Cleared to Land?
Thread Starter
Cleared to Land?
So Tower tells you to continue with your approach and then the frequency gets very busy and as you cross the threshold they haven't cleared you to land. Do you:-
a) Go around regardless of having landed at the airport loads of times and irrespective of having an empty runway ahead of you, or
b) Flare as usual, hold her just above the stall a few feet off the deck until you can get a request to land in to Tower, or
c) Land regardless of not having clearance and vacate asap, hoping they just forgot to utter the clearance because of the congested frequency, or
d) Something else...
a) Go around regardless of having landed at the airport loads of times and irrespective of having an empty runway ahead of you, or
b) Flare as usual, hold her just above the stall a few feet off the deck until you can get a request to land in to Tower, or
c) Land regardless of not having clearance and vacate asap, hoping they just forgot to utter the clearance because of the congested frequency, or
d) Something else...
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had exactly this on my third or so solo flight. I went around from about 50 feet I guess. I wasn't proficient enough then to fly it to the deck and hold off until I got my clearance.
Words from the tower: "Cadet XXX, cleared to... Never mind, I see you're going around."
Words from the tower: "Cadet XXX, cleared to... Never mind, I see you're going around."
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: On a roll...
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unless you've got an emergency or some other very good reason to be on the ground, Not "Cleared To Land" is....Not Cleared to Land.
Ask yourself the same question for a take-off & you'll see what I'm getting at.
Always best to clear up any confusion with ATC after having done something positive like a making a go-around, rather than bluthering into a potentially unknown situation on the ground.
Some very good debate on this on the "Go-Around from 50 feet?" thread.
Ask yourself the same question for a take-off & you'll see what I'm getting at.
Always best to clear up any confusion with ATC after having done something positive like a making a go-around, rather than bluthering into a potentially unknown situation on the ground.
Some very good debate on this on the "Go-Around from 50 feet?" thread.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: On a roll...
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Backpacker - saw your comment about holding off for a substantial time in that other thread.
Further to what one other poster commented, this also seems to me a bizarre solution to a late landing clearance.
Have been in similar situations before on very long runways with commercial traffic ahead & behind.
Why don't you either reduce to min app speed (if nothing fast behind) or ask to "land long" & fly a standard (...even fast) approach but aiming further down the park??
As you state, seems a pretty vulnerable place to be, especially in a gusty crosswind, in the flare, visibility restricted, low & slow above the tarmac...
Just thinking, would be even less clever in a taildragger...
Further to what one other poster commented, this also seems to me a bizarre solution to a late landing clearance.
Have been in similar situations before on very long runways with commercial traffic ahead & behind.
Why don't you either reduce to min app speed (if nothing fast behind) or ask to "land long" & fly a standard (...even fast) approach but aiming further down the park??
As you state, seems a pretty vulnerable place to be, especially in a gusty crosswind, in the flare, visibility restricted, low & slow above the tarmac...
Just thinking, would be even less clever in a taildragger...
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
a) and b) should be the only options you should be considering, b) only if you're happy with doing that, followed by a) when it's evident a landing clearance isn't going to happen OR you can't land safely from it anyway
Bear this in mind - if you're given a continue then do that and say nothing. There's nothing worse from an ATC perspective than trying to issue a landing clearance and the frequency is blocked. Now, bearing in mind one of the attributes of being an ATCO is prioritisation then no matter whet everyone else is saying the call that deserves priority is your landing clearance - so you should get that without you having to re-request it. Everyone else should then be dealt with after you.
And if that doesn't happen - then go-around, and call going around when you are able to get a word in.
DO NOT, under any circumstances, do c) - then the paperwork starts and it won't go well for you.
Bear this in mind - if you're given a continue then do that and say nothing. There's nothing worse from an ATC perspective than trying to issue a landing clearance and the frequency is blocked. Now, bearing in mind one of the attributes of being an ATCO is prioritisation then no matter whet everyone else is saying the call that deserves priority is your landing clearance - so you should get that without you having to re-request it. Everyone else should then be dealt with after you.
And if that doesn't happen - then go-around, and call going around when you are able to get a word in.
DO NOT, under any circumstances, do c) - then the paperwork starts and it won't go well for you.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BFA, I am referring to a situation where a light aircraft in front of me is late to vacate, I'm in a light aircraft as well and I'm approaching my home field which has a 2.2 km runway. There is no such thing as "min app speed" in the light aircraft I fly. There is a reference speed but in most aircraft the flaps are so effective that I can slow down from the top of the white arc to stall speed in ten seconds or so. And at my field light aircraft are sequenced so close behind each other that reducing speed does not make a difference. Landing long does buy you some time and of course if you see the situation developing early enough, that's exactly what you do. But if the landing clearance is late in coming I might already be so low that "landing long", in the sense that you alter your approach path to an aiming point further down the runway, is no longer an option. Flaring and holding off with a bit of power on is.
I would not do this at an unfamiliar field. I would not do this in an unfamiliar aircraft. I would also not do this in a gusty crosswind. But as I said in one of my posts in that other thread: it's a game you're playing. ATC knows the callsigns of the aircraft based there and sometimes tries to push things. If you're comfortable with that game, you can play along and this is one of the tricks we use. Within limits of course: a go-around should always remain a possibility.
I would not do this at an unfamiliar field. I would not do this in an unfamiliar aircraft. I would also not do this in a gusty crosswind. But as I said in one of my posts in that other thread: it's a game you're playing. ATC knows the callsigns of the aircraft based there and sometimes tries to push things. If you're comfortable with that game, you can play along and this is one of the tricks we use. Within limits of course: a go-around should always remain a possibility.
Guest
Posts: n/a
DO NOT, under any circumstances, do c) - then the paperwork starts and it won't go well for you.
Interesting comment - I guess "any circumstances" assuming a normal situation.
Please forgive the thread creep, but there might be a little interesting learning in thinking about abnormal circumstances.
Let's take one abnormal scenario that could develop late in the approach.
You smell burning and see a little smoke coming out from the panel. Something has shorted out in the radio kit and killed the radio, so you can't hear the clearance.
Do you go around with a potential fire or land?
This scenario is not so far fetched, I had it at about 50 knots on the take off roll and rejected.
I guess that there is going to be a lot of paperwork anyway, so you might as well land
Interesting comment - I guess "any circumstances" assuming a normal situation.
Please forgive the thread creep, but there might be a little interesting learning in thinking about abnormal circumstances.
Let's take one abnormal scenario that could develop late in the approach.
You smell burning and see a little smoke coming out from the panel. Something has shorted out in the radio kit and killed the radio, so you can't hear the clearance.
Do you go around with a potential fire or land?
This scenario is not so far fetched, I had it at about 50 knots on the take off roll and rejected.
I guess that there is going to be a lot of paperwork anyway, so you might as well land
Thread Starter
I think I would go-around (a) at most airfields because I don't think option (c) can ever be a sensible course of action even if you can get away with it. But holding off (b) at a big airfield where the ATC are clearly swamped by RT and you have plenty of runway to land on is a reasonable option IMHO (especially when that's what the instructor acting as PIC in the other seat is telling you to do).
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting comment - I guess "any circumstances" assuming a normal situation.
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Euroland
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quite simply, unless you have landing clearance, you have to go-around.
A flypast at 2' is NOT an acceptable alternative.
A flypast at 2' is NOT an acceptable alternative.
The reason for not being cleared to land could be that a vehicle is about to cross the runway at speed..........just as you are making your low pass.
Regards,
DFC
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: On a roll...
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Backpacker - Seems the original post has already been well answered by other people, but I'm still intrigued by this "long hold off in the flare with power" manouevre.
I realise your wish to defend your technique, but that seems like a long list of exceptions you've got there(!)
When you've got that many, there are some questions which come to mind:
- What happens if an unexpected gust suddenly "grabs" you while down there in the hold-off? You're sitting there quite a while by the sounds of things.
- What speed do you have on the ASI while all this is going on? If you are truly holding off & need power then you are behind the drag curve, in which case you're doing "min app speed" & you're nose-high & sinking without a good dose of power. Otherwise, forgive me if I'm mistaken, but you are not really holding off.
- Have you tried going around from this position? Does it feel secure? Nose high with moderate power doesn't sound like a good starting point if you ask me?!? Have you watched how much height you're losing?
- Ever asked a pax in the back how the manoueuvre feels?!?
Listen, I'm not an instructor, but not sure this is a technique that maybe you should be advocating to be used widely. I stand to be corrected.
And I still can't see this being at all a good idea in a taildragger, whether aiming to 3-point or wheeling it on.
Any instructors like to comment?
Yours
BFA
I realise your wish to defend your technique, but that seems like a long list of exceptions you've got there(!)
When you've got that many, there are some questions which come to mind:
- What happens if an unexpected gust suddenly "grabs" you while down there in the hold-off? You're sitting there quite a while by the sounds of things.
- What speed do you have on the ASI while all this is going on? If you are truly holding off & need power then you are behind the drag curve, in which case you're doing "min app speed" & you're nose-high & sinking without a good dose of power. Otherwise, forgive me if I'm mistaken, but you are not really holding off.
- Have you tried going around from this position? Does it feel secure? Nose high with moderate power doesn't sound like a good starting point if you ask me?!? Have you watched how much height you're losing?
- Ever asked a pax in the back how the manoueuvre feels?!?
Listen, I'm not an instructor, but not sure this is a technique that maybe you should be advocating to be used widely. I stand to be corrected.
And I still can't see this being at all a good idea in a taildragger, whether aiming to 3-point or wheeling it on.
Any instructors like to comment?
Yours
BFA
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DFC
The reason for not being cleared to land could be that a vehicle is about to cross the runway at speed..........just as you are making your low pass.
If given "continue" it means the runway is occupied / has been allocated to someone else, but that is the only thing that is preventing you landing and we're waiting for the runway to become vacated - and expect it to be so by the time you reach the touch down zone, OR, in the case of UK ops, a "Land After" can be issued.
There will be no vehicles driving in front of you after that point (not intentionally anyway).
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: High seas
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had this situation many, many times during training (solos) and after, and have seen/heard many others.
There is an answer (d) that is used out there, which is to transmit over other traffic a request for landing clearance. Being closer to the tower than others (normally) the transmission can be recieved by ATC who then respond.
I don't condone and didn't resort to this, normally choosing the extended flare option, but understood the frustration in others.
There is an answer (d) that is used out there, which is to transmit over other traffic a request for landing clearance. Being closer to the tower than others (normally) the transmission can be recieved by ATC who then respond.
I don't condone and didn't resort to this, normally choosing the extended flare option, but understood the frustration in others.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
- What happens if an unexpected gust suddenly "grabs" you while down there in the hold-off? You're sitting there quite a while by the sounds of things.
- What speed do you have on the ASI while all this is going on? If you are truly holding off & need power then you are behind the drag curve, in which case you're doing "min app speed" & you're nose-high & sinking without a good dose of power. Otherwise, forgive me if I'm mistaken, but you are not really holding off.
- Have you tried going around from this position? Does it feel secure? Nose high with moderate power doesn't sound like a good starting point if you ask me?!? Have you watched how much height you're losing?
- Ever asked a pax in the back how the manoueuvre feels?!?
Listen, I'm not an instructor, but not sure this is a technique that maybe you should be advocating to be used widely. I stand to be corrected.
And I'm not an instructor but I think if an instructor would do this hold-off-in-the-flare followed by a go-around with a student a few times during flight training, then that would greatly increase the students skill in manipulating the aircraft at low level.
And I still can't see this being at all a good idea in a taildragger, whether aiming to 3-point or wheeling it on.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It does - for the purposes of saving or preserving life the action necessary to do that takes precedence
I don't have taildragger experience and I don't know how well they can climb away once they're in their three-point attitude.
Personally, I would reckon to go around, rather than faff around, but to each their own. Try tugging at Lasham one day, with five tugs, two winches, lots of gliders and NO ATC. Find your bit of grass and weave around the landed gliders, crews going out to fetch them, and try not to drag your fifty metres of rope over a glider. Not to mention the glider pilots screaming for a launch.......They just hate it when you go for fuel, never mind going around!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Euroland
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There will be no vehicles driving in front of you after that point (not intentionally anyway).
Who other than the ATCO knows if the first words are going to be;
Go-arround
or
Cleared to land.
In the absence of the latter, I would do the former as with no ATCO input it is the one which assures safety.
Regards,
DFC