Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

PPL visa requirements

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

PPL visa requirements

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jun 2010, 20:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PPL visa requirements

Hi all,

I am a foreign graduate student with an F1 visa, valid for the next 3 years, and currently domiciled in NY.
I would love to take a PPL (still have to decide between FAA or JAA), but first I need to understand if I meet all the visa requirements. I found some info on the AOPA website, which sends me to www.uscis.gov , but nothing helped.
The point is that I still haven't understood if the F1 visa I am currently holding (with a US university as the official sponsor) is enough, or I need something else.

Thanks!
Ale
ale_login is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2010, 22:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: On the move
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You would have to request a change of status
ab33t is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 04:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think so. Your primary purpose of visiting the US is your university study, so that's what you need a visa for. Which you have.

As long as flight training is a secundary activity, it doesn't require a separate visa, as long as it's not specifically forbidden as part of the F1 visa requirements.

But that's my interpretation. Why don't you ask USCIS about it?
BackPacker is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 04:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 55
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flight Training is considered vocational rather than academic training and as such you will need a M1 visa rather than F.

Also, the visa issue is tied to the sponsoring organisation all of which is in SEVIS.

Not sure if you could hold a F1 and M1 visa at the same - best bet is to speak to the International/Immigration people at your school.
AnotherPPLwannabe is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 18:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So his suggestion of getting a JAA license will not work (assuming there is no JAA flight school in NY near his Uni).
Although I would assume that when the university has an official and published vacation, he would be able to use that vacation to go to another state (FL, most likely) and do flight training.

But I agree that in all respects the primary purpose of the visit to the US (the uni study) has to be maintained as such throughout the process.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 19:17
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would he need to do a JAR course?

Just do a FAA PPL at a mom and pop school and enjoy his flying it will cost less than going to one of the multiple JAR schools which we all moan about being run by a bunch of xxxxxx. Place your own word of choice instead of xxxxxx.

Then if he decides to go JAR he can swap it at a later date.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 22:48
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think mad_jock has it right. IF (and I don't profess to be an expert regarding US visas) his visa situation allows for flight training, then he doesn't have to go to any of the 'sausage factory' outfits than can sponsor a visa, but has the luxury and pleasure to learn wherever he wants to, which can be any flight school. Later convert to JAR PPL. Bliss !
172driver is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2010, 09:36
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 55
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"JAR schools which we all moan about being run by a bunch of xxxxxx"

" 'sausage factory' outfits"


Excuse my naivety, but why is there so much anti FL JAR flight schools around on these forums.
AnotherPPLwannabe is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2010, 11:10
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because over the years there have been numerous issues with them.

Without pointing fingers at individual schools

Poor quality of training
Sharp buisness practises
Not being all together truthfull in advertising
Unpleasant characters involved running them.
Sausage factory production.
Customer service very poor.


To be honest though the unpleasant characters is the main reason for most of the posts. With most of them there are literially hundreds of unsatisfied customers that have a point to be made.

Some folk can have a good experence out there learning and others have a terrible time.

Personally I did the FL PPL thing and its wasn't until I did the commercial and FI stuff I realised how poor the training was. After the FI I realised you couldn't really do a PPL test in a hour. Normally it includes a PFL, a nav leg with a divert before you get to the first turning point. And that divert involved turning right to run up a river and count 2 bridges with the first bridge your half way point. The RT test isn't someone banging on the wall everytime you make a mistake and you just having a go again until you get the call right.

Just to prove that this isn't across the board if you go back far enough there was a school called Brittannia run by 2 lads that never got anything bad said about them on PPrune. Both of them moved on and the school shut which was unfortunate. Everything wasn't perfect by a long shot but everyone was happy and it was a good laugh there; even if the school itself was a bit ruff and ready.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2010, 11:56
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With most of them there are literially hundreds of unsatisfied customers that have a point to be made.
Well, I've been active on here ever since I got my PPL at one of those 'sausage factories' and I must have done something wrong, because I haven't seen these 'literially [sic] hundreds of unsatisfied customers' posting on here about the school I went to. Sure, I have seen a few negative comments but IMHO nothing excessive, especially not if you compare it to their volume of business.

Are they all gathered over at the other forum, or some other place that I missed?

Have to admit there's one school that gets a fair share (but not 'literally hundreds') of negative comments, but this one is easily avoided. Don't tar the others with the same brush.

Then if he decides to go JAR he can swap it at a later date.
That is not so trivial as that single sentence seems to suggest. If your intention is to do an FAA PPL and then at a later date use that to acquire a JAA PPL, make sure you do a little research into what's involved beforehand. This thread is not the right place to discuss this, but it's definitely not a straightforward swap.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2010, 12:35
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Over the years there have been loads.

They banned the subject of PPL training on wannabies forums because of it.

For quite a few years every other thread was on the subject of FL and issues.

All the schools apart from brittannia have had a good kicking at times. It usually ends up the legal types gets involved and the thread gets pulled.

The converstion to a UK isn't to bad. If he has less than 100 hours PIC time he will have to complete all the exams. If over that just the air law I think. And then a test with a FE and a radio test.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2010, 12:36
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sausage factory

I initially trained at a small school in California (long, long before visa requirements and TSA fingerprinting) and got great service. And no, my PPL checkride certainly wasn't just one hour

However, I then did some further training on a couple of occasions at some of the proverbial FL 'sausage factories' and the difference was striking. Not trying to slag these outfits off, I achieved what I came for, but you simply have to run the shop differently if you have, say, 200 students rather than 10.

Which brings me back to my post, stating the OP probably has the luxury of being able to train with a small outfit that can provide personalised service.
172driver is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2010, 13:02
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but you simply have to run the shop differently if you have, say, 200 students rather than 10.
And that's probably the main issue. If you go to a 'sausage factory', with its cheap prices and promise of a three-week PPL, you've got to behave like a sausage, and work to fit the mold.

If you expect personalized content, an atmosphere where everybody knows everybody else and were lots of extra-curricular activities take place, don't go to a 'sausage factory'.
The converstion to a UK isn't to bad. If he has less than 100 hours PIC time he will have to complete all the exams. If over that just the air law I think. And then a test with a FE and a radio test.
That's what I meant. Hardly a straight swap. Essentially you need to do everything all over again except the 45 flying hours.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2010, 13:15
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Essentially you need to do everything all over again except the 45 flying hours.
Sorry, BP, you are really exaggerating here, at least not once you've passed the 100 (or 150, not sure now) hours PIC. Before that, perhaps, thereafter it's really no big deal.
172driver is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2010, 13:28
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I doubt whether the OP will be able to acquire 100 hours PIC before he finishes his University study in three years time.

But even with 100+ hours you've got to do three written exams (not just one as you suggested), plus the RT practical and the PPL skills test:
- Air Law (LASORS C1.3)
- Human Performance & Limitations (LASORS C1.3)
- Communications (LASORS B1.4)

So I still maintain that going from an FAA PPL to a JAA PPL is hardly what I would call a straight swap.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2010, 13:39
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The guy has got 3 years over there.

The embuggeration factor alone of getting a FAA JAR piggy back would put me off. Never mind waiting months for paper work to wing its way forwards and backwards across the atlantic.

Get a FAA ticket and see what happens. Its not as if it stops him flying a G reg if he wants day VFR. If he then wants to continue on to do CPL etc his FAA ICAO ticket will do he doesn't need to swap it.

With a FAA he will be able to add an instrument ticket to it as well if he likes.

In fact the more I think about it he would be daft to go anywhere near a JAR training establishment and thats not including the fact that most of them are run by knobs.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2010, 16:10
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(not just one as you suggested)
Never said that. Anyway, I'm with mad_jock here, get the FAA ticket, enjoy the flying, and then you can still convert to any other license, JAR or otherwise.
172driver is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2010, 16:19
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't knock US training.

IME, UK training can be pretty crap. I could tell some atrocious stories.

My US training was very thorough.

The rumour (which I cannot personally confirm) is that, currently, the half a dozen or so JAA-PPL-capable schools in Florida are packed with students from the Indian subcontinent and, incidentally in the same way as with UK universities, these people pay and expect to get the papers, no matter how, so the "business incentive" is pretty obvious (same as in UK universities, actually, where standards have plummeted to rock bottom).

That leaves just the one in California, which may be OK.
IO540 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2010, 04:55
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for all the info!!!
I'm surprised that my first post could start such a discussion!

Anyways, since I'm a PhD student and I'm working here, I surely cannot leave to FL for three weeks to take a JAA licence (I just found out that around NY there are no such schools)!!
My VISA lasts for the next 3 years, but what matters is actually the I-20 which lasts even longer (no problems with the duration of stay instead: indefinite). I would be kind of reluctant to change VISA status or similar things, since it could really screw things up badly, especially if I do it without informing my home institution...

Well, I think that at this point, the safest thing is to contact USICS and see what they say! I'll update this thread once I have an answer.

Cheers!
Ale
ale_login is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2010, 11:48
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good luck with the visa and enjoy your flying. There is nothing wrong with FAA training. Go visit a few schools and meet the instructors and see what the planes are like. You might find the university you are linked with will have an attached flight school, I proberly wouldn't use them.

Nice little school with a gatorade machine in the foyer, and some old vietnam vet of an instructor who teaches because he enjoys it and keeps him and his aircraft airborne.
mad_jock is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.