Changing from Warrior to 152?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buckinghamshire
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Changing from Warrior to 152?
I have a choice of starting my training on a Piper Warrior or a Cessna 152. I will be training for PPL only - no ambition to get Commercial.
a) Please vote your preference so I can get a consensus
b) If I train on one of these, how many hours will I need to swapping type later?
c) Would it benefit me training on both perhaps, (or is that a daft idea?
)
thanks
a) Please vote your preference so I can get a consensus
b) If I train on one of these, how many hours will I need to swapping type later?
c) Would it benefit me training on both perhaps, (or is that a daft idea?
) thanks
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
a) don't think it makes much of a difference, it's choice, really. I'd go for the cheaper one, leaves you more cash to enjoy your flying later 
b) you'll have to get a checkout on any new airplane anyway (otherwise the club/FBO won't let you fly it) and that should be enough. While Cessnas and Pipers are different, they remain in the same class of spamcan....
c) No. Stick with one type and don't needlessly complicate your life. Now go on and learn to fly
b) you'll have to get a checkout on any new airplane anyway (otherwise the club/FBO won't let you fly it) and that should be enough. While Cessnas and Pipers are different, they remain in the same class of spamcan....
c) No. Stick with one type and don't needlessly complicate your life. Now go on and learn to fly
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did it the other way around. Trained in a C152 then converted to a PA-28. Took 1.6 hours according to my logbook.
Like someone else has stated, go for the cheapest choice. C152 is a nice plane to learn in, and then once you qualify, you'll appreciate the Piper more.
Like someone else has stated, go for the cheapest choice. C152 is a nice plane to learn in, and then once you qualify, you'll appreciate the Piper more.
Guest
Posts: n/a
I suspect a lot people learn on a C150/152 and move up to a PA28/C172 - I did it that way.
Personally, I'd learn on the Cessna and then make a move to the PA28 - I wouldn't mix the two for consistency reasons whilst you are learning.
Between 1 & 2 hours with an Instructor is usually quite sufficient for the conversion.
Personally, I'd learn on the Cessna and then make a move to the PA28 - I wouldn't mix the two for consistency reasons whilst you are learning.
Between 1 & 2 hours with an Instructor is usually quite sufficient for the conversion.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did about 50 hours in a 152 before heading back to the UK and am now flying a PA-28... I loved the 152 for it's old charm (It was actually 2 years older than I am!) But when I first got into the PA-28 I could feel the difference in quality.
Granted it's a newer plane with 2 extra seats and has a slightly more powerful engine, but everything just seems to be more robust and in a sensible place (To me)... Also you get a proper throttle and not a plunger!
The only thing I would bring over from the 152 to the PA-28 would be the electric flap selector, that's a nice touch compared to the handbrake style one in the 28.
In answer to your question I wouldn't worry too much about your choice of plane as both are similar, however as 172driver and Paris Dakar have said, once you have chosen, stick to it for your entire training to get some consistency in. Convert once you have the skills necessary and I'm sure it will be a fairly smooth transition.
One question though, why on Earth did they only include one door in the PA-28?! I'm sure there's a sensible answer, but I can imagine a few questions coming my way when I finally take up some friends... I'll look it up!
Good luck with the flying!
Granted it's a newer plane with 2 extra seats and has a slightly more powerful engine, but everything just seems to be more robust and in a sensible place (To me)... Also you get a proper throttle and not a plunger!
The only thing I would bring over from the 152 to the PA-28 would be the electric flap selector, that's a nice touch compared to the handbrake style one in the 28.
In answer to your question I wouldn't worry too much about your choice of plane as both are similar, however as 172driver and Paris Dakar have said, once you have chosen, stick to it for your entire training to get some consistency in. Convert once you have the skills necessary and I'm sure it will be a fairly smooth transition.
One question though, why on Earth did they only include one door in the PA-28?! I'm sure there's a sensible answer, but I can imagine a few questions coming my way when I finally take up some friends... I'll look it up!
Good luck with the flying!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bucks
Age: 34
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd have to agree, not only on cost terms, but the C152 is more manoverable, if you can fly the 152 on a navigation exercise and you can be accurate you will find a conversion later on in time to a Pa28 much easier, its a much more stable a/c.
Sam
Sam
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
biz_fish
Look at it another way - if you train on the PA28 you won't have to convert to another plane to take more people with you.
The 'lightweight' PA28 easily copes with 3 people and those with the higher all up weight (of which BAFC) have 2 can take 4 without too much problem.
Of course then there is the Dakota which gives you a real 4 seater capability plus luggage, hours worth of fuel and a genuine 135 kts cruise - and they have one of those too!
After a few hundred hours in Cessnas and now flying PA28s occasionally (I have a homebuild to fly for fun!) I do feel the Pipers are a more substantial, 'grown up' aeroplane. Sit in a C152 with an instructor and then try the Warrior and feel the extra width for starters!
PM me for some other thoughts if you like.
Look at it another way - if you train on the PA28 you won't have to convert to another plane to take more people with you.
The 'lightweight' PA28 easily copes with 3 people and those with the higher all up weight (of which BAFC) have 2 can take 4 without too much problem.
Of course then there is the Dakota which gives you a real 4 seater capability plus luggage, hours worth of fuel and a genuine 135 kts cruise - and they have one of those too!
After a few hundred hours in Cessnas and now flying PA28s occasionally (I have a homebuild to fly for fun!) I do feel the Pipers are a more substantial, 'grown up' aeroplane. Sit in a C152 with an instructor and then try the Warrior and feel the extra width for starters!
PM me for some other thoughts if you like.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Staines, Middlesex
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Go with which ever aircraft you feel comfortable in and can afford. I trained in a 152 and had no trouble. When I got my license I got checked out on a PA28 in under 2 hours and loved it, although it was more expensive.
The only real problem I had with a 152 was the lack of power, not so good considering I was flying around during hot and humid summer days... Also the seats are damn uncomfortable (I ended up logging 35+ hours sitting with the cowl plugs as a lumbar support!).
I found I tended to get much smoother landings in the PA28. The low wing makes for much more ground effect and the landing gear is not as rigid as the Cessna. My additional experience probably helped a bit too though.
I never found the lack of electric flaps a problem in the PA28, the feel of pulling up the big lever with one hand and letting the yoke pull forward in the other helped me get a better idea of what the aircraft wanted to naturally do. Personally I think i'd go for the manual lever now given the choice, especially after I experienced a flap servo failure during lessons!
The only real problem I had with a 152 was the lack of power, not so good considering I was flying around during hot and humid summer days... Also the seats are damn uncomfortable (I ended up logging 35+ hours sitting with the cowl plugs as a lumbar support!).
I found I tended to get much smoother landings in the PA28. The low wing makes for much more ground effect and the landing gear is not as rigid as the Cessna. My additional experience probably helped a bit too though.
I never found the lack of electric flaps a problem in the PA28, the feel of pulling up the big lever with one hand and letting the yoke pull forward in the other helped me get a better idea of what the aircraft wanted to naturally do. Personally I think i'd go for the manual lever now given the choice, especially after I experienced a flap servo failure during lessons!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Saraksh
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Paris Dakar
I suspect a lot people learn on a C150/152 and move up to a PA28/C172 - I did it that way.
Personally, I'd learn on the Cessna and then make a move to the PA28 - I wouldn't mix the two for consistency reasons whilst you are learning.
Between 1 & 2 hours with an Instructor is usually quite sufficient for the conversion.
Personally, I'd learn on the Cessna and then make a move to the PA28 - I wouldn't mix the two for consistency reasons whilst you are learning.
Between 1 & 2 hours with an Instructor is usually quite sufficient for the conversion.
done same! Agree 100%. next day after PPL skill test with C-172 (was whole course with 172) i switched to Piper-28 Archer and after 30 min was already familiar with it. but after Cessna , Piper feels like flying Airliner for me, but i'm still happy that my training was with 172
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fly the 152, there is a reason why they have been one of the most enduring trainers of all time. They are easy to fly but hard to master. They give a good view of the ground which when starting out you will find helps with your nav. On a hot day they are a lot cooler as the wing protects you. And above all they are cheap to fly.
I bought one a year after my PPL and just sold it after putting 1200hrs on the clock and enjoyed every minute. It was a teafull parting but at least I swapped it for another Cessna!
As far as "conversion" is concerned to other types if you can fly a Cessna you can fly a warrior. I have never taken more than a couple of circuits to get the feel of another SEP. Read the POH to understand the numbers and of you go, its not rocket science. People who take a couple of hours to go from 1 152 to a warrior or vice versa were probably marginal in the first place or they are being turned over by the school. My Multi Engine was only the required 5hrs!
I bought one a year after my PPL and just sold it after putting 1200hrs on the clock and enjoyed every minute. It was a teafull parting but at least I swapped it for another Cessna!
As far as "conversion" is concerned to other types if you can fly a Cessna you can fly a warrior. I have never taken more than a couple of circuits to get the feel of another SEP. Read the POH to understand the numbers and of you go, its not rocket science. People who take a couple of hours to go from 1 152 to a warrior or vice versa were probably marginal in the first place or they are being turned over by the school. My Multi Engine was only the required 5hrs!
Gizajob
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: uk
Age: 49
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having gathered the information from this thread (some of which is more useful than others 
), can I suggest that you fly both and see which you like? I wouldn't buy a car I hadn't driven myself and half an hour in each will tell you enough to know which you prefer. There's no 'right' answer and you'll get a PPL either way - just go for what you would like to fly.
Bose-x, I wish I had your confidence.
), can I suggest that you fly both and see which you like? I wouldn't buy a car I hadn't driven myself and half an hour in each will tell you enough to know which you prefer. There's no 'right' answer and you'll get a PPL either way - just go for what you would like to fly.Bose-x, I wish I had your confidence.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somerset
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bose-x
People who take a couple of hours to go from 1 152 to a warrior or vice versa were probably marginal in the first place or they are being turned over by the school.
1. Some learn quickly and retain well
2. Some learn quickly and retain badly
3. Some learn slowly and retain well
4. Some learn slowly and retain badly
The type 4s tend to drop off training courses as they are getting nowhere, the type 2s end up being a danger to us all - the 1s and 3s end up being competent (and hopefully good) pilots - speed of familiarisation does not imply depth of understanding. One of the best GA pilots I know took just short of 100 hours to get her PPL and one of the worst did it in two weeks in Florida in a total of 50 hours - don't confuse thoroughness with lack of ability.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm learning on the 152. Currently 27 hours into my PPL course at Denham.
I was originally going to learn on the PA-28 as there was some concern about the leg/knee/headroom for me in the 152 (it's a tightish fit) but those concerns were unfounded and I find it a super little aeroplane to fly.
I have flown 3-4 hours in a PA-28. Yes there's more room and it feels more stable than the 152 (especially on approach) but I like learning in an aeroplane which requires sensitive handling and rewards accurate flying. The 152 is excellent for Nav exercises too and it's also cheaper per hour at my training organisation (The Pilot Centre).
I intend to complete my PPL on the 152 and then convert to the PA-28 also when I want to carry more people around with me.
Hope this helps
Andy
I was originally going to learn on the PA-28 as there was some concern about the leg/knee/headroom for me in the 152 (it's a tightish fit) but those concerns were unfounded and I find it a super little aeroplane to fly.
I have flown 3-4 hours in a PA-28. Yes there's more room and it feels more stable than the 152 (especially on approach) but I like learning in an aeroplane which requires sensitive handling and rewards accurate flying. The 152 is excellent for Nav exercises too and it's also cheaper per hour at my training organisation (The Pilot Centre).
I intend to complete my PPL on the 152 and then convert to the PA-28 also when I want to carry more people around with me.
Hope this helps
Andy
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am sorry if my comment seemed arrogant but it is a fact. A current SEP pilot should be able to fly any other similar SEP with little effort.
As certified aircraft they all fly inside a similar envelope and a current pilot should not have a problem learning the subtle differences in a very short period of time. I have just this minute come back from being checked out in a PA32.
Checkout was:
Standard landing, short field landing, flapless landing.
Stall, clean, and turning with gear out and final config.
Speeds and power settings were talked through as we went along and were pretty much standard. Gear up back to 25/25 cruise 23/23, lean. I worked out where the fuel pumps, emergency gear release and landing lights etc were and what all the buttons did from being a CURRENT SEP/MEP pilot.
All in all we were brakes to brakes 30 minutes. It really is not rocket science.
As certified aircraft they all fly inside a similar envelope and a current pilot should not have a problem learning the subtle differences in a very short period of time. I have just this minute come back from being checked out in a PA32.
Checkout was:
Standard landing, short field landing, flapless landing.
Stall, clean, and turning with gear out and final config.
Speeds and power settings were talked through as we went along and were pretty much standard. Gear up back to 25/25 cruise 23/23, lean. I worked out where the fuel pumps, emergency gear release and landing lights etc were and what all the buttons did from being a CURRENT SEP/MEP pilot.
All in all we were brakes to brakes 30 minutes. It really is not rocket science.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somerset
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bose-x
I am sorry if my comment seemed arrogant but it is a fact. A current SEP pilot should be able to fly any other similar SEP with little effort.
Difference of opinion but as always mine is right
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now I see your point, PA28 does have brakes, only the old Cherokee style used the handbrake...... I guess it does take longer for some people, and I always thought I was a retard, now I am juat plain dangerous.....
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Staines, Middlesex
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 152 has totally unbreakable landing gear so is well recommended for learning! I reckon they make it out of the same stuff they use to make flight recorders!
If you break the gear on a 152 you get to keep the plane!
If you break the gear on a 152 you get to keep the plane!