Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Light aircraft crash in Andover (merged)

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Light aircraft crash in Andover (merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Apr 2010, 10:01
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Is it mandatory (from a certification point of view) to have a small opening panel incorporated into a single piece clear canopy?"

No, not in a permit aircraft anyway.

Rod1
Rod1 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 12:19
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know any more than anybody has posted anywhere, but from the stuff I read yesterday it sounded like there was a major fire which either spread to the cockpit, incapacitating the pilot(s), or the smoke from it filled the cockpit and the ventilation system (if there was one) was not capable of being shut off so as to stop the smoke entering.

Either way, a dire situation and the sooner the details come out the better.

The AAIB report is going to take a year and most of them don't contain much useful information beyond "official" speculation.
IO540 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 12:31
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the several images I have seen of the type of aircraft involved, some don't appear to have any ventilation panels set into the single piece canopies.

However, how such panels, when open, would in practice assist in "evacuating" smoke/gas from the cockpit is open to debate. The pressure differential may act to "draw" more smoke/gas from the engine area at a rate faster than that which is being expelled?

Also raises a question of on board fire extinguishers. . . .and so on . . . .
Fake Sealion is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 12:40
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know if somebody "around here" knows something they aren't saying but I don't think fires originating inside the cockpit are at all common.

Maybe a laptop or some other appliance might catch fire...

A much more likely issue is a fire forward of the firewall, fuelled by a fuel leak. This is why the firewall should be made of steel, fuel hoses should be fire sleeved and properly secured so they cannot touch hot items, the exhaust system should be leak-free, etc. And the cockpit heater controls should have a clear all-shutoff position which blocks all gas routes through the firewall.

And obviously electrical wiring needs to be done and secured properly, and done using high-temp insulated cable.
IO540 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 13:31
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
“I don't know if somebody "around here" knows something they aren't saying “

I could not possibly say...

The aircraft type concerned does not normally have a “DV” panel, but it does have ventilation via ducts down the side of the fuz. It is possible to shut them off.

I do not think we know what order the key events happened in so what caused the smoke in the cockpit is impossible to know for now. (ie which side of the f/w it all started). The firewall in this case was carbon with metal bonded to it on the engine side.

Rod1
Rod1 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 14:00
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The firewall in this case was carbon with metal bonded to it on the engine side.
What metal and how thick?

I could not possibly say...
Pot and black comes to mind, following recent posts on Flyer by the two of you
IO540 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 15:28
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Age: 68
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
uuuuhhhhhhhhhh IO540

I'm glad we're back on topic here discussing whatever we can learn from this accident.

What type of craft was involved? Does this type have a history of fires?
Engine type?
vanHorck is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 15:53
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Does this type have a history of fires?"

No

"Engine type?"

Rotax 912ULS

Rod1
Rod1 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 16:02
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts
I understand it has a history of tailplanes ('tis a T tail?) coming off in flight.

I don't know why the type secrecy, the pilot and his companion have both been named in the press and G-INFO only links one microlight to either of them. 2 + 2 = 4.

Rans6....
rans6andrew is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 16:19
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
“I understand it has a history of tailplanes ('tis a T tail?) coming off in flight.”

If one incident in the entire fleet is “history”…

I was asked not to make the type public, but you can work it out.

Rod1
Rod1 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 16:52
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I simply cannot understand the need for all this secrecy. Who exactly asked you to keep quiet about which sort of aircraft was involved?

A very strange reaction indeed.
JW411 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 19:12
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SW France
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The crash A/C was G-TOOT a Dyn'Aero MCR01 VLA version; 100hp Rotax engined. This type does not have a history of tailplane failure; there are hundreds of MCR01 flying on the continent with no known tailplane failures.

A single UK registered microlight version of the MCR01 did loose a tailplane; this particular A/C had a chequered history; PM me if you need more details.
MCR01 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 20:25
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
“there are hundreds of MCR01 flying on the continent with no known tailplane failures. “

Around 575 ish flying world wide with a very good safety record.

The one that did fail had been crashed and had non standard repair brackets fitted to the tail.

Non of which has any relevance to this tragic accident.

Rod1
Rod1 is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 09:51
  #54 (permalink)  

Sub Judice Angel Lovegod
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have had three fires in the air and all were cockpit fires (one ADF, one electric trim, one main bus wiring.) All on different types (HS125, Chieftain, Aztec respectively.)
Timothy is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 10:04
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Were all 3 "maintained" by the same company? What was the age of the piston twins?
IO540 is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 14:42
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Retford, UK
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I now know when preflighting this engine type I will be extremely thorough.
7AC, just going back to this again, you seemed to imply that from what you know about this incident there was something unusual that operators of this engine ought to be checking thoroughly in their preflight checks - is that what you meant and could you be more open?
MichaelJP59 is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 18:39
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the north
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am sure the AAIB will be thorough and hopefully prompt on this tragedy.
Have seen a couple of aircraft suffer engine fires (carb area) on the ground at start up and both extinguished promptly with an extinguisher - one a Cessna 182 and one a Rotax 912 homebuilt.
Somewhat worried by reference in a banbi buyers guide to the possibility of leaking fuel tank seams so I am sure the relevant people know about this.
Sad end to fellow fliers.
bingoboy is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2010, 06:30
  #58 (permalink)  
7AC
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Out West
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MichaelJP,
I had no inside information on this accident but when a light aircraft comes down like that
I am always keen to know the circumstances as even the gossip can teach something.
With the Rotax I have always been nervous about exhaust and fuel fittings when I watch how they shake so much on start-up and shutdown.
Recently on inspection the exhaust on my Champ had an ugly crack in the exhaust and it was only spotted after another owner casually mentioned one on his Cub.
I suppose we just have to live and learn, and try to postpone the appointment with the Grim Reaper as long as possible.
7AC is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2010, 06:48
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Surrey Hills
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
7AC

If you have a slipper clutch on your 912ULS then maybe Conrad Beale can help.

ConAir Soft Start Module SSM

My SkyArrow [Rotax 912UL] had a Beale family device fitted to augment carb heat and it was truly amazing. Carb icing just never happened again. Good firm to deal with.

No commercial connections, just a happy customer.
aviate1138 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2010, 09:19
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Retford, UK
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the Rotax I have always been nervous about exhaust and fuel fittings when I watch how they shake so much on start-up and shutdown.
Agree about that, when mine stops it does so extremely abruptly, which no doubt puts stress on all the fittings.
MichaelJP59 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.