Night Qualification in the UK a waste of money?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Night Qualification in the UK a waste of money?
I was thinking: how many airports are open to GA, at night and has runway lighting in the UK? How many of those charge you less than Jet Charter prices for their handling?
In short, is the NQ the most useless endorsement ever for the UK pilot?
In short, is the NQ the most useless endorsement ever for the UK pilot?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In my opinion, the night qualification with single-engine piston aircraft is basically useless anywhere in the world.
For example, given the terrain is many times unsuitable for forced landing at day, imagine how would you choose and approach it at moonless night? Not to mention, the weather has to be almost perfect (imagine that in the UK), if you want to do a safe VMC flight at night, since clouds aren't visible until you enter them and see strobe lights reflections in front of you. Night flying in all requires extensive pre-flight preparation, since you cannot (well, you can, I for one wouldn't) fly through narrow valleys at night, and since terrain isn't visible, it's very smart to fly at least 500 ft above the highest obstacle in the vicinity of expected flight path. And in order to do so, you need very good weather (high ceilings, great visibility).
Flying in at night in a single-piston is just not what I consider standard/normal ops, since in my opinion, risk simply cannot be managed to the same standard than in day conditions.
For example, given the terrain is many times unsuitable for forced landing at day, imagine how would you choose and approach it at moonless night? Not to mention, the weather has to be almost perfect (imagine that in the UK), if you want to do a safe VMC flight at night, since clouds aren't visible until you enter them and see strobe lights reflections in front of you. Night flying in all requires extensive pre-flight preparation, since you cannot (well, you can, I for one wouldn't) fly through narrow valleys at night, and since terrain isn't visible, it's very smart to fly at least 500 ft above the highest obstacle in the vicinity of expected flight path. And in order to do so, you need very good weather (high ceilings, great visibility).
Flying in at night in a single-piston is just not what I consider standard/normal ops, since in my opinion, risk simply cannot be managed to the same standard than in day conditions.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We have lights that are available 24x7 and I use them a lot especially in the winter. It means I don't have to worry about getting back before dark, especially when I have flown to work and we have over run.
As A&C education is not wasted especially when honing your skills as a pilot.
As A&C education is not wasted especially when honing your skills as a pilot.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire
Age: 49
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did a couple of hours of night flying last year as part of my PPL training.
I very much enjoyed it, and on a clear moonlit night, the visibility is absolutely staggering - it feels like you can see to infinity.
It's also a fantastic experience landing at an airport with the full runway lighting.
Even though I'm now based at a grass airfield with no lighting, I very much intend on completing my remaining hours for the night qualification as soon as it starts getting dark again.
I don't know how practically useful it will end up being, but this hasn't put me off.
I very much enjoyed it, and on a clear moonlit night, the visibility is absolutely staggering - it feels like you can see to infinity.
It's also a fantastic experience landing at an airport with the full runway lighting.
Even though I'm now based at a grass airfield with no lighting, I very much intend on completing my remaining hours for the night qualification as soon as it starts getting dark again.
I don't know how practically useful it will end up being, but this hasn't put me off.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have found the NQ to be useful many times, during the colder months, for getting back home.
This is even though I do not fly at night, partly due to SE risk management, and partly due to most GA-usable airports being closed.
I have logged enough night time to get the CPL, etc.
There is a bit of a "conflict" between the NQ and the rest of PPL training, in that to fly on a proper dark night (as opposed to sunset+31 minutes, along the brightly lit coast from Bognor Regis to the Brighton Marina, which is when most UK PPLs log their night time
) you need to be 100% instrument (aircraft control, and radio navigation) capable - yet night flight is permitted as a VFR/VMC activity without an IMCR or an IR. Kennedy Jr found this out the hard way 
If I was training somebody I care about (I am not an instructor of any sort) I would make sure they can do all the "IR" stuff before doing night flight.
This is even though I do not fly at night, partly due to SE risk management, and partly due to most GA-usable airports being closed.
I have logged enough night time to get the CPL, etc.
There is a bit of a "conflict" between the NQ and the rest of PPL training, in that to fly on a proper dark night (as opposed to sunset+31 minutes, along the brightly lit coast from Bognor Regis to the Brighton Marina, which is when most UK PPLs log their night time
) you need to be 100% instrument (aircraft control, and radio navigation) capable - yet night flight is permitted as a VFR/VMC activity without an IMCR or an IR. Kennedy Jr found this out the hard way If I was training somebody I care about (I am not an instructor of any sort) I would make sure they can do all the "IR" stuff before doing night flight.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First of all, I agree that NQ is good education, it gives you little insight of a real IFR flight (attitude flying etc.), but night flying (except perhaps traffic pattern) in SEP is no-go for me...
@IO540: Back here a little to the south east from UK, we can fly completely VFR at night (I did my XC for NQ via DR and checking VOR radials at waypoints) and the only legally required radio-navigation instrument is a VOR receiver
But I agree, a lot of people taht have NQ don't have the neccessary attitude flying skill/profficiency, which can be - as per your example - fatal.
@IO540: Back here a little to the south east from UK, we can fly completely VFR at night (I did my XC for NQ via DR and checking VOR radials at waypoints) and the only legally required radio-navigation instrument is a VOR receiver
But I agree, a lot of people taht have NQ don't have the neccessary attitude flying skill/profficiency, which can be - as per your example - fatal.
Fly Conventional Gear
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Winchester
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On the subject of night flying in the UK do any airports here have pilot controlled lighting?
Out of interest which airfield is that?
We have lights that are available 24x7 and I use them a lot especially in the winter. It means I don't have to worry about getting back before dark, especially when I have flown to work and we have over run.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: France & UK
Age: 40
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is a few places that operate PCL but is mainly used by based aircraft or not at all 
There is an airfield near me here in the Suffolk that has PCL but refuse to operate it based on not wanting to piss off the NIMBYS and plus the extra electric costs
The UK is a nightmare at times
VFR
There is an airfield near me here in the Suffolk that has PCL but refuse to operate it based on not wanting to piss off the NIMBYS and plus the extra electric costs
The UK is a nightmare at times
VFR
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Age: 52
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Definitely NOT a waste of money!
The point made by a previous poster, that any kind of additional flight training is seldom waster, is entirely valid.
Also, especially if you are based at an airfield with lights, it's nice not to need to be back from that Christmas shopping trip in France, by 15.30
The point made by a previous poster, that any kind of additional flight training is seldom waster, is entirely valid.
Also, especially if you are based at an airfield with lights, it's nice not to need to be back from that Christmas shopping trip in France, by 15.30
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Londonish
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I haven't used mine in this country, so in the UK, possibly. Frankly I need to do some procedures study before I do, as I got it 'granted' through having it on my Aus license, however, it is definitely not useless worldwide as FlyingStone suggests.
In aus it requires 10hrs, plus a 2hr flight with the examiner; including a *lot* of instrument appreciation, and radio nav. Mandatory 2+hr nav flight away from centres of habbitation (in other words black hole, and black like you can't imagine from europe). Legal requirements to observe MSA, calculate MSA for route, etc. Additionally the examiner pointed out it was a license to kill myself, and made me do all my VOR/NDB intercepts in solid cloud, bumpy and wet, and yes, I got some pretty funky 'leans' that never occurred 'under the hood'. I don't think I've ever been so stressed (as in under pressure), in an aircraft before or since. Which I suspect was exactly what was intended.
For my aus license, it removes me from needing to be in sight of the surface, and visually fixing my position. That and the ability to stretch the day have been the most evidently useful. The extra rigour training and thought process changed the way I approached a lot of planning. And lastly, whilst I would never deliberately flout VMC, I'm pretty comfortable that I can put my head down and fly out of it on the clocks if the need arises, whether in VMC or IMC.
So, useless? Absolutely not. As for the risks, SE at night is like SE IFR, SE over water, etc.. down to your personal assessment. Besides, you can fly a twin on a NQ can you not? (you can down there)
In aus it requires 10hrs, plus a 2hr flight with the examiner; including a *lot* of instrument appreciation, and radio nav. Mandatory 2+hr nav flight away from centres of habbitation (in other words black hole, and black like you can't imagine from europe). Legal requirements to observe MSA, calculate MSA for route, etc. Additionally the examiner pointed out it was a license to kill myself, and made me do all my VOR/NDB intercepts in solid cloud, bumpy and wet, and yes, I got some pretty funky 'leans' that never occurred 'under the hood'. I don't think I've ever been so stressed (as in under pressure), in an aircraft before or since. Which I suspect was exactly what was intended.
For my aus license, it removes me from needing to be in sight of the surface, and visually fixing my position. That and the ability to stretch the day have been the most evidently useful. The extra rigour training and thought process changed the way I approached a lot of planning. And lastly, whilst I would never deliberately flout VMC, I'm pretty comfortable that I can put my head down and fly out of it on the clocks if the need arises, whether in VMC or IMC.
So, useless? Absolutely not. As for the risks, SE at night is like SE IFR, SE over water, etc.. down to your personal assessment. Besides, you can fly a twin on a NQ can you not? (you can down there)
Last edited by Mark1234; 24th Aug 2010 at 11:01.
As part of my night training my instructor got me to head out to sea. As soon as I lost sight of the coastal lights in my peripheral vision I was totally on intruments. No moon so no sight of the surface.
It begs the question. Without an IMCr, would I have been legal, and safe?
It begs the question. Without an IMCr, would I have been legal, and safe?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark1234
As for the risks, SE at night is like SE IFR, SE over water, etc.. down to your personal assessment.
But as you say, it's down to one's personal assessment...
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep, Whilst its legal to get a NQ straight after getting a PPL, I think having a IMCr first makes a lot of sense. With that , losing the horizon should not be a big deal. it also means that should you get lost, you can use radio navigation to find your way or even flying an instrument approach into somwhere to get down. it also means that if you encounter cloud (which is harder to spot unless it between you and some lights) again its not a big deal.
(Flying in the UK at night has to be IFR anyway as well.)
(Flying in the UK at night has to be IFR anyway as well.)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Age: 52
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As part of my night training my instructor got me to head out to sea. As soon as I lost sight of the coastal lights in my peripheral vision I was totally on intruments. No moon so no sight of the surface.
It begs the question. Without an IMCr, would I have been legal, and safe?
It begs the question. Without an IMCr, would I have been legal, and safe?
If you head out over the sea on a 'grey' (but still VFR) day, there is no discernible horizon. I'm not sure it's THAT much different
Pitch black every way you look. It's VERY different.
Pitch black every way you look. It's VERY different.
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas and UK
Age: 66
Posts: 2,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having experienced a total engine faliure while instructing a pilot (for his instrument rating) during winter on an extended cross country (Birmingham, Jersey return), The flight started in the day but departure was delayed. I said I would NEVER fly single engine at night again, 20 years later I have not. Its not worth the risk. Its handy to know how, as an extra skill, useful to get out of trouble but questionable about its wisdom if you have not got at the very least an IMC rating and dont mind facing the prospect of death when you cant see the terrain if the engine stops.
I was very lucky, I was at FL100, in an airway at the start of the emergency and was able to finally glide to a large military airport with 24hr D&D via a PAR approach. This was after having initially declared a Pan call when the engine started to run rough 5 min before it stopped totally. The vibration was so severe that several instruments failed (it was almost impossible to see them with the vibration) I thought that we had lost part of the propellor due to the amount of vibration.
That night I was incredibly lucky, I think that luck like that happens rarely twice in a life time and its a risk I can avoid.
So no more single engine at night for me. At least in IFR day time flight you have a chance of seeing some ground when you drop out of the bottom of the clag if the engine stops, but I pick my days for flights in an IFR single. If the weather is too extreme, I dont go.
I was very lucky, I was at FL100, in an airway at the start of the emergency and was able to finally glide to a large military airport with 24hr D&D via a PAR approach. This was after having initially declared a Pan call when the engine started to run rough 5 min before it stopped totally. The vibration was so severe that several instruments failed (it was almost impossible to see them with the vibration) I thought that we had lost part of the propellor due to the amount of vibration.
That night I was incredibly lucky, I think that luck like that happens rarely twice in a life time and its a risk I can avoid.
So no more single engine at night for me. At least in IFR day time flight you have a chance of seeing some ground when you drop out of the bottom of the clag if the engine stops, but I pick my days for flights in an IFR single. If the weather is too extreme, I dont go.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I think having a IMCr first makes a lot of sense
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Londonish
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Note I didn't suggest it was the *same risk* as SE IFR etc., but that it was 'like'. Like in as much as some people will argue vehemently that it is tantamount to suicide, and some will not see any issue.
I can profess no knowledge of the UK NQ syllabus, but to flyingmac and spikeair in particular, in *my* humble opinion, if being without a horizon is an issue, you are ill advised to fly at night. However, whilst night flying does require significant instrument appreciation, it does not require an instrument rating; there is significantly more to an instrument rating than simply flying by the clocks.
Again, it's simply my own experience, but it was drummed into me that on a night takeoff you go straight onto instruments as soon as the wheels leave the runway, and stay there until 500ft minimum; something to do with somatogravic illusions..
I can profess no knowledge of the UK NQ syllabus, but to flyingmac and spikeair in particular, in *my* humble opinion, if being without a horizon is an issue, you are ill advised to fly at night. However, whilst night flying does require significant instrument appreciation, it does not require an instrument rating; there is significantly more to an instrument rating than simply flying by the clocks.
Again, it's simply my own experience, but it was drummed into me that on a night takeoff you go straight onto instruments as soon as the wheels leave the runway, and stay there until 500ft minimum; something to do with somatogravic illusions..