Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

CFIT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Oct 2009, 08:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CFIT

YouTube - Close call with terrain
worrab is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 08:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N/A
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope FAA got the video and details about this pilot.
Intercepted is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 09:14
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: someplace between FAF & MAPt
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Holy s t
moonym20 is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 14:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,558
Received 39 Likes on 18 Posts
There's 4 folks in Algonquin Park, Ontario doing pretty much the same stupidity who were not as lucky
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 14:55
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norfolk UK
Age: 80
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What tossers!

I can't believe they were laughing about it on the ground afterwards.

Maybe some of these scary videos should be shown to us when we are students?
Lister
Lister Noble is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 15:59
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 41
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just plodding along in zero vis in a valley.
Might as well drive down the M1 with your eyes closed...

Pathetic
liam548 is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 18:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crikey! The ONLY options you have when entering IMC inadvertently at low level are an immediate 180* turn to get out of it straight away or if you have the IF skills an immediate climb to above safety altitude and pick up a radar service.

To happily continue not just below safety altitude but actually below the height of surrounding terrain is suicidal. I cannot comprehend how these guys would consider that a reasonable course of action.
Torque Tonight is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 19:01
  #8 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
To fly like that is sheer folly.

To put it on YouTube is almost as stupid....
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 19:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,558
Received 39 Likes on 18 Posts
I can't believe they were laughing about it on the ground afterwards.
I once had a very narrow escape when a road went over a rise and suddenly dead ended at the lip of a steep slope without any signs posted I stopped a few feet short from going over the edge and the first thing I did was an involuntary laugh. I witnessed the same reaction from another driver whose car overturned, but was uninjured.

It happens when you can't believe your extremely lucky escape
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 19:36
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northampton
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RatherBeFlying,

But it's usually during aforementioned stupid laugh that your demise will come about in a very unexpected (and somewhat comical) way! For example, banana skin, acidic bird s**t etc

p.s. regarding the vid, some posters have referred to the two gentleman up front as pilots... really?
Halfbaked_Boy is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 20:17
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am sure many people have done worse stuff but it did not end up on film. There are plenty of clowns around.

I know one man who was flying along in poor vis, in and out of IMC, and a wind turbine blade passed right in front of him. He never did that again...

The ONLY options you have when entering IMC inadvertently at low level are an immediate 180* turn to get out of it straight away or if you have the IF skills an immediate climb to above safety altitude and pick up a radar service.
I think a 180 is the best option unless one has a GPS running a real topo chart. A climb straight ahead, say +500fpm, could just take you into a hill.

But why fly so low to start with?
IO540 is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 21:30
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Moray,Scotland,U.K.
Posts: 1,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
If you can't get out with a 180 turn, put the plane down before you are in cloud. Climbing without a good, preplanned, gps track, will have a high risk of hitting something in hilly country.
Why fly a single engine over cloud covered mountains? You're safer following the valleys, provided you keep a few hundred feet below any cloud you see, as well as a few hundred feet above the terrain, and for your legal visibility take the distance at which you can see a low cloud against a grey background, not a white house on dark moorland.
Maoraigh1 is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 21:31
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CFIT

Not sure I would call this CONTROLLED flight into terrain...
172driver is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 21:36
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You're safer following the valleys, provided you keep a few hundred feet below any cloud you see, as well as a few hundred feet above the terrain,
Errr.... no, you are most definitely NOT safer doing this What you describe here is the route to perdition of several pilots every year - ducking under a cloud base, getting further and further into a valley. Until there is no more space to turn. The result is usually contained in an AAIB report
172driver is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 21:47
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Moray,Scotland,U.K.
Posts: 1,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I don't fly valleys unless I can see a way through. With 1000+ feet between surface and cloud, it's safer than on top with a single engine.. If I do get caught, without being able to do a 180, I'll put the plane down rather than climb into cloud.
Maoraigh1 is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 21:54
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good luck to you - just don't take any passengers
172driver is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 22:05
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why fly a single engine over cloud covered mountains? You're safer following the valleys, provided you keep a few hundred feet below any cloud you see, as well as a few hundred feet above the terrain, and for your legal visibility take the distance at which you can see a low cloud against a grey background, not a white house on dark moorland.
I agree 100% with 172driver.

Loads of people get killed every year doing this. It requires expert local knowledge, very good aircraft handling (slow speed turns, etc), and appreciation of local weather conditions.

I have overflown the Alps and other bits, above an overcast. The only risk is an engine failure, but scud running in the valleys carries many more risks than that.
IO540 is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2009, 22:06
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The key is not to get yourself in a situation where inadvertent IMC becomes a possibility in the first place. It should almost always be avoidable in recreational flying. If it looks unavoidable, a precautionary landing would be advisable.

If inadvertent IMC does occur, I believe that the best course of action for a non IMCR/IR pilot is the 180* level turn. For a pilot and aircraft capable of instrument flight it is my opinion that climbing to safety altitude is generally the safest option. If there is hilly terrain in the area, maneouvring laterally could be the least safe option. A zoom climb to stabilize at the best angle of climb speed will get you away from the ground with the least risk of hitting something solid. How well would a right 180* turn have gone in the video above? Just my opinion.
Torque Tonight is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2009, 00:09
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Torque Tonight has it almost right IMO.

How would a right 180 have worked for these guys other than driving straight into high ground?

Full power climb and corkscrew up keeping the turn tight and not standard.
On reaching SSA change to IFR keep a little extra speed for the tighter turn.

If not IFR capable dont enter cloud. Turn visual, accept the altitude to keep out of cloud and do a 180 back from whence you came. But I stress keeping visual which means NOT in cloud.

Pace
Pace is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2009, 07:38
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Full power climb and corkscrew up keeping the turn tight and not standard.
Why corkscrew up - if you have been flying up a valley, presumably the valley goes straight on and turning either way might put you into the side, plus, even if you are current in flying IMC a corkscrew manouver can be very dissorientating - if you are flying there then you [I]should[I] have an idea where the valley goes after you become IMC, so climb doing your best to follow the center of the valley.
foxmoth is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.