Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Differences training required?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Differences training required?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Oct 2010, 13:00
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Londonish
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Differences training required?

Slightly unusually, I have a JAA PPL with the skills test done in a wobbly prop tailwheel. That was done as a conversion based on having an ICAO (australian) PPL with CSU and tailwheel endorsements, and a bunch of time on nose and tailwheels.

So, if I want to fly a nosewheel in JAA land, do I need differences training?
I'm assuming I don't need differences 'signed off' for tailwheel/CSU as they're what I got the PPL on - i.e. not a difference..

Lasors just has me puzzled!
Mark1234 is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2010, 15:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Differences training is required if you haven't flown the relevant variant (e.g. fixed pitch, nosewheel SEP) in the last 2 years. JAR-FCL 1.235(c) refers.
BillieBob is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 10:31
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Londonish
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the reply, looks like I've resolved the question externally. However for the record, JAR-FCL 1.235(c) doesn't apply for SEP, nor does it address the implicit assumption that one has gained ones license on a nosewheel, fixed prop a/c. Why do I always have to be different...
Mark1234 is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 13:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: France
Posts: 1,030
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I don't think you are all that different.....I make sure to do a couple of hours a year on the club's robins so as not to be moithered. Mind, as my cub is annexe II, it looks like I am going to have to make that twelve hours in future, on top of the 100 or so in the cub
Piper.Classique is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 17:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
However for the record, JAR-FCL 1.235(c) doesn't apply for SEP
For the record, JAR-FCL 1.235(c) does apply to SEP - read it. It may, however, be the case that your licensing authority has decided to ignore the requirements in respect of SEP which, until the EASA implementing rules become law, it is quite at liberty to do. Whilst JAR-FCL 1.235(c) may not address the fact that experience is gained on other than a nosewheel fixed pitch prop, the Licence Endorsement List in JAR A&GM does.
BillieBob is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2010, 20:10
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Hove
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JAR-FCL 1.235(c) does apply to SEP - read it
OK then:
(c) Variants. If the variant has not been flown within a period of 2 years following the differences training, further differences training
or a proficiency check in that variant will be required except for types or variants within the SEP class rating.
It seems to me that that paragraph specifically excludes the SEP rating.

What's more, that paragraph does not state that if you haven't flown a variant for two years, you will need to repeat differences training.
tinpilot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.