LAA CEO Good Value?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Age: 87
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nothing snide about my comments Fitter2, they are straight questions, asked on here because I reckon we might get some sensible answers. It may be my first post as Winco W, but there's a reason for that as I already stated. Snide would be telling you to spell matter correctly!(not mattor), I'm sure that was a typo and I wouldn't actually stoop to that sort of sniping other than as an example.
I have no doubt that Peter Harvey is a good glider pilot, never questioned it. THAT has no bearing on his ability to run a company. BTW an interesting comment came from a member of the Lasham Gliding Club on his appointment to the PFA (as it was then). That was "Never saw him as a team player, he's always been a loner chasing records" - interesting in the light of his performance in the office ;-)
In any case, there are enough LAA members on here to read this, which was my intention. I do post on here in another guise but don't bother asking who! This has one purpose; to raise a debate which won't be censored on the LAA site (which by the way requires real names to be used)
I have no doubt that Peter Harvey is a good glider pilot, never questioned it. THAT has no bearing on his ability to run a company. BTW an interesting comment came from a member of the Lasham Gliding Club on his appointment to the PFA (as it was then). That was "Never saw him as a team player, he's always been a loner chasing records" - interesting in the light of his performance in the office ;-)
In any case, there are enough LAA members on here to read this, which was my intention. I do post on here in another guise but don't bother asking who! This has one purpose; to raise a debate which won't be censored on the LAA site (which by the way requires real names to be used)
I've worked in a similar environment, and right now I run an autonomous organisation rather bigger than LAA HQ in Turweston. I also fly. I also have studied quite a lot of management topics.
If you look at the truly successful organisations, very rarely are they successfully run by:
(1) People who work stupidly long hours.
(2) People who don't maintain a good understanding of what their organisation is really about - the classic parachuted in CEOs (such as CAA's !) in other words.
So, we've got a chap here who is running a recreational aviation organisation, and is getting out of the office to go and engage with recreational aviation. Okay, a slightly different sort of flying, but that would worry me much less than to hear that he was a golf obsessive.
If he's doing this on work time rather than leave, then as an LAA member I do feel that's inappropriate. If he's spending every other day out there networking with other European GA organisations however, then I'd not be so worried. Ultimately however, if the LAA is running well, and does appear to be, then that is what really matters, not anybody else's idea of how he should spend his time whilst he's in charge.
Plus it keeps him out of the hair of the man who really runs the LAA, and has done for a couple of decades.
G
If you look at the truly successful organisations, very rarely are they successfully run by:
(1) People who work stupidly long hours.
(2) People who don't maintain a good understanding of what their organisation is really about - the classic parachuted in CEOs (such as CAA's !) in other words.
So, we've got a chap here who is running a recreational aviation organisation, and is getting out of the office to go and engage with recreational aviation. Okay, a slightly different sort of flying, but that would worry me much less than to hear that he was a golf obsessive.
If he's doing this on work time rather than leave, then as an LAA member I do feel that's inappropriate. If he's spending every other day out there networking with other European GA organisations however, then I'd not be so worried. Ultimately however, if the LAA is running well, and does appear to be, then that is what really matters, not anybody else's idea of how he should spend his time whilst he's in charge.
Plus it keeps him out of the hair of the man who really runs the LAA, and has done for a couple of decades.
G
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Gt. Yarmouth, Norfolk
Age: 68
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The original post seems to assume quite a lot, none of which is established:
whether the LAA needs a CEO is a matter for the directors and ultimately the members as a whole. The fact is that the LAA decided to have one. This is a different issue from whether the incumbent should have gone off gliding for three weeks. I would guess though that having a CEO who is still active in aviation sports may be seen as an advantage and may enable him to speak with more authority that otherwise would be the case.
- Has the CEO taken this as extra paid holiday
- Has he already taken his holiday entitlement, whatever that is?
- Has this trip been authorised by the board of directors (or whatever they are called)
- Is there any power in the LAA's Articles or rules of membership to expell somone for asking awkward questions?
- Has this ever in fact happened
- What is to stop our poster from raising this at the AGM as you normally would when the performance of an executive director or chief exec is an issue
whether the LAA needs a CEO is a matter for the directors and ultimately the members as a whole. The fact is that the LAA decided to have one. This is a different issue from whether the incumbent should have gone off gliding for three weeks. I would guess though that having a CEO who is still active in aviation sports may be seen as an advantage and may enable him to speak with more authority that otherwise would be the case.
Winco Wobbly wrote
I am sure I could get an unattributable derogatory 'quote' on anybody, including yourself.
The 'anonymous Lasham member' obviously never attended, or was part of the organisation of any of the BGA conferences Pete organised.
As a matter of interest, can you list any of the recoirds he 'chased'? I always got the impression that between competitions he was too busy building up a successful company.
(Note to self, stop feeding the troll).
I have no doubt that Peter Harvey is a good glider pilot, never questioned it. THAT has no bearing on his ability to run a company. BTW an interesting comment came from a member of the Lasham Gliding Club on his appointment to the PFA (as it was then). That was "Never saw him as a team player, he's always been a loner chasing records" - interesting in the light of his performance in the office ;-)
The 'anonymous Lasham member' obviously never attended, or was part of the organisation of any of the BGA conferences Pete organised.
As a matter of interest, can you list any of the recoirds he 'chased'? I always got the impression that between competitions he was too busy building up a successful company.
(Note to self, stop feeding the troll).
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Winco Wobbly
I some one has been expelled from the LAA this is a matter to be raised first with the people who run the LAA and if the answer is not satisfactory then it should be put to the membership in an open way with ALL the facts in public view.
It should not be the subject of cheap shots at the CEO (as said above the post will require a lot of "out of hours" work) on an unrelated issue.
Perhaps you would like to tell us why this guy was expelled from the LAA as you see so keen on this forum as a tool for comment on the LAA's policys.
It should not be the subject of cheap shots at the CEO (as said above the post will require a lot of "out of hours" work) on an unrelated issue.
Perhaps you would like to tell us why this guy was expelled from the LAA as you see so keen on this forum as a tool for comment on the LAA's policys.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it is acceptible for a member of an organisation to question the CEO's salary when their fees are going to pay it.
It does seem that sometimes when people get into senior positions like this that they can abuse their positions (MPs and expenses for example) for their own personal gain.
But saying that, I understand that in a typical CEO position you don't work 9-5. You work whenever is required and the thing that matters at the end of the day is whether the CEO generates or saves more money than they cost.
It does seem that sometimes when people get into senior positions like this that they can abuse their positions (MPs and expenses for example) for their own personal gain.
But saying that, I understand that in a typical CEO position you don't work 9-5. You work whenever is required and the thing that matters at the end of the day is whether the CEO generates or saves more money than they cost.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Age: 87
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's not clear from the responses to my post how many of you are actually LAA Members? My purpose was simply to provide information on a known scenario, sadly anonymously (but with good reasons). I wanted to see how people felt about this and if it was unacceptable then no doubt appropriate action would follow.
It's a little sad, but not unexpected that certain of you went for a personal approach in defence of the CEO instead of remaining objective. Others did provide objective criticism which is fine but from my perspective was a little off target in these circumstances.
Winco Wobble will remain anonymous, is totally weatherproof! and will return when there is something to air. Understand though, that WW isn't just a whinger, he actually treads the corridors of the LAA and his information will never be without foundation.
So Fitter2, better start turning over stones for that Troll , he's always hungry
It's a little sad, but not unexpected that certain of you went for a personal approach in defence of the CEO instead of remaining objective. Others did provide objective criticism which is fine but from my perspective was a little off target in these circumstances.
Winco Wobble will remain anonymous, is totally weatherproof! and will return when there is something to air. Understand though, that WW isn't just a whinger, he actually treads the corridors of the LAA and his information will never be without foundation.
So Fitter2, better start turning over stones for that Troll , he's always hungry
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Wessex
Age: 55
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One assumes that the CEO of the LAA is a saleried post so he doesn't get paid overtime.
That being the case whenever he atends a NC meeting or other meetings at weekends then it is part of the job.
So I doubt it would take very many months to rack up enough time off in lou to cover a couple of weeks gliding.
Personally as an LAA member I don't really care if only works alternate Thursdays when the moon is full as long as the LAA is doing OK.
Oh and judging from your totally negative attitude you are Welshman AICMP.
That being the case whenever he atends a NC meeting or other meetings at weekends then it is part of the job.
So I doubt it would take very many months to rack up enough time off in lou to cover a couple of weeks gliding.
Personally as an LAA member I don't really care if only works alternate Thursdays when the moon is full as long as the LAA is doing OK.
Oh and judging from your totally negative attitude you are Welshman AICMP.
Last edited by A_Pommie; 23rd Jul 2010 at 13:38.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As an LAA member I'm at least interested in this topic.
To answer some of the critics - there is no easy way for ordinary memebers to comunicate between themselves - the LAA forum is impossibly heavily moderated. Emailing or phoning gets a response, yes we have received your **** but usually nothing more.
With a potentially contentious issue like this then Pprune is probably the only obvious medium.
The LAA does some great stuff - but equally there have been some disgraceful episodes. As already displayed in this thread the politics of the organisation can make NuLabour look honourable.
I'll be interested to see a somewhat official explanation - but as with all these things it is extremely unlikely to happen.
To answer some of the critics - there is no easy way for ordinary memebers to comunicate between themselves - the LAA forum is impossibly heavily moderated. Emailing or phoning gets a response, yes we have received your **** but usually nothing more.
With a potentially contentious issue like this then Pprune is probably the only obvious medium.
The LAA does some great stuff - but equally there have been some disgraceful episodes. As already displayed in this thread the politics of the organisation can make NuLabour look honourable.
I'll be interested to see a somewhat official explanation - but as with all these things it is extremely unlikely to happen.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
“The boss of an aviation association goes flying; not much of a headline if you ask me.”
I suppose that depends. If a significant number of members of the LAA think it is an issue, then it is an issue, as the LAA is a democratic organisation. For this to happen, the anonymous critics will have to stand up to be counted (or shot
).
Rod1
I suppose that depends. If a significant number of members of the LAA think it is an issue, then it is an issue, as the LAA is a democratic organisation. For this to happen, the anonymous critics will have to stand up to be counted (or shot
).Rod1
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Wessex
Age: 55
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The problem with the LAA forum is that it went members only to try and control the ****e and spam that infested it. It also insists on posters using there own names so the oh so brave anonimous warriors all left.
That and only a few members use it so the board an NC think it is irelevant.
Unfortunatly it will remain irelevent until the board and NC take it seriously as a medium. If they took it seriously so would the members and therein lies the problem.
Any way back to the more important issues, wibbly wobbly welshman were's my 5 quid?
That and only a few members use it so the board an NC think it is irelevant.
Unfortunatly it will remain irelevent until the board and NC take it seriously as a medium. If they took it seriously so would the members and therein lies the problem.
Any way back to the more important issues, wibbly wobbly welshman were's my 5 quid?
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Suffolk
Age: 70
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The LAA forum is a window to the organisation. They should get a professional moderator/designer to kick some life into it and get it working as a forum that people go back to because it's informative, fun to use, and makes people feel part of a community. At the moment, it looks amateurish and has nothing to draw people back to it - making it sticky as web designers call it.
I'm an LAA member and used their coaching scheme to get my tailwheel rating - it does a lot of good work. But the forum design and operation lets it down.
I'm an LAA member and used their coaching scheme to get my tailwheel rating - it does a lot of good work. But the forum design and operation lets it down.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It also insists on posters using there own names so the oh so brave anonimous warriors all left.
If you insist on using real names then almost nothing of value will get written. It is an unfortunate characteristic of many human activities that a lot of stuff has political / commercial undertones and a lot of comment that is useful has to impinge on these, and this upsets the axe grinders. Aviation is thick with this stuff.
One can make it a members-only forum but anybody can join (of their own initiative, or by invitation from an existing member who wants to settle a score with another existing member) and read peoples' old (and controversial) postings; I have seen this happen (elsewhere) where somebody representing a business joined up and some existing people were threatened with legal action and all kinds of hassle.
In the long run, most of the regulars will get to know each other anyway but still you won't get anything really "cutting" written by somebody under his real name - unless he has absolutely nothing to lose (which applies to almost nobody).
IMHO the only solution is to allow anon posts but to moderate at a level where personal attacks are stopped. Very few forums get this right. It does require near-constant attendance by the mods, which takes effort. For H24 moderation you need 3-4 people, and while certain professions lend themselves better than others to this, it is damn hard to find 3-4 specimens with a sense of humour
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sheerness
Age: 73
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am an LAA board member and just thought I'd make comment about the inferences made by several posters that the Association wields the big stick against members who choose to criticise it. Some evidence would be welcome.
I have been actively involved in the Association for over twenty years and know of only one person being excluded for two (maybe three I cannot recall exactly) months. He was an Executive Committee member who deliberately worked against an important, then PFA, initiative and threatened its viability. It is not unreasonable to expect EC, now board members to support board decisions.
The person in question did operate a PFA aircraft and action was taken to ensure that his right to do so was not jeopardised in any way, and he actually re-permitted the aircraft during the course of his suspension. Hardly an act of oppressive vindictiveness I'd suggest.
Regarding the LAA Forum, the view was taken that it does reflect on the Association and sniping posts, many by people who were not even members, did nothing to further the cause of the Association. This forum is somewhat different of course; it is not allied to a particular company of association so comments made on it do not 'attack' the provider of the forum. It can therefore be considered as independent.
Some of you may recall the AAIB comments, in a microlight accident report, about a minority of BMAA members working against the BMAA safety culture, resenting over regulation by CAA and giving the impression that it was OK to break the rules. That view was formed in the main by postings on the BMAA forum and whether or not you agree with the inclusion of those comments in the report (I do not), it is clear that what is written on these forums is read and interpreted by more than a few anonymous people who like the sound of their own voice. If you are independent, like PPrune it doesn't matter, if you are not, like the BMAA and LAA forums, it can have unwelcome consequences.
That is why LAA took the decision to limit the forum to members and to use only real names. The forum now tends to be used by members who seek info on aircraft parts, technical issues, fly-ins etc. It is in the main non controversial, which no doubt is why many on here consider it a waste of time. Personally I take the view that it serves the purpose I want it to serve, there are plenty of independent forums available where anarchy rules, though I put little store in posts made by people who are not prepared to come out from behind the shield of anonymity.
I have no intention of commenting on the original subject matter of this thread. Making a submission to the LAA board, or raising the matter at the LAA AGM is the correct procedure for dealing with such issues.
Brian Hope.
I have been actively involved in the Association for over twenty years and know of only one person being excluded for two (maybe three I cannot recall exactly) months. He was an Executive Committee member who deliberately worked against an important, then PFA, initiative and threatened its viability. It is not unreasonable to expect EC, now board members to support board decisions.
The person in question did operate a PFA aircraft and action was taken to ensure that his right to do so was not jeopardised in any way, and he actually re-permitted the aircraft during the course of his suspension. Hardly an act of oppressive vindictiveness I'd suggest.
Regarding the LAA Forum, the view was taken that it does reflect on the Association and sniping posts, many by people who were not even members, did nothing to further the cause of the Association. This forum is somewhat different of course; it is not allied to a particular company of association so comments made on it do not 'attack' the provider of the forum. It can therefore be considered as independent.
Some of you may recall the AAIB comments, in a microlight accident report, about a minority of BMAA members working against the BMAA safety culture, resenting over regulation by CAA and giving the impression that it was OK to break the rules. That view was formed in the main by postings on the BMAA forum and whether or not you agree with the inclusion of those comments in the report (I do not), it is clear that what is written on these forums is read and interpreted by more than a few anonymous people who like the sound of their own voice. If you are independent, like PPrune it doesn't matter, if you are not, like the BMAA and LAA forums, it can have unwelcome consequences.
That is why LAA took the decision to limit the forum to members and to use only real names. The forum now tends to be used by members who seek info on aircraft parts, technical issues, fly-ins etc. It is in the main non controversial, which no doubt is why many on here consider it a waste of time. Personally I take the view that it serves the purpose I want it to serve, there are plenty of independent forums available where anarchy rules, though I put little store in posts made by people who are not prepared to come out from behind the shield of anonymity.
I have no intention of commenting on the original subject matter of this thread. Making a submission to the LAA board, or raising the matter at the LAA AGM is the correct procedure for dealing with such issues.
Brian Hope.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SE England
Age: 70
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally I take the view that it serves the purpose I want it to serve,
In the Board's shoes, on certain subjects I'd want to know the views of the membership and also, to some extent, the non-members.
If you really want the membership to tell you what they think of the organisation then confidential responses are essential - its what you do when you run a questionnaire, after all. And a confident Board would be able to ignore the sniping and look at the bigger picture.
Making a submission to the LAA board, or raising the matter at the LAA AGM is the correct procedure for dealing with such issues.