice one ST that showed us!

Now i'm going to photoshop an 6 seater tomahawk see if anybody goes for it?
FlyingKiwi_73 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2011, 18:54
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no fooling this is why i check the brakes before going anywhere.

http://images.rcuniverse.com/forum/u...19/Pn37830.jpg

there are to many nice expensive aircraft at Omaka! Although a tommie prop may not reach a nanchang!
FlyingKiwi_73 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2011, 21:33
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,047
Received 2,920 Likes on 1,249 Posts
Buccaneer had front and rear seats offset too.....
NutLoose is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.