Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

CAA Director Airspace policy - £170 000 + bonus

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

CAA Director Airspace policy - £170 000 + bonus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Jun 2008, 10:09
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please don't this as being rude, but where are you from or specifically which planet!
astir 8 - I wouldn't either waste bandwidth asking the question. Bose X is a sky god (here and elsewhere), and everyone else just has to fall in behind him. Any "misunderstanding" is always down to the reader, and never the result of his use of the English language
flaxman is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2008, 10:50
  #42 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Inverness-shire
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No worries, it was Bosey asking me which planet I come from, not vice versa.

Planet Wales innit?
astir 8 is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2008, 12:46
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ...back of the drag curve
Age: 61
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are mistaken about SRG down at Gatport Airwick, where Blue has been almost completely erased.
Really? I must be mistaken then. You've only got to eavesdrop on the "When I was on...." (Insert RAF/Navy types here) war stories during CAA lunch hour at Aviation House to know that this is just not the case. I've often heard the same stories twice

Not many AAC chaps in the flying posts though......
'Chuffer' Dandridge is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2008, 14:03
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Astrid....


[B]Answer - I'm from Wales specifically Llangollen - now let's hear you pronounce that![/
B]

With ease, spent a lot of time in the area, used to have my kayaks built by Nomad who were in the warehouse building down the side of the river.

Quango

Quango (p.s. not a quangos) has been used as an acronym for

a) "Quasi-autonomous non-governmental organisation

or b) Quasi non-governmental organisation

or c) Quasi-autonomous national governmental organisation

A Quango has also been described as a non-departmental public body

Personally I take the CAA to fall into the category of b) above.

Amongst other things if the CAA is not a government body, how does it get to prosecute people?

Oh and since you were being rude, it's now my turn.

Comment deleted after cooling off slightly
The CAA does not fit that description which is why I pulled you on it. PPruneRadar saved me the hassle of doing the job for you and looking it up....

Flaxman, thanks for the recognition of my status.....
S-Works is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2008, 14:37
  #45 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
FWIW I think that Ghengis' post sums this up very well.

£170Kpa to be a director of a public corporation that has no competition and limited risk seems way on the high side.

Quite frankly, does it really need a world class candidate to do this job or just a very good one (this last differentiation makes quite a difference to compensation.,)
 
Old 10th Jun 2008, 16:09
  #46 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,234
Received 52 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by bose-x
With ease, spent a lot of time in the area, used to have my kayaks built by Nomad who were in the warehouse building down the side of the river.
And still are I think. Check your PMs bose-x; I think that we probably used to race against each other.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2008, 16:19
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oxford
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think what is missing from this discussion is the fact that we feel not that £170,000 is an outrageous amount of money, but that it's an outrageous amount of our money. Actually, I think it's the wrong target. The problem is the lack of independent scrutiny of the charging regime, and of the manning levels required to deliver the services which the CAA is obliged to provide. I.e. we all feel that the boys keep one another in nice little sinecures until retirement, paid with our fees for PPL issues, C of A and the like.

Now probably much of this is untrue. It's just that no-one really seems to know.

Tim
tmmorris is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2008, 19:13
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Norfolk, England
Age: 58
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BOSE X

Great, you're a big earner, and good for you! Yep, there are jobs out there that attract huge salaries, but please, please don't insult us with all this bull****e about such high earners being so because they are "highly motivated" or "go the extra mile". They may very well be, but many of us do just that, but earn far more, (dare I say?) normal wages! I work in excess of 80 hours per week, and do my job to the very best of my ability. I've won prizes for my business and have improved profitability in a time that many are fleeing the industry. What do I do? I'm a farm manager. I have a degree, work bloody hard, and I'm pretty sure I'm at the top of my game. However, farming will never pay the kind of money you'd even consider. So what should we all do? Quit these sort of jobs and become the elite "essential" earners you so defend? Sorry, but in my book we're all essential and should not be considered any less motivated just because we don't aspire to your wage level

Ok, like I said, you're doing well and I'm sure you're worth it ... But how about you try not to rub our noses in it eh?

SS
shortstripper is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2008, 21:33
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Dagobah
Posts: 631
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And now that you have confirmed that you are minted. I'm definatly going to try and marry your daughter!
youngskywalker is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2008, 21:49
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: the air please
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You socialists are just pathetic...but I have a solution:

BartV is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2008, 22:11
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BOSE X

Great, you're a big earner, and good for you! Yep, there are jobs out there that attract huge salaries, but please, please don't insult us with all this bull****e about such high earners being so because they are "highly motivated" or "go the extra mile". They may very well be, but many of us do just that, but earn far more, (dare I say?) normal wages! I work in excess of 80 hours per week, and do my job to the very best of my ability. I've won prizes for my business and have improved profitability in a time that many are fleeing the industry. What do I do? I'm a farm manager. I have a degree, work bloody hard, and I'm pretty sure I'm at the top of my game. However, farming will never pay the kind of money you'd even consider. So what should we all do? Quit these sort of jobs and become the elite "essential" earners you so defend? Sorry, but in my book we're all essential and should not be considered any less motivated just because we don't aspire to your wage level

Ok, like I said, you're doing well and I'm sure you're worth it ... But how about you try not to rub our noses in it eh?

SS
You know what, I don't give a toss. I tried to bring some balance to the reason why these jobs are paid they way they are. I frankly don't care about your education or your chosen career and whether it is well paid or not. It was not my intention to rub anyones nose in anything, if you feel so inferior that you perceived it that way then tough luck.

But as usual it comes down to mud slinging. So go plough your field or whatever it is that keeps you happy. Out of interest who paid for your degree, mummy and daddy send you to that nice little farming university so you could learn all about land management? A few beers and some shagging whle you studied 'full time'? Before you insult me at least do me the courtesy of asking about my background and where my education came from.

I never suggested anyone quit any job, nor that anyone should change their career. All I did was try and explain to the mud slingers the logic behind the packages that these organisations offer. If you are happy working 80hrs a week for whatever remuneration you get then good on you. I would kill to have people with your work ethic.

You know **** all about me but think it perfectly acceptable to have a pop and read things into my posts that fit your own sense of inadequacy. NOWHERE have I derided or insulted anyone that does not earn a huge salary.

S-Works is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2008, 23:53
  #52 (permalink)  

A little less conversation,
a little more aviation...
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bracknell, UK
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bose X
You know what, I don't give a toss. I tried to bring some balance to the reason why these jobs are paid they way they are. I frankly don't care about your education or your chosen career and whether it is well paid or not. It was not my intention to rub anyones nose in anything, if you feel so inferior that you perceived it that way then tough luck.

But as usual it comes down to mud slinging. So go plough your field or whatever it is that keeps you happy. Out of interest who paid for your degree, mummy and daddy send you to that nice little farming university so you could learn all about land management? A few beers and some shagging whle you studied 'full time'? Before you insult me at least do me the courtesy of asking about my background and where my education came from.

I never suggested anyone quit any job, nor that anyone should change their career. All I did was try and explain to the mud slingers the logic behind the packages that these organisations offer. If you are happy working 80hrs a week for whatever remuneration you get then good on you. I would kill to have people with your work ethic.

You know **** all about me but think it perfectly acceptable to have a pop and read things into my posts that fit your own sense of inadequacy. NOWHERE have I derided or insulted anyone that does not earn a huge salary.
And breath.....breath...and maybe play some soothing whale-song/womb-music....light some scented candles, and maybe go off and perform the blood-pressure-reduction procedure unofficially recommended by various AMEs.

You need to relax mate. You're on the verge of being seen as....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2FhFi0FZ9Y

But more importantly, this little beauty...

Originally Posted by Bose X
But you will find it is the highly motivated, highly capable individuals who are prepared to go the extra mile and reach high standards.
Bordering on bone-fide middle-management buzzword bullsh!t b0llocks bingo - any more of that and you enter "Leveraging synergy across all platforms" territory, at which point the Pprune Terms & Conditions apparently allow us to have you keel-hauled. Under HMS Belfast. Twice.

This thread isn't about you...or what you earn. Its about what the CAA are paying themselves, and what they do for the money. Frankly, if there was an opportunity for me to start Honest Ed's Airspace Ltd, and provide a high-quality bespoke airspace service to high-quality clients such as yourself, in competition with the CAA, at half the price, then fair enough. But what we're seeing is an ineffective monopoly taking the piss with 'executive' salaries for equally ineffective time-servers. They have to advertise the post by law, but if it goes to someone not already in the Belgrano I'll eat my Gentex.
eharding is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2008, 07:16
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This thread isn't about you...or what you earn. Its about what the CAA are paying themselves, and what they do for the money. Frankly, if there was an opportunity for me to start Honest Ed's Airspace Ltd, and provide a high-quality bespoke airspace service to high-quality clients such as yourself, in competition with the CAA, at half the price, then fair enough. But what we're seeing is an ineffective monopoly taking the piss with 'executive' salaries for equally ineffective time-servers. They have to advertise the post by law, but if it goes to someone not already in the Belgrano I'll eat my Gentex.
Exactly Ed, but it seems some people took it as an opportunity for a childish fight when all I tried to do was point out that it was a reasonable sector salary.

Whether we end up getting a candidate that proves to be value for money is a different matter.
S-Works is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2008, 07:22
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Norfolk, England
Age: 58
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bose,

If you read my post again you will see that I wasn't mud slinging or insulting toward you or the salary you earn. As I said, that's good for you and as I also said, I'm sure you're worth it. What I took exception to, was the way you implied that all these high earners are there because they have the kind of motivation and hard work ethic that sets them above the rest of us. IMHO THAT is the bit of what you say that is tter ( B.... ok I'll modify my comment a bit) .... rubbish!

Just as I have no idea about your background, you have no idea of mine. However, you are clearly happy to make the same assumptions you accuse me of Although you disguise it behind a question, you imply Mummy and Daddy payed for me to go to college? As it happens, my father was a lobster fisherman and earned enough to get by, but certainly not enough to pay my way. I've done that myself since I was 15 years old when my parents moved away ... thankyou very much! Also for your information, whilst I certainly wouldn't say no to your salary, I certainly DO NOT feel inferior to you (unless you stuck me in IMC in a ME where I would most certainly bow to your experience ). Actually, though I often moan about it (who doesn't?) I'm happy enough in my job, although I must admit the hours are becoming more tedious as I get older. Also, though it's probably not truely representative, watching "the apprentice" and seeing how much a.. licking and back stabbing is required to progress in the corporate world ......... I think can keep it!

I still think £170,000 is too much for the post

SS
shortstripper is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2008, 07:45
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I still think £170,000 is too much for the post
You would, is it to much for your job? Is there such a thing as to much money for our own jobs?

If you answer yes then you are in the wrong field (no pun intended), may I then suggest a new career, Saint, Pope or maybe Jesus Christ.


S-Works is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2008, 07:59
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Norfolk, England
Age: 58
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair point ... and whilst I think I am worth it, who would pay me £170K to manage their farm? If you know someone who would, and let me know and I'll happily consider you to be a Saint, Pope or Jesus Christ!

shortstripper is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2008, 08:00
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: cnutsville
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You would, is it to much for your job? Is there such a thing as to much money for our own jobs
I would say yes, considering that the post holders salary is partly being funded by GA and does not seem to be in-line with other public sector leaders who we have established, in some cases, earn far less.

And I thought it was you who currently held the position of Jesus Christ, obvioulsy you have found a more senior position.
sketchy is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2008, 08:30
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
You would, is it to much for your job? Is there such a thing as to much money for our own jobs
I would say yes, considering that the post holders salary is partly being funded by GA and does not seem to be in-line with other public sector leaders who we have established, in some cases, earn far less.

And I thought it was you who currently held the position of Jesus Christ, obvioulsy you have found a more senior position.
Show me where the post is being funded by GA to any noticeable value and we can have a different discussion. GA pays a tiny minority of the revenue generated by the CAA. This is a GREAT bone of contention to the airlines who have tried to 'even' things up over recent years but even then the GA input is tiny in the scheme of things.

I think a lot of people posting on here are just looking for a fight rather than a real understanding of how the CAA operates, how the charges made to GA from the CAA are actually made and what percentage of CAA revenues that GA actually inputs.

Don't get me wrong, I am not defending the CAA, even Jesus Christ could not do that at times with a clear conscience. But I am pragmatic enough to understand how it works.

I went through the Sunday times this morning from last weekend and looked at the public sector jobs (of which the CAA is actually private sector with a public oversight) and the salaries are in line. As far as private sector is concerned we recently employed a Head of It for one the group companies with 40 staff reporting in and the salary was £160k plus car and benefits, shares and bonus.

A band of £130-170k is not unusual I think.
S-Works is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2008, 09:02
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: .
Age: 37
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why all the insults back-and-forth? Completely unrelated to the thread, and like children in a playground. We're all adults aren't we? Cut it out.

The only one who seems to have spoken any sort of sense in this discussion is tmmorris (Post #47).
Captain Smithy is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2008, 09:22
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: england
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look here for a start.
Lurking123 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.